Title: Fourier Transform and Phase Determination
1Fourier Transform and Phase Determination
- Fourier Series and Synthesis
- Direct Methods
- Patterson Methods
2Fourier Series
- Eulers formula
- for any real number f,
-
- proved by Taylor
- Series Expansions
Fig.1 Eulers formula Image from Wikepedia
3Fourier Series
- Definition
- Any periodic function, if it is
- piecewise continuous
- square-integrable in one period,
- it can be decomposed into a sum of sinusoidal and
- cosinoidal component functions---Fourier Series
4Fourier Series
- e.g, f(t) is periodic with period T,
- Here,
- It is the nth harmonic (angular frequency) of the
function f
5Fourier Series
- In exponential form
- where, the fourier coefficients are
- Relationship between an,bn and cn
6Fourier Series
Fig.2 Fourier Series for Identity
function Animation from Wikipedia
No cosine terms? Because this is an odd function
7Fourier Series
- In exponential form
- where, the fourier coefficients are
- Relationship between an,bn and cn
Transform pair
8Family of Fourier Transform
9Fourier Series in XRD
- Fourier series
- Continuous, Periodic ? Discrete, Aperiodic
- Election Density Distribution ? Structure Factor
- ?(x,y,z) ? F(hkl)
- Real Space (R3) ? Reciprocal Space (Z3)
10The Nature of F Transform
- Re-express a function in one domain into another
domain (conjugate domain) - e.g. Time domain ? Frequency domain
- Real space ? Reciprocal space
- Now, to know a function, we have two ways
- (1) From the original domain
- directly measure (x,f(x)), get enough sample
points and do regression. (can we measure the
electron density distribution as we measure water
density in a pond?) - (2) From the conjugate domain
- get Cn, and transform to original domain
11About Cn
- The meaning of C0
- ?0 0,
- Integrated mean
- think that F(000) the amount of total electrons
in a cell
12About Cn
Assume f is real, thus an and bn are both
real When f is odd, an 0 When f is even, bn
0, so Cn is real, which means the phase angle of
Cn is kp Center of symmetry in real space ??
F(hkl) is real a-n an, b-n -bn, so C-n
Cn, Friedels law (symmetry in reciprocal
space) ?? ?(x,y,z) is real, which is definitely
right Generally speaking, reality in one domain
implies symmetry in the conjugate domain.
13Reexamine Structure Factor
Coordinate Form Vector Form Where h h,
k, l, rj xj, yj, zj fj is the atomic
scattering factor, and it is relevant to the
modulus of reflection index
14Reexamine Structure Factor
- F(hkl) is considered as the resultant of adding
the waves scattered in the direction of the hkl
reflection from all the atoms in the unit cell. - Assumption the scattering power of the electron
cloud surrounding each atom could be equated to
that of a proper number of electrons (fj)
concentrated at the atomic center. - What is the scattering factor fj ?
- It is a continuous Fourier transform of electron
distribution around an atom. Since we use sphere
model of atoms, the scattering factor is also
isotropic, only relevant to h.
15Reexamine Structure Factor
- Another view
- Consider all electrons in one unit cell as a
whole. In this case, F(hkl) is the sum of the
wavelets scattered from all the infinitesimal
portions of the unit cell. It is the Fourier
Transform of electron density distribution in the
cell.
The integration domain V is the space of one unit
cell. Also, no sphere model assumption is made in
this formula.
16Fourier Transform pair
Note the exponential term, one has a minus sign,
the other hasnt the period (V) is involved in
one equation.
17Reexamine Structure Factor
- If the center of symmetry exists
So F is real when center of symmetry exists. In
the same way, we can explore the effects of other
symmetry elements and systematic absences.
18Wilson Plot
- Before knowing how phases are obtained, a general
idea of how the magnitude is got from initial
intensity data is useful. - First, a series of corrections, like absorption
correction, LP correctionafter these, we get
Irel - Then, we need to put these real intensities on an
approximately absolute basis, that is what the
Wilson plot deals with.
19Wilson Plot
Theoretical average intensity It merely
depends on what is in the cell, not on where it
is. Ideally, the ratio of the two intensities
should be the scaling factor. To calculate, it is
not simple. First, fj varies with sin?/?. So the
averaging should be carried out in thin
concentric shells, not the whole range.
