Panel Data Course Lecture 4 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 10
About This Presentation
Title:

Panel Data Course Lecture 4

Description:

(1) Treat the model as static, and the temporal correlation as a problem. (2) Include a dynamic specification of the model by ... GLS Shrinkage estimators: ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:137
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 11
Provided by: itde1
Category:
Tags: course | data | gls | lecture | panel

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Panel Data Course Lecture 4


1
Panel Data CourseLecture 4
  • Trinity Term 2006
  • Dr David Rueda

2
Today
  • More on Temporal Dynamics in TSCS/Panel Data.
  • First Difference Estimators.
  • Arellano and Bond.
  • Random Coefficient Models.
  • Stata Session.

3
More on Temporal Dynamics in TSCS/Panel Data (1)
  • From last week
  • Two options (1) the static and (2) the dynamic
    options.
  • (1) Treat the model as static, and the temporal
    correlation as a problem.
  • (2) Include a dynamic specification of the model
    by including a lagged dependent variable into the
    model
  • We can take the models that we did last week a
    little farther. Imagine we have a model that has
    both unit-effects and a lagged dependent
    variable.
  • What happens if we estimate this model with OLS.
    In other words, we estimate
    where

4
More on Temporal Dynamics in TSCS/Panel Data (2)
  • Note we are assuming that the errors mean is 0
    and that there is no serial correlation.
  • Lets look at the lagged dependent variable in
    more detail
  • You can see that both uit and Yit-1 contain ai.
    Which means
  • That in our OLS model one of our independent
    variables is correlated with the error terms
    which means we will have biased and inconsistent
    estimates of F and ß.
  • Possible solutions?

5
First Difference Estimators (1)
  • Anderson and Hsiao (1981) difference the series
    to get rid of the cross-sectional effects
  • which is the same as
  • Using first differences we get rid of the unit
    effects.
  • But the correlation between the independent
    variables and the errors is still a problem
    (Yit-1 and uit-1 are still correlated).

6
First Difference Estimators (2)
  • This can be resolved through the use of
    instrumental variables
  • Use a set of variables Z to predict the X that is
    a problem.
  • The Z variables need to be highly correlate to X
    but uncorrelated to uit.
  • Since there is no serial correlation
    (assumption), ?Yit-2 and Yit-2 are correlated
    with ?Yit-1 and Yit-1 but uncorrelated with ?uit.
  • So we can either use ?Yit-2 or Yit-2 as the Z
    (instrument for ?Yit-1).

7
Arellano and Bond
  • Since we are assuming that the errors mean is 0
    and that there is no serial correlation
  • ?uit is uncorrelated with all Yit and Xit for t-2
    and earlier.
  • Therefore all these variables (Yit-2, Yit-3,
    and Xit-2, Xit-3, ) can be used as instruments
    for ?Yit-1.
  • See Wawro 2002 for details.
  • Strengths of Arellano and Bond
  • Your instruments get better as N is larger.
  • The model can be applied to more complex lags of
    Y.
  • Weaknesses
  • Same problem as fixed effect model?
  • It is not possible to estimate the effect of time
    invariant factors.
  • Observations are dropped. Why?
  • For the lags we are using as instruments, we lose
    the first observation, etc.

8
Random Coefficient Models (1)
  • We will not get into this in great detail. Some
    intuitions.
  • Back to the main model
  • We have been assuming a common effect for all
    units.
  • We could assume instead a unit specific effect
  • We could then use the usual F test to check if
    the unit specific model is a better
    specification.
  • This method (comparing the two models above and
    choosing the most appropriate one) is, in a way,
    an all-or-nothing approach.
  • Instead we could compromise and find a way in
    between. This is what a random coefficient model
    does.
  • What random coefficient models do is to produce
    estimates that are a combination of the
    unit-specific and the pooled estimates.

9
Random Coefficient Models (2)
  • Steins Shrinkage estimator
  • The linear combination of the unit-specific and
    pooled OLS estimators is determined by the F test
    itself.
  • GLS Shrinkage estimators
  • The error term is considered to have the usual
    variability of uit but also the variability due
    to the differences in ß across units.
  • The estimates are a combination of the pooled OLS
    ones and of a weighted combination of the
    unit-specific estimates (the units with the
    lowest variance are the most influential).
  • In Stata 8, we can estimate a Hildreth-Houck
    random coefficient model
  • See stata session.
  • In Stata 9 there are other options (xtmixed).

10
Stata Session
  • See computer class notes.
  • See Stata file in Student_Shared folder
    (cps4.do).
  • It is annotated with explanations of commands and
    procedures.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com