Title: Historical Origins of Human Rights
1Historical Origins of Human Rights
- Lecture 19
- Non-Western Responses to Human Rights
- April 16, 2007
2Human Rights Violations Unscientific Google
Search
- Iraq
- Chechnya
- China
- Cuba
- Venezuela
- Libya
- East Timor
- Eritrea
3outline
- UNDHR and imperialism
- The Third World Movement and the Cold War
- Why didnt anti-colonial movements appeal to the
language of human rights? - Modernization and human rights
- How European is the Enlightenment? (the return of
Burke) - Asian values vs. Development as Freedom?
4UN on decolonization
- Similar to Leagues mandate system
- UN charter Chapter XI, Article 73
- Members of the United Nations which have or
assume responsibilities for the administration of
territories whose peoples have not yet attained a
full measure of self-government recognize the
principle that the interests of the inhabitants
of these territories are paramount and, to this
end - a. to ensure, with due respect for the culture of
the peoples concerned, their political, economic,
- social, and educational advancement, their just
treatment, and their protection against abuses - b. to develop self-government, to take due
account of the political aspirations of the
peoples, and to assist them in the progressive
development of their free political institutions - c. to further international peace and security
- Problem which goals are given priority? Do
economic goals conflict with political and social
ones?
5Imperialism didnt go away in many places
- much of decolonization didnt happen until the
late 50s and 70s - Algeria - 1962 (FLN vs. France)
- Vietnam - 1945 (Independence recognized)1954
(French withdraw from South Vietnam) 1976 (US
withdraws from SV) - Much of Africa
- Nigeria - 1960
- Mozambique - 1975
6some important exceptions
- Some British colonies with prewar anti-colonial
movements - India - 1947
- Egypt - 1953
- Places occupied by Axis powers
- China -1945 (PRC - 1949)
- Indonesia - 1949
- Libya - 1951
7Non-Aligned Movement and the Cold War
- Bandung 1955
- Key figures leaders of early, successful
anti-colonial movements - Nehru (India), Sukarno (Indonesia), and Nasser
(Egypt) - Committed to democracy, modernization, and peace
- In line with UN version of universalism
- India as early model
- Gandhi non-violent resistance
8Bandung anti-colonialism as an alternative
universalism?
- Experience of imperialism didnt lead to rights
talk, but didnt turn the anti-colonial movement
against enlightenment values either. - Nehru functionalist critique of the
enlightenment - Reporter What do you think of Western
Civilization? - Gandhi I think it would be a good idea!
- And that is the great thing I hold against
pseudo-humanism that fortoo long it has
diminished the rights of man, that its concept of
thoserights has been--and still is--narrow and
fragmentary, incomplete andbiased and, all
things considered, sordidly racist. -- Aimé
Césaire,Discourse on Colonialism, 1955 - Anti-colonial movement tries to transcend class,
culture, and religion - democracy, secularism, reason
- Political, but doesnt quite conform to Cold War
divisions - capitalism vs. communism or colonizer vs.
colonized? - US criticized movement as neutralism
9Non-Aligned Movement leaders at the UN 1960
103rd-World Agenda and the United Nations
- In contrast to the League, UN does not appear to
be an imperialist tool - UN as forum for militarily weak nations that
represent most of the globes population - Lack of security council veto
- Peace
- Disarmament - unsuccessful
- Recognition anti-colonial movements
- Economic development (social rights implicitly
emphasized)
11The revolution was a success now what?
- Perceived need to catch up
- Two competing versions of progress US and
Soviet - USSR version Leninist stage theory
- Lenin Imperialism The Highest Stage of
Capitalism (1916) - Socialism as state monopoly?
- Dictatorship of the proletariat
- Two-front class war directed against capitalists
and parasitic landlords (perceived to be a
remnant of feudalism) - Economic prosperity should result from this
12Linear Development
Capitalism
Development
Metropole
Feudalism
Colony
Time
13US Version of Now what?Modernization Theory
- W.W. Rostow -The Stages of Economic Growth A
Non-Communist Manifesto (1960) - It is possible to identify all societies, in
their economic dimensions, as lying within one of
five categories the traditional society, the
preconditions for take-off, the take-off, the
drive to maturity, and the age of high
mass-consumption. - Rights or development? Not the right the
question because no one was talking about rights. - Democracy and development part of the same
package (modernity) - Need to industrialize quickly in order to prevent
Communist takeover. - Samuel Huntington military modernization
(1968) - Two paradigms come to seem not that different?
14Grappling with global unevenness
- Gap between third-world and first-world economies
keeps growing. - Import-substitution theory
- Cartels
- OPEC - 1960
- Economic divergence workers employed in
profitable development industries vs. the rest of
the population (very poor) - Dictatorships, inequality
- Laying the foundation for anti-enlightenment
criticism? - 1) US and USSR modernization plans seemed
increasingly similar as the Cold War intensified
in the 1960s. - 2) These development plans often failed to
produce the expected results.
