NIH - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 34
About This Presentation
Title:

NIH

Description:

Gil Harootunian, Director, Office of Academic & Government Grants. NIH ... Director, Office of Academic & Government Grants. How To Increase the Odds? ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:76
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 35
Provided by: gilharo
Category:
Tags: nih | government | grants

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: NIH


1
NIH
  • Annual Budget 28.6 billion
  • Funds available for open competition 8.4 billion

2
Think
  • New PIs should plan on applying to an NIH grant
    three times. Rebecca Claycamp, NIH Chief
    Grants Management Officer
  • (Panel NIH 101 Primer at the National Council
    of University Research Administrators national
    conference, 2006, Washington, D.C.)

3
What are the odds?
  • NIH receives 40,000 applications for open grant
    competitions (2005).
  • Panels of 3 reviewers were given 120 applications
    each.
  • Panel has to recommend 10.
  • ODDS 121 for first-time submissions

4
How To Increase the Odds?
  • Request reviewers comments, revise with care, and
    re-submit.
  • By third submission, the odds are substantially
    more in your favor.
  • NIH asks you to identify if your application is
    new or a re-submission, as reviewers look forward
    to the latter.

5
Another Recommended Strategy
  • Identify Program Officer (PO) for your
    discipline.
  • Send PO a two-sentence email State your idea for
    research, then ask PO to point you in right
    direction
  • PO will clarify if s/he is the right one for you,
    or point you toward the correct PO
  • Then send the second, follow-up, lengthier email
    describing your research project and ask for
    response.

6
Why Do All This?
  • NIH is largest federal funder.
  • NIH has 98 different grant types.
  • Treasure of opportunities to enrich your research
    and career.
  • This is a blessing and a curse. NIH has many
    opportunities. Which one is right for you?
    Susanne Fisher, Director, Division of Receipt
    and Referral, NIH Center for Scientific Review,
    NIH Training Session, 12/5/06, Bethesda, MD

7
Start Browsing
  • First Visit NIH Guide for Grants Office of
    Extramural Research Homepage
  • Identify categories of grants good for you.
  • Visit Award Trend for New Investigator Help
  • All this can be a challenge, so talk to grants
    associate if necessary.
  • Open up a great line of communication between
    your grants officer and you. Chocolate works.
    Marcia Hahn, Director, NIH Division of Grants
    Policy, NIH Training Session, 12/5/06, Bethesda,
    MD

8
Category Research Project Grants (RPGs)
  • Usually investigator-initiated
  • Includes most R (Research) grants R01, R03,
    R15, R21, R22, R23, R33, R35, R36, R37, R55, RC1,
    PO1, P42, PN1, U01, UC1, and NIGMS P41
  • Other R grants termed other research

9
Category Research Project Grants (RPGs)
  • Four best bets
  • R15 150,000 total to stimulate research at
    colleges and universities that dont receive
    significant NIH support. Project can run 1-3
    years.
  • R21 Two-year grant for exploratory/
    developmental research (100,000 Year 1 and
    175,000 Year 2).
  • R03 50,000 x 2 years for small projects
    completed in short period.
  • R01 Original and historically oldest NIH grant
    mechanism. Award for health-related research
    fulfilling missions of NIH. No funding limit
    typical award runs up to 250,000.
  • Note These are the only four R grants allowed
    to use the modular (translationsimplified)
    budget.

10
Category Research Project Grants (RPGs)
  • R15, investigator-initiated grant, is tailored
    for faculty at colleges.
  • R15 was developed to stimulate research at
    colleges that are not major recipients of NIH
    support.
  • R15 is known as AREA, Academic Research
    Enhancement Award, grant.
  • Award runs up to 150,000 (direct costs) for 1-3
    year research project.

11
Category Research Project Grants (RPGs)
  • R15 goals
  • Enable faculty who would not otherwise have the
    chance to conduct independent research.
  • Strengthen research environment at colleges.
  • Give students exposure to and participation in
    research in biomedical and behavioral sciences.
  • R15 is research (not training) award. Do not map
    training for undergrads or grads but design
    exposure for them to meritorious research.

