The Power Of Microeconomics - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 47
About This Presentation
Title:

The Power Of Microeconomics

Description:

The Power Of Microeconomics – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:81
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 48
Provided by: ronk
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: The Power Of Microeconomics


1
The Power Of Microeconomics
2
Monopoly And Monopolistic Competition
3
Lesson 6 Colander McConnell Samuelson
Schiller Brue Nordhaus
Complete Textbook (includes both Micro-and
Macroeconomics) Microeconomics Text Only
12, 13 24, 25 9,10 24,26
12, 13 11, 12 9,10 9,11
Page Down to advance the presentation
4
A Definition Of Competition
  • Competition is when everyone tries to get a
    monopoly.
  • Were going to learn about monopoly as well as
    one other form of imperfect competition called
    monopolistic competition.
  • We shall see that prices are generally higher and
    outputs are lower under imperfect competition
    than under perfect competition.

5
  • There may be benefits to imperfect competition,
    including the exploitation of economies of scale
    to lower costs and the acceleration of
    technological change and long term growth.
  • If you understand how imperfectly competitive
    markets work, you will understand better how our
    economy, and the economies of other
    industrialized nations, function.

6
The Gilded Age Of America
  • Between 1870 and 1914 monopolists pretty much ran
    amuck.
  • Indeed, legendary and often unscrupulous figures
    like John D. Rockefeller, Jay Gould, Cornelius
    Vanderbilt, Andrew Carnegie, and J.P. Morgan were
    able to corner the markets in everything from oil
    and steel and the railroads to kerosene, sugar,
    and salt.

7
Rockefeller
  • Saw visions of riches in the fledgling oil
    industry and began to organize oil refineries.
  • Using a combination of shrewd management, secret
    deals with the railroads, and an utter
    ruthlessness in crushing his competitors,
    Rockefeller was able to gain control of 95 of
    all of the pipelines and refineries in America --
    after which, of course, he promptly raised
    prices.

8
Rockefeller Invents The Trust
  • Shareholders turned their shares over to
    trustees who would then manage the industry to
    maximize its profits.
  • These trusts were essentially cartels
  • A cartel is an organization of independent firms
    producing similar products that work together to
    raise prices and restrict output.
  • This trust device worked so well that other
    industries soon imitated Rockefellers Standard
    Oil Trust to consolidate their monopoly power.

Page Down to advance the presentation
9
Antitrust Laws
  • This practice so incensed the American public
    that, in 1910, the Congress passed antitrust
    laws to break up the trusts, ban cartels, and
    even regulate the prices of many of the
    industries.
  • Today, the unregulated monopolies of a century
    past are rare while the monopolies that do exist
    tend to be subject to a very special form of
    price regulation.

10
Monopoly
  • Exists when there is only one seller in the
    market selling a product for which there are no
    close substitutes.
  • The monopolist is not a price taker as was our
    perfectly competitive firm.
  • Rather, it is a price maker, meaning that it
    exerts considerable control over what the market
    price will be.
  • The monopolist has this power because it also
    controls quantity supplied in the market.

Page Down to advance the presentation
11
A Quiz
  • Under our assumption that the monopolist wants to
    maximize profits, where do you think the
    monopolist will set the market price?
  • Hint Do you remember the profit maximizing rule
    from the last lesson?
  • The Monopolist will maximize profits when
  • a) P MC
  • b) P is as high as possible.
  • c) MR MC

Page Down to advance the presentation
12
A Quiz
  • The Monopolist will maximize profits when
  • a) P MC
  • b) P is as high as possible.
  • c) MR MC
  • In the last lesson, I made the claim that all
    profit-maximizing firms will set price where the
    marginal revenue from an additional unit sold
    equals its marginal cost.

Page Down to advance the presentation
13
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5)
(6) (7) Total Total Total Marginal Marginal
Price revenue cost profit revenue
cost Quantity P TR TC TP MR MC
q () () () () () ()
0 200 0 146 -145 200 34 180
30 1 180 180 175 5 160 27 ?
25 2 160 320 200 120 120 22 100
20 3 140 420 220 200 80 21 60
30 4 120 480 250 230 40 ? 20
50 5 100 500 300 200 0 60 -20
70 6 80 480 370 ? -40 80
-60 90 7 60 420 460 -40 -80 100
-100 110 8 40 320 570 -250
Page Down to advance the presentation
14
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5)
(6) (7) Total Total Total Marginal Marginal
Price revenue cost profit revenue
cost Quantity P TR TC TP MR MC
q () () () () () ()
Questions 1. At what price and quantity are
profits maximized? 2. At this point, what is the
relationship between marginal revenue and
marginal cost?
0 200 0 146 -145 200 34 180
30 1 180 180 175 5 160 27 140
25 2 160 320 200 120 120 22 100
20 3 140 420 220 200 80 21 60
30 4 120 480 250 230 40 40 20
50 5 100 500 300 200 0 60 -20
70 6 80 480 370 110 -40 80
-60 90 7 60 420 460 -40 -80 100
-100 110 8 40 320 570 -250
Page Down to advance the presentation
15
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5)
(6) (7) Total Total Total Marginal Marginal
Price revenue cost profit revenue
cost Quantity P TR TC TP MR MC
q () () () () () ()

