Title: Teacher Quality: EvidenceBased Policy Practice in Education
1Teacher Quality Evidence-Based Policy/ Practice
in Education
- Jane Hannaway, Director
- The Urban Institute
- CALDER
- www.caldercenter.org
2Two Necessary Conditions for Improvement
- POLITICAL WILL
- TECHNICAL KNOW-HOW
- Few, but growing, guideposts
3PARADIGM SHIFT Technical Know-How with Evidence
- Who has the evidence?
- Where are the makings?
- Why do we have it?
- Why important?
4Research Background What We Know
- Teachers matter- single most important schooling
contributor to student outcomes - Wide variation in teacher effectiveness. Some
teachers are simply much better than others. - Standard measures of teacher quality not much
related to effectiveness, but directly related to
spending.
5Research BackgroundWhat We Dont Know
- What is it about teachers that matters?
6Three Possibilities
- Personality Characteristics
- Selection
- Malleable Characteristics
- Training
- Product
- Value-added
- Judgment/ observation
73 Research Probes
- Teacher Maldistribution
- Teacher Selection
- Teacher Mobility
- Principal Judgment
8Teacher Maldistribution 1
- Comparison of VA of teachers in high/ low poverty
schools - North Carolina and Florida
- Findings
- Low poverty - higher va, but not much
- High poverty larger variation in school
9Teacher Value-Added at Percentiles by School
Poverty Levels (North Carolina-Math)
10Teacher Value-Added at Percentiles by School
Poverty Levels (Florida- Math)
11- Novice teachers are less effective than
experienced teachers. - Returns to experience taper off 3-5 years.
12Distribution of Value-Added of Elementary Math
Teachers in High Poverty Schools
Solid line Novice teachers Dash line Teachers
with 1-2 years of experience Dotted line
Teachers with 3-5 years of experience
13Teacher Maldistribution 2
- New York City
- Phasing out of emergency certification
- Introduction of alternative route teachers
14LAST Exam Failure Rate of Elementary Teachers by
Poverty Quartile, 2000-2005
15LAST Exam Failure Rate of New Teachers by Poverty
Quartile, 2000-2005
16Predicted Effectiveness For Highest and Lowest
Poverty Schools
Narrows by 25
17Teacher Selection
- Teach for America
- North Carolina
- Secondary school
- Mainly math and science
18TFA Findings high school
Student FE, Math subjects
All TFA coefficients are significant at the .05
level.
19Teacher Mobility
- Mobility highest at most challenging schools
- The worst teachers more likely to leave
- General tendency to move to more affluent schools
20Principal Judgment and Personality Characteristics
- Principal Judgment
- Correlated with value-added
- Better than exper, adv degree
- Adds information, esp when little va
- Personality Characteristics
- intelligence, skills, subject knowledge
21Topic of the Day Performance Incentives
- Objective??
- Recruitment/ selection
- Retention/ deselection
- Increase performance thru effort
22Issues
- How good are the measures?
- Individual vs school rewards?
- Teachers without test scores?
23VA Measures
- Problems
- Year to year variability
- Measurement error
- Sorting
- How serious?
- Less serious for policy research
- More serious for individual stakes
24Predicting Performance
- Using first 2 yrs of performance top to top/
bottom to bottom quintile - Goldhaber and Hansen (NC) 46/ 44
- Koedel and Betts (SanDiego) 29/ 35
- Sass (Florida) 22-32/ 24-24
-
25Policy/ Practice Implications
- Use VA freely for research
- Use VA carefully for individual teacher judgments
- Important information
- Corroboration
- More years are better
- Move tenure decision out