Clean Air Act Section 112r Federal Program Update - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 25
About This Presentation
Title:

Clean Air Act Section 112r Federal Program Update

Description:

Clean Air Act Section 112(r) Federal Program Update. U.S. EPA Pacific Southwest Region ... Chemical Accident Prevention Provisions of the Clean Air Act ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:211
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 26
Provided by: gg11
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Clean Air Act Section 112r Federal Program Update


1
Clean Air Act Section 112(r)Federal Program
Update
Janice Witul
February 15, 2007 CUPA Training Workshop
  • U.S. EPA Pacific Southwest Region
  • Emergency Prevention and Preparedness

2
CAA Section 112(r)
  • Chemical Accident Prevention Provisions of the
    Clean Air Act
  • Regulatory requirement for subject facilities to
    file a Risk Management Plan (RMP) by June 21,
    1999 or before covered chemical is on site
  • Has General Duty Clause requiring facilities to
    consider hazards and minimize risk posed by
    chemicals

3
RMP Filers in CA
4
RMP Filers in CA
  • 985 facilities currently registered
  • 301 facilities de-registered from program
  • No longer uses any regulated substance
  • Source terminated operations
  • Reduced inventory
  • Other (possibly CalARP-only facility)
  • Additional facilities have withdrawn flammable
    substances used or sold for fuel were never
    subject to rule

5
RMP Filers in CA
  • 47 facilities overdue for re-submission
  • Additional facilities, representing 567 separate
    processes, have supplied data that indicates
    non-compliance with regulations

6
Accident History - Nationwide
7
Chemical Accident Prevention Provisions - No
Invitation Necessary!
  • Under Cal ARP, local agency may have to ask a
    facility to register
  • With EPA, a facility is subject if it meets the
    program requirements
  • If a facility has a covered process, they must
    file an RMP before the substance is brought on
    site, no grace time to comply

8
EPA RMP and OSHA PSM
  • Co-location may not be a factor when determining
    inclusion in OSHAs Process Safety Management
    (PSM) program
  • For EPA, proximity may mean inclusion in the
    program and require an RMP
  • For example, cylinders stored together with only
    a few in use would all be considered part of a
    process

9
EPA RMP and OSHA PSM
  • The risk management program goes further than
    PSM, requiring
  • Offsite consequence analysis
  • Emergency Response Plan
  • Actual filing of Risk Management Plan

10
General Duty Clause CAA 112(r)(1)
  • Statutory requirement, effective as of November
    1990
  • No list of covered substances, no threshold
    quantities
  • No reporting requirement, information sharing
    with public not required
  • No exemptions or exclusions

11
Substances Covered under GDC
  • Extremely hazardous substances
  • Short- term exposures associated with releases to
    air may cause death, injury, or property damage
    due to toxicity, reactivity, flammability,
    volatility, or corrosivity
  • Includes, but not limited to, RMP list of toxic
    and flammable substances

12
Broad Facility Responsibilities under GDC
  • Identify hazards of chemicals, and assess impact
    of potential releases
  • Design and maintain safe facilities
  • Follow codes, standards and other business
    practices
  • Minimize consequences of accidental releases

13
GDC- Considerations for Safe Processes
  • What are similar businesses doing to minimize
    hazard?
  • Codes and standard practices
  • EPA and other Safety Alerts, Case Studies, and
    Investigation Reports
  • Trade association guidelines
  • What is the accident history of my industrial
    sector?
  • Lessons learned

14
RMP Listed Substances
  • CalARP covers more substances and may have lower
    thresholds
  • No solids under the federal program (and no
    modeling available)
  • Facilities may be submitting RMPs to EPA when it
    is not necessary

15
Filing Deadlines
  • Facilities must resubmit RMPs at 5 year
    intervals no grace period to work with agency on
    the plan/program after that due date

16
Resubmit vs Update
  • Updates may be done on-line through Central Data
    Exchange (CDX) for some minor changes
  • Even changes made by submitting RMP on media may
    not affect the re-submittal date
  • The additional information required by June 2004
    did not extend re-submittal dates.

17
After RMP is submitted
  • There are additional responsibilities, it is not
    a static program that ends with filing
  • Certification of receipt and completion from RMP
    Reporting Center does not indicate that an RMP is
    in compliance with regulations
  • Late filing not taken into consideration
  • Offsite Consequence Analysis (OCA) may be
    calculated incorrectly
  • Program level may be incorrect

18
Important Dates reported in RMPs
  • PHAs, Compliance Audits, and SOP review dates are
    requested
  • Leaving these entries blank or having future
    dates will flag EPA inspectors
  • Having dates (as of the filing) that are more
    than 5 years, 3 years, and 1 year past will flag
    inspectors

19
PHAs and Compliance Audits
  • The dates that these are performed is important,
    as is the make-up of the teams
  • Dates of when recommended actions were, or will
    be, completed is necessary
  • If such completion dates are not shown in
    facility documentation, objective quality
    evidence is required

20
General Recordkeeping and Official Documents
  • Have forms completely filled out with names,
    dates, and relevant information
  • No notes or line-outs made without signature and
    date
  • When the above practices are not followed, a
    document does not appear to be official

21
Deregistration
  • EPA requires a de-registration letter be
    submitted for facilities that have reduced
    inventory or no longer use any covered substance
  • Form is available on the RMPSubmit program
  • Withdrawal (for flammable fuels) can be achieved
    with a form from website
  • http//yosemite.epa.gov/oswer/ceppoweb.nsf/cont
    ent/
  • RMPsubmission.htmWithdrawal

22
Deregistration Letter
23
Withdrawal Letter
24
Contact Information
RMP Reporting Center (310) 429-5018 8 am-430
pm M-F Eastern Time or via e-mail
userrmp.usersupport_at_epcra.org. They can provide
your EPA ID number, a copy of your certification
letter, or a copy of your RMP ASCII file
http//yosemite.epa.gov/oswer/ceppoweb.nsf/content
/index.html
  • U.S. EPA Pacific Southwest Region
  • Emergency Prevention and Preparedness

25
Contact Information
Janice Witul EPCRA/RMP Compliance Officer (415)
972-3089 witul.janice_at_epa.gov Karin Graves
EPCRA/RMP Inspector (415) 972-3153 graves.karin_at_e
pa.gov
http//yosemite.epa.gov/oswer/ceppoweb.nsf/content
/index.html
  • U.S. EPA Pacific Southwest Region
  • Emergency Prevention and Preparedness
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com