International Organizational Structure - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 25
About This Presentation
Title:

International Organizational Structure

Description:

... as a licensor or licensee and then, over time, continues to ... the dual-boss, cross-communication system is expensive and complex. OTHER STRUCTURAL FORMATS ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:2146
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 26
Provided by: ValuedGate862
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: International Organizational Structure


1
Chapter 6
  • International Organizational Structure

2
TRADITIONAL AND CONTEMPORARY INTERNATIONAL
STRUCTURES
  • Functional Structure
  • International Division
  • Foreign Subsidiary Structure
  • Product Division Structure
  • Regional Structure
  • Matrix Structure
  • Contractual Alliance Structure
  • Networking
  • Mixed (Hybrid) Structure

3
THE FUNCTIONAL STRUCTURE
  • In this structure the focus is on major
    functions. Product knowledge is centered in
    manufacturing, engineering, and marketing, and
    management of each of these departments is
    responsible for both domestic and international
    activities.
  • Advantages of the Functional Structure
  • Emphasis on functional expertise
  • Tight control
  • Prevents conflicts

4
  • Disadvantages of the Functional Structure
  • Weak regional coordination
  • In firm with multiple products line, functional
    structure can lead to top heaviness.
  • Much greater emphasis is often placed on domestic
    sales than on foreign sales

5
Evolution of Organizational Structures in MNCs
  • Effective organizing requires two interrelated
    tasks. First, managers must design an
    organizational structure that will facilitate the
    firms strategy and maximize the use of its
    global resources.
  • Second, managers must arrange activities,
    relationships, and responsibilities so as to
    facilitate the communications, authority, and
    coordination needed to ensure efficient
    international operations.

6
What is INTERNATIONALIZATION?
  • INTERNATIONALIZATION is the process by which a
    firm gradually changes in response to
    international competition, domestic market
    saturation, and the desire for expansion, new
    markets, and diversification.
  • As previously discussed, the firms managers
    weigh alternatives and decide on appropriate
    entry strategies.

7
  • Perhaps the firm starts by exporting or by acting
    as a licensor or licensee and then, over time,
    continues to internationalize by engaging in
    joint ventures or by establishing service,
    production, or assembly facilities abroad.

8
  • Depending on the strategy chosen at a given time,
    the firms managers redesign the organizational
    structure to optimize the strategys chances to
    work, making changes in the firms tasks and
    relationships and designating authority,
    responsibility, lines of communication and
    geographic dispersal of units.

9
Stages of structural adaptation to strategic
choices
  • Even a mature MNC needs to make structural
    changes from time to time to facilitate changes
    in strategy such as from globalization to
    regionalization or an effort to improve
    efficiency or effectiveness.
  • Firms with low technology and high marketing
    orientation tend to adopt the regional
    organizational structure.

10
Typical ways firms organize their international
activities
  • The typical ways in which firms organize their
    international activities are
  • DOMESTIC STRUCTURE EXPORT DEPARTMENT
  • DOMESTIC STRUCTURE FOREIGN SUBSIDIARY
  • Under the foreign subsidiary organizational
    structure, foreign affiliates are treated as an
    entity and Autonomy of affiliates and direct
    top management involvement are advantages.

11
THE INTERNATIONAL DIVISION
  • Functional staffs such as marketing, finance,
    research and development are typically
    established, and an executive responsible for
    international operations is appointed.
    INTERNATIONAL DIVISION (this facilitates the
    beginning of a global strategy)
  • Under this, functional managers are responsible
    for both the international business activities.

12
Advantages of the International Division
  • Focused international responsibility and
    authority.
  • International executive development.
  • The international operation has a single, strong
    voice in the company.
  • Company-wide view of international operations is
    obtained.

