Accelerator Based Neutrino Physics at Fermilab - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Accelerator Based Neutrino Physics at Fermilab

Description:

Accelerator Based Neutrino Physics at Fermilab – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:71
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 44
Provided by: ECD5
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Accelerator Based Neutrino Physics at Fermilab


1
Accelerator Based Neutrino Physics at Fermilab
  • E. Craig Dukes
  • University of Virginia
  • 31 October 2008
  • SESAPS 2008

2
It has been a Decade Since Neutrino Physics
Really Got Interesting
3
A Huge Amount has been Learned in the Past Decade
4
What Remains to be Learned?
  • What is the value of ?13, the mixing angle
    between first- and third-generation neutrinos
  • Impacts mass hierarchy measurement
  • Impacts CP-violation search
  • Is the mass hierarchy normal or inverted?
  • Is ?23 maximal (45 degrees)? if so, why?
  • Are neutrinos and anti-neutrinos different?
  • Do neutrinos respect CP? If not, is CP violation
    in the neutrino sector responsible for the
    matter-antimatter asymmetry in the universe?

I will focus only on what Fermilab is doing to
address these questions, with apologies to those
involved in the efforts outside of Fermilab
5
The Past
6
Fermilab has long history of n physics
  • Last fixed target run (1997) two neutrino
    experiments DONUT and NuTeV
  • DONUT nt discovery
  • NuTeV sin2qW anomaly

DONUT
7
The Present
8
Fermilab has built two new Neutrino Beams
  • 120 GeV protons from Main Injector
  • Beam
  • 4 x 1013 p/1.87 s (0.4 MW)
  • Experiments
  • MINOS (running)
  • MINERvA (construction)
  • NOvA (beginning construction)
  • ArgoNeuT (being installed)
  • LAr5 at SOUDAN (planning)
  • 8 GeV protons from Booster
  • Beam
  • 4 x 1012 p/0.20 s
  • Experiments
  • MiniBooNE (running)
  • SciBooNE (just completed)
  • MicroBooNE (approved)

NUMI Beamline
9
MiniBooNE
Appearance Experiment nm?ne (nm?ne)
Running on anti-nms until April 2008
Rule out LSND result
Find low-energy excess
LSND Result
Designed to confirm or refute the LSND
oscillation result
10
Do We Know the Low Energy sn?
  • M.C. Martinez et al., arXiv0805.2344 nucl-th
    (2008) - K.S. Kim, L.E. Wright,
    nucl-th/0705.0049 (2007)
  • - O. Benhar, AIP Conf. Proc. 967, 111 (2007)
    - A. Butkevich, S.
    Kulagin, nucl-th/0705.1051 (2007)
  • A.V. Butkevich, arXiv0804.4102 nucl-th (2008)
    - J.E. Amaro et al., PRC 75,
    034613 (2007)
  • M.J. Vincente Vacas et al., arXiv802.1128
    nucl-th (2008) - A. Bodek et al.,
    arXiv 0708.1827 hep-ex (2007)
  • A. Bodek et al., Eur. Phys. J. C53, 349 (2008)
    - P. Lava et al., PRC
    73, 064605 (2006)
  • A.M. Ankowski et al., AIP Conf. Proc. 967, 106
    (2007) - O. Benhar et al.,
    nucl-ex/0603029 (2006)
  • A.V. Butkevich, S.A. Kulagin, arXiv0711.3223
    nucl-th (2007) - R. Bradford et al.,
    hep-ex/0602017 (2006)
  • J.E. Amaro et al., arXiv0710.5884 nucl-th
    (2007) - K.S. Kuzmin et al., Acta
    Phys. Polon. B37, 2337 (2006)
  • A.N. Anatov et al., Phys. Rev. C75, 064617
    (2007) - J. Nieves et al., Phys.
    Rev. C73, 025504 (2006)
  • T.W. Donnelly, Eur. Phys. J. A21, 409 (2007)
    - M.C. Martinez et al., PRC 73,
    024607 (2006)
  • T. Nasu et al., AIP Conf. Proc. 967, 187 (2007)
    - A. Meucci et al., Acta
    Phys. Polon, B27, 2279 (2006)
  • N. Jacjowicz et al., AIP Conf. Proc. 967, 292
    (2007) - C. Giusti et al.,
    nucl-th/0607037 (2006)
  • K.S. Kim et al., J. Phys. G34, 2643 (2007)
    - N. Jachowicz et al., NP. Proc.
    Suppl. 155, 260 (2006)
  • J.A. Caballero et al., nucl-th/0705.1429 (2007)
    - G. Co,
    ActaPhys.Polon.B37, 2235 (2006)
  • M. Martini et al., Phys. Rev. C75, 034604
    (2007) - M. Valverde et al.,
    Phys. Lett. B642, 218 (2006
  • E. Hernandez et al., Phys. Lett. B647, 452
    (2007) - M. Valverde et
    al., Phys. Lett. B638, 325 (2006)
  • A. Bodek et al., arXiv 0709.3538 hep-ex
    (2007)
  • M.V. Ivanov et al., Phys. Rev. C77, 034612
    (2008) - H. Nakamura et al.,
    hep-ph/0705.3884 (2007)

