Title: CANARIE Gigabit Internet to every citizen of Catalunya
1CANARIE Gigabit Internet to every citizen
of Catalunya
Bill.St.Arnaud_at_canarie.ca
2Outline
- What will drive broadband new applications or
competition? - The Reality of Broadband
- Some possible models for Gigabit to the Citizen
- Customer Owned networks a new way of looking at
networking - Third Wave of the Internet
3CANARIE Inc
- Mission To facilitate the development of
Canadas communications infrastructure and
stimulate next generation products, applications
and services - Canadian equivalent to Internet 2 and NGI
- private-sector led, not-for-profit consortium
- consortium formed 1993
- federal funding of 300m (1993-99)
- total project costs estimated over 600 M
- currently over 140 members 21 Board members
4Historical Look at Rate of Growth of
Telecommunications
70
60
VCR
50
Cable TV
PC
40
Penetration of households
30
Telephone
20
10
0
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
55
60
65
70
Years after market introduction
Source Scientific American August 1993
5Penetration vs Price
16
14
12
10
Cost of per capita income
8
Telephone
6
PC
VCR
4
Cable
2
0
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
55
60
Penetration of Households
Source Scientific American August 1993
6Real Cost vs Penetration
Telephone
VCR
Cable TV
PC
Internet?
Extrapolated from Scientific American data
7What will drive BroadbandApplications or
Competition?
- Once a technology is perceived as having broad
utilitarian value, price, as opposed to features
or applications drive penetration - Every year the PC has new applications
- But the biggest driver for widespread PC in the
home is low cost - What is the driver for low cost?
- COMPETITION
8What is competition?
- Market structures and dynamic competition
http//itech.fgcu.edu/faculty/bhobbs/bds7/sld001.h
tm - Herfindahl index sum of square of market share
- Monopoly 0.6
- Oligpoly 0.2 0.6
- Perfect Competition
- Current duopoly of DSL and Cable modems is
actually a monopoly market - Characteristics price increases and decreased
service levels over time
9The reality
- Most people who have DSL and cable modems are
quite satisfied - Those who cannot get either are mad as hell and
are not going to take it anymore - So far there is only one identifiable application
that requires speeds greater than 1.5 Mbps - Downloading movies see www.Movielink.com
- Takes 4 hours to days to download one MPEG movie
- DVD movie in excess of 5 GigaBytes may take days
- Next generation of DSL and cable modems will only
have bandwidth capacity up to 50 Mbps - There is no business case for FTTH with current
telco centric business models - Trapped by take up economics
10A growing trend
- There is a clear trend in all formerly monopoly
services to move to competitive services - Electrical distribution systems
- Separation of transmission costs versus power
costs from competitive suppliers - Gas distribution systems former regulated
monopolies (unbundling is well underway) - Telecom is the last bastion of monopoly operation
where services and infrastructure are provided by
same company - Government policy makers are going to have
increasing input on future broadband access
technologies to insure competition
11Why government intervention?
- Private sector competition in an open competitive
level playing field is the best vehicle for
producing innovation and lowering costs. - As much as possible governments should not
intrude into the marketplace. - Sometimes government intrusion in the marketplace
is warranted if there are significant benefits to
the economy and society where otherwise to do
nothing would be to do harm - Bridges displace private sector ferry service
operations - Free trade disrupted business plans of many
private sector companies - Opening up of long distance competition disrupted
business plans of incumbent telcos - Governments have also have a critical role to
balance off interests of private property owners
versus social benefits delivery of enabling
infrastructure such as electricity, telephone,
cable, etc
12How to introduce competition
- Open Access, Structural separation or
Facilities based competition? - Road ways are examples of competition through
structural separation while parallel railways are
examples of facilities based competition - To date telecom regulators have focused on
facilities based competition and open access - Facilities based competition has been very
successful in the long haul - Open access has been the alternative solution for
the last mile - But has had poor track record
- Mistaken belief that wireless can compete
effectively with fiber - If fiber is a natural monopoly, particularly in
last mile suburban areas, then structural
separation maybe more important than facilities
based competition
13One Possible Model
- Municipal Condominium Fiber Network using fiber
ROW and fiber facilities facilitated by municipal
government - Governments partner with private sector to build
condominium fiber networks to all public sector
buildings - Government achieves social goal of affordable
bandwidth to all public sector buildings - Condominium fiber allows many competitors to own
strands of fiber into the neighbourhood - Cost of construction is shared amongst all
participants - Structural separation between ownership of fiber
cable and ownership of individual strands - But facilities based competition between owners
of individual strands - A change from the traditional telecom model where
value of services is enhanced because of monopoly
control of infrastructure
14The need for ADco
- Lawrence J. Spiwak, COMMUNICATIONS WEEK
INTERNATIONAL, Opinion US Competition Policy --
The Four Horsemen of the Broadband Apocalypse
(01 April 2002). - http//www.phoenix-center.org/commentaries/CWIHors
emen.pdf - PHOENIX CENTER POLICY PAPER NO. 12 Why ADCo? Why
Now? An Economic Exploration into the Future
Industry Structure for the "Last Mile" in Local
Telecommunications Markets. pdf file - http//www.phoenix-center.org/wps.html
15Municipal Condo Architecture
Fiber Splice Box
Carrier Owned Fiber
School board or City Hall
Central Office For Wireless Company
Cable head end
Telco Central Office
Condominium Fiber with separate strands owned by
school and by service providers
Colo Facility
School
School
802.11b
Average Fiber Penetration to 250-500 homes
VDSL, HFC or FTTH
Business
16What is condominium fiber?
