Title: Process and Measurement System Capability Analysis
1Chapter 7
- Process and Measurement System Capability Analysis
27-1. Introduction
- Process capability refers to the uniformity of
the process. - Variability in the process is a measure of the
uniformity of output. - Two types of variability
- Natural or inherent variability (instantaneous)
- Variability over time
- Assume that a process involves a quality
characteristic that follows a normal distribution
with mean ?, and standard deviation, ?. The upper
and lower natural tolerance limits of the process
are - UNTL ? 3?
- LNTL ? - 3?
37-1. Introduction
- Process capability analysis is an engineering
study to estimate process capability. - In a product characterization study, the
distribution of the quality characteristic is
estimated.
47-1. Introduction
- Major uses of data from a process capability
analysis - Predicting how well the process will hold the
tolerances. - Assisting product developers/designers in
selecting or modifying a process. - Assisting in establishing an interval between
sampling for process monitoring. - Specifying performance requirements for new
equipment. - Selecting between competing vendors.
- Planning the sequence of production processes
when there is an interactive effect of processes
on tolerances - Reducing the variability in a manufacturing
process.
57-1. Introduction
- Techniques used in process capability analysis
- Histograms or probability plots
- Control Charts
- Designed Experiments
67-2. Process Capability Analysis Using a
Histogram or a Probability Plot
- 7-2.1 Using a Histogram
- The histogram along with the sample mean and
sample standard deviation provides information
about process capability. - The process capability can be estimated as
- The shape of the histogram can be determined
- Histograms provide immediate, visual impression
of process performance
7Example 7-1
- Pgs. 353-354
- This procedure works if data are distributed
normally
8Reasons for poor process capability
- See Fig. 7-3
- Poor process centering
- Assume that this can be corrected
- Excess process variability
- Harder to correct
97-2.2 Probability Plotting
- Probability plotting is useful for
- Determining the shape of the distribution
- Determining the center of the distribution
- Determining the spread of the distribution.
- Recall normal probability plots (Chapter 2)
- The mean of the distribution is given by the 50th
percentile - The standard deviation is estimated by
- 84th percentile 50th percentile
107-2.2 Probability Plotting
- Cautions in the use of normal probability plots
- If the data do not come from the assumed
distribution, inferences about process capability
drawn from the plot may be in error. - Probability plotting is not an objective
procedure (two analysts may arrive at different
conclusions).
11Example
- See Fig. 7-4
- First, mest 260 psi
- Then, sest 298 260 38 psi
- Can also use normal probability plot to estimate
fallout - If LSL 200 psi
- Then, from Fig 7-4, about 5 will be below that
value
127-3. Process Capability Ratios
- 7-3.1 Use and Interpretation of Cp
- Recall
- where LSL and USL are the lower and upper
specification limits, respectively.
137-3.1 Use and Interpretation of Cp
- The estimate of Cp is given by
- Where the estimate can be calculated using
the sample standard deviation, S, or -
147-3.1 Use and Interpretation of Cp
- Piston ring diameter in Example 5-1
- The estimate of Cp is
-
157-3.1 Use and Interpretation of Cp
- One-Sided Specifications
- These indices are used for upper specification
and lower specification limits, respectively
16Example 7-2
17Table 7-3
- Process fallout for one- and two-sided
specifications
187-3.1 Use and Interpretation of Cp
- Assumptions
- The quantities presented here (Cp, Cpu, Clu) have
some very critical assumptions - The quality characteristic has a normal
distribution. - The process is in statistical control
- In the case of two-sided specifications, the
process mean is centered between the lower and
upper specification limits. - If any of these assumptions are violated, the
resulting quantities may be in error.
19Table 7-4
- Recommended minimum values of the PCR
- For example, a new process with two-sided
specifications has a recommended Cp of 1.50 - This implies that process fallout would be 7 ppm
- Six s would result in a Cp of 2.0
207-3.2 Process Capability Ratio on
Off-Center Process
- Cp does not take into account where the process
mean is located relative to the specifications. - A process capability ratio that does take into
account centering is Cpk defined as - Cpk min(Cpu, Cpl)
21Figure 7-7
- All of the panels in the figure have Cp 2.0
- But, when the process mean shifts, the capability
of the process can change - Note that s does not shift
22Figure 7-7, cont.
- For panel b, N(53, 22)
- Cpk min(Cpu, Cpl)
- Cpu (62-53)/3(2) 1.5
- Cpl (53-38)/3(2) 2.5
- Cpk 1.5
237-3.3 Normality and the Process
Capability Ratio
- The normal distribution of the process output is
an important assumption. - If the distribution is nonnormal, Luceno (1996)
introduced the index, Cpc, defined as
24Example
- USL 90, LSL 80
- So, T (90 80)/2 85
- (T target value)
- Let X 84
- Then, Cpc 1.33
- (Be careful with this resultI dont trust it!)
257-3.3 Normality and the Process
Capability Ratio
- A capability ratio involving quartiles of the
process distribution is given by - In the case of the normal distribution Cp(q)
reduces to Cp
26Why does it reduce to Cp?
- In the case of the normal distribution
- x.00135 m 3s
- x.99865 m 3s
277-4. Process Capability Analysis Using a
Control Chart
- If a process exhibits statistical control, then
the process capability analysis can be conducted.
- A process can exhibit statistical control, but
may not be capable. - PCRs can be calculated using the process mean and
process standard deviation estimates.
28Example
297-5. Process Capability Analysis Designed
Experiments
- Systematic approach to varying the variables
believed to be influential on the process.
(Factors that are necessary for the development
of a product). - Designed experiments can determine the sources of
variability in the process.
30Example
- Machine that fills bottles with a soft-drink
beverage - Each machine has many filling heads that are
independently adjusted - Quality characteristic measured is syrup content
in degrees brix - Three possible causes of variabililty
- Machines, heads, analytical tests
31Example, cont.
- Variability is sB2 sM2 sH2 sA2
- Conduct an experiment
- Say the result is as shown in Fig. 7-12
- Head-to-head variability is large
- Improve the process by reducing this variance
327-7 Setting spec limits on discrete components
- Setting specifications to insure that the final
product meets specifications - As discussed previously, if normally distributed
variables are linked, the result is normally
distributed with mean the sum of the individual
means, and variance the sum of the individual
variances
33Example 7-9
34Example 7-10
35Example 7-11
367-8 Estimating tolerance limits
- Confidence limits
- Provide an interval estimate of the parameters of
a distribution - Tolerance limits
- Indicate the limits between which we can expect
to find a specified proportion of a population
377-8.1 Tolerance limits based on the normal
distribution
- Suppose xN(m, s2), both unknown
- Take a sample of size n and compute xbar and S2
- Natural tolerance limits might be estimated
using - Xbar Za/2S
- Since xbar and S are only estimates, the interval
may or may not always contain 100(1-a) of the
distribution
387-8.1 Tolerance limits based on the normal
distribution
- However, we may use a constant K such that in a
large number of samples a fraction g of the
intervals xbar KS will include at least
100(1-a) of the distribution - Values of K are tabulated in Appendix Table VII
- 2.01
39Example 7-13
40Assignment
- Work odd-numbered exercises on the topics covered
in class
41End