New sn calculations 2006-2008 (Sam Zeller)
QE
Single p production
DIS
11
Beware neutrino anomalies can be important!
Beta-decay anomaly
J. Chadwick, Verh. d. Deutsch. Phys. Ges. 16,
383, 1914.
Solar neutrino anomaly
Atmospheric nm/ne anomaly in proton decay
experiments
12
MINOS (Main Injector Neutrino Oscillation Search)
  • Detector
  • NUMI beam
  • Long baseline 735 km
  • 5.4 kt far detector, 1kt near
  • Optimized for nm disappearance
  • Sampling 2.54 cm Fe / 1.0 cm scint.
  • Magnetic field sign of charge
  • Goals
  • Make precision measurements of Dm232 and sin22q23
  • Confirm oscillations vs decay/decoherence

13
MINOS Results
  • Dm232 (2.43 0.13) x 10-3 eV2 (68 CL)
  • sin2(2q23) gt 0.90 (90 CL)
  • Decoherence disfavored at 5.7s
  • Decay disfavored at 3.7s

5 error!
14
MINOS Future
MINOS Plans
  • Will run through 2010 10x1020 pot
  • Want to continue running ns beyond 2011
  • Want to run anti-ns as well

Projected sin2(2q13) Sensitivity
At CHOOZ limit expect 12 ne signal events and 42
background events with 3.25x1020 protons.
15
The Immediate Future
16
MINERnA Physics Goals
  • Current and planned long-baseline experiments
    need energies from 0.5 GeV to several GeV
  • Neutrino cross sections poorly known at low
    energies ?mostly old bubble-chamber data
  • MINERnA plans to measure neutrino nucleus cross
    sections with unprecedented statistics from 1
    20 GeV
  • Neutral current p0 is a major background to ne
    appearance experiments

Main Injector Experiment for n-A
Note MiniBooNE. SciBooNE (and K2K) making these
measurements as well!
Current knowledge of CC cross sections NC cross
sections known to 50 at best
p0
17
MINERvA Detector
  • Fully active segmented scintillator detector
    5.87 tons
  • Nuclear targets He, C, Fe and Pb
  • MINOS Near Detector as muon catcher

18
MINERnA Cross Section Goals
  • Constrain charged-current quasi-elastic,
    resonance, coherent, DIS cross sections to 5
    (error on flux) for neutrino energies between 1
    and 20 GeV
  • Measure neutral current cross sections to 10
  • Note current uncertainties are
  • QE 15-20
  • resonance 20-40
  • coherent 100
  • expect 800,000 QE events
  • Similar s for other modes

nmN ? m-p
5 flux error not included
19
NOvA
  • Second generation experiment in the NUMI beamline
  • Accelerator upgrades will increase the NUMI beam
    power from 0.4 MW to 0.7 MW
  • Monochromatic off-axis beam
  • Fully active detector optimized for detection of
    nm ? ne oscillations
  • Long baseline (810 km) gives sensitivity to
    neutrino mass hierarchy

20
NOnA Detector
  • Surface detector
  • 15 kT of plastic (30) filled with liquid
    scintillator (70)
  • Liquid scintillator read out by embedded fibers
  • 385K cells, x and y
  • Longitudinal sampling 0.15 X0
  • ne efficiency 35

21
NOvA What you see in the Detector
22
NOvA Run Plan and Status
  • Run Plan
  • Run 3 years each on n and n-bar
  • For 0.7 MW this is 36 X 1020 pot
  • For 1.2 MW (superNUMI upgrade) this is 60 X 1020
    pot
  • Project X would provide 2.3 MW beam and 120-240 X
    1020 pot
  • Status
  • Budget fiasco put project behind by several
    months
  • Funding restored in August, 2008
  • CD-3a just signed (Friday) Approve start of
    limited construction
  • Aug 2012 partial detector online
  • Jan 2014 full detector online

23
NOvA Is q23 Maximal?
  • Because of NOvAs good energy resolution, it will
    make a 1 measurement of q23 through muon
    neutrino disappearance

24
NOvA What is q13?
  • NOvA designed for good electron appearance
    sensitivity down to 0.01 level
  • s(E)/E 10/vE for ne CC events