- Several next generation carriers and fiber
brokers are now arranging condominium fiber
builds - IMS, QuebecTel, Videotron, Cogeco, Dixon Cable,
GT Telecom, etc etc - Organizations such as schools, hospitals,
businesses, municipalities and universities
become anchor tenants in the fiber build - Each institution gets its own set of fibers on a
point to point architecture, at cost, on a 20
year IRU (Indefeasible Right of Use) - One time up front cost, plus annual maintenance
and right of way cost approx 5 of the capital
cost - Fiber is installed and maintained by 3rd party
professional fiber contractors usually the same
contractors used by the carriers for their fiber
builds - Institution lights up their own strands with
whatever technology they want Gigabit Ethernet,
ATM, PBX, etc - New long range laser will reach 120 km
- Typical cost is 25,000 (one time for 20 years)
per institution
17Lanaudière
Sorel-Tracy
Lionel-Groulx
Montreal Public Sector Condominium Networks
Marie-Victorin
Rosemont
Montmorency
Maisonneuve
Ahuntsic
Édouard-Montpetit
Bois-de-Boulogne
Vers Québec
St-Laurent/Vanier
Champlain
Vieux-Montréal
Gérald-Godin
Dawson
John-Abbott
André-Laurendeau
18Halifax Condo Fiber Build
Private fibre optic network 12-15 km 350,000
build 150,000 engineering Links all major
universities, hospitals, research centers and
some schools Connects to CAnet4 at Nova Scotia
GigaPOP
19South Dundas
IROQUOIS
MORRISBURG
20ORION
21RISQ Fiber Network
Network
450 Km
OC-12
MAN
Scale 100 Km
250 Km
Dark fiber
Leased bandw.
22Level 3 provides dark fiber for California
Research Network
23Villages Branches
- Quebec Government to provide 75m funding to help
schools, businesses and municipalities acquire
condo fiber networks - Private sector to build and manage condo networks
- Individual point to point strands within cable
are owned by institutions through 20 year IRUs
24Condo Fiber Costs - Examples
- Des Affluents Total cost 1,500,00 (750,000 for
schools) - 70 schools
- 12 municipal buildings
- 204 km fiber
- 1,500,000 total cost
- average cost per building - 18,000 per building
- Mille-Isles Total cost 2,100,000 (1,500,000
for schools) - 80 schools
- 18 municipal buildings
- 223km
- 21,428 per building
- Laval Total cost 1,800,000 (1,000,000 for
schools) - 111 schools
- 45 municipal buildings
- 165 km
- 11,500 per building
25Typical Payback for school(Real example des
affluents north of Montreal)
- Over 3 years total expenditure of 1,440,000 for
DSL service - Total cost of dark fiber network for 75 schools
1,350,000 - Additional condominium participants were brought
in to lower cost to school board to 750,000 - School board can now centralize routers and
network servers at each school - Estimated savings in travel and software upgrades
800,000 - Payback typically 8 16 months
- Independent Study by Group Secor available upon
request
26Reduction in the number of servers
27Big Cost Saving in VoIP for schools
- Many schools are using dark fiber to enable VoIP
telephones to each teachers desk - Also free phones in hallways for kids to all kids
in other scholl - With dark fiber only cost is the one VoIP phone
itself - VoIP gateway to PSTN is located at school board
office - Most teachers have never had a telephone in their
classroom - Has a bigger impact than multimedia,
tele-learning etc - Schools are ripping out old copper telephone
systems and leaving one copper telephone for
emergency purpose - For more details http//www.canarie.ca/press/publi
cations/pdf/workshop99/schweikhardt.pdf - But allows exciting new learning tools for
schools - Laval
28Benefit to Cities
- If city builds and owns conduit can be revenue
generator - Yet saves carriers money
- Accelerates opportunity for information society
29Condo fiber for Business
- Significant reduction in price for local loop
costs - No increase in local loop costs as bandwidth
demands increase - Ability to outsource LAN and web servers to
distant location as LAN speeds and performance
can be maintained over dark fiber - Access to lower cost competitive service
providers at carrier neutral hotels - New entrants cannot afford high cost of building
out their own fiber networks - Examples
- Colgate-Palmolive build in Cincinnati
- Nortel, Cisco, Govt depts in Ottawa
- Lehman Brothers in NY
