Title: Presenters:
1Strategy ImplicationsCompetition for Standards
in the PDA Industry
- Presenters
- Megan McCarroll
- Valentin Morozov
- Ahmed Ozalp
- Francis Vo
2Agenda
- Industry Background and Landscape
- Market Projections
- Decision Tree
- Recommendation
3PDA Industry Background
- PDAs are a huge market
- In 2000, 8.9 million units sold word-wide, 2.3
billion industry - By 2005, we project the 39 million units and a
6.6 billion in sales
Total PDA Units Shipped Global Forecast, 2000
to 2005
Source Aberdeen Group, August 2001
4PDA Industry Background
Major O/S Players
5Industry Landscape
Threat of New Entrants High because of horizontal
integration For H/W, convergence of consumer
products For O/S, introduction of more flexible
platforms for applications
Competitive Rivalry Consumer Price
Wars Professional/Prosumer - Price
differentiators Palm O/S vs.MS Pocket PC
Buyer Power Strong buyer power Low switching
costs within O/S
Supplier Power Weak supplier power Industry-wide
shortages increase power
Complementors 3rd part applications
developers 3rd party hardware add-ons
Threat of Substitutes Very low, paper-based day
planners Possibly Yahoo distributed system but
not ubiquitous
6Industry segments
- Consumer
- Mostly Palm-based, difficult integration
- Palm, Handspring
- Prices 150-350
- First-mover advantage, established the standard
- Dominates the market
- Buying decisions made by consumers
- Important features price, ease of use
- Business
- Windows-based, easy integration
- Compaq, HP
- Prices 200-450
- New standard
- Rapidly growing segment
- Buying decisions made by IT managers
- Important features integration with IT systems,
uniformity across company
7Growth Forecast
- Windows-based systems overtake in 2003
- Economies of scope, scale, better margins, deeper
pockets - Is Palm next BetaMax ?
- What does this mean for HP ?
Palm and Pocket PC Global Forecast, 2000 to
2005
Source Aberdeen Group, August 2001
8Decision Tree
Devoted, small share
Continue as is
Might get larger percentage of small growth market
Alliance (cell phone, hardware)
Bigger share
Change, dominant now
N
Compete on OS
Smaller share
-
Smaller share
-
Get out of handhelds
N
Stay with MS, may become dominant
Biggest share
-
No risk, no reward
9Recommendations
- Continue to support and promote merger effort
with Compaq - Advantages of not competing head to head with
Compaq on MS OS - If merger does not succeed, we would still
maintain our current trajectory with Microsoft
OS, but would need to develop a differentiating
point between HP and Compaq - Proactively co-brand with Microsoft
- Work with Microsoft to fuel creation of killer
apps for MS OS standard