Strategic Prevention Framework State Incentive Grant

1
Strategic Prevention Framework State Incentive
Grant

• O V E R V I E W

2
VISION

• Imagine Indiana Together
• Healthy, safe, and drug-free environments that
  nurture and assist all Indiana citizens to
  thrive.

3
MISSION

• To reduce substance use and abuse across the
  lifespan of Indiana citizens.

4
GOALS

• Reduce youth access to alcohol and tobacco
• Reduce alcohol, tobacco and methamphetamine use
  among Indiana youth and adults
• Reduce substance abuse related crime and problem
  behavior and
• Increase the capacity and the effectiveness of
  Indianas prevention system (people,
  infrastructure, resources).

5

• Rollout of SPF-SIG Project

6

• Approval of Strategic Workplan

7
Pre-Conference Informational Session March 1st
, 2007Prior to Regional Technical Assistance
Workshops
8

• Target Audience
• Selected Governors Advisory Council members,
• Stakeholders,
• Workgroup members,
• Indiana Prevention Resource Center (IPRC)
  Office of Faith-Based Community Initiatives
  (OFBCI) members and
• Community Consultants/Local Coordinating Council
  (LCC)
• All potential applicants for the SPF SIG Award
• Purpose Overview goals of SPF SIG /SEOW
  reports/Data Resources Community Resources/
  Organizational Readiness/Cult. Competency/Evaluati
  on/ RFS process

9
Regional Technical Assistance Workshops March
5th-9th, 2007
10

• Target Audience Applicants and fiscal agencies
• Purpose
• Review RFS,
• steps of SPF,
• grant process, and
• instruction on Organizational Assessment Tool

11
Deadline for Letter of Intent Submission
March 12th, 2007
12
Selected Expert Review Team

• Number of teams to be selected based on number of
  Letters of Interest
• 3 Members per Expert Review Team
• Each team to review no more than 4 to 5 proposals

13
Question/Inquiry Process-

• Applicants submit questions by 300 p.m., March
  15, 2007
• DOA will respond and post-all questions with
  responses

14
Deadline for the RFS submission, Transmittal
Letter and Assessment Tool March 29, 2007
15
Expert Review Team will begin reviewing
applications April 9 April 16th, 2007

• Applications chosen and identified as appropriate
  and complete will be given to the
• Grant Review Workgroup.

16
Pre-Contract Interviews held April 16th April
20th, 2007
17
Grant Recipients announced May 5, 2007
18
Overview of Dates

• Pre-Grant Submission Activity
  Date
• Issue of RFS
  
• 
  March 1st , 2007
• Deadline to Submit Written Questions
• 
  March 15th,2007
• Pre-Conference Informational Session
• March 1st, 2007
• Regional Technical Assistance Workshops
• March 5th-9th, 2007
• Deadline to Submit Letter of Intent
  
• March 12th, 2007
• Response to Written Questions/RFS Amendments
• March 19th, 2007

19
Overview of Dates Contd.

• Grant Review Activity
  Date
• Submission of Proposals, Transmission Letter and
• Organizational Assessment Tool
  March
  29th, 2007
• Expert Review Team Evaluation April
  9th April 16th 2007
• Grant Review Workgroup Evaluation April 9th
  April 23rd, 2007
• Pre-Contract Interview of Applicants April
  16th April 23th , 2007
• Best and Final Offers (if necessary)
  April 27th, 2007
• Contract Award May 5th, 2007

20
SPF SIG

• TARGET POPULATION

21
The Indiana State Epidemiological and Outcome
Workgroup (SEOW) Identifying the SPF SIG Target
Population

• Eric R. Wright, Ph.D.
• Harold Kooreman, M. A.

Contact Information IUPUI Center for Health
Policy 342 North Senate Ave. Indianapolis, IN
46204 Phone [phone] Email
ewright_at_iupui.edu hkoorema_at_iupui.edu URL
www.urbancenter.iupui.edu
22
What is the SEOW?

• SEOW The State Epidemiological and Outcome
  workgroup
• Established April 2006
• Purpose
• To review the epidemiological profile of
  substance use and abuse in Indiana
• To make recommendations to the SPF regarding
  priorities for prevention funding

23
SEOW Members

• Eric Wright, Chair, Director, Center for Health
  Policy, IUPUI
• Dave Bozell, Division of Mental Health and
  Addictions
• Terry Cohen, Indiana Criminal Justice Institute
• Karla Carr, Division of Educational Information
  Systems
• Niki Crawford, Indiana State Police
• Roland Gamache, Indiana State Department of
  Health
• Barbara Lucas, Indiana Youth Institute
• Ruth Gassman, Indiana Prevention Resource Center
• Maggie Lewis, Indiana Criminal Justice Institute

24
SEOW Members (Continued)

• Miranda Spitznagle, Indiana Tobacco Prevention
  Cessation
• Robert Teclaw, Indiana State Department of Health
• Amanda Thornton, Indiana Department of Correction
  
• Joshua Ross, Indiana Criminal Justice Institute
• Richard (Rick) Vandyke, Indiana Family and Social
  Services Administration
• Diana Williams, Indiana Department of Correction
• Janet Whitfield-Hyduk, Indiana Criminal Justice
  Institute
• Jim Wolf, Survey Research Center, IUPUI

25
SEOW Non-Voting/Proxy Members

• Jeremy Chenevert, Indiana Department of Education
• Mary A. Lay, IPRC and Indiana Division of Mental
  Health and Addiction
• Barbara Seitz de Martinez , Indiana Prevention
  Resource Center
• Sheila Nesbitt, Central Region SAMHSA/CSAP
• Kim Manlove, Division of Mental Health and
  Addictions
• John Viernes, Division of Mental Health and
  Addictions
• Martha Payne, Division of Mental Health and
  Addiction