0 200 0 146 -145 200 34 180 30
1 180 180 175 5 160 27 140
25 2 160 320 200 120 120 22 100
20 3 140 420 220 200 80 21 60
30 4 120 480 250 230 40 40 20
50 5 100 500 300 200 0 60 -20
70 6 80 480 370 110 -40 80
-60 90 7 60 420 460 -40 -80 100
-100 110 8 40 320 570 -250
Page Down to advance the presentation
16
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5)
(6) (7) Total Total Total Marginal Marginal
Price revenue cost profit revenue
cost Quantity P TR TC TP MR MC
q () () () () () ()
0 200 0 146 -145 200 34 180 30
1 180 180 175 5 160 27 140
25 2 160 320 200 120 120 22 100
20 3 140 420 220 200 80 21 60
30 4 120 480 250 230 40 40 20
50 5 100 500 300 200 0 60 -20
70 6 80 480 370 110 -40 80
-60 90 7 60 420 460 -40 -80 100
-100 110 8 40 320 570 -250
Page Down to advance the presentation
17
/q
200 100 0 -150
MC
175
G
120
AC
F
E
MRMC
q
2 4 6
8 10
MR
Page Down to advance the presentation
18
Monopoly Pricing
P
S
A
Pm
B
C
Pe
E
F
D
Q
Qe
Qm
How much is the dead weight loss and how much
income is redistributed from consumers to the
monopolist because of monopoly pricing?
a) The loss in allocative efficiency or dead
weight loss equals C plus E. The rectangle of
consumer surplus B is transferred to the
monopolist. b) The loss in allocative efficiency
or dead weight loss equals D plus E. The
rectangle of consumer surplus BC is transferred
to the monopolist. c) I skipped the last lecture
and havent got a clue.
Page Down to advance the presentation
19
Monopoly Pricing
P
S
A
Pm
B
C
Pe
E
F
D
Q
Qe
Qm
How much is the dead weight loss and how much
income is redistributed from consumers to the
monopolist because of monopoly pricing?
a) The loss in allocative efficiency or dead
weight loss equals C plus E. The rectangle of
consumer surplus B is transferred to the
monopolist. b) The loss in allocative efficiency
or dead weight loss equals D plus E. The
rectangle of consumer surplus BC is transferred
to the monopolist. c) I skipped the last lecture
and havent got a clue.
Page Down to advance the presentation
20
Public Policy
  • So you can see that monopoly is both inefficient
    and redistributes income in a way that many would
    describe as unfair.
  • The question for public policy is what to do
    about monopoly, and the answer is not as easy as
    you might think.

21
1
2
Long-run ATC
Long-run ATC
Unit costs
Unit costs
Output
Output
4
3
Long-run ATC
Long-run ATC
Unit costs
Unit costs
Page Down to advance the presentation
Output
Output
22
Natural Monopoly
Unit Costs
Long-run ATC
Output
Page Down to advance the presentation
23
  • Now suppose some irate Congressman decides to
    launch a crusade against monopoly and sponsors
    antitrust legislation to break up every monopoly
    into many small firms.
  • Is this a good idea?

Page Down to advance the presentation
24
A Good Idea?
  • Breaking up some monopolies might be a very good
    idea indeed.
  • However, breaking a natural monopoly up into many
    small firms is likely to be a very bad idea.
  • This is because each of the smaller firms will
    produce at a significantly higher unit cost than
    the monopolist.

25
Each Of The Smaller Firms
  • Will be unable to achieve the same minimum
    efficient scale as the monopolist.
  • Thus, while this artificially created competitive
    market may indeed yield a competitive price where
    P equals MC, it may also be the case that this
    price is well above the natural monopolists one.
  • In Websters Dictionary, that might well be used
    as an example of irony.

Page Down to advance the presentation
26
Price Regulation
  • So if breaking up a natural monopoly is a bad
    idea, what can you do to address public policy
    concerns?
  • Well, another approach is price regulation.
  • But again, you have to be really careful about
    where price should be set.