20Wilson Plot
Second, f contains thermal motion effects, which
could be expressed as In which, fo stands for
the scattering factor of a static atom, also B is
not known. If we assume same B value for all
atoms, the exponential term is the same for all
foj,
21Wilson Plot
Now if C is the coefficient that brings Irel to
an absolute basis, it is a constant. Now,
substitude Iobs and the equation could be
transformed to In which, B and C are what we
assume constant for all reflections. If we plot
this equation, the intercept is lnC, the slope is
-2B.
22Wilson Plot
Fig.3 an illustration of Wilson plot Image from
http//www.ocms.ox.ac.uk/mirrored/xplor/manual/
23Wilson Plot
- We get C by extrapolation, then we get
- Note, the structure factor in this lecture, also
the term structure factor we generally use, is
the Fobs, the scaled F.
24Us and Es
- U(hkl) unitary structure factor
- Definition U(hkl) F(hkl)point/F(000)
- Fpoint is the structure factor when we replace
the real atoms with point atoms, whose scattering
power is concentrated at the nucleus, and f is no
longer a function of (sin?)/?, but a constant
equal to the atomic number Z. - The right is a common
- approximation formula
- of Fpoint
25Us and Es
- Note F(000) is equal to total atomic number, thus
Here, fj includes the effects of atomic
vibration. Ult,1, and the phase is same as
that of F(hkl)
26Us and Es
- E(hkl) normalized structure factor
is the theoretical average intensity. And F(hkl)
is the scaled structure factor.
e is usually 1, but may assume other values for
special sets of reflections where symmetry causes
intensities to be abnormally high (e.g. m-b
causes (h0l) average intensity is twice that of
general (hkl), so e 2 for E(h0l).)
27Us and Es
- E shows which reflections have above or below
average intensities. It is easy to see that the
expectation of E2 is one. - Also, E value can help us see if center of
symmetry exists - ltEgt ltE2-1gt
- Centrosymmetric 0.798 0.968
- Non- 0.886 0.736
28The Phase Problem
- As we have seen, we need F(hkl) to do the Fourier
transform, but experiments can only give us F,
so we need to know the phase by some other means. - The Direct Method and Patterson Method are two
ways to give us phase information.
29Direct Methods
- Basis
- Some phase info is hided in the Magnitude of
structure factors and their relationships. - Inequality
- Harker and Kasper applied Cauchy inequality to
unitary structure factor equation and got - U2(hkl)lt,1/2 1/2 U(2h,2k,2l)
- Here, centrosymmetry is assumed.
30Direct Methods
- U2(hkl)lt,1/2 1/2U(2h,2k,2l)
- If U2(hkl) 0.6, U(2h,2k,2l) 0.1,
- u must be positive for the inequality to hold.
- If U2(hkl) 0.3, U(2h,2k,2l) 0.4,
- Could be either, but to guess u is positive
could probably be right - Weakness
- rare reflections are qualified, since F
declines with sin? rapidly.
31Direct Methods
- Karle-Hauptman determinant
32Direct Methods
- Iet us examine a third order determinant
If it is centrosymmetric If Us at the
right side are large, the left must be
positive s(F) is the symbol fuction, equal to
-1 when F is negative
33Direct Methods
- If it is non-centrosymmetric,
- If Us are all large,
34Direct Methods
Sayres Equation (1) This equation can
be derived from Fourier Series as
follows (2) Rewrite the equation by
setting that hLL, kL (3)
35Direct Methods
- Since squared density is also periodic, so write
it into its - Fourier series form
- (4)
- Here G(h) is the structure factor of the squared
cell. - Compare (3) and (4), it follows that
- (5)
- The structure factor G(h) is
- (6)
36Direct Methods
In equation (6), gj is the scattering factor of
the squared cell. If we assume equal atom model,
(3) reduces to (7) The normal structure
for equal atoms is (8) Thus we can
obtain (9)
37Derect Methods
- Finally, from (9) and (5), we get Sayres
equation - (10)
- Dont care the fraction coefficient outside the
summation. - The summation contains a large number of terms
however, in general it will be dominated by a
smaller number of large F(k)F(h-k). Considering
a reflection with large F(h), it can therefore
be assumed that the terms with large F(h)F(h-k)
have their angular part approximately equal to
the angular part of F(h) itself
38Direct Methods
So we get, Or If it is centrosymmetric, which
means phase could only be 0 or p, Same result
as deduced from Karle-Hauptman determinant Note,
these relationships are independent of origin
location.
