Primary vertex reconstruction with the SPD - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 32
About This Presentation
Title:

Primary vertex reconstruction with the SPD

Description:

ALICE PHYSICS WEEK M nster ... Fill a histogram of Zi with 100 mm (200 in pp) bin size ... Zv = weighted average of the Zi of the tracklets in the window ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:56
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 33
Provided by: frances113
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Primary vertex reconstruction with the SPD


1
Primary vertex reconstruction with the SPD
  • E. Crescio, M. Masera, F. Prino
  • INFN and Università di Torino
  • A. Dainese
  • INFN LNL

ALICE PHYSICS WEEK Münster February 12th 2007
2
Outline
  • Summarize status of SPD vertexing algorithms
  • AliITSVertexerZ
  • AliITSVertexer3D
  • Show recent modifications/upgrades
  • AliITSVertexer3D is relatively new (first version
    commited to CVS on October 30th 2006) and is
    still under development/optimization
  • Answer to specific issues arisen in First Physics
    meeting of January 19th 2007
  • Vertexeing with tracks not discussed
  • see talk by A. Dainese on Friday

3
AliITSVertexerZ the method
  • Build tracklets from SPD Clusters
  • associate each Cluster on layer1 to all the
    Clusters on layer2 within a window ?f lt0.01 rad
  • Calculate Zi Z of closest approach of tracklet
    and nominal beam axis.
  • Fill a histogram of Zi with 100 mm (200 in pp)
    bin size
  • define a z window (2 mm wide) around the peak
  • Calculate vertex position and error
  • Zv weighted average of the Zi of the tracklets
    in the window
  • after symmetrization around the peak
  • Error propagation of errors on Clusters
  • also in case of just 1 tracklet

Layer 2
Layer 1
Beam axis
HijingParam1500
? New version, committed to CVS on Feb. 9th
4
p-p event
Z distributions for single events examples
signal
Combinatorial background
Higher multiplicity event (Hijing
parametrized with 1500 charged primary
particles in 2 units of rapidity)
5
Vertexer3D the method
  • Build tracklets ( straight lines) from pairs of
    Clusters on layers 1, 2
  • First selection done w.r.t. nominal beam axis
  • Loose selection ?f lt 0.5 rad, DCA to beam lt 2.5
    cm, zINTlt5.3 cm
  • Combine tracklet pairs and select them according
    to
  • small DCA (lt 1 mm) between the two tracklets
  • Tracklet intersection close to beam axis (rINT lt
    2.5 cm )
  • Tracklet intersection in the diamond region
    (zINTlt 5.3 cm)
  • Get a first estimate of the vertex from selected
    tracklets
  • same vertex finder algorithm used with ESD tracks
    (AliVertexerTracks)
  • Re-build tracklets
  • Selection done w.r.t. beam position from vertex
    estimate in previuos step
  • Tight selection ?f lt 0.01 rad, DCA to beam lt
    0.5 cm, zINT - zVERTlt0.5 cm
  • Combine tracklet pairs and select them according
    to
  • small DCA (lt1 mm) between the two tracklets
  • Tracklet intersection close to the estimated
    vertex (Dr lt 0.5 cm)
  • Tracklet intersection in the diamond region (Dz lt
    0.5 cm)
  • Calculate the vertex using the selected tracklets

6
Events used in this study
  • Event generation
  • AliRoot v4-04-Release of June 2007
  • pp collisions (kPyMb) at ?s14 TeV
  • Vertex smearing on x,y (50 mm) and z (5.3 cm)
  • NO TRIGGER information
  • 4 sets of pp events
  • 9800 events with beam centered in (0, 0)
  • 9400 events with beam centered in (500 mm, 0)
  • 9200 events with beam centered in (5 mm, 0)
  • 10000 events with beam centered in (1 cm, 0)
  • VertexerZ and Vertexer3D performance studied in
    bins of Ntracklets in SPD (AliMultiplicityGetNum
    berOfTracklets)
  • Last version of AliMultiplicity on CVS gives the
    number of associated Clusters as discussed on
    January 19th meeting

7
Overall efficiency
  • Efficiency Number of event with vertex / Total
    number of events
  • Vertexer3D efficiency increased by 4 with DCA
    cut optimization
  • Vertexer3D requires at least 2 selected tracklets
  • Events with just one tracklet are 10

8
More on efficiency
  • GetNContributors() for VertexerZ ?information on
    where inefficiencies come from
  • gt0 ? Vertex OK (84 of events)
  • 0 ? error in the vertex finding procedure (0)
  • -1 ? no tracklets (0.25)
  • -2 ? no Clusters in 1 SPD layer (16)

9
Residuals
  • Zfound Ztrue distribution for VertexerZ in the
    6 multiplicity bins
  • Good agreement between gaussian sigma and histo
    RMS