27
A Regulated Monopoly
a) Set price at Point A where PMC. b) Set price
at Point B where MRMC. c) Set price at point C
where PAC.
B
Pm Pf Pr 0
C
ATC
Price and costs (dollars)
A
MC
MR
Qm Qf Qr
Page Down to advance the presentation
Quantity
28
A Regulated Monopoly
Monopoly Price
B
Pm Pf Pr 0
PAC
C
ATC
Price and costs (dollars)
A
MC
MR
Qm Qf Qr
Page Down to advance the presentation
Quantity
29
A Regulated Monopoly
Monopoly Price
B
Pm Pf Pr 0
C
ATC
Price and costs (dollars)
A
MC
MR
Qm Qf Qr
Page Down to advance the presentation
Quantity
30
A Regulated Monopoly
Monopoly Price
B
Pm Pf Pr 0
PAC
C
ATC
Price and costs (dollars)
A
MC
MR
Qm Qf Qr
Page Down to advance the presentation
Quantity
31
An Important Rule
  • This rule has been used for decades to regulate
    prices in natural monopoly industries ranging
    from electricity, gas, and water to the
    railroads, telephone, and even cable TV.

32
Not A Perfect Solution
  • There is never any free lunch in economics, only
    hard choices.
  • Because even though the P AC rule seems to
    solve a lot of problems with monopoly, it can
    also create additional problems.

33
X-Inefficiency
Unit costs (dollars)
PAC
P1
Average Total Costs--Efficient Production
Q
Page Down to advance the presentation
Quantity
34
X-Inefficiency
Average Total Costs
Unit costs (dollars)
Page Down to advance the presentation
Quantity
35
Cost Plus Pricing
  • Under the P equals AC rule, you are basically
    guaranteed the recovery of any costs that you
    incur.
  • In fact, thats why this type of regulation is
    known as cost-plus pricing.

Page Down to advance the presentation
36
Do You See The Problem?
  • Under cost-plus pricing, regulated industries no
    longer have the incentive to minimize costs and
    therefore maximize profits.
  • Instead, there is a perverse incentive to
    increase costs for the benefit of the executives
    operating the firm.

37
The X-inefficiency Theory Predicts
  • Executives in regulated industries will tend to
    hire more staff, buy thicker carpets, build
    larger offices, and engage in more business
    travel than they otherwise would under strict
    profit maximization.
  • What do you think such behavior would do to the
    observed average total cost curve AND the
    regulated price?

Page Down to advance the presentation
38
X-Inefficiency
Unit costs (dollars)
PAC
P1
Average Total Costs--Efficient Production
Q
Page Down to advance the presentation
Quantity
39
The Punch Line
  • In some cases, any increase in allocative
    efficiency achieved by regulating a monopolist
    might be more than offset by an increase in
    X-inefficiency due to cost-plus pricing.

Page Down to advance the presentation
40
The Broader Point
  • Monopoly and the appropriate public policy
    response raises many thorny issues.
  • Let me leave you with one last issue before we
    move on to monopolistic competition.
  • This has to do with the effect of industry
    structure on another key measure of market
    performance known as dynamic efficiency.

41
Dynamic Efficiency
  • Dynamic efficiency measures the rate of
    technological change and innovation in an
    industry.

42
Are Monopolies Bad?
  • The question first raised by Harvard economist
    Joseph Schumpeter is whether monopolies are
    likely to outperform competitive industries in
    the dynamic efficiency dimension.
  • If the answer is yes, then perhaps we should just
    leave monopolies alone.

Page Down to advance the presentation
43
Joseph Shumpeters Argument
  • Since monopolists are likely to earn a much
    higher level of economic profit than competitive
    industries, they will have much deeper pockets to
    engage in longer term strategic activities such
    as research and development.
  • They will also have a much bigger cash fund with
    which to make investments to speed the diffusion
    of the technology.

Page Down to advance the presentation
44
The Counter Argument
  • While the monopolist may have deep pockets to
    spend on developing new technologies, that same
    monopolist has little incentive in the absence of
    competitors to introduce the technology so
    technological progress is actually slowed.

Page Down to advance the presentation
45
The Touchtone Phone
  • Some critics claim that the phone monopoly AT T
    invented the touch tone phone in its research arm
    of Bell Laboratories.
  • Nonetheless, it waited years before ever
    bothering to introduce it because it faced no
    competition.

46
We Cant Settle This Here
  • This debate provides yet an additional layer of
    complexity to thinking through the public policy
    implications of economic theory.
  • Lets turn to an even more complex beast that
    of monopolistic competition.

Click here to go to part 2 of the presentation
47
End Of Part 1
Lecturer Peter Navarro Multimedia Designer Ron
Kahr Female Voiceover Ashley West Leonard
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com