Title: ARPOP NEW PROTECTIVE ORDER FORMS
1ARPOP NEW PROTECTIVE ORDER FORMS
- Elizabeth R. Finn
- Presiding Judge
- Glendale City Court
- efinn_at_glendaleaz.com
2DOMESTIC VIOLENCE RULES COMMITTEE
- Arizona Supreme Court MinutesSeptember 22, 2005
- The Domestic Violence Rules Committee was
established to - Research other state domestic violence rules
- Study the issues relevant to domestic violence
- procedural matters in Arizona
- Incorporate Benchbook
3Continue to Refer to Benchbook
- FURTHER ORDERED Pursuant to Administrative
Order 96-37, judges in Arizona shall continue to
consult the Domestic Violence Benchbook for
guidance.
BENCHBOOK
4DV RULES COMMITTEES MISSION STATEMENT
- The mission of the Domestic Violence
- Rules Committee
- Establish a comprehensive, statewide set of rules
of procedure for protective orders aimed at fair,
effective, uniform, and timely resolution of
family cases involving protective orders, and - Enhance enforcement of protective orders and
public safety to the extent possible and
appropriate.
5Changes in Rules 6-15-06 from printed materials
- Page 5 Rule 1(J) Created a new (J) Transfer of
Protective Orders, court transferring order shall
notify, in writing, their Sheriffs Office and
update information in that courts protective
order repository. - Page 7 Rule 1(Q) Changed "and" to "or"
City courts Justice courts
Superior court
6Changes in Rules 6-15-06 from printed materials
- Page 8 COMMITTEE COMMENTS Rule 1(J) Added a new
committee comment for the new (J) - Page 12 Rule 4(A)(5)(c) New language was drafted
to require superior court to hold hearing on
transferred case within 5 days as opposed to 48
hours -
- Page 12 Rule 4(B)(2) Moved the statutory
reference to the end of the sentence
7Changes in Rules 6-15-06 from printed materials
- Page 22 Rule 7(C) Deleted the section (C.
Inter-jurisdictional Modification) because
addressed in Rule 1 - Page 22 Rule 8(B) Created a new (B) Notice of
Hearing, and language was drafted
8RULES YOU WANT TO REVIEW
- Page 3 - Alternative Dispute Resolution
- Page 4 - I.1 Multiple Orders, Cross Orders an
Conflicting Orders - a. judge examine all available records
- b. schedule pre-issuance hearing unless likely
result in imminent danger - c. judge has duty to set hearing within 5 days
if conflicting relief
9Page 5
- K. Record all hearings including ex parte if
practicable - L.3. Modified orders must be served or defendant
must sign Acceptance of Service - cannot be done
by minute entry however minute entry should
reflect method of service
10Pages 6 and 7
- N.2 Within twenty four hours, any modification or
dismissal must be in writing and faxed or emailed
to sheriff. No phone calls permitted. - P. Ex parte and after hearing orders are
appealable
Fax for immediate notification
11Page 9 Fees Rule 2A
- 1.b Filing fees for Workplace Injunction per ARS
12-284(A) not mandatory - 1.c No filing fee for request for hearing
- 1.d No filing fee for Motion to Quash or Dismiss
for Order or Injunction - 1.e No filing fee for Motion to Quash or Dismiss
Workplace Injunction - 1.f No filing fee for appeal for Order/Injunction
but can charge for cost of record - 1.g Can be fee for Notice of Appeal for Workplace
Injunction
12Pages 11 and 12
- Rule 4.A.3. Even if Superior action pending,
limited jurisdiction can still issue order if - a. imminent danger to the plaintiff
- b. special circumstances such as distance
plaintiff must travel to superior court, time of
day etc. - Rule 4.A.5.c. Transferred orders to superior
court shall be scheduled for hearing within 5
days of receipt
ISSUE THE ORDER FOR PROTECTION!
13RULES OF EVIDENCE Pages 12 - 13
- Relaxed Rules of Evidence to be consistent with
new Family Law Rules - Rule 5.A.2 admit without custodian if
- a. appears compete and accurate on
its face
AND - b. appears to be relevant and reliable
IS THIS ADMISSIBLE?
14Page 13
- Rule 5.B - disclosure requirement of the Arizona
Rules of Civil Procedure and Arizona Rules of
Family Law Procedure DO NOT APPLY
YOU WANT WHAT?
