Title: Clean Air Act Section 112r Federal Program Update
1Clean Air Act Section 112(r)Federal Program
Update
Janice Witul
February 15, 2007 CUPA Training Workshop
- U.S. EPA Pacific Southwest Region
- Emergency Prevention and Preparedness
2CAA Section 112(r)
- Chemical Accident Prevention Provisions of the
Clean Air Act - Regulatory requirement for subject facilities to
file a Risk Management Plan (RMP) by June 21,
1999 or before covered chemical is on site - Has General Duty Clause requiring facilities to
consider hazards and minimize risk posed by
chemicals
3RMP Filers in CA
4RMP Filers in CA
- 985 facilities currently registered
- 301 facilities de-registered from program
- No longer uses any regulated substance
- Source terminated operations
- Reduced inventory
- Other (possibly CalARP-only facility)
- Additional facilities have withdrawn flammable
substances used or sold for fuel were never
subject to rule
5RMP Filers in CA
- 47 facilities overdue for re-submission
- Additional facilities, representing 567 separate
processes, have supplied data that indicates
non-compliance with regulations
6Accident History - Nationwide
7Chemical Accident Prevention Provisions - No
Invitation Necessary!
- Under Cal ARP, local agency may have to ask a
facility to register - With EPA, a facility is subject if it meets the
program requirements - If a facility has a covered process, they must
file an RMP before the substance is brought on
site, no grace time to comply
8EPA RMP and OSHA PSM
- Co-location may not be a factor when determining
inclusion in OSHAs Process Safety Management
(PSM) program - For EPA, proximity may mean inclusion in the
program and require an RMP - For example, cylinders stored together with only
a few in use would all be considered part of a
process
9EPA RMP and OSHA PSM
- The risk management program goes further than
PSM, requiring - Offsite consequence analysis
- Emergency Response Plan
- Actual filing of Risk Management Plan
10General Duty Clause CAA 112(r)(1)
- Statutory requirement, effective as of November
1990 - No list of covered substances, no threshold
quantities - No reporting requirement, information sharing
with public not required - No exemptions or exclusions
11Substances Covered under GDC
- Extremely hazardous substances
- Short- term exposures associated with releases to
air may cause death, injury, or property damage
due to toxicity, reactivity, flammability,
volatility, or corrosivity - Includes, but not limited to, RMP list of toxic
and flammable substances
12Broad Facility Responsibilities under GDC
- Identify hazards of chemicals, and assess impact
of potential releases - Design and maintain safe facilities
- Follow codes, standards and other business
practices - Minimize consequences of accidental releases
13GDC- Considerations for Safe Processes
- What are similar businesses doing to minimize
hazard? - Codes and standard practices
- EPA and other Safety Alerts, Case Studies, and
Investigation Reports - Trade association guidelines
- What is the accident history of my industrial
sector? - Lessons learned
14RMP Listed Substances
- CalARP covers more substances and may have lower
thresholds - No solids under the federal program (and no
modeling available) - Facilities may be submitting RMPs to EPA when it
is not necessary
15Filing Deadlines
- Facilities must resubmit RMPs at 5 year
intervals no grace period to work with agency on
the plan/program after that due date
16Resubmit vs Update
- Updates may be done on-line through Central Data
Exchange (CDX) for some minor changes - Even changes made by submitting RMP on media may
not affect the re-submittal date - The additional information required by June 2004
did not extend re-submittal dates. -
17After RMP is submitted
- There are additional responsibilities, it is not
a static program that ends with filing - Certification of receipt and completion from RMP
Reporting Center does not indicate that an RMP is
in compliance with regulations - Late filing not taken into consideration
- Offsite Consequence Analysis (OCA) may be
calculated incorrectly - Program level may be incorrect
-
18Important Dates reported in RMPs
- PHAs, Compliance Audits, and SOP review dates are
requested - Leaving these entries blank or having future
dates will flag EPA inspectors - Having dates (as of the filing) that are more
than 5 years, 3 years, and 1 year past will flag
inspectors
19PHAs and Compliance Audits
- The dates that these are performed is important,
as is the make-up of the teams - Dates of when recommended actions were, or will
be, completed is necessary - If such completion dates are not shown in
facility documentation, objective quality
evidence is required
20General Recordkeeping and Official Documents
- Have forms completely filled out with names,
dates, and relevant information - No notes or line-outs made without signature and
date - When the above practices are not followed, a
document does not appear to be official
21Deregistration
- EPA requires a de-registration letter be
submitted for facilities that have reduced
inventory or no longer use any covered substance - Form is available on the RMPSubmit program
- Withdrawal (for flammable fuels) can be achieved
with a form from website - http//yosemite.epa.gov/oswer/ceppoweb.nsf/cont
ent/ - RMPsubmission.htmWithdrawal
22Deregistration Letter
23Withdrawal Letter
24Contact Information
RMP Reporting Center (310) 429-5018 8 am-430
pm M-F Eastern Time or via e-mail
userrmp.usersupport_at_epcra.org. They can provide
your EPA ID number, a copy of your certification
letter, or a copy of your RMP ASCII file
http//yosemite.epa.gov/oswer/ceppoweb.nsf/content
/index.html
- U.S. EPA Pacific Southwest Region
- Emergency Prevention and Preparedness
25Contact Information
Janice Witul EPCRA/RMP Compliance Officer (415)
972-3089 witul.janice_at_epa.gov Karin Graves
EPCRA/RMP Inspector (415) 972-3153 graves.karin_at_e
pa.gov
http//yosemite.epa.gov/oswer/ceppoweb.nsf/content
/index.html
- U.S. EPA Pacific Southwest Region
- Emergency Prevention and Preparedness