12
Category Research Project Grants (RPGs)
  • R15 unique opportunities
  • Special supplements are available to recruit and
    support high school and college students from
    underrepresented populations.
  • So check out R15 AREA Award past awardees,
    current guidelines, FAQs, contact information,
    and lots more.
  • Other R15 resources
  • Sample PI biographical sketch
  • Sample Modular Budget
  • Contact Information
  • Email R15 Chief Program Officer Dr. Henry
    Khachaturian about other questions or NIH-wide
    policy on R15 program.

13
CategoryCenter Grants
  • Research Center Grants
  • Established by Institutes and Centers (ICs) to
    meet special needs
  • Research and core facility
  • Example
  • Specialized (P50, U54)
  • Core grants (P30)
  • General clinical (M01)

14
CategoryResearch Training/Career Awards
  • Training Grants (T32)
  • Institutional
  • Predoctoral and postdoctoral
  • FellowshipsKirschstein NRSAs
  • Individual
  • Predoctoral (F31)
  • Postdoctoral (F32)
  • Career Awards (Ks)

15
CategoryCooperative Agreements
  • U01, U10, U13, U19, U24, U54
  • Assistance as opposed to Acquisition
  • Substantial programmatic involvement by
    college/university and NIH
  • Generally referred to as a grant
  • Usually initiated by NIH

16
Category Parent FOAs
  • NIH is committed to investigator-initiated
    research and so wants YOUR unsolicited
    applications.
  • All applications must be submitted in response to
    a Funding Opportunity Announcement (FOA).
  • NIH created "Parent" FOAs.
  • PI applies using parent electronic application
    package for his/her chosen grant award.

17
Review Process
  • Panel given 120 applications will read
    Abstracts only to make the first 50 cut.
  • Only then will reviewers read the Project
    Narratives of the remaining 50 (or 60)
    applications.
  • Three most common reasons for first cut
  • Dont follow guidelines/directions
  • Dont meet agency needs
  • Hard to read/poorly written

18
Streamlined Review
  • Applications eliminated in first 50 cut are not
    discussed by panel.
  • These applications still receive summary written
    critique from panel to help with re-submission.
  • This streamlined review process allows more
    discussion time for more meritorious
    applications.
  • This shortens review process and results in more
    scientists willing to serve as reviewers.

19
What Happens Next?
  • Recommended applications go to NIH National
    Council for 2nd level peer review/final approval.
  • Most become Approved applications en bloc.
  • Some do not due to NIH policy considerations.
  • Example NIH might be devoting a higher proportion
    of funds this year HIV/AIDS research, so one or
    two highly meritorious proposals on breast
    cancer or adolescent psychology might be bumped
    by a number of good HIV/AIDS applications

20
Other Considerations
  • NIH program balance
  • NIH availability of funds
  • NIH funding strategies
  • Example Out of 10 recommended applications, 8
    research anorexia or bilumia and 2 research
    obesity. The 2 on obesity have at least a 41
    better chance of making the final cut to
    approved applications.

21
Do Some Homework
  • Visit NIH Guide for Grants Office of Extramural
    Research Homepage to ascertain available funds,
    program priorities, and funding strategies.
  • Then you can make informed decisions about what
    research to develop this year (or next) for NIH.
  • When should you begin this process? NOW. Megan
    Columbus, NIH Program Manager for Electronic
    Submission, NIH Training Session, 12/5/06,
    Bethesda, MD

22
Develop Proposal for Review
  • Meet 5 elements for successful review
  • Science (significance)
  • Approach (design, methods, analyses, problems and
    alternatives)
  • Investigator (training, suitability)
  • Innovation (novel concepts or approaches)
  • Environment (unique features, distinct
    collaborations, institutional support)
  • Review "Updated Criteria for Evaluating Research
    Grant Applications."

23
Additional Review Criteria
  • The following are considered when reviewers for
    merit and priority score
  • Protection of human subjects
  • Inclusion of women, minorities, and children in
    research
  • Care and use of vertebrate animals in research
  • Precautions in use of biohazards
  • Meeting current NIH priority areas or Public
    Health Service initiatives such as Healthy People
    2010

24
Best Practices
  • Visit Grant Writing Tip Sheets. You will find 13
    links to best practices in developing, writing,
    and submitting grants.
  • Take advantage of NIH Grants Information. This
    service is provided to answer all inquiries
    related to grants.
  • Find answers the Frequently Asked Questions about
    NIH Grants.