26
SEOW Technical Support Team

• Harold Kooreman, Center for Health Policy, IUPUI
• Chandana Saha, Center for Health Policy, IUPUI
• Marion Greene, Center for Health Policy, IUPUI
• Rachel Thelin, Center for Urban Policy and the
  Environment, IUPUI

27
SEOW Data Sources

• Alcohol and Drug Treatment Episodes and
  Admissions Data/Treatment Episodes Data Set
  (TEDS)
• Alcohol Tobacco and Other Drug Use by Indiana
  Children and Adolescents Survey (ATOD)
• Clandestine Methamphetamine Laboratory Seizures
• Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System
  (BRFSS)
• Fatality Analysis Reporting System (FARS)

28
SEOW Data Sources Continued

• Indiana Youth Tobacco Survey (YTS)
• Mortality Data
• Monitoring the Future
• National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH)
• Uniform Crime Reporting (UCR) Program
  County-Level Detailed Arrest and Offense Data
• Youth Risk Behavior Surveillance System (YRBSS)

29
State Epidemiological Profile

• Published September 2006
• Available Online at http//www.urbancenter.iupui.
  edu/PubResources/pdf/208_State_Epidemiological_Pro
  file.pdf

30
State-Wide Priority 1

• To prevent and reduce underage drinking and binge
  drinking among 18 to 25 year olds.

31
Figure 1.4 Percent of Indiana and U.S. 18- to
25-Year Olds Reporting Binge Drinking in the
Past 30 Days (NSDUH, 1999 2004)
32
Figure 1.14 DUI Arrest Rates per 1,000
Population for Adults (18 and Older) in Indiana
and the U.S., (UCR, 1999 2003)
33
Figure 1.15 Public Intoxication Arrest Rates
per 1,000 Population for Adults (18 or Older) in
Indiana and the U.S., (UCR, 1999 2003)
34
Figure 1.16 Liquor Law Violation Rates per
1,000 Population for Adults (18 or Older) in
Indiana and the U.S. (UCR, 1999 2003)
35
State-Wide Priority 2

• To prevent the first use of tobacco among 12-17
  year olds and reduce tobacco use among 18 to 24
  year olds, blacks, and individuals with lower
  income and/or less than a high school education

36
Figure 2.2 Percentage of Indiana and U.S.
Population (12 Years and Older) Reporting
Cigarette Use in the Past Month, Average 2003 and
2004 (NSDUH, 2003-2004)
37
Figure 2.5 Adult (18 Years and Older) Smoking
Prevalence for Indiana and the U.S., by
Race/Ethnicity, for 2005 (BRFSS, 2005)
38
Figure 2.10 Smoking Rates in Indiana and U.S.
High School Students (9th 12th grade), by
Race/Ethnicity, for 2005 (YRBSS, 2005)
39
Figure 2.18 Age-Adjusted Chronic Obstructive
Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Mortality Rates, per
1,000 Population, for 2002 (CDC WONDER)
40
State-Wide Priority 3

• To prevent the first use of marijuana among 12-17
  year olds and reduce the use of marijuana among
  18-25 year olds

41
Figure 3.3 Percentage of Indiana and U.S. High
School Students (9th 12th grade) Reporting
Current Marijuana Use, by Grade, for 2005 (YRBSS,
2005)
42
Figure 3.7 Percent of Indiana and U.S.
Treatment Admissions Reporting Marijuana Use at
Admission, from 2000 to 2004 (TEDS, 2000 2004)
43
Figure 3.11 Percent of Indiana and U.S.
Treatment Admissions Reporting Marijuana as
Their Primary Drug, from 2000 to 2004 (TEDS, 2000
2004)
44
Figure 3.13 Indiana and U.S. Marijuana
Possession Arrest Rates, per 1,000 Population,
from 1999 to 2003 (UCR, 1999 2003)
45
Figure 3.14 Indiana and U.S. Marijuana
Sale/Manufacture Arrest Rates, per 1,000
Population, from 1999 to 2003 (UCR, 1999 2003)
46
Regional/Local Priority 1

• Prevent the first use and reduce the use of
  cocaine among 18-25 year olds.

47
Figure 4.1 Percentage of Indiana and U.S.
Population (12 years and older) Reporting Cocaine
Use in the Past Year, by Age Group, Average from
2003 and 2004 (NSDUH, 2003 2004)
48
Figure 4.12 Percentage of Indiana and U.S. High
School Students (9th 12th Grade) Reporting
Lifetime Cocaine Use, by Grade, for 2005
(YRBSS, 2005)
49
Figure 4.13 Percentage of Indiana and U.S. High
School Students (9th 12th Grade) Reporting
Current (Past Month) Cocaine Use, by Grade, for
2005 (YRBSS, 2005)
50
Figure 4.6 Percentage of Indiana and U.S.
Patients Reporting Cocaine as Their Primary
Substance Problem at Admission, from 2000 to 2004
(TEDS, 2000 2004)
51
Figure 4.17 Indiana and U.S. Arrest Rates for
Cocaine and Opiates Productions/Sales Offenses,
from 1999 to 2003 (UCR, 1999 2003)
52
Figure 4.18 Indiana and U.S. Arrest Rates for
Cocaine and Opiates Possession Offenses, from
1999 to 2003 (UCR, 1999 2003)
53
Regional/Local Priority 2

• Prevent and reduce the abuse of prescription
  drugs among individuals 12 to 25 years old.

