Title: Settlement Site Selection and Exploration Through Hierarchical Roving
1Settlement Site Selection and Exploration
ThroughHierarchical Roving
- Gregory Konesky
- SGK Nanostructures, Inc.
- Rutgers Symposium on Lunar Settlements
- Rutgers University
- 3-8 June 2007
2 3 4NASA JSC
Machines Scout Ahead Man Soon Follows
5NASA JSC
Man/Machine Synergism
6Remote Teleoperated Man/Machine Synergism
7- Teleoperation from the Moon
- or from the Earth
- Lunokhod 1 (Arrival 11/17/1970)
- Traveled 10.5 km
- Lunokhod 2 (Arrival 1/15/1973)
- Traveled 37 km
- Approx. 1.3 second one-way delay
8- On-site Rover Teleoperation for
- Settlement Site Selection and Exploration
- Provide Ground Truth
9- Given cost of 1,000,000 / day
- to support a Man on the Moon
- Economic Leveraging effect of
- Teleoperated Rovers
10NASA JPL
Rover Size Affects Capability
11Mars Exploration Rovers (MER) Sojourner Alpha
Proton X-Ray Spectrometer (APXS) Deployment
Mechanism Imaging
12Spirit/Opportunity APXS Rock Abrasion
Tool Microscopic Imager Deployment
Mechanism Stereoscopic Panoramic
Cameras Navigation Cameras Hazard Avoidance
Cameras Miniature Thermal Emission
Spectrometer Mossbauer Spectrometer Magnetic
Particle Detection
13Sojourner (1997) Traveled a few hundred
meters Lasted a few months Contact
Lost Spirit/Opportunity (2004) Traveled tens of
kilometers Continue to operate today
14By chance, Sojourner landed in a strewn rock
field. It easily navigated around/between
them. Had Spirit/Opportunity landed there,
they might have had considerable navigation
difficulty.
15Small size can be an enabling asset When
proceeding into unknown terrain, it would be
ideal to have both benefits at your disposal ?
Hierarchical Roving
16Large/Small Rover Tradeoffs
Payload Capacity and Distribution - Small Rovers
spatially distribute payloads - Simultaneously
sense a much larger environment - Redundancy -
Navigation Agility - Levels of Hierarchy
17Small Rover Specialization
Imaging Sample Collection and Processing Analytica
l Manipulators Collective Interaction of
Multiple Small Rovers on a Common Task
18Small Rover Specialization - continued
Imaging Applications Navigation Terrain Mapping
and Understanding Hazard Identification Locating
Areas of Interest for Visit by Other
Rovers Standoff Self-Imaging Self-Rescue
19Carrier Rover Characteristics
- Deploy/Recover/Transport Small Rover Fleet
- Communications Relay Link between
- Command Center(s) and Small Rover Fleet
- Recharge Small Rover Batteries
20Traditional Approach
21Distributed Capability Approach
22Operational Scenarios Identify Region of
Interest
23Sample Acquisition and Analysis
24Multiple Analysis Vehicles
25Archive a Sample
26Rover Command Transmission
27Command Reception and Retransmission
28(No Transcript)
29Design Example Characteristics
Dimensions Vehicle 52 Long, 34 Wide, 37
High Carrier Bay 31 Long, 24 Wide, 18
High Weight Carrier Vehicle 152
Pounds Available Payload 48 Pounds Typical Small
Rover 5-10 Pounds Power 66 Watts Solar
Panels 56 Amp-Hr Lead Acid Battery Reserve
30(No Transcript)
31(No Transcript)
32(No Transcript)
33(No Transcript)
34(No Transcript)
35(No Transcript)
36(No Transcript)
37(No Transcript)
38(No Transcript)
39(No Transcript)
40(No Transcript)
41(No Transcript)
42(No Transcript)
43Georgia Tech
44(No Transcript)
45(No Transcript)
46(No Transcript)
47- Levels of Earth-bound
- Teleoperation Users
- Vehicle Drivers (10 channels)
- Active Viewers (500 channels)
- Passive Viewers (unlimited)
48(No Transcript)
49(No Transcript)
50(No Transcript)
51(No Transcript)
52(No Transcript)
53(No Transcript)
54(No Transcript)
55(No Transcript)
56(No Transcript)
57Conclusions
Hierarchical Roving represents a paradigm
shift in the decision between a large and small
rover. Best of both choices incorporated into
one platform. Provides the ability to
sense/sample the environment from several mobile
points simultaneously. Multiple levels of
Hierarchy are possible.
58Acknowledgements
59(No Transcript)