15Page 22 Rule 9 Forms
- Courts CANNOT change fonts on forms, only margins
- Nothing can affect the placement of information
on the forms - PROJECT PASSPORT
16DV RULES COMMITTEE WEBSITEwww.supreme.state.az.us
/cidvc/DVRules/ default.htm
17ARPOP COMMENT SUBMISSION FORMwww.supreme.state.az
.us/cidvc/DVRules/comment.asp
18Timeline for ARPOP Approval Process
- October 12, 2006 AJC
- November 1, 2006 Filing Deadline
- December 20, 2006 Circulation ARPOP
- May 20, 2007 Comment period ends
- June 20, 2007 Deadline to respond to comments
- September 2007 Justices Rules Agenda
- January 1, 2008 Effective date
19Contact for DV Rules Committee
- Konnie Neal
- Domestic Violence Specialist
- Arizona Supreme Court
- kkyoung_at_courts.az.gov
- 602-452-3360
20New Protective Order Forms
- DO NOT USE UNTIL NOTIFIED
21PROJECT PASSPORTPROTECTIVE ORDER FORMS
- OBJECTIVE To improve recognition and enforcement
of orders of protection within and between
states/tribes
- HOW?
- Identify needs of different entities
- Use of recognizable first page - Model Template
First Page - Foster ongoing collaboration info sharing
22National ExpansionCovering the Nation
- Creation of XML-based form
- Southeastern Regional Expansion
- Northeast/Great Lakes Expansion
- Extending Project
- Passport Western US
Project Passport
Supported by CCJ, NAICJA COSCA
23Key Conceptof Model Template
- RECOGNIZABILTY
- Consistency in format
- ALL info required for facial validity
on ONE page - Passes squint test
24ARIZONAS PROJECT PASSPORT ORDER OF PROTECTION
Courts can change margins
County
Amended Order
Former Case Number
25Protected Parties Only need name and
dob Eliminated relationship and address
BOXES
26Reduced to 6 relationship codes
27Weapon alleged in Petition Estimated DOB no
more 1/1/1900
28WARNINGS IN SAME POSITION
29This order is effective for one year from date of
service. VERIFY VALIDITY (call holder of record)
Sheriffs Office computer will print correct
number
30Brady if Order changed at hearing
31NO CONTACT STARTS ON FIRST PAGENOTICE CHANGE IN
LOGIC
Change in logic for no contact Only one box if no
contact less entries Recommended allow some
contact i.e. mail if children
32(No Transcript)
33STANDARD WARNINGS AT END OF ORDER
If you do not want the Plaintiff to contact you,
you have the right to request a protective order
against the Plaintiff.
34ARIZONAS PROJECT PASSPORTPROTECTIVE ORDER FORMS
35DEFENDANTS GUIDE SHEET(Changed since printed)
36CHANGES SINCE PRINTED
- INJUNCTION AGAINST HARASSMENT The Plaintiff
has alleged that you have committed a series of
acts (more than one) of harassment against the
Plaintiff within the last year.
OMITTED NOT A FAMILY MEMBER AND DATING
RELATIONSHIP
37CHANGES SINCE PRINTED
Added word will to Brady firearms
38CHANGES SINCE PRINTED
- 6. PLAINTIFF CONTACT Even if the Plaintiff
initiates contact, you could be arrested for
violating this protective order. You have the
right to request a protective order against the
Plaintiff if you do not want the Plaintiff to
contact you. - 8. FIREARMS If the judge has ordered UNDER STATE
LAW that you shall not possess
39Timeline for Project Passport Forms
Implementation Process
- Summer 2006 Finish Programming New DV Module in
AZTEC and Non-AZTEC Courts To Generate Forms in
Case Management Systems - September 2006 Pilot Testing of New DV Module
- Fall 2006 Implementation of Protective Order
Forms - November 2006 AOC Training for Judges and Court
Staff
40December 2006 Full Implementation in All
Courts
41AOC Contacts for Project Passport Protective
Order Forms
Konnie Young Neal Domestic Violence
Specialist KNeal_at_courts.az.gov 602-542-9360 Robe
rt Roll JUSTIS Manager Contact for Non-AZTEC
Courts RRoll_at_courts.az.gov 602-542-9523 Pat
Wuensche Domestic Violence Trainer/
Automation Specialist Contact for AZTEC Courts
PWuensche_at_courts.az.gov 602-542-9372
42For More Information
- Denise Dancy (Extending Project Passport)
- ddancy_at_ncsc.dni.us
- 757-259-1593
- Web-based Resources
- http//www.ncsconline.org
- NCSC Family Violence Forum (newsletter)
- Subscription available online at website