Numerical methods for coastal ocean modeling - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 34
About This Presentation
Title:

Numerical methods for coastal ocean modeling

Description:

Numerical methods for coastal ocean modeling – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:63
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 35
Provided by: ssp1
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Numerical methods for coastal ocean modeling


1
Numerical methods for coastal ocean modeling
  • Oliver Fringer
  • Environmental Fluid Mechanics Laboratory
  • Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering
  • Stanford University
  • 3 March 2006

2
Tidal dissipation in the worlds oceans
Roughly 25-30 of tidal energy is dissipated near
topographic features (about 1 TW!).
3
Internal Waves O(104 m)
Straight of Gibraltar
Baja California
Image http//cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/goes/misc/010930
/010930_vis_anim.html
Image http//envisat.esa.int/instruments/images/g
ibraltar_int_wave.gif
4
Internal Waves O(101 m)
Klymak Moum, 2003
Venayagamoorthy Fringer, 2004
5
Internal waves O(10-1 m)
  • length 3.0 m, width 0.2 m, depth 0.5 m

6
Motivation
  • Internal waves are believed to account for a
    significant portion of mixing and dissipation
    within the oceans, especially near complex
    bathymetry
  • Where are they being generated and where are they
    breaking?
  • How do they affect pollutant transport?
  • How do they affect the propagation of acoustic
    signals?

7
SUNTANS Overview
  • SUNTANS
  • Stanford
  • Unstructured
  • Nonhydrostatic
  • Terrain-following
  • Adaptive
  • Navier-Stokes
  • Simulator
  • Finite-volume prisms
  • Parallel computing MPI ParMetis

Side view
Top view
8
Parallel Graph Partitioning
  • Given a graph, partition with the following
    constraints
  • Balance the workload
  • All processors should perform the same amount of
    work.
  • Each graph node is weighted by the local depth.
  • Minimize the number of edge cuts
  • Processors must communicate information at
    interprocessor boundaries.
  • Graph partitioning must minimize the number of
    edge cuts in order to minimize cost of
    communication.

Delaunay edges Voronoi graph
Voronoi graph of Monterey Bay
9
ParMetis Parallel Unstructured Graph
Partitioning (Karypis et al., U. Minnesota)
Five-processor partitioning Workloads 20.0
20.2 19.4 20.2 20.2
Original 1089-node graph of Monterey Bay, CA
Use the depths as weights for the workload
10
Bandwidth reduction via graph ordering
Consider the simple triangulation shown
11
ParMetis Parallel Unstructured Graph Ordering
(Karypis et al., U. Minnesota)
Unordered Monterey graph with 1089 nodes
Ordered Monterey graph with 1089 nodes
Ordering increases per-processor performance by
up to 20
12
Pressure-Split Algorithm
  • Pressure is split into its hydrostatic and
    hydrodynamic components
  • Hydrostatic pressure

Surface pressure
Barotropic pressure
Baroclinic pressure
13
Boussinesq Navier-Stokes Equations with
pressure-splitting
Surface pressure gradient
Internal waves c O ( 1 m/s )
Surface waves c O ( 100 m/s )
Acceleration uO(0.1 m/s)
14
Semi-implicit time-advancement scheme
  • First step hydrostatic pressure 2D Poisson
    equation for h
  • Second step nonhydrostatic correction 3D
    Poisson equation for
  • Is it necessary to compute the nonhydrostatic
    pressure?

15
Hydrostatic vs. Nonhydrostatic flows
  • Most environmental flows are Hydrostatic
  • Hyperbolic character
  • Long horizontal length scales, i.e. long waves
  • Only in small regions is the flow Nonhydrostatic
  • Elliptic character
  • Short length scales relative to depth

Long wave (hydrostatic)
free surface
Steep bathymetry (nonhydrostatic)
bottom
16
When is a flow nonhydrostatic?
Aspect Ratio
17
(No Transcript)
18
When are internal waves nonhydrostatic?
CPU time 1 day CPU time 3 days
19
Hydrostatic vs. Nonhydrostatic lock exchange
computation
Hydrostatic
Nonhydrostatic
Doman size 0.8 m by 0.1 m (grid 400 by 100)
20
Conditioning of the Pressure-Poisson equation
  • The 2D x-z Poisson equation is given by
  • For large aspect ratio flows,
  • To a good approximation,
  • The preconditioned equation is thenwhich is a
    block-diagonal preconditioner.

21
Speedup with the preconditionerwhen applied to a
domain with dD/L0.01
No preconditioner (22.8X)
Diagonal (8.5X)
Block-diagonal (1 X)
22
Vertical grid structure z-level
SUNTANS employs z-level grids, which have the
advantage that they allow accurate computation
of horizontal density gradients static density
fields remain static.
Stair-stepped
Bottom-following
Advantage Stepped geometries
23
Z-level prism grids with the Immersed boundary
method
The main drawback to using z-level grids is
accurate computation of Wall-normal gradients.
This is remedied with the use of the
ghost-cell immersed boundary method of Tseng and
Ferziger (2003).
Stair-stepped UW0 at boundaries
Immersed boundary U, W nonzero
Image Yi-Ju Chou, EFML
24
Other features required when wetting and drying
is employed
Wetting and drying incurs small cell heights
Implicit vertical advection/diffusion
25
Monterey Bay An internal wave sanctuary
26
Internal tide generation over topography
Deep ocean (3000 m deep)
Shelf (500 m)
Depth
Density
27
Internal wave generation in Monterey Bay
28
Where are internal waves generated?
Energy flux
Across 1000 m of water,
E 1 MW
1 KW/m
Figure S. Jachec, EFML
29
log10(W/m2)
52 MW
Figures S. Jachec, EFML
30
Global tidal energy budget
  • World coastline 532,000 km
  • Monterey Bay coastline 100 km
  • Internal tidal generation in Monterey Bay 52 MW
  • Scaled to global coastline 0.27 TW

31
Internal Waves in the South China Sea
  • How do internal waves influence the propagation
    of acoustic signals in the ocean?

Warm, light
Cold, heavy
  • Numerical Challenges
  • High aspect ratio 10 km long,
  • 10 m high
  • Long-time propagation 1 m/s
  • over 3000 km
  • Disparate length scales 10 km
  • wavelength, 1 m interface

32
Nonhydrostatic internal wave propagation
Hydrostatic
Nonhydrostatic
Small changes in wave character can significantly
alter propagation of acoustic signals
33
Transport due to internal waves at Huntington
Beach
Initial tracer field
Without Stratification
Critical stratification
After 3 weeks
Supercritical stratification
34
Acknowledgments
  • Collaborators
  • Prof. Margot Gerritsen, Prof. Bob Street
  • Field data E. Petruncio, L. Rosenfeld, J. Paduan
  • Students
  • S. Chen, Y. Chou, Y. Hu, S. Jachec, D. Kang, K.
    Venayagamoorthy,
  • B. Wang, Z. Zhang, Gang Zhao
  • Support
  • ONR Grants N00014-02-1-0204, N00014-05-1-0294,
    NSF Grant 0113111
  • For more information visit http//suntans.stanfo
    rd.edu
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com