Survey of Regulatory Documents - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 26
About This Presentation
Title:

Survey of Regulatory Documents

Description:

Subpart B Guinea Pigs and Hamsters- 3.25-3.41. Subpart C Rabbits- 3.50-3.66 ... cat, nonhuman primate, guinea pig, hamster, rabbit, or any other warm blooded ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:45
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 27
Provided by: vhaatg7
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Survey of Regulatory Documents


1
Survey of Regulatory Documents
Another flaw in the human character is that
everybody wants to build and nobody wants to do
maintenance. Kurt Vonnegut (1922 - ), Hocus Poc
us
2
Law vs. Regulations vs. Guidance
3
USDA is King
  • Most important agency regulating animal
    research is the United States Department of
    Agriculture (USDA).
  • Congress gave the USDA broad authority to
    regulate animal research in the Animal Welfare
    Act.
  • USDA established Animal Welfare Act Regulations
    (AWAR), which take precedence over regulatory
    documents produced by all other agencies.
  • The USDA has published a Policy Manual that
    clarifies how some of the language in the USDA
    Animal Welfare Act Regulations should be
    interpreted.

4
Animal Care
  • The Animal Care office in the Animal and Plant
    Health Inspection Service at USDA administers the
    AWAR

5
Animal Welfare Act
USDA Animal Welfare Act Regulations
Part 2 Regulations
Part 3 Standards
Part 1 Def of Terms
Definitions 1.1
Subpart A Licensing- 2.1-2.11
Subpart B Registration- 2.25-2.27
Subpart C Research Facilities- 2.30-2.38
Subpart D Veterinary Care (exhibitors)- 2.40
Subpart E ID of Animals- 2.50-2.55
Subpart F Stolen Animals- 2.60
Subpart G Records- 2.75-2.80 Subpart H Compl wit
h Stds/Holding Periods- 2.100-2.102
Subpart I Miscellaneous 2.125-2.133
Subpart A Dogs and Cats - 3.1-3.19
Subpart B Guinea Pigs and Hamsters- 3.25-3.41
Subpart C Rabbits- 3.50-3.66 Subpart D Nonhuman
Primates- 3.75-3.92 Subpart E Marine Mammals-
3.100-3.118 Subpart F Other Warm-Blooded Animals
- 3.125-3.142
Guidance Policy Manual Policies 1-29
6
Lab Mice and Rats are Not Regulated by USDA
  • "Animal means any live or dead dog, cat, nonhuman
    primate, guinea pig, hamster, rabbit, or any
    other warm blooded animal, which is being used,
    or is intended for use for research, teaching,
    testing, experimentation, or exhibition purposes,
    or as a pet. This term excludes Birds, rats of
    the genus Rattus and mice of the genus Mus bred
    for use in research, and horses not used for
    research purposes and other farm animals, such
    as, but not limited to livestock or poultry used
    or intended for use for improving animal
    nutrition, breeding, management, or production
    efficiency, or for improving the quality of food
    or fiber. With respect to a dog, the term means
    all dogs, including those used for hunting,
    security, or breeding purposes." (USDA AWAR Part
    1, Definitions)

7
Public Health Service (PHS) Policy
  • PHS Policy on Humane Care and Use of Laboratory
    Animals (PHS Policy) incorporates compliance
    with the USDA AWAR.
  • Congress gave PHS authority to regulate animal
    research at its awardees in the Health Research
    Extension Act of 1985.
  • PHS Policy is functionally equivalent to USDA
    regulations.
  • OLAW provides written guidance that clarifies
    PHS Policy, equivalent to USDA Policy Manual.
  • PHS insiders refer to PHS Policy as the PHS
    Policy.