25
Budget Tips
  • Do not create lump sum items.
  • Example at NIH seminar 15 pigs _at_ 15,000
  • PI had buried all surgical costs in one line
    item.
  • PI needed at least five line items
  • 15 pigs _at_ 600 each
  • Daily maintenance (40/day x 15)
  • Surgical procedures (3,000 x 2 operations x 15)
  • Surgical equipment (500 x 30 operations)
  • Surgical supplies (est. 750)

26
Budget Tips
  • Brainstorm for six budget categories
  • Senior PIs
  • Includes salary and fringe benefits (30)
  • Other personnel (postdocs, URAs)
  • Equipment
  • Travel (domestic and foreign)
  • Participant/Trainee Support (if allowable)
  • Other direct costs (e.g., supplies, consultants,
    rental fees, and agency-specific costs)

27
Evaluation Tips
  • As the saying goes, Without data, you are just
    another guy (or gal) with an opinion.
  • Design SMART assessment tools
  • Specific (narrow name target population)
  • Measurable (reference quantifiable data)
  • Achievable (possible plausible)
  • Results-oriented
  • Timebound (set deadlines)

28
Format Tips
  • No headers or footers
  • NIH electronic system will do this
  • Documents read online format for ease of reading
    electronic form
  • Example underline looks truly ugly on screen
  • Do not use special characters in file names.
  • Do not write protect the .pdf files disable
    all security features so NIH reviewers can mine
    your text.
  • Do not scan text attachments use print command
    on a word processed document to convert to a .pdf
    file.

29
Format Tips
  • Allowable fonts Arial, Helvetica, Palatino
    Linotype, or Georgia
  • 11 point of larger
  • All type must be black
  • 15 characters per inch/6 lines per inch
  • Figures, Graphs, Diagrams, Charts.
  • Color allowed
  • Smaller type size allowed as long as clear and
    black
  • Research Plan
  • Construct as single document
  • Separate for PDF files at last moment
  • NIH will not count white space toward page limit
    of entire Research Plan
  • Web links
  • Do not use because reviewers are not obligated to
    visit
  • Reviewers discouraged from visiting as it could
    compromise their anonymity.

30
E-Submission Tips
  • Agency-specific instructions are denoted with HHS
    logo.
  • Fill out SF-424 first because it populates fields
    on many other forms.
  • Yellow fields are mandatory for Grants.Gov.
  • Select white fields are also mandatory for NIH.
  • Example Credential, e.g. agency login
  • Similarly, some optional attachments are
    mandatory for specific NIH awards.
  • Example If there are 4 budget forms under
    optional attachments, one is mandatory for your
    specific grant
  • All attachments must now be in PDF. Do not scan
    documents. Generate PDFs from text files.

31
E-Submission Tips
  • After submission, PI receives 4 emails
  • Submission Receipt (Grants.Gov)
  • Validation Receipt (Grants.Gov accepts and
    forwards to federal agency)
  • Grantor Agency Retrieval Receipt
  • Grantor Agency Tracking Number
  • You have 2 weekdays to log onto eRA Commons and
    Check Status of your application (accepted or
    rejected) by NIH.
  • If Christmas falls on a weekday, Christmas counts
    in those 2 weekdays.

32
E-Submission Tips
  • You are responsible to log onto eRA Commons to
    view and validate your entire grant application
  • Check all elements, especially check the
    graphics.
  • Bookmarks for elements of application will be
    on left side of screen.
  • Ask others to check the application, too,
    especially the grants associate.
  • Bookmark and refer to NIH Electronic Submission
    of Applications Guide.
  • You have two days to do this (holidays included).
  • 4 weeks later, you can log on to learn the review
    group (and its contact info) to which your
    application has been assigned.
  • You must direct all questions to Scientific
    Review Administrator. If you contact reviewers,
    your application will be disqualified.

33
  • Frequently Asked Questions
  • Avoiding Common Errors
  • eRa Commons Help Desk
  • Phone 301-402-7469
  • Toll Free 866-504-9552
  • TTY 301-451-5939
  • Business Hours M-F, 7 a.m.-8 p.m. EST
  • Contact Grants Info
  • Phone 301-435-0714
  • TTY 301-451-0088
  • Email GrantsInfo_at_nih.gov

34
Last Words
  • There are new processes and new forms, but its
    still about the science! NIH folks, training
    sessions, Bethesda, MD December 5, 2006
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com