10
VertexerZ average of residuals
  • Unbiased!
  • The small bias (5 mm) which was present in the
    previous releases of the code was due to a
    systematic error in finding the maximum of the
    histograms for few low multiplicity events
  • Corrected since Rev. 1.17 of AliITSVertexerZ.cxx

11
Vertexer3D average of residuals
  • No apparent bias

12
Resolutions
  • Resolution improved for both vertexers in last
    weeks
  • New procedure for VertexerZ
  • Cut optimization for Vertexer3D

13
Pulls
  • Distributions of (Zfound-Ztrue)/Zerr
  • Only for VertexerZ, error calculation for
    Vertexer3D still under development

14
VertexerZ pulls
  • Pull distribution has RMS 1.5 independent of
    multiplicity
  • Checked also with higher multiplicity events
  • Errors slightly underestimated
  • Other sources of error
  • Multiple scattering (Beam Pipe Layer 1) ? found
    to be negligible
  • Beam smearing effect (see next slide)
  • Error on radius (under study)

15
Beam smearing contribution
HijingParam generation with 500 particles in ylt2
  • Beam X,Y smearing 50 mm
  • Pull 1.5
  • Beam X,Y smearing 0
  • Pull 1.36

16
VertexerZ vs. vertex position (I)
  • Efficiency and RMS worsen for large zvertex
  • Due to smaller number of tracklets in acceptance
  • Average of residual stable against zvertex
  • No bias as a function of zvertex

17
Ntracklets vs. Ztrue
  • SPD extends from z-14 cm to z 14 cm
  • For Zvertex gt 14 cm the number of SPD
    tracklets (and ESD tracks with SPD points) starts
    to decrease

18
VertexerZ vs. vertex position (II)
  • In events generated with AliRoot rev. after June
    12th 2006 a bias (slope vs. ztrue) is observed
  • see Jan Fiete talk at first physics meeting on
    Jan 19th 2007
  • Major modifications in ITS geometry
  • ITS geometry changed to TGeo
  • SPD chip thickness reduced to 150 mm
  • The bias is introduced by the SPD chip thickness
  • Bug found and fixed by L. Gaudichet on February
    5th 2007

19
Beam offset in X and Y
  • VertexerZ resolution dramatically worsens in case
    of large (and unknown) beam offset
  • The performance is completely recovered if the
    X,Y position of the beam is known
  • Vertexer3D performance not affected also in case
    of large and unknown beam offset

20
Summary
  • Vertexer Z (items under study are in red color)
  • Very high overall efficiency (98 for non
    diffractive events)
  • Inefficiencies essentially due to events with no
    Clusters on SPD layer 2
  • Suitable for all multiplicities --gt p-p p-A
    Pb-Pb interactions
  • No bias
  • Error calculated for all events but slightly
    underestimated (pulls1.5)
  • Performance dramatically worsens with increasing
    X,Y beam offset
  • If the X,Y position of the beam is known the
    performance is completely recovered
  • Under study the application for pile-up detection
  • Vertexer3D (items under study are in red color)
  • Efficiency limited by the need of at least 2
    tracklets
  • No bias
  • Performance remains practically the same also for
    large beam offsets
  • CPU time and memory consumption presently under
    test
  • Important for application to Pb-Pb interactions
  • Error calculation under study (VertexFitter of
    AliVertexerTracks should be used)
  • Under study the application for measuring average
    x,y beam position in the LHC fill

21
Backup slides
22
VertexerZ and beam offset (I)
  • Beam offset up to 1 cm assumed unknown
  • Efficiency not affected
  • Resolution dramatically worsens with increasing
    beam offset

23
VertexerZ and beam offset (II)
  • Beam offset up to 1 cm assuming to know the beam
    position
  • Good performance for offsets up to 1 cm if the
    beam position is known

24
Vertexer3D and beam offset
  • Beam offset up to 1 cm assumed unknown
  • Performance maintained

25
Efficiency detail (Z)
26
Residuals 3D (X)
27
Residuals 3D (Y)
28
Residuals 3D (Z)
29
VertexerZ at higher multiplicities
30
VertexerZ at higher multiplicities
31
VertexerZ at higher multiplicities
32
Pile-up
  • Expected interaction rate 2105 Hz at a
    luminosity of 51030 cm-2s-2
  • 1 interaction every 200 bunch crossings
  • In case of SPD strobe duration of 100 ns
  • 4 bunch crossings (0.02 interactions)
  • All events in the strobe are overlapped even if
    not belonging to the same bunch-cross
  • Caveat high- multiplicity triggers will select
    piled-up events
  • First check on AliITSVertexerZ in the case of
    pile-up
  • Manual merging of recpoints with an ad hoc
    macro
  • Results
  • Vertices with distances gt600 µm the vertex of
    the event with higher multiplicity is found
  • Vertices with distances lt600 µm an intermediate
    value of z is found
  • Under study check if the vertexer can be used to
    detect the pile-up, searching for two peaks
    (possible in the case of well separated peaks)
  • Study to be performed also on the Vertexer3D
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com