8
Office of Laboratory Animal Welfare
  • The Office of Laboratory Animal Welfare at NIH
    administers PHS Policy

9
Health Research Extension Act of 1985
PHS Policy on Humane Care and Use of Lab Animals
U.S. Govt Principles for Utilization and Care of
Vertebrate Animals Used in Testing, Research, and
Training
Main Body
Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals
Report of the AVMA Panel on Euthanasia
I. Introduction II. Applicability III. Defini
tions IV. Implementation by Institutions A.
Animal Welfare Assurance B. Functions of th
e Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee
C. Review of PHS-Conducted or Supported
Research Projects D. Information Required in
Apps and Proposals Submitted to PHS
E. Recordkeeping Requirements
F. Reporting Requirements
V. Implementation by PHS A. Responsibilities
of the Office of Laboratory Animal Welfare
B. Responsibilities of PHS Awarding Units
C. Conduct of Special Reviews/Site Visits
D. Waiver
Guidance OLAW Letters and Articles
10
PHS Policy Definition of Animal
  • "Animal- Any live, vertebrate animal used or
    intended for use in research, research training,
    experimentation, or biological testing or for
    related purposes." (PHS Policy, Section III.A)
  • Covers lab rodents, but only live ones.

11
US Government Principles- IRAC, 1980s
  • Part of PHS Policy. Critical concepts for
    IACUC reviewers.

I. The transportation, care, and use of animals
should be in accordance with the Animal Welfare
Act (7 U.S.C. 2131 et. seq.) and other applicable
Federal laws, guidelines, and policies.
II. Procedures involving animals should be desig
ned and performed with due consideration of their
relevance to human or animal health, the
advancement of knowledge, or the good of society.
Justification for Use of Animals
12
III. The animals selected for a procedure should
be of an appropriate species and quality and the
minimum number required to obtain valid results.
Methods such as mathematical models, computer
simulation, and in vitro biological systems
should be considered. IV. Proper use of animals
, including the avoidance or minimization of
discomfort, distress, and pain when consistent
with sound scientific practices, is
imperative. Unless the contrary is established,
investigators should consider that procedures
that cause pain or distress in human beings may
cause pain or distress in other animals.
Alternatives- the 3 Rs
Philosophy of IACUC Pain/Distress Evaluation
13
V. Procedures with animals that may cause more
than momentary or slight pain or distress should
be performed with appropriate sedation,
analgesia, or anesthesia. Surgical or other painf
ul procedures should not be performed on
unanesthetized animals paralyzed by chemical
agents. VI. Animals that would otherwise suff
er severe or chronic pain or distress that cannot
be relieved should be painlessly killed at the
end of the procedure or, if appropriate, during
the procedure.
Sole Use of Paralytics Prohibited
Need for Endpoint Criteria
14
VII. The living conditions of animals should be
appropriate for their species and contribute to
their health and comfort. Normally, the housing,
feeding, and care of all animals used for
biomedical purposes must be directed by a
veterinarian or other scientist trained and
experienced in the proper care, handling,
and use of the species being maintained or
studied. In any case, veterinary care shall be
provided as indicated. VIII. Investigators and
other personnel shall be appropriately qualified
and experienced for conducting procedures on
living animals. Adequate arrangements shall be
made for their in-service training, including the
proper and humane care and use of laboratory
animals.
Veterinary Care Required
Training Required
15
IX. Where exceptions are required in relation to
the provisions of these Principles, the decisions
should not rest with the investigators directly
concerned but should be made, with due regard to
Principle II justification for animal use, by
an appropriate review group such as an
institutional animal care and use committee. Such
exceptions should not be made solely for the
purposes of teaching or demonstration.
IACUC Review and Oversight Needed
16
VA Programs Follow USDA AWAR and PHS Policy
  • Federal law requires VA animal research
    programs to comply with USDA Animal Welfare Act
    Regulations (Animal Welfare Act, item 2(e)),
    reiterated in 1200.7, item 4b(5))
  • VHA Handbook 1200.7 (Use of Animals in
    Research) stipulates that VA programs follow PHS
    policy whether or not PHS funds are utilized
    (1200.7, item 4b(4))

17
VA Policy- 1200.7, Use of Animals in Research
  • Equivalent to USDA regulations but without
    criminal penalties.
  • Similar to PHS Policy- to get PHS funds, PHS
    Policy must be followed to get VA funds, VA
    Policy must be followed.
  • Philosophy of VA Policy USDA and PHS provide
    adequate framework for animal research
    additional VA policies only needed to address
    gaps or consistent problems in VA programs.