54
Figure 7.2 Percentage of Indiana and U.S.
Patients Reporting Any Pain Reliever or Other
Morphine-like Drug Use at Admission, from 2000 to
2004 (TEDS, 2000 2004)
55
Figure 7.6 Percentage of Indiana and U.S.
Patients Reporting any Benzodiazepine Use at
Admission, from 2000 to 2004 (TEDS, 2000 2004)
56
Figure 7.8 Percentage of Indiana and U.S. 12th
Grade Students Reporting Annual Ritalin Use,
from 2001 to 2005 (ATOD Survey and MTF Survey,
2001 2005)
57
Figure 7.1 Prevalence of Lifetime Pain Reliever
Use in Indiana and the U.S., by Age Group, for
2004 (NSDUH, 2004)
58
Figure 7.10 Percentage of Indiana Adult
Treatment Admissions for Pain Relievers and Other
Morphine-Like Drugs, by Gender, from 2000 to 2004
(TEDS, 2000 2004)
59
Figure 7.11 Percentage of Indiana Adult
Treatment Admissions for Pain Relievers and Other
Morphine-Like Drugs, by Race, from 2000 to 2004
(TEDS, 2000 2004)
60
Regional/Local Priority 3

• To Prevent and reduce the use of methamphetamine
  among black youth and among white women and men
  18 to 44 years of age.

61
Figure 6.13 Number of Clandestine Labs Seized
in Indiana, from 2002 to 2005 (El Paso
Intelligence Center, 2002 2005)
62
Figure 6.1 Percentage of Indiana and U.S. High
School Students (9th-12th Grade) Reporting
Lifetime Methamphetamine Use for 2003 and 2005
(YRBSS)
63
Figure 6.6 Percentage of Indiana and U.S.
Treatment Admissions Reporting Methamphetamine
Use at Admission, from 2000 to 2004 (TEDS, 2000
2004)
64
Figure 6.11 Percentage of Indiana Treatment
Admissions Reporting Methamphetamine as Primary
Drug, by Age, from 2000 to 2004 (TEDS, 2000
2004)
65
Reasons for Narrowing the Number of Priorities

• Limited amount of SPF SIG money
• CSAP requested number of priorities be reduced

66
Criteria Used to Select Priorities

• Existing Capacity/Resources
• Preventability and Changeability
• Community Readiness/Political Will

67
Matrix for the Priority Subset
68
(No Transcript)
69
Target Allocation of SPF SIG Community Funds
Alcohol 60
Cocaine 20
Methamphetamine 20
70
Identification of High Need Communities

• Highest need/highest contributor model
• Selected proxy indicators for alcohol (6),
  cocaine (2), and methamphetamine(2) from the UCR
  and Crash Records
• Assigned scores for each indicator are based on
  communitys percentile ranking as follows
• Percentile Score
• 10th 4
• 15th 3
• 25th 2
• 50th 1
• A total priority score was computed by summing
  the scores for each indicator with a substance
  priority.
• -Alcohol 1-10 points or greater
• -Cocaine Top 10th percentile (either rate or
  number)
• -Methamphetamine Top 10th percentile (either rate
  or number)

71
Proxy Indicators for Alcohol

• Number of alcohol-related fatal auto accidents
• Rate of alcohol-related fatal auto accidents
• Number of alcohol-related crashes
• Rate of alcohol-related crashes
• Number of arrests for public intoxication
• Rate of arrests for public intoxication

72
High Need Communities for Alcohol
73
Proxy Indicators for Cocaine and Methamphetamine

• Total number of arrests for possession
• Rate of arrests for possession

74
High Need Communities for Cocaine and
Methamphetamine

• Cocaine
• Marion (HN/HC)
• Wayne (HN/HC)
• St. Joseph (HN/HC)
• Howard (HN/HC)
• Allen (HN/HC)
• Grant (HC)
• Elkhart (HN/HC)
• Lake (HC)
• Tippecanoe (HC)

• Methamphetamine
• Gibson (HN)
• Bartholomew (HN/HC)
• Vigo (HN/HC)
• Daviess (HN)
• Warrick (HN/HC)
• Greene (HN)
• Vanderburgh (HN/HC)
• Tippecanoe (HC)
• Elkhart (HC)

75
For Communities Not Identifiedas High Need

• Option of making an epidemiological case that
  their community is a high need one
• To make the case, a community must
• use equivalent local data to report on substance
  use and consequences in their communities.
• compare their rates and numbers to the SEOW State
  Epidemiological Profile and Supplemental tables.

76
SPF SIG

• DATA COMMUNITY RESOURCES

77
About the Commission

• Mission and Goals
• Purpose Function
• Role
• Staff Support

78
Mission and Goals

• The mission of the Governors Commission for a
  Drug-Free Indiana is to reduce the incidence and
  prevalence of substance abuse and addictions
  among adults and children of Indiana. This is
  accomplished through increasing the capacities of
  local communities to organize and develop
  comprehensive solutions to local substance abuse,
  addictions and other behavioral health issues to
  create a safer healthier Indiana.

79
Commission Purpose

• The Commissions purpose is to provide the
  vision, expertise and leadership to develop
  comprehensive statewide strategies to address the
  complex problems associated with alcohol and
  other drugs within the State
• The Commission facilitates communication,
  collaboration and coordination of efforts across
  the state.