- Ford in Detroit
30Benefits to Carriers
- For cablecos and telcos it help them accelerate
the deployment of high speed internet services
into the community - Currently deployment of DSL and cable modem
deployment is hampered by high cost of deploying
fiber into the neighbourhoods - Cable companies need fiber to every 250 homes for
next generation cable modem service, but
currently only have fiber on average to every
5000 homes - Telephone companies need to get fiber to every
250 homes to support VDSL or FSAN technologies - Wireless companies need to get fiber to every 250
homes for new high bandwidth wireless services
and mobile Internet - It will provide opportunities for small
innovative service providers to offer service to
public institutions as well as homes - For e-commerce and web hosting companies it will
generate new business in out sourcing and web
hosting
31BOEING BUILDS PRIVATE NATIONWIDE OPTICAL NETWORK
- Boeing awarded an estimated US20 million
contract to Nortel Networks to build a private
nationwide optical network based on DWDM and next
generation SONET. Plans call for the deployment
of OPTera Long Haul 1600 Optical Line Systems and
OPTera Metro 3500 Multiservice Platform in
multiple cities across the country.
http//www.nortelnetworks.com/corporate/news/newsr
eleases/2002c/07_23_02_boeing.html
32The Future -CAnet 4?
- Funded by Govt of Canada for 110m now fully
operational - A network of point to point condominium
wavelengths - Universities and researcher own and control their
own lightpaths or wavelengths and associated
cross connects on each switch - All lightpaths terminate at switches where
condominium owner can manage their own portion of
the switch - Owners of wavelengths determine topology and
routing of their particular light paths - Condominium owner can recursively sub partition
their wavelengths and give ownership to other
entities - Wavelengths become objects complete with
polymorphism, inheritance, classes, etc Object
Oriented Networking
33Customer Owned Networks
- The customer owns the infrastructure (dark fiber,
switches and wavelengths) while the carrier
provides the service and network management - Relieves the carrier of huge capital cost of
infrastructure and gives customer greater
flexibility in choice of service provider and
control of the network - Very similar parallel to evolution of computer
industry from the centrally managed time share of
the 1960s to the customer owned mini-computer of
the 70s and the PC of the 80s - Today telecom is largely a service industry much
like time share computing of the 60s - Asset based telecom puts customer in control and
ownership of the network - Asset based telecom started with the same people
who brought you the Internet our universities
and research centers
34CAnet 4 Architecture
CANARIE
GigaPOP
ORAN DWDM
Carrier DWDM
Edmonton
Saskatoon
St. Johns
Calgary
Regina
Quebec
Winnipeg
Charlottetown
Thunder Bay
Montreal
Victoria
Ottawa
Vancouver
Fredericton
Halifax
Boston
Chicago
Seattle
New York
CAnet 4 node)
Toronto
Possible future CAnet 4 node
Windsor
35Whats next
- Customer owned fiber/wavelength networks liberate
the customer to use new applications and create a
whole new business sector liberated from the
artificial constraints of the current telecom
business model leading to the - The Third Wave of the Internet
36The three waves
- The first wave of the Internet consisted
primarily of text and data services such as
e-mail and FTP. - The second wave was the web which improved ease
of use and facilitated the transfer of images,
sound and video. - The third wave is the integration of
applications, p2p networking, open source,
distributed computing enabled by next generation
web services, semantic web and high speed
networks
37Todays Network
The network is subservient to the computer
The application is tightly bound to the OS
Network
Application
Application
User
User
OS
OS
The network is a mechanism for applications to
communicate with each other
Data
Data
38Third Wave Network
Application and data exist on the network and are
uncoupled from any specific machine or location
Third Wave
Third Wave
Network
OS
OS
The computer is subservient to the network
Application and Data
Third Wave
OS
Data
39What is the Third Wave?
