Hard Cases - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 11
About This Presentation
Title:

Hard Cases

Description:

... the same as obscenity. 3. History of Pornography. 1920s: Stag Films. 1950s: Playboy. 1960s: Store-fronts. 1980s: Cable-Access TV. Deregulation of broadcasting ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:97
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 12
Provided by: janqu
Category:
Tags: boy | cases | hard | play

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Hard Cases


1
Hard Cases
  • When ought government to intervene in our
    affairs?
  • Rights, Positive and Negative

2
Definition of Pornography
  • Latin To write about whores
  • Not necessarily the same as obscenity

3
History of Pornography
  • 1920s Stag Films
  • 1950s Playboy
  • 1960s Store-fronts
  • 1980s Cable-Access TV
  • Deregulation of broadcasting
  • 1990s Internet Satellites

4
Pornography the Law
  • The Miller Test
  • Prurience
  • Patent Offensiveness
  • No serious artistic value

5
Pornography the Law
  • Offensiveness is the linchpin of this standard
  • Pornography offends us so harms us
  • Liberals (Brennan) who gets to decide what is
    harmful?
  • In practice, Miller protects most forms of
    pornography

6
Pornography Feminists
  • Pornography harms women
  • It sets up a gender hierarchy
  • Puts men women in their proper places

Catherine MacKinnon
7
Pornography Feminists
  • Obscenity doctrine ignores this harm because it
    is male-centered
  • We cannot have free speech when individuals are
    not equal to begin with must take social
    circumstances into account
  • Court should ignore distinction between public
    and private
  • Stanley v. GA (1968)
  • No such thing as a free marketplace free for
    whom why? Sunstein

8
American Booksellers Assn. V. Hudnut (1985)
  • City Ordinances
  • Individuals may not traffic in pornography
  • coerce others into performing in pornographic
    works
  • or force others to watch the pornographic
  • finally, anyone injured by someone who has seen
    or read pornography has a right of action against
    the maker or seller.

9
Key Issue
  • Does pornography cause harm?
  • Can this legislation pass the Miller Test?

10
Sunsteins Point of View
  • much pornography lies outside first amendment
    concerns
  • it causes sufficient harm to warrant regulation
  • connection between pornography violence against
    women
  • connection between pornography anti-women
    behavior
  • pornography plays a part in silencing women
  • we ban ads for gambling, cigarette smoking
    alcohol. Why not pornography?
  • Current law takes the social consensus as a
    foundation for the decision

11
Pornography the Conceptual Issues
  • What does it mean to have a right?
  • How does one get rights?
  • Can government only exercise a negative force on
    society?
  • Should government seek to account of social
    inequalities?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com