80
Purpose, continued

• Local Level
• Works to strengthen local coordinating councils
  and assist in strategic and comprehensive
  planning
• Mobilizes communities to address ATOD issues in
  their communities

81
Goals

• To provide public education and awareness
• To educate and empower local communities
• To assist Local Coordinating Councils
• To coordinate and facilitate collaboration
• To collect data

82
Role of the Governors Commission

• Long Range Significantly reduce alcohol and
  other drug use and abuse and the related problems
  and consequences
• To improve
• AOD education, prevention, treatment and justice
  programs
• Data collection
• A system of support to assist LCCs
• Development of citizen based drug related crime
  control efforts

83
Role of the Local Coordinating Council (LCCs)

• To identify community drug programs, coordinate
  community initiatives, design comprehensive,
  collaborative community strategies and monitor
  anti-drug activities at the local level.
• Become responsible for their community process
• Promote public awareness campaigns, initiatives
• Collect local data

84
Staff Support

• The Commission has 13 Community Consultants
  available to provide technical assistance and
  support to the Local Coordinating Councils.

85
(No Transcript)
86
Community Consultant Contact Information

• Patricia Wiers
• 12871 North 1000 West
• DeMotte, In 46310
• HOME 219.987.6337
• pwiers_at_cji.in.gov
• Counties Lake, Porter, Jasper, Newton
• Janet Whitfield-Hyduk
• P.O. Box 1850
• Mishawaka, IN 46546
• HOME 574.257.8437
• TOLL FREE 877.794.0700, pin 0164
• FAX [phone]
• Jwhitfield-hyduk_at_cji.in.gov
• Counties LaPorte, St. Joseph, Elkhart, Starke,
  Marshall, Pulaski, Fulton, Kosciusko

87
Community Consultant Contact Information

• Kelly Sickafoose
• P.O. Box 45284
• Fort Wayne, IN 46885-5284
• OFFICE 260.486.9954
• ksickafoose_at_cji.in.gov
• Counties LaGrange, Steuben, Noble, DeKalb,
  Whitley, Allen, Adams, Wells
• Monica Greer, BS, CPP
• 17986 Forreston Oak Drive
• Noblesville, IN 46062
• HOME 317.776.1677
• TOLL FREE 866.258.2339
• mgreer_at_cji.in.gov
• Counties Wabash, Huntington, Grant, Blackford,
  Jay, Hamilton, Tipton, Madison

88
Contact Info Contd

• Jen Bushore
• 2144 Ulen Lane
• Lafayette, IN 47904
• VOICEMAIL 765.446.9643
• FAX [phone]
• jbushore_at_cji.in.gov
• Counties White, Benton, Warren, Tippecanoe,
  Fountain, Vermillion, Parke, Carroll
• Rebecca Smith
• 14569 Dublin Drive
• Carmel, IN 46033
• HOME 317.536.8055
• rsmith_at_cjin.in.gov
• Counties Cass, Clinton, Montgomery, Boone,
  Putnam, Hendricks, Miami, Morgan

89
Contact Info Contd

• Tim Retherford
• P.O. Box 32
• Maxwell, IN 46154
• HOME 317.326.1150
• tretherford_at_cjilin.gov
• Counties Jay, Randolph, Hancock, Henry, Wayne,
  Shelby, Rush, Delaware
• Maggie London-Lewis, MPA
• 4235 Trace Edge Lane
• Indianapolis, In 46254
• HOME 317.297.5731
• TOLL FREE 899.222.9457
• mlewis-london_at_cji.in.gov
• Counties Howard, Marion, Johnson, Bartholomew

90
Contact Info Contd

• Ruthann Walton
• 13 Arlington Ct.
• Jasper, IN 47546
• Home.. 812.481.1062
• rwalton_at_cji.in.gov
• Counties Knox, Gibson, Dubois, Posey,
  Vanderburgh, Warrick, Spencer, Perry
• Terry Cohen
• 4406 Eagle View Drive
• Bloomington, IN 47403
• HOME 812.824.7213
• tcohen_at_cji.in.gov
• Counties Vigo, Clay, Owen, Sullivan, Greene,
  Monroe, Pike, Daviess

91

• Kim Linkel
• P.O. Box 13
• Batesville, IN 47006
• HOME 812.934.2298
• FAX [phone]
• klinkel_at_cji.in.gov
• Counties Fayette, Union, Decatur, Franklin,
  Dearborn, Ohio, Switzerland, Ripley
• Lin Montgomery
• 11241 N. 400 W
• Seymour, IN 47274
• VOICEMAIL 812.497.3621
• lmontgomery_at_cji.in.gov
• Counties Brown, Martin, Lawrence, Jackson,
  Jennings, Washington, Scott, Orange
• Janna Hocker
• Voice
• jcmhocker_at_insightbb.com

92
Resources for the SPF Assessment Phase Where to
Find Data
Strategic Prevention Framework State Incentive
GrantRequired Orientation MeetingGovernment
Center, IndianapolisMarch 1, 2007
THE INDIANA PREVENTION RESOURCE CENTER
The Indiana Prevention Resource Center at Indiana
University is funded, in part, by a contract with
the Division of Mental Health and Addiction/FSSA.
The IPRC is operated by the Department of
Applied Health Science and the School of Health,
Physical Education and Recreation.
93
Purpose of this presentation

• To introduce resources you might use
• After receiving funding.
• For the SPF Assessment Phase.