15Criticizing the enlightenment Jalal Al-e-Ahmad
- Jalal Al-e-Ahmad cosmopolitan intellectual,
novelist, translator of Sartre, Camus,
Dostoyevsky - Occidentosis A Plague from the West
- Parts written in 1961, but marginal until
uncensored version appears in 1978 after Iranian
revolution begins almost 10 years after his death
in 1969. - Modernization (whether US or Soviet-style) means
the obliteration of history and tradition
enslavement to the machine - If we define occidentosis as the aggregate of
events in the life culture, civilization, and
mode of thought of a people having no supporting
tradition, no historical continuity, no gradient
of transformation, but having only what the
machine brings them, it is clear we are such a
people. (34) - The occidentotic has no character. He is a
thing without authenticity. His person, his
home, and his words convey nothing in particular,
and everything in general And because suspicion
dominates our age, he must never open his heart
to anyone. The only palpable characteristic he
has is fear. (95)
16A convergent critique? Vaclav Havel and Jalal
Al-e-Ahmad
17Vaclav Havel and Jalal Al-e-Ahmad
- Occidentosis appears uncensored the same year as
Havels Power of the Powerless (1978)
coincidence? - Criticize enlightenment tendency towards
technology-driven totalitarianism from opposite,
converging directions - Al-e-Ahmad If conformism in life and thought is
such a danger in an advanced machine-making
society, dangerous enough to make one a slave to
the machine, it is doubly dangerous to us, who
are only consumers of the machine it enslaves us
to the machine twice over. (105) - Havel Is not the grayness and the emptiness of
life in the post-totalitarian system only an
inflated caricature of modern life in general?
And so we not in fact stand as a warning to the
West, revealing to it its own latent tendencies?
(145)
18Vaclav Havel and Jalal Al-e-Ahmad (part 2)
- Both Havel and Al-e-Ahmad influenced by Heidegger
- Havel Technology - that child of modern
science, which in turn is a child of modern
metaphysics - is out of humanitys control, has
ceased to serve us, has enslaved us and compelled
us to participate in the preparation of our own
destruction. (206) - Al-e-Ahmads response neither submit to the
machine nor return to primeval means of
production - The third road - from which there is no recourse
- is to put this jinn back in the bottle. It is
to get it under control The machine should
naturally serve us as a trampoline, so that we
may stand on it and jump the farther by its
rebound. One must have the machine one must
build it. But one must not remain in bondage to
it one must not fall into its snare. The
machine is a means not an end. (79)
19Where they might disagree
- What fails to conform to technological
authoritarianism? Though Havel and Al-e-Ahmad
draw on similar sources, they inspire quite
different movements - Havels answer life
- Characteristics freedom, plurality,
authenticity, rootedness, living in truth
(human rights as tool) - Al-e-Ahmads answer life
- Life authenticity
- Authentic Islam possible defense against
occidentosis - Khassi dar Miqat (1966) - turn towards Islam.
- Questions Is there any way for this dispute over
what life really is to be resolved? - Does this constitute an insurmountable impasse
for human rights? - Is there something limiting about the terms of
this debate? - Echoes of Burke and Montaigne? Remember, there
exists a European genealogy associated with
Al-e-Ahmads views.
20Criticizing the enlightenment Lee Kuan Yew
- Singapore becomes model as 3rd-world economic
development stagnates. - Lee Democracy and economic development not part
of same package. - Good government as universal
- 1991 Interview - Universality of Democracy?
- All peoples of all countries need government. A
country must first have economic development,
then democracy may follow What is good
government? This depends on the values of a
people. What Asians value may not necessarily be
what Americans or Europeans value. Westerners
value the freedoms and liberties of the
individual. As an Asian of Chinese cultural
background, my values are for a government which
is honest, effective, and efficient in protecting
its people, and allowing opportunities for all to
advance themselves in a stable and orderly
society, where they can live a good life and
raise their children to do better than
themselves. - Democracy and freedom of speech Western
unsuitable for multi-cultural Asian societies
21Amartya Sen The Enlightenment Strikes Back
- Development as Freedom (1999)
- Democracy makes sense for both cultural and
economic reasons. - Achievement of development is thoroughly
dependent on the free agency of people
(innovation, etc.) - Asian cultural traditions provide justifications
for democracy and human rights - Buddhism
- Ashoka
- Akbar
- European history has plenty of historical
examples that could potentially justify human
rights abuses - Aristotle supporting slavery, etc.
- Therefore, the turn to historical exemplars
doesnt solve the problem neither tradition can
be simply characterized as individualistic or
group-centric
22The debate continues
- How can human rights respond to culturalist
arguments? - Given human diversity, is it impossible to appeal
to humanity? - If so, what alternatives are there?
- Development and social rights?