39Direct Methods
- Does the Magnitude of F(hkl) change with the
shift of origin? - No.
- Does the phase of F(hkl) change with the shift of
origin? - Yes.
- However, certain linear combinations of phases
dont Change regardless of the arbitrary
assignment of cell origins. These are called
structure invariants.
40Direct Methods
- Structure Invariants
- Assume atom js position is rj. Now the origin
shifts through a vector r, the new position of
this atom is rj. The beam, which contributes to
reflection h and is scattered by this atom j now
has a phase change equal to 2p(hr), independent
of where the atom is. - Thus, the phase change of F(h) is 2p(hr).
- If we want the sum of several reflection phases
to be constant, which means their total phase
changes should be zero, the condition is easily
derived, - h1h2h3hn 0
- This kind of combination is a structure invariant.
41Direct Methods
- The choice of origin is not arbitrary other than
P1 space group, the symmetry elements should be
considered and the permissible origins are much
less, so there are many more this kind linear
combinations, which are called structure
seminvariants. - e.g. In space group P(-1), the origin must be
located at one of the eight centers of symmetry
in the cell, so the shift vector r can take eight
values only, - r (s1, s2, s3), s1,2,3 0 or ½
- Think about the phase of F(222), does it change?
42Direct Methods
- Table 1 relative sign relationships for
possible origins
43Direct Methods
- Now, we have Inequality, Sayres equation, which
use Intensity data to guess phase - we have triple structure invariants and
seminvariants, which show what remains unchanged
when the origin is shifted.
44Direct Methods
- General Process
- Pick out all stronger reflections (like Egt2.0)
as a set, find all triple relationships among
them (indices sum to zero), compute probabilities
of each triple. - Select three reflections for origin
determination. These reflections are the most
often and most reliably interconnected. The
phases of these three are set freely, but do
check the table on last page to avoid conflicts.
After the initial set of phases, origin is fixed. - Phase propagation (phase variables may be
involved)
45Direct Methods
- General Process
- Get enough phases, do Fourier Transform, a
preliminary electron density model is obtained.
Usually, we can get positions of several heavier
atoms. - Calculate phases based on this model, and connect
the calculated phases with observed F(hkl), and
transform again, the result is usually better, so
more atom positions could be located, so our cell
model is improved. - Repeat (5), and also gradually lower the E
cutoff, include more reflections in the
calculation, until all the atoms are located.
46Direct Methods
- Lets see a phase propagation process.
- E.g. a crystal with space group P21/c
- Assign phases to F(3 1 -17), F(3 4 11), F(5 0
14), thus the origin is set - Three starting reflections combine to imply two
new ones, - s(6 5 -6) s(3 1 -17) s(3 4 11)
- s(8 1 -3) s(3 1 -17) s(5 0 14)
- This example is from George Stout, Lyle Jensen,
X-ray Structure Determination---A Practical
Guide, second edition, page 271-273
47Direct Methods
- (3) Based on the symmetry, in the case of P21/c,
- if kl is even, F(h k l) F(h -k l) F(-h k
-l) - if kl is odd, F(h k l) -F(h -k l) -F(-h
k -l) - so, s(-3 4 -11) -s(3 4 11) -
- s(8 -1 -3) s(8 1 -3)
- combine,
- s(5 3 -14) s(-3 4 -11) s(8 -1 -3) -
- At this point, lets assume we have used up all
relationships we can find, thus to continue this
process, we need to assign phase variable to
another useful reflection.
48Direct Methods
- Assign s(6 5 -12) a (a could be or -)
- s(2 -6 9) s(6 5 -12) s(8 -1 -3)
- s(2 -6 9) a
- s(2 -6 9) a
-
- s(3 6 5) s(-3 1 17) s(6 5 -12) a
- Now we have a checking relationship, all three
reflections - phases are known,
- s(2 -6 9) s(3 6 5) s(5 0 14)
- a a
- which is correct and lends confidence to the work
so far.
49Direct Methods
- Also, s(9 1 -1) s(3 -4 11) s(6 5 -12) -a
- In this relationship
- s(2 -6 9) s(7 7 -10) s(9 1 -1)
- two are known in terms of the variable
- a s(7 7 -10) -a
- But s(7 7 -10) is negative absolutely.