94
Were going to find data and learn how to cook
with it!

• FBI
• IN Department of Health
• SAVI
• American FactFinder
• ICJI

SEOW IN Prevention Resource Center IPRCs
PREV-STAT IYI Stats Indiana FSSA DOE
95
Session Overview

• How do I find data?
• Internet
• Call IPRC
• How is data useful?
• To secure funding
• For assessment (readiness, needs, resources)
• For capacity building
• For program planning
• For selection of an evidence-based strategy
• For evaluation

96
Source 1

• State Epidemiological Outcomes Workgroup
• (SEOW)

97
Source 2

• Indiana Prevention
• Resource Center

98
Indiana Prevention Resource Center
www.drugs.indiana.edu
99
Indiana Prevention Resource Center

• ATOD Survey of Indiana Children and Adolescents
• Drug Information
• Library Reference Service
• PREV-STAT Service

Indiana Prevention Resource Center
100
Source 3

• IPRCs
• PREV-STAT Service

101
Indiana Prevention Resource Center
Indiana Prevention Resource Center
102
Basic Demographics

• Occupation
• Educational Attainment
• Households
• Families
• Lifestyle

• Population
• Race/Ethnicity
• Marital Status
• Labor Force
• Industry

103
Community Risk Factors

• Availability of Drugs
• Laws and Norms
• Transitions and Mobility
• Extreme Economic and Social Deprivation

Meth Lab Busts, 2005
Indiana Prevention Resource Center
104
Family Risk Factors

• Family Management Problems
• Family Conflict
• Family Attitudes and Involvement

105
Protective Factors

• Youth Serving Agencies
• Libraries
• Places of Worship
• Afternoons R.O.C.K.
• Adequate Income
• Health Insurance

Indiana Prevention Resource Center
106
Appendices include

• Ranking Tables IN Counties by Select Variables
• State Level Data for Youth

Indiana Prevention Resource Center
107
Coverage
GEOGRAPHY
TABLES and MAPS of data on

• County
• Neighborhood
• Block Group or Census Tract
• Zip Code
• Radius around a Site

• Demographics
• Drug Information
• Spending
• Behaviors
• Lifestyle
• Additional Risk/Protective Factors

Indiana Prevention Resource Center
108
Source 3

• Indiana Youth
• Institute

109
Indiana Youth Institute
www.iyi.org
110
Source Indiana Youth Institute

• County-Level Data
• Historical Depth
• Child and Youth Indicators
• General Demographic Indicators
• Economic, Education, and Health Data Emphasis

Indiana Prevention Resource Center
111
Indiana Youth Institute
Indiana Prevention Resource Center
112
Indiana Youth Institute
Indiana Prevention Resource Center
113
Source Indiana Youth Institute
Indiana Prevention Resource Center
114
Source 4

• STATS Indiana

115
Source STATS Indiana
www.stats.indiana.edu
116

Source STATS Indiana

• State and County Level Data
• Indiana In Depth Profiles
• U.S. Counties and States in Profile
• Maps and Geography Tools
• Indicators include
• Population, Age, Race, Households, Education,
  Poverty, Health, Labor Force, Employment

Indiana Prevention Resource Center
117
Source 5

• Family and Social
• Services Administration

118
Source FSSA

• www.state.in.us/fssa

119
Source FSSA

• A safety net for IN families, children, etc.
• Manages 157 programs
• 4 Divisions (DFC, DMHA, DDARS, OMPP)
• Reports and Statistics
• Free and Reduced Lunch Eligibility
• Food Stamp Program
• TANF Payments

Indiana Prevention Resource Center
120
Source 6

• Department of
• Education

121
Source IN Department of Education

• ideanet.doe.state.in.us

122
Source DOE

• School Level and School Corp. Level Data
• K-12 School Data
• Enrollment, attendance, test scores, contact info
• Annual Performance Reports
• Graduation, dropout rates, suspensions,
  expulsions
• Trend Data
• Unemployment, enrollment, teachers salaries
• Academic Standards

Indiana Prevention Resource Center
123
Source IN Department of Education
Indiana Prevention Resource Center
124
Source IN Department of Education
Indiana Prevention Resource Center
125
Data for One School or Corporation
Indiana Prevention Resource Center
126
Source 7

• Indiana Criminal
• Justice Institute

127
Source Indiana Criminal Justice Institute
/www.in.gov/cji/
128
Source IN Criminal Justice Institute

• County-Level Data
• Statistics, Campaigns, Information
• Indicators include
• Crashes by age and alcohol involvement
• Drivers Licenses by age
• Methamphetamine
• Crime Trends Clock

Indiana Prevention Resource Center
129
Source Indiana Criminal Justice Institute
www.in.gov/cji/methfreeindiana/
130
Source 8

• Indiana Department
• Of Health

131
Indiana Department of Health
http//www.in.gov/isdh/
132
Indiana Department of Health

• Data and Statistics
• Cancer
• Health Behavior Risk Factors
• HIV/STD
• Maternal and Child Health
• Youth Risk Behavior Survey
• Health Information
• Public Health Programs

Indiana Prevention Resource Center
133
Indiana Department of Health
Indiana Prevention Resource Center
134
Source 9

• SAVI

135
SAVI
www.savi.org
136
SAVI

• Community profiles
• Data and mapping
• Aims to build capacity to improve decision-making
• Community information resource
• Census 2000 data
• Many local data providers

Indiana Prevention Resource Center
137
Source 10

• U.S. Census
• American Factfinder

138
Source U.S. Census Bureau
www.census.gov
139
Source U.S. Census Bureau

• Data by geographic census regions
• SF1 Basic Demographic indicators
• Population by age, race/ethnicity
• SF3 Summary Files
• School enrollment educational attainment civil
  status employment industry occupation region
  of birth language spoken disabilities
• Small-level geography data available (enter a
  street address)

Indiana Prevention Resource Center
140
Source 11

• Federal Bureau
• Of Investigation
• (FBI)