- Before the Web on-line information was only
available through a small number of information
providers who charged high fees - Compuserve, Dialogic, etc
- The Web allowed millions of creators of
information to make it easily accessible to all
others at very low cost, bypassing the
information middleman - The Third Wave proposes to extend the WEB
paradigm to processes, applications and content - Third Wave is about creation of tools and
applications (i.e. services) in variety of fields
such as eLearning, eBusiness, eScience, eHealth,
etc that can make these services easily available
to all others - At there are millions of web sites, there will be
millions of Third wave services - Elements of the Third Wave
- Open Source, Web services, Semantic web,
Distributed computing, Peer to peer, Grids,
Agents, Java Spaces, Creative Commons - Third Wave is more than web services as typified
by Microsoft .Net or IBM Websphere - These are equivalent to the old Compuserve model
with portals and ASPs
40Third Wave and science
- Science used to about test tubes, wet labs and
big instruments - But increasingly science is moving to networks
and computers - Science is now longer bound by bricks and mortar
or geography - NSF has announced Cyber Infrastructure
initiative - https//worktools.si.umich.edu/workspaces/datkins/
001.nsf - DOE SciDAC Scientific Discovery through Advanced
Computing - http//www.er.doe.gov/feature_articles_2001/august
/SCIAC/SciDAC_announcement.htm - Recognition that more and more science is network
and computationally based - Grids using web services will be foundation of
this new research methodology - Some early examples.
41Virtual Observatory
- http//www.us-vo.org/
- Discovery process will rely on advanced
visualization and data mining tools - Not tied to a single brick and mortar location
- Will cross correlate existing multi-spectral
databases petabytes in size - Web services will integrate data and applications
No new telescopes or radio dishes. Just big
networks interconnecting large databases
42What is eScience?
- The ultimate goal of e-science is to allow
students and eventually members of the general
public to be full participants in scientific
discovery and innovation. - Uses advanced high speed networks like CAnet 4
and CANARIEs Third Wave which integrates new
concepts in distributed computing, peer to peer
file sharing and web services - Will allow increasing number of computationally
or networked research experiments to be
seamlessly integrated with the computer
capabilities of thousands of PCs located at our
schools and in our homes. - High performance computers located at
universities can be seamlessly integrated with
eScience distributed computers at school across
CAnet 4 - Some early primitive examples
43FightAIDS_at_Home
- Scientists at The Scripps Research Institute
(TSRI) are using computational methods to
identify drugs that have the right shape and
interaction characteristics to fight diseases
such as AIDS. - Once such candidates are identified, they can be
synthesized in a laboratory, tested according to
FDA guidelines, and released as prescription
drugs to benefit the public. - Such computations require a vast number of trial
dockings, testing variations in the target
protein and the trial drug molecules
44Folding_at_home
http//www.stanford.edu/group/pandegroup/Cosm/ htt
p//members.ud.com/vypc/cancer/
- This "virtual supercomputer" uses peer-to-peer
technology to make unprecedented amounts of
processing power available to medical researchers
to accelerate the development of improved
treatments and drugs that could potentially cure
diseases. - Rapid new discoveries in cancer research
45Climate Prediction
- Predict future climate due to greenhouse affect
- Distribute climate model to thousands of PCs
worldwide - www.climateprediction.com
46ALTA Cosmic Ray eScience
- Collaborative scientific research project
involving the University of Alberta Center for
Subatomic Research and over 50 high schools
across Canada in the area of cosmic ray
detection. - Teachers and students actively contribute to the
physics research while learning about an exciting
area of modern science. - Distributed computing at schools will be required
to analyze data from sensors in near real time
47Neptune eScience Grid
- Joint US-Canadian project forundersea dark fiber
network off west coast of USA and Canada - Undersea network will connect instrumentation
devices, robotic submarines, sensors, under sea
cameras, etc - All devices available to students and researchers
connected to CAnet 4 and Internet 2 networks
- Distributed computing and data storage devices on
CAnet 4 and Internet 2 will be used to analyze
and store data
48 Neptune eScience
- Fish Surveys
- Earthquake Research
- Underwater Laboratory with remote submarines and
cameras
49Faulkes Telescope
- Provide UK schools with access to a research
class telescope in Hawaii - Provides an exciting resource for teachers to use
via the Web - To provide a real-time experience of astronomy,
through live use of a telescope - To allow students to participate in real research
programs, mentored by professional astronomers - Provides other public interest groups, such as
amateurs, access to high quality astronomical
data - http//www.faulkes-telescope.com/
50Gigabit to the Home
Colo Facility with RPON
ISP E
ISP C
ISP B
ISP D
Customer owns fiber strand all the way
to Neighborhood Node
Colo Facility
Splice Box
X
X
Up to 15 km
School with dual connections
864 strands
Municipal Condominium Fiber Trunk
51Self Organizing Networks- RPON
Aggregator
Switch
ISP
Passive Optical Splitter
Neighborhood Node
Active laser at customer premises
Customer Controlled or Owned Fiber