- In this way, more and more structure factor
phases are determined or assumed, and Fourier
transform could be carried out when phase
information is enough. -
50Patterson Methods
- In 1935, A. L. Patterson pointed out that if we
do Fourier Synthesis with F2 instead of F as
coefficients, the result shows info on all of the
interatomic vectors. - In Patterson map, if (u, v, w) is a peak, it
indicates there are atoms exist in the cell at
(x1, y1, z1,) and (x2, y2, z2) such that ux1-x2,
vy1-y2, wz1-z2.
51Patterson Methods
- Formula
- The above is actually the electron density
function convoluted with its inverse. This may
give a better understanding why it shows the
vectors between atoms.
52Patterson Methods
Unit Cell Patterson Cell
Fig.4 Compare Patterson cell with unit
cell Figure from http//www-structmed.cimr.cam.ac.
uk/Course/
It illustrates that you can think of a Patterson
as being a sum of images of the molecule, with
each atom placed in turn on the origin. Also note
the patterson cell and the crystal unit cell has
the same size.
53Patterson Methods
- How many peaks are there in one Patterson cell?
- If we have N atoms in one cell, there are N2
interatomic vectors, in which N vectors are 0
(just one atom to itself), so we have N2-N1
peaks in a Patterson cell if there are no more
overlaps. - The huge origin peak, is usually useless and may
cover other peaks near it. It is possible to
remove it by subtracting the average value of
F2 from each term. If we use E2, it will be
easier. (why easier?)
54Patterson Methods
- Two other properties of Patterson Peaks
- The peak spread is the sum of the two
corresponding Fourier density peak and also peak
amount is nearly squared, but cell size is the
same. These two lead to a great overlap. But we
can create a sharpened Patterson map, if we use
Fpoint2. - The peak height in Patterson map is approximately
the multiple of two Fourier density peaks which
generate it. Thus the vectors connecting heavy
atoms will stand out sharply,
55Patterson Methods
- Patterson Symmetry
- The Patterson space group is derived by original
space group by replacing all translational
elements by the correspondent nontranslational
elements (axes, mirrors) and by adding a center
of symmetry if it is not already present. Their
lattice types dont change.
56Patterson Methods
- Though translational elements are replaced,
traces are left. - Harker lines and planes
- ---unusually high average intensity of certain
lines or planes - Think about a m vertical to b axis in real space.
In Patterson map, a dense line is along b axis. - If above is not a mirror, but a c glide, can we
tell the difference based on the patterson map? - In the same way, think about axes and screw axes.
57Patterson Methods
Fig.5 Harker section This image is
from http//journals.iucr.org/d/issues/2001/07/00/
gr2131/gr2131fig2.html Which symmetry element
generate the above harker section?
58Patterson Methods
- On a Patterson Map, we can see strongest peaks,
which are related to heavy atoms we can also see
Harker lines and planes, which are related to
symmetry elements. Therefore, we can probably
tell heavy atoms positions relative to symmetry
elements in real space. Since the origin is also
set or restricted by the symmetry elements in
each space group, we can tell where these heavy
atoms are.
59Patterson Methods
- Now, lets look at an example of one heavy atom
in P21/c - List out all equivalent positions (4 in this
case) - Caculate vectors between these positions (16
vectors, 4 of which contribute to origin peak,
other overlaps lead to stronger peaks in special
positions) - Compare with observed harker section, and get
heavy atom coordinate
60Patterson Methods
Fig.6 equivalent positions of P21/c from
International Table
61Patterson Methods
Table 2 vectors between equivalent positions
also the peak positions in Patterson Maps
Same colors indicate overlap positions, but four
black coordinates are just four different
positions
62Patterson Methods
- Now, collect redundant peaks
- peak position relative weight
- 0 0 0 4
- 0 ½2y ½ 2 along harker line
- 0 ½-2y ½ 2 along harker line
- 2x ½ ½2z 2 in harker plane
- -2x ½ ½-2z 2 in harker plane
- 2x 2y 2z 1
- -2x -2y -2z 1
- 2x -2y 2z 1
- -2x 2y -2z 1
63Patterson Methods
- So, on the Harker line, which is parallel to b
axis, equal to shift b axis up ½ unit along c, we
may find two strong peaks, for example, the
coordinates are (0,0.3,1/2) and (0,0.7,1/2), thus
we can get y0.1 by solving a simple equation. In
the same way, we can get x and z from Harker
plane. So, this heavy atom is found.
64Patterson Method
- After this, we get a simple unit cell model with
only heavy atoms, which usually dominate the
reflection phases. - Following is just routine repetition until all
atoms are solved.