Update on Entry Capacity Substitution

1 / 11
About This Presentation
Title:

Update on Entry Capacity Substitution

Description:

... obligation at one ASEP where capacity is not required does not ... Definition of sterilised capacity. Alternative suggestion. Use previous year's peak flow. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:29
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 12
Provided by: gasgove

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Update on Entry Capacity Substitution


1
Update on Entry Capacity Substitution
  • Transmission Workstream
  • 6th March 2008
  • Summary of consultation responses

2
Introduction
  • Last PCR introduced several fundamental changes
    to the entry regime which included Entry Capacity
    Substitution
  • A key intention of the policy measures is to
    ensure that capacity does not become sterilised,
    i.e. an obligation at one ASEP where capacity is
    not required does not prevent use of that
    capacity elsewhere.
  • Key Licence deliverables are
  • Entry Capacity Substitution Methodology Statement
  • Submit to the Authority for approval by 6th
    January 2009
  • Amendment of Incremental Entry Capacity Release
    Methodology Statement to include substitution.
  • On 1st February National Grid issued consultation
    document seeking views on a range of issues.

3
Capacity Available for Substitution.
  • What proportion of baseline capacity should be
    withheld from QSEC auctions (and substitution)
    for use in later auctions (the current Licence
    requirement is 10)?

4
Capacity Available for Substitution.
  • Should allocated capacity or forecast flows be
    used in defining substitutable capacity?
  • Licence defines substitution of unsold
    non-incremental obligated entry capacity.
  • Would forecast flows impact TBE data?
  • Alternative suggestion
  • Use previous years peak flow.

5
Single Quarter Problem.
  • Where capacity is currently booked at an ASEP for
    a single quarter in the future should this
    prevent capacity at that ASEP, to the level
    booked, being available for substitution in the
    period prior to that booking?
  • Users say this should not prevent substitution
    but a workable solution is not evident at this
    stage.

6
Lower NPV Test.
  • Should different User Commitment tests be applied
    for incremental capacity satisfied from
    substitution and from investment?
  • Comments
  • Combined Substitution / Investment Competing
    Bids is complex, but should not be an issue with
    a single test.

7
Exchange Rate Cap.
  • To avoid excessive capacity degradation should
    capacity substitutions be prohibited if the
    exchange rate exceeds a specified value?
  • If yes, what should the cap on exchange rates be?

8
Availability of Capacity for Substitution.
  • Should National Grid substitute capacity to
    release incremental capacity ahead of 42 months?
  • If yes, should any limit be placed on the timing
    of such release, e.g. 18 months, 30 months?
  • Should substitution be limited to single donor
    ASEP or should combinations (substituted at
    different times) be allowed?
  • Responses
  • Mainly in favour of early release (from 18
    months) provided capacity has previously been
    available in AMSEC.
  • Is this feasible? QSEC / AMSEC do not overlap
    sufficiently.
  • Impact on incentives to be considered.

9
Other Issues.
  • New Entry Points
  • Support for a delaying substitution until a
    regular QSEC auction.
  • Unlikely to be an issue with April 2009
    implementation date.
  • Assuming UNC mod implemented for April 2009 QSEC.
  • Alternative Economic Test / User Commitment
  • No support for changing now.
  • Willing to review.
  • Reserve Price Discounts
  • Conflicting views 1 totally against discounts, 3
    in favour.

10
Other Issues.
  • We would be interested in peoples thoughts as to
    how the substitution process may impact upon
    other elements of the entry capacity regime.
  • 6 respondents specifically commented on the need
    for more time to consider potential consequences
  • 5 refer to a holistic approach consider
    interactions.
  • 4 respondents identify potential price increases
    as a consequence of substitution
  • 1 reference to regulatory Impact Assessment.

11
Next Steps
  • Arrange workshops
  • Establish workgroup.
  • Develop policy / processes.
  • National Grid to draft
  • Entry Capacity Substitution Methodology Statement
  • Contains process to identify donor ASEPs and
    quantities.
  • Incremental Entry Capacity Release Methodology
    Statement
  • Likely to include most of the business rules to
    be developed
  • National Grid consultation to commence Nov 2008
  • Submit to Authority for approval by 6th January
    2009
  • May need to be earlier to accommodate Impact
    Assessment
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)