13
Disadvantages of the International Division
  • Bottleneck.
  • Exports slowdown.
  • Conflict between employees in the domestic and
    the international division.
  • International managers spread too thin

14
THE FOREIGN SUBSIDIARY STRUCTURE
  • Each foreign subsidiary is treated as an entity.
    Each reports directly to top management at
    headquarters. Coordination between product and
    service departments is carried out at the
    headquarters office. Therefore Multidomestic
    strategy applies.
  • Advantages of the Foreign Subsidiary Structure
  • Autonomy of affiliate
  • Direct top management involvement
  • Disadvantages of the Foreign Subsidiary Structure
  • Diffuseness of international responsibility
  • Potential for unwieldiness

15
Integrated global Structures
  • To respond to increased product diversification
    and to maximize benefits from both domestic and
    foreign operations, a firm may choose to replace
    international division with an integrated global
    structure organized along functional, product,
    geographic, or matrix lines.
  • GLOBAL FUNCTIONAL STRUCTURE
  • Under the functional international organizational
    structure, units are responsible for both
    domestic and foreign activities.

16
GLOBAL FUNCTIONAL STRUCTURE
  • The global functional structure is designed on
    the basis of the companys functions such as
    production, marketing, finance, and so forth
  • Foreign operations are integrated into the
    activities and responsibilities of each
    department to gain functional specialization and
    economies of scale.

17
GLOBAL PRODUCT STRUCTURE
  • Each division has its own functional,
    environmental, sales and manufacturing
    responsibilities to meet its own sales and profit
    objectives.
  • Advantages of the Product Division Structure
  • Product and technology emphasized
  • Worldwide product planning
  • Conflict minimized.

18
  • Disadvantages of the Product Division Structure
  • Weakness in worldwide know-how
  • Inherent weakness of multiproduct systems
  • Division managers often lack international skills
  • Foreign coordination problems.

19
  • A Product (divisional) structure may be more
    strategically advantageous than a functional
    structure for firms with diversified product
    lines (or services) that have different
    technological bases and that are aimed at
    dissimilar or dispersed markets.
  • In this structure, a single product (or product
    line) is represented by a separate division. Each
    division is headed by its own general manager,
    and each is responsible for its own production
    and sales function.

20
THE REGIONAL STRUCTURE
  • Regional heads are made responsible for specific
    territories, usually consisting of areas such as
    Europe, Asia, etc., and report to the CEO or his
    or her designated executives at the HQ.
  • Advantages of the Regional Structure
  • Decentralization
  • Adaptation
  • Single management units possess regional knowledge

21
  • Disadvantages of the Regional Structure
  • Weak worldwide product emphasis and technical
    knowledge
  • Technology transfer barriers
  • Policy barriers
  • Costly application
  • Weak communications

22
THE MATRIX STRUCTURE
  • Managers from the functional side (e.g.,
    Marketing, Africa) assign a staff to the product
    side (e.g., Product B). The staff leader is then
    responds to both bosses.
  • Advantages of the Matrix Structure
  • Coordination and cooperation across subunits and
    therefore easy to respond to global competition
    in any market.
  • Overall corporate global performance is
    highlighted.
  • Many internal conflicts are resolved at the
    lowest possible level.
  • In the matrix group decision making process,
    decisions are usually made slowly.

23
  • Disadvantages of The Matrix Structure
  • Responsibility given to managers with weak
    international experience.
  • The organization tends to create a mountain of
    paperwork.
  • the dual-boss, cross-communication system is
    expensive and complex.

24
OTHER STRUCTURAL FORMATS
  • Contractual Alliance Structures
  • The advantage is that when there is a breakup,
    there is no long, drawn-out fight for the
    division of assets unlike equity-based
    partnerships.
  • The disadvantages is that when one partner
    acquires other partners skills, and the reverse
    is not the case, the learned partner may leave.
  • Networking
  • A corporation subcontracts its manufacturing
    function to other companies.
  • When an organization enters into such network
    agreements, it must create a unit whose
    responsibility is to monitor the agreement.

25
  • The Mixed (Hybrid) Structure
  • International organizations can centralize some
    functions, such as an accounting division that
    provides services for all worldwide subsidiaries,
    while other function, such as marketing, remain
    decentralized
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com