141
Source F.B.I. Uniform Crime Reports
www.fbi.gov
142
Source F.B.I. Uniform Crime Reports

• County and State Level Data
• Historical Depth
• Juvenile, Adult and All Arrest Data
• Indicators include Violent crimes drug use,
  sale, or possession driving under the influence

http//www.fbi.gov/ucr/ucr.htm
http//fisher.lib.virginia.edu/crime
Indiana Prevention Resource Center
143
Source F.B.I. Uniform Crime Reports
Indiana Prevention Resource Center
144
SELECTED DATA SOURCES

• 1. INDIANA PREVENTION RESOURCE CENTER (IPRC)
• http//www.drugs.indiana.edu
• 2. IPRCs PREV-STAT
• http//www.drugs.indiana.edu/resources/prev-stat/i
  ndex.html
• 3. INDIANA YOUTH INSTITUTE (IYI) Kids Count in
  Indiana Database http//www.iyi.org
• 4. STATS Indiana - from Indiana Business Center
• http//www.stats.indiana.edu/

Indiana Prevention Resource Center
145
SELECTED DATA SOURCES

• INDIANA FAMILY AND SOCIAL SERVICES
  ADMINSISTRATION (FSSA)
• www.state.in.us/fssa
• 6. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION (DOE)
  Accountability System for Academic Progress
  (ASAP) http//ideanet.doe.state.in.us
• 7. INDIANA CRIMINAL JUSTICE INSTITUTE (ICJI)
• http//www.in.gov/cji/home.htm
• 8. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH Data and
  Statistics
• http//www.in.gov/isdh/dataandstats/data_and_stati
  stics.htm

Indiana Prevention Resource Center
146
SELECTED DATA SOURCES

• 9. SAVI INTERACTIVE Information for Central
  Indiana Communities www.savi.org
• 10. U.S. CENSUS American FactFinder
• http//factfinder.census.gov/home/saff/main.html?_
  langen
• 11. FBI Uniform Crime Reports
• http//www.fbi.gov/ucr/ucr.htm

147
Contact us
Indiana Prevention Resource Center 2735 East 10th
Street, CA110 Bloomington, IN 47408-2602 Phone
1-800-346-3077 or 812-855-1237 Fax
812-855-4940 E-mail drugprc_at_indiana.edu http//w
ww.drugs.indiana.edu

The Indiana Prevention Resource Center at Indiana
University is funded, in part, by a contract with
the Division of Mental Health and Addiction/FSSA.
The IPRC is operated by the Department of
Applied Health Science and the School of Health,
Physical Education and Recreation.
Indiana Prevention Resource Center
148
SPF SIG

• ORGANIZATIONAL
• READINESS

149
Organizational Readiness

• Ready, Set, Go??????

150
Mission

• Underlying Values
• Why do you exist?
• What are you doing to address the identified
  problem?
• What is the level of commitment?

151
Strategic Planning and Operations

• When did you complete the latest Strategic Plan?
• Who was involved in the planning process?
• Are you following the Plan?

152
Needs Assessment, Program Design and
Implementation

• How often do you measure the needs identified in
  your mission?
• Is the program design of all programs addressing
  the stated needs that are being addressed?
• Is implementation process focused, on target, and
  driving the programs?

153
Program Alignment

• What criteria is used to add a new program?
• Are programs designed to compliment each other or
  are they designed as stand-alone initiatives?

154
Performance Measurement

• Have measurable goals been identified?
• Do goals align with strategies and anticipated
  outcomes?
• Have the evaluation questions defined the data
  collected?

155
Continuous Improvement

• Staff Training?
• Program process indicators?
• Will you know when goal has been achieved?

156
Use of Technology

• Is organization using technology in a way that
  benefits both the staff and clients served?
• Is technology training updated regularly?

157
Financial Management

• Experience with a federal or state grant?
• Do staff need additional training?
• Are systems redundant?
• Is there a check/balance system of approvals?
• How frequently is budget monitored against
  expenditures?

158
Human Resources

• What is recruitment and retention policy for
• Employees
• Volunteers
• What is training policy?
• Are performance appraisals administered regularly?

159
Partnerships/Collaborations

• Who are organizations partners?
• What benefit does the organization receive from
  partnerships?
• Is organization a willing collaborator?

160
Sustainability

• How diverse is the organizations funding?
• What portion of the organizations funding is
  based on soft dollars?
• Has the organization/board established an ongoing
  fundraising effort?

161
Governance and Operations

• Is the Board of Directors active?
• Does the Board of Directors participate in
  fundraising and give to the organization?
• Are there policies that govern the use of
  volunteers?
• Are there policies and procedures that govern the
  Boards operations?
• Is there a Conflict of Interest policy?

162
SPF SIG

• CULTURAL COMPETENCY READINESS

163
Cultural Competency

• Guidelines, Expectations, Assumptions

164
Guidelines

• In accordance with 25 IAC 5-5, the respondent is
  expected to submit with its proposal a MWBE
  Subcontractor Commitment Form.
• Failure to meet these goals will affect the
  evaluation of your Proposal.
• A signed letter(s), on company letterhead, from
  the MBE and/or WBE must accompany the MWBE
  Subcontractor Commitment Form.

165
Guidelines

• By submission of the Proposal, the Respondent
  acknowledges and agrees to be bound by the
  regulatory processes involving the States M/WBE
  Program
• Questions involving the regulations governing the
  MWBE Subcontractor Commitment Form should be
  directed to Minority and Womens Business
  Enterprises Division at [phone] or
  mwbe_at_idoa.in.gov.
• The Respondent specifically agrees to comply with
  the provisions of the Americans with Disabilities
  Act of 1990 (42 U.S.C. 12101 et seq. and 47
  U.S.C. 225).