18
VA Authorizing Legislation Title 38 United
States Code (U.S.C.) Section 7303
VHA Handbook 1200.7, Use of Animals in Research
Appendix A CVMO Contact Info
Appendix B Special Aged Rodent Procurement
Appendix C Occupational Health and Safety
Appendix D Animal Component of Research Protocol
(ACORP)
Appendix E VA IACUC Semi-Annual Self-Review Item
s
Sections 1. Purpose 2. Background 3. Def
initions 4. Scope 5. Chief Veterinary Medic
al Officer (CVMO) VA Central Office
6. Organization at VA Medical Centers
7. VMU Operations at the VA Medical Center
8. Institutional Animal Care and Use Committees
9. Visits to VA Animal Facilities by Non-VA Fe
deral Regulators 10. Occupational Health and Safe
ty 11. References
Main Body
19
Association for Assessment and Accreditation of
Laboratory Animal Care, International (AAALAC)
Rules of Accreditation
  • Participation in AAALAC program is voluntary for
    most of the world, but mandatory for VA programs.
    (1200.7, item 7e)
  • ORD pays for a contract that covers all VA
    programs. (1200.7, item 7e)
  • All accredited programs must agree to follow
    AAALACs rules.

20
Office of Res Oversight (ORO) and Office of Res
and Development (ORD)- Missions
Secretary of the VA
Undersecretary for Health
Network/VISNs
ORD
ORO
Developing Policy, Funding Research
Monitoring Research Compliance
Performing and Supporting Research
21
ORO and ORDAnimal Research Policies
Secretary of the VA
Undersecretary for Health
Network/VISNs
ORD
ORO
1200.7, Use of Animals in Research
Memo- What to Report to ORO
(VISN Research Policies)
22
Memo- What to Report to ORO, September 8, 2005
  • Page 2, item 4 Stipulates format of deficiency
    reports
  • Pages 3-4 12 types of animal research
    deficiencies that must be reported to ORO

Note Handbook 1200.7, paragraph 8g and
subparagraphs, has additional guidance on what
must be reported, how it should be reported, and
who should be notified.
23
Memo- What to Report to ORO, September 8, 2005
  • Note VHA Handbook 1058.1 (November 19, 2004)
    entitled "Reporting Adverse Events In Research to
    The Office of Research Oversight" addresses only
    reporting requirements for human subjects
    research programs.

24
ORO/OLAW Documents
  • ORO has an agreement with OLAW (PHS Policy) to
    share information.
  • Item IV.B The cooperating agencies agree to
    share information, to the extent permitted by
    law, of mutual concern and interest regarding
    animal welfare at VA and VA-affiliated PHS
    assured institutions, including, but not limited
    to, evidence of serious noncompliance with
    standards for the care and use of laboratory
    animals, significant adverse findings regarding
    animal care and use investigated, inspected, or
    site-visited, and actions taken by the agencies
    in response to the findings.

25
Shared Compliance Information
  • VA ORO has an agreement with OLAW
  • USDA and OLAW have an agreement with FDA

Conceal a flaw, and the world will imagine the
worst. Marcus Valerius Martialis (Latin poet 40
AD-103 AD)
26
Managing Regulatory Complexity is Difficult
Some Strategies
  • Design forms (ACORP , semi-annual review forms)
    and SOPs to help investigators, IACUC Tab U,
    and animal care staff meet regulatory
    expectations.
  • Provide training so that forms and SOPs can be
    used effectively.
  • Use software to manage tasks of tracking protocol
    expiration dates, tracking animal use, generating
    correspondence, agendas and minutes, and
    generating standard regulatory reports.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com