Digital Childhood: - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 31
About This Presentation
Title:

Digital Childhood:

Description:

Children's bedrooms should be TV free. Recommendations based on scant empirical evidence ... Virtually all infant videos claim to be 'educational' ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:63
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 32
Provided by: rti74
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Digital Childhood:


1
Digital Childhood
  • Electronic Media in Young Childrens Lives
  • Elizabeth A. Vandewater
  • Public Health and Environment
  • Research Triangle Institute

2
Funding
  • Primary Funding
  • National Science Foundation (BCS-0623856)
  • IRADS Collaborative Research Influences of
    Digital Media on Very Young Children
  • Other Sources of Funding
  • The Kaiser Family Foundation
  • Monitoring Young Childrens Technology Use
  • Brainy Baby Corporation
  • Video as a Teaching Tool for Infants and
    Toddlers
  • Disney Corporation
  • Infant Video Viewing and Language Development

3
Young Childrens Media Landscape in the
Millennium 2000
  • Children use electronic media 2-5 hours daily
  • More time with television than any other single
    activity except sleep
  • Explosion of products marketed to the very young

  • Baby Einstein, Baby Mozart
  • Computer Lapware
  • Preschool Video Games
  • Yet, we knew relatively little about the impact
    of this use.
  • Vast majority of existing work focused on older
    children

4
Rising Concerns
  • American Academy of Pediatrics (2001)
  • No screen time children
  • No more than 2 hours daily after that
  • Childrens bedrooms should be TV free
  • Recommendations based on scant empirical evidence

5
Digital childhood Electronic media use among
infants, toddlers and preschoolers
  • Vandewater, E. A., Rideout, V., Wartella, E. A.,
    Huang, X., Lee, J. H., Shim, M. (2007).
    Pediatrics, 119, e1006-e1015

6
Research Questions
  • How much media do young children (0-6) use?
  • How much access to media do they have in the
    home?
  • How many young children fall within the American
    Academy of Pediatrics media-use guidelines?

7
Sample
  • Survey of 1051 parents of children aged 6 months
    to 6 years selected by random-digit telephone
    dialing.
  • Response rate 33
  • Calls staggered over times of day and days of the
    week.
  • Vast majority (81) of respondents were mothers.
  • Ethnicity
  • 60 non-Hispanic white, 14 Black, 20 as
    Hispanic/Latino, 6 other
  • Annual Income
  • 6 10 000 or less, 10 10 000-19 999, 13 20
    000-29 999, 21 30 000-49 000, 18 of 50
    000-74 999, 11 75 000-99 999, and 11 100
    000 or more
  • Family Structure
  • 76 two-parent family home, 23 single-parent
    family home

8
How much media do young children use?
9
How much access to media do they have in the
home?
10
Parents reasons for putting TV in their young
childs bedroom
11
How many young children fall within the AAP
media-use guidelines?
12
Conclusions
  • Young children growing up in a media saturated
    environment
  • Media and technology part of the fabric of their
    daily lives
  • Few parents follow the AAP Guidelines
  • Consequences Developmental Implications?

13
Video as a Teaching Tool for Infants and Toddlers
  • Can Babies Learn from Commercially Available
    Video?

14
Two Studies
  • Can infants and toddlers learn a novel shape from
    video?
  • Brainy Baby Shapes Colors
  • Does viewing a language based infant video impact
    infant language development?
  • Baby Einstein Baby Wordsworth First words
    around the house

15
Can infants learn a novel shape from commercial
video?
  • Assessing the Educational Impact of Brainy Baby
  • (under review, Journal of Media and Children)

16
Study Design
  • Post-test only design
  • Novel shape the crescent
  • Randomly assigned to one of two conditions
  • Experimental (n 32) 10 minutes with Brainy
    Babys Baby Shapes 1 DVD - lessons on circles,
    squares, rectangles, triangles and crescents
  • Control (n 26) 10 minutes with the same DVD
    lessons on crescents replaced with video of toys
    dancing
  • Community Sample
  • Austin, TX and surrounding areas
  • Descriptive Statistics
  • Age range 13 to 33 months Mean age 21.95
    Months. (SD 5.21)
  • Total N 58
  • 57 Boys, 43 Girls
  • Avg. Family Monthly Income 6,208