166
Expectations

• Pursuant to IC 4-13-16.5 and in accordance with
  25 IAC 5, it has been determined that there is a
  reasonable expectation of minority and woman
  business enterprises subcontracting opportunities
  on a contract awarded under this RFS.
• Respondents are encouraged to contact and work
  with MWBED at 317-232-3061 to design a
  subcontractor commitment to meet established
  goals as referenced in this solicitation.

167
Expectations

• Prime Contractors must ensure that the proposed
  subcontractors meet the following criteria
• Must be listed on the IDOA Directory of Certified
  Firms
• Each firm may only serve as once classification
  MBE or WBE
• A Prime Contractor who is an MBE or WBE must meet
  subcontractor goals by using other listed
  certified firms. Certified Prime Contractors
  cannot count their own workforce or companies to
  meet this requirement.
• Must serve a commercially useful function. The
  firm must serve a value-added purpose on the
  engagement.
• Must provide goods or service only in the
  industry area for which it is certified as listed
  in the directory at www.buyindiana.in.gov
• Must be used to provide the goods or services
  specific to the contract
• National Corporate Diversity Plans are generally
  not acceptable

168
Assumptions

• What is Cultural Competence?
• Cultural competence is provision of effective and
  respectful care that is compatible with the
  cultural health and mental health beliefs,
  practices and languages of the people receiving
  services.

169
Assumptions

• Why Cultural Competence?
• culture bears upon whether people even seek
  help in the first place, what types of help they
  seek, what coping styles and social supports they
  have and how much stigma they attach to mental
  illness

170
Assumptions

• Cultural considerations
• Ethnicity
• Age
• Gender
• Primary Language
• Spiritual Practices
• English Proficiency
• Literacy levels
• Geographic location

171
Assumptions

• Cultural considerations contd
• Sexual orientation
• Education
• Employment
• Income
• Immigration status
• Country of Origin
• Physical limitations or disabilities
• Criminal Justice involvement

172
Assumptions

• Domains to Guide Planning
• Needs Assessment
• Information Exchange
• Services Design
• Development and Delivery
• Human Resources
• Policy and Governance
• Outcomes

173
Assumptions

• Bridging Cultural Competence and Evidence-Based
  Practices
• Activities should be imbedded
• Readiness should include skill development and
  policy guidance
• Evidence-based practices should be across
  cultural groups
• Cross cultural relevant strategies should be
  highlighted
• Dissemination of what works is a priority

174
Evaluation Requirements of the SPF-SIG

• Eric R. Wright, Ph.D.
• Harold Kooreman, M.A.

Contact Information IUPUI Center for Health
Policy 342 North Senate Ave. Indianapolis, IN
46204 Phone [phone] Email
ewright_at_iupui.edu hkoorema_at_iupui.edu URL
www.urbancenter.iupui.edu
175
Role of Evaluation in the SPF Process
Assessment
Capacity
Evaluation
Sustainability Cultural Competence
Planning
Implementation
176
Goals for SPF Evaluation

• Provide information on the SPF planning process
  at both a state and local level.
• Provide information on the implementation of
  local prevention initiatives.
• Provide information on outcomes of local
  initiatives at both a state and local level.
• Provide information which can be used for further
  community assessment, capacity building,
  planning, implementation and evaluation.

177
Evaluation Expectations

• State-level expectations.
• Community-level expectations.

178
State-Level Expectations for the Evaluation

• The State-Level Instruments
• Mandated by CSAP.
• Composed of 11 interviews with representatives
  from state agencies involved in substance abuse
  prevention.
• Data collection will be completed by WESTAT, a
  federal contractor.
• Two interviews will be completed
• The State Infrastructure Interview.
• The SPF Implementation interview.

179
Goals of the State Level Interviews

• The State Infrastructure Interview
• To understand baseline infrastructure conditions.
• Assess changes in Indianas ATOD prevention
  infrastructure and capacity.
• Qualitative analysis of Indianas efforts to
  improve infrastructure.

180
Goals of the State Level Interviews

• SPF Implementation Interview will
• Fidelity to the 5 steps of the SPF model.
• SPF implementation experience for Indiana.
• Characteristics of GAC and SEOW.
• Structure
• Role and responsibilities
• Activities throughout life of the project

181
Community Evaluation Expectations

• Community Level Instrument
• National Outcome Measures (NOMS)
• State-level Measures
• SPF SIG Process Evaluation
• Community-Specific Evaluation
• Fidelity Evaluation

182
Community Level Instrument

• Mandated by CSAP.
• Covers community-level SPF activities over time.
• Coordinated by Mayatech, an evaluation
  contractor.
• Data will be collected through an on-line,
  web-based. survey developed and distributed by
  Mayatech
• Training will be provided by Mayatech to all
  funded communities on how to complete the survey.
• Training plan is for each community to send one
  representative to Indianapolis to attend the
  training .
• Details of training will be arranged after
  funding decisions are made.

183
Community Level Instrument Timeline

• The first survey will be due February 15th 2008
• Includes all activities conducted from start of
  funding through December 31, 2007.
• Surveys will then be completed every SIX months
  till the end of the grant.
• One survey will cover January 1st to June 30th
  and will be due on August 15th.
• One survey will cover July 1st through December
  31st and will be due on February 15th.

184
Community Level Instrument Protocol

• Communities will have 3 weeks to complete the
  survey.
• The state will have 2 weeks to review the survey
  and resolve discrepancies with communities.
• Communities will be given 1 week to make
  revisions.