NOvA
25
NOvA CP violation sensitivity
  • NOvA will provide the first look into CP
    conservation

26
NOvA Mass Hierarchy Sensitivity
  • NOvAs long baseline makes it sensitive to the
    mass hierarchy due to the difference between
    s(nee-), s(nee-), s(nme-) in the earth

NOvA alone
NOvA T2K
27
Longer-Range Future
28
Fermilab Looks into the Future with no Collider
P. Oddone, HEPAP, Feb. 14, 2008
29
Pushing the Intensity Limits with ProjectX
Project X Replace the 40-year old Booster with
a high intensity LINAC.
30
Project X Proton Beam Power
Critical Decision 1 (CD-1) in 2010, leading to a
CD-2/3a in 2011
31
P5 Panel Recommendations
The panel recommends a world-class neutrino
program as a core component of the US program,
with the long-term vision of a large detector in
the proposed DUSEL and a high-intensity neutrino
source at Fermilab.
32
Consensus in the Neutrino Community Forming
U.S. Long Baseline Neutrino Experiment Study
(arXiv07054396) NUSAG Report, July 13, 2007
  • DUSEL far detector site
  • Longer baseline than NuMI
  • Deep underground site being prepared
  • Multi-purpose detector possible
  • Wide band beam is best can fit oscillation
    parameters using energy spectrum
  • Considerable upgrade to the current Fermilab
    intensity needed
  • Water Cerenkov of multi-100kTon size is needed
  • An equivalent sensitivity liquid argon TPC would
    be 1/3 the size

33
Next Generation Detectors Being Designed
LENA 50kT
Glacier 10-100kT
MEMPHIS 215kT /shaft
UNO 500kT
LArTPC 50kT
LANND 122kT (8x8)
34
Two Detector Technologies Favored
U.S. Long Baseline Neutrino Experiment Study
(arXiv07054396)
35
Fermilab Pursuing Aggressive Liquid Argon Program
Bonnie Fleming
Similar program underway in Europe
Staged program for RD with physics increasing
with each step
36
ArgoNeuT
  • Joint NSF/DOE Liquid Argon TPC RD program
  • 500 liter detector in NUMI beam
  • Goals
  • Demonstrate effectiveness of liquid argon
    purification techniques
  • Measure gamma vs electron discrimination
  • Measure low energy neutrino cross sections

37
MicroBooNE
  • 70/170 ton mass
  • RD (stage 2 of LArTPC program)
  • Test purity in a non-evacuated vessel
  • Full systems test of low-noise electronics
  • TPC and vessel design
  • Physics
  • Study surface running issues
  • Investigate MiniBooNE low energy excess
  • Measure neutrino cross sections
  • BNB 100K events, NuMI 60K events
  • Schedule
  • Construction 2009
  • Data 2011

38
Fermilab Decision Path Y.K. Kim
39
The Sensitivities of the Different Schemes
q13
Hierarchy
CPV
NUMI NOvA
NUMI NOvA5kT
NUMI NOvA5kTPX
NUMI 2x100kTPX
DUSEL 100kTPX
Niki Saoulidou, NUFACT08 Talk
40
Ultimate Reach Neutrino Factory
  • Advantages
  • Large neutrino fluxes
  • Little uncertainty in neutrino flux
  • Little background if sign of lepton can be
    determined
  • All n parameters measured from ne ?nm and anti-ne
    ? anti-nm
  • Dm2 sensitivity so good that hierarchy may be
    measurable with q13 0!
  • Disadvantages
  • Need to measure muon sign ? magnetic detector
    needed
  • Technology unproven lots of RD needed that
    will take time

International Design Study ZDR by 2010, RDR by
2012
41
4 GeV Neutrino Factory
CPV
Mass Hierarchy
  • Geer, Mena, Pascoli, Phys. Rev. D75, 093001,
    (2007).
  • Bross, Ellis, Geer, Mena, Pascoli, hep-ph
    arXiv0709.3889

Bands indicate running time and background
uncertainties
Magnetic cavern with two parallel solenoids (0.5T
x 34,000 m3).
Superconducting transmission line designed for
VLHC
n
42
The Future is very exciting, but. . .
  • It isnt going to come cheap! A very crude
    estimate of the costs
  • DUSEL 500M
  • Fermilab beamline to DUSEL 250M
  • Project X 1,000M
  • A new detector for DUSEL 500M-1,000M
  • Total 2,250M-2,750M
  • Neutrino factory 2,100M-2,700M
  • Note NOvA (beam upgrade) 270M
  • Note US LHC 500M over a decade
  • It is clear that an international effort is
    needed
  • It is clear that this will be a decades-long
    program, unless we are lucky and q13 and d are
    large!

43
But the Government is in a Generous Mood. . .
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com