17
Study DesignProcedure
  • Children watched the video at home
  • Parents were asked to show children the video a
    minimum of 5 times per week for a three week
    period
  • Children were brought to the lab for testing
  • Roughly 5 minute warm-up period
  • 3 minute refresher video clip from the research
    video
  • Identifying shapes for the experimenter by
    pointing them out in a picture book

18
Major Findings
  • Experimental group was 9 times more likely to
    identify the crescent than the control group
  • The same results hold for children who were 24
    months or less
  • No difference between the groups on childrens
    ability to identify any other shapes

19
Differences in shape recognition for whole sample
20
Differences in shape recognition for children
under 24 months old
21
Conclusions
  • Findings suggest that young children can learn
    from video, even children under the age of two
  • Content is key when given content with a clear
    educational curricula, young children can learn
    from it
  • Further research needed to examine if children
    learn some things better from video than others

22
The Effect of Video on Infant Word Learning
  • Assessing the educational impact of
  • Baby Einstein

23
Background
  • Virtually all infant videos claim to be
    educational
  • When asked how they know Children like it
  • Current literature on the impact of video on
    language development is mixed
  • Some have found that word learning from video is
    possible (Krcmar, Grela, Lin, 2007 Linebarger
    Walker, 2005)
  • Some have found no relationship (DeLoache et al.,
    under review Robb, Richert Wartella., in
    press)
  • Still others have found negative relationships
    (Chonchaiya Pruksananonda, 2008 Zimmerman et
    al., 2007)

24
Our Question
  • Given that only 30 of children under age of 2
    follow AAP guidelines
  • Does viewing language based, commercially
    available infant video harm, not harm, or foster
    infant language development?
  • Harm - infants exposed to video should show fewer
    language gains over time
  • No harm - no difference in language gains over
    time in children exposed
  • Foster - infants exposed to video should show
    greater language gains over time

25
Study DesignCondition
  • Randomly assigned to one of two conditions
  • Experimental Group (n 126) Mailed a Baby
    Wordsworth DVD and asked to show it to child at
    least 2 times a week for next 4 weeks.
  • Control Group (n 131) Given instructions to
    keep child from being exposed to Baby Wordsworth
    DVD over next 12 weeks.

26
Experimental Longitudinal Design
  • Age range 8 to 15 months at baseline (M11.24,
    SD2.28)
  • Sample drawn from online panel provided by Survey
    Sampling International (SSI)
  • Data collected via parental report on Web-based
    surveys
  • Descriptive Statistics
  • Baseline N 453
  • Analysis N 257 (completed all 3 waves 56
    retention rate)
  • 51 Boys, 48 Girls
  • 81 White, 7 Black, 2 Latino, 4 Pacific
    Islander, 6 Native American or Other

27
Language Outcomes
  • Receptive and Expressive Language
  • Receptive Words understood
  • Expressive Words spoken
  • Communicative Development Inventory (CDI)
  • 89 words understood / spoken vocabulary
    checklist
  • DVD words understood/spoken
  • 10 words already included in CDI
  • ball, book, chair, couch, cup, home, lamp,
    kitchen, table, blanket
  • 11 words exclusively in DVD
  • bear, bed, bedroom, blocks, bowl, cat, puzzle,
    refrigerator, telephone, tree, window

28
Major Findings
  • Children exposed to the video had a higher
    receptive vocabulary (words understood) at the
    end of the study
  • The two groups did not differ on expressive
    vocabulary (words spoken).
  • Main reason the experimental group scored higher
    on the CDI was because of the 10 words the CDI
    shared with DVD script.

29
OLS Regressions Receptive Language
30
OLS Regressions Predicting Receptive Language at
Final Testing
31
Mean Differences in CDI Words Understood Over
Time
Sig
n.s.
n.s.
MANCOVA Results Time Main effect, ? .96, F (2,
238) 4.01, p on, ? .97, F (2, 238) 2.81, p 32
Mean Differences in DVD Words Understood Over
Time
Sig
n.s.
n.s.
MANCOVA Results Time Main effect, ? .97, F (2,
238) 3.05, p interaction, ? .97, F (2, 238) 3.03, P 33
Conclusions
  • Findings suggest that young children can learn
    from video, even children under the age of two
  • Content is key
  • Language Development May take longer to become
    evident than existing studies have run

34
Digital Childhood
  • Electronic Media in Young Childrens Lives
  • Elizabeth A. Vandewater
  • Public Health and Environment
  • Research Triangle Institute
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com