185
National Outcome Measures

• Standardized outcome measures collected from all
  funded sites throughout the country.
• Data are collected for all people served within
  funded communities.
• The questions are drawn primarily from the
  National Survey of Drug Use and Health (NSDUH).
• Questions cover alcohol, tobacco and other drug
  use.
• NOMS will be submitted annually via a web-based
  system developed by the state evaluation team.

186
State-Level Outcome Measures

• State-specific outcome measures will be added to
  supplement NOMS to provide a more complete
  description of the people served.
• Will help gather data on issues specific to
  Indiana.
• Will help with comparison of funded sites across
  the state.
• State-Level Outcomes will be submitted annually
  via a web-based system developed by the state
  evaluation team.

187
Community-Level SPF SIG Process Evaluation

• This part of the evaluation is mandated by CSAP.
• Communities have to evaluate how well they have
  moved through all steps of the SPF process.
• Currently a suggested data collection protocol
  exists for some but not all parts of the process.
• Communities are not required to use this protocol
  but an evaluation of each step is required.

188
Community-Level Fidelity Evaluation

• This part of the evaluation is mandated by CSAP.
• Communities will be required to evaluate how well
  they implemented the evidence-based strategy or
  strategies outlined in their community plan to
  address the selected priority.

189
Community-Level Outcome Evaluation

• Communities will each be required to develop
  their own site-specific outcome evaluation as
  part of their local strategic plan and in
  consultation with the state evaluation team.
• The outcome evaluation will require each site to
  track priority-related changes in the use and
  consequences of the targeted priority within the
  community where the program(s) has been
  implemented.
• Communities may contract with an independent
  evaluation entity to assist with the development
  and completion of the evaluation.

190
Requirements for the Application

• A statement of commitment to carry out a local
  evaluation and participate in all state-level
  evaluation-related activities.
• A description of your communitys and the
  applicant agencys capacity and experience with
  data collection and evaluation activities.
• A computer with a minimum of DSL or better
  connection to the internet.
• Agree to use the Microsoft Office Suite 2003 or
  newer version (including at a minimum MS Word, MS
  Excel, MS Access) to process data and submit
  written reports requested by SPF SIG program and
  evaluation staff.

191
SPF SIG

• Request For Services
• Dos and Donts

192
Dos

• Carefully read the RFS from front to back
• Check and recheck to ensure that all required
  elements of the RFS have been completed
• Submit any questions that you have regarding the
  RFS through the appropriate process outlined in
  the RFS

193
RFS Important Highlights
194
Section 1.4.1 Summary Scope of Work

• Outlines the overall To Do list for the RFS
• Includes required meetings and submittal dates
• Outlines the staffing requirements for SPF-SIG
  proposals
• Outlines Memorandum of Understanding requirements
• Note Computer/internet requirements
• Note Staff certification requirements

195
Section 1.6 Question/Inquiry Process

• Questions can only be submitted through three
  avenues
• By submitting a question via email to
  RFP_at_idoa.in.gov by 3 p.m. Eastern time on March
  15, 2007
• Through questions asked during the Pre-Conference
  Session today
• Through questions submitted on note cards during
  the Regional Technical Assistance workshops
  offered during the week of March 5, 2007
• The only responses that officially apply to this
  RFS are those posted on the IDOA and DMHA websites

196
Section 1 Other Highlights

• 1.7 Due date for RFS March 29, 2007
• 1.8 Pre-conference Informational Sessions
• 1.13 The state may request a site visit to aid in
  the evaluation of the proposal
• 1.14 The term of the contract 2 years from date
  of execution. There may be 2 one year renewals
  for a total of 4 years
• 1.17 To receive an award the respondent must be
  registered with the IDOA Procurement Division
  (www.in.gov/idoa/proc click on Bidder
  Registration
• MBE/WBE
• 1.23 Outlines key RFS dates

197
Section 2.2 Transmittal Letter

• Must be in the form of a letter
• Must address the topics listed in this section
  (unless the topic is listed as optional)
• Refer to page 16 and 17 of the RFS

198
2.3 Business Proposal

• This is the general information section of the
  RFS
• Includes information such as the respondents
  company/agency structure-Organizational chart
• Respondents company/agency financial information
• References
• Registration to do business respondents must be
  registered with the Indiana Department of
  Administration. This can be accomplished online
  at www.in.gov/idoa/proc

199
2.4 Technical Proposal

• This section outlines the specific project plans
  for SPF-SIG
• Ensure that the Technical Proposal is divided
  into the sections described in the RFS
• Ensure that each point is addressed in the order
  presented in the RFS
• Communities that are planning to apply for the
  SPF-State Incentive Grant must submit a Letter of
  Interest by March 12, 2007
  (See Attachment A)

200
2.4 Technical Proposal

• There are two phases to the grant for each
  sub-recipient
• The first phase are the first three steps of the
  SPF process-assessment, capacity analysis, and
  writing a strategic plan
• The second phase will include program
  implementation and evaluation-a list of programs
  from SAMHSAs Model Program list will be provided
  from which for sub-recipients will select

201
Section 2.5 Cost Proposal

• If the Program Director and/or Administrative
  Assistant hired for the SPF-SIG project are
  contractual the Fringe Benefits portion can be
  left blank
• Note the requirements for expenditures for the
  Local Epidemiological and Outcomes Workgroup

202
Section 3 Proposal Evaluation

• Thoroughly review this section to understand the
  evaluation criteria under which proposals will be
  assessed
• Note that there are required elements of the
  proposal which if not included will automatically
  disqualify the proposal.
• Review scoring criteria (Attachment D) to ensure
  that the proposal meets or exceeds assessment
  standards

203
QUESTIONS

• ?