Title: Update on Entry Capacity Substitution
1Update on Entry Capacity Substitution
- Transmission Workstream
- 6th March 2008
- Summary of consultation responses
2Introduction
- Last PCR introduced several fundamental changes
to the entry regime which included Entry Capacity
Substitution - A key intention of the policy measures is to
ensure that capacity does not become sterilised,
i.e. an obligation at one ASEP where capacity is
not required does not prevent use of that
capacity elsewhere. - Key Licence deliverables are
- Entry Capacity Substitution Methodology Statement
- Submit to the Authority for approval by 6th
January 2009 - Amendment of Incremental Entry Capacity Release
Methodology Statement to include substitution. - On 1st February National Grid issued consultation
document seeking views on a range of issues.
3Capacity Available for Substitution.
- What proportion of baseline capacity should be
withheld from QSEC auctions (and substitution)
for use in later auctions (the current Licence
requirement is 10)?
4Capacity Available for Substitution.
- Should allocated capacity or forecast flows be
used in defining substitutable capacity? - Licence defines substitution of unsold
non-incremental obligated entry capacity. - Would forecast flows impact TBE data?
- Alternative suggestion
- Use previous years peak flow.
5Single Quarter Problem.
- Where capacity is currently booked at an ASEP for
a single quarter in the future should this
prevent capacity at that ASEP, to the level
booked, being available for substitution in the
period prior to that booking? - Users say this should not prevent substitution
but a workable solution is not evident at this
stage.
6Lower NPV Test.
- Should different User Commitment tests be applied
for incremental capacity satisfied from
substitution and from investment? - Comments
- Combined Substitution / Investment Competing
Bids is complex, but should not be an issue with
a single test.
7Exchange Rate Cap.
- To avoid excessive capacity degradation should
capacity substitutions be prohibited if the
exchange rate exceeds a specified value? - If yes, what should the cap on exchange rates be?
8Availability of Capacity for Substitution.
- Should National Grid substitute capacity to
release incremental capacity ahead of 42 months? - If yes, should any limit be placed on the timing
of such release, e.g. 18 months, 30 months? - Should substitution be limited to single donor
ASEP or should combinations (substituted at
different times) be allowed? - Responses
- Mainly in favour of early release (from 18
months) provided capacity has previously been
available in AMSEC. - Is this feasible? QSEC / AMSEC do not overlap
sufficiently. - Impact on incentives to be considered.
9Other Issues.
- New Entry Points
- Support for a delaying substitution until a
regular QSEC auction. - Unlikely to be an issue with April 2009
implementation date. - Assuming UNC mod implemented for April 2009 QSEC.
- Alternative Economic Test / User Commitment
- No support for changing now.
- Willing to review.
- Reserve Price Discounts
- Conflicting views 1 totally against discounts, 3
in favour.
10Other Issues.
- We would be interested in peoples thoughts as to
how the substitution process may impact upon
other elements of the entry capacity regime. - 6 respondents specifically commented on the need
for more time to consider potential consequences - 5 refer to a holistic approach consider
interactions. - 4 respondents identify potential price increases
as a consequence of substitution - 1 reference to regulatory Impact Assessment.
11Next Steps
- Arrange workshops
- Establish workgroup.
- Develop policy / processes.
- National Grid to draft
- Entry Capacity Substitution Methodology Statement
- Contains process to identify donor ASEPs and
quantities. - Incremental Entry Capacity Release Methodology
Statement - Likely to include most of the business rules to
be developed - National Grid consultation to commence Nov 2008
- Submit to Authority for approval by 6th January
2009 - May need to be earlier to accommodate Impact
Assessment