CRADAs Under 15 U'S'C' 3710a - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 47
About This Presentation
Title:

CRADAs Under 15 U'S'C' 3710a

Description:

There are a variety of tools for working with outside parties. The different tools are not in conflict ... RONALD REAGAN. The White House. April 10, 1987. 25 May 2004 ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:96
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 48
Provided by: onr9
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: CRADAs Under 15 U'S'C' 3710a


1
CRADAs Under 15 U.S.C. 3710a
  • Technology Innovation Legislation Applicable to
    All Federal Agencies

2
Tools of T2
  • There are a variety of tools for working with
    outside parties
  • The different tools are not in conflict
  • It is the responsibility of the laboratory with
    the advice and review of legal counsel to select
    the proper tool
  • A powerful tool for doing research with a
    collaborator and/or teaching/learning from or/
    with a collaborator is the Cooperative Research
    and Development Agreement

3
History of Technology Innovation Legislation 1
  • 1980
  • Stevenson-Wydler Technology Innovation Act (P.L.
    96-480)
  • 1st of a series of laws to define promote
    technology transfer. S-W made it laboratory
    mission to promote Technology Transfer (T2) and
    set aside a portion of agency budget for T2.
  • Bayh-Dole Act (P.L. 96-517)
  • Created boundaries and allowed small business,
    universities, and not-for-profit org. to own IP
    from Federal Funded Research.

4
History of Technology Innovation Legislation 2
  • 1982
  • Small Business Innovation Development Act (P.L.
    97-219) (SBIR)
  • Established SBIR program requiring agencies to
    set aside funds for small business RD.
  • 1986
  • Federal Technology Transfer Act (P.L. 99-502)
  • Major legislation that created CRADAs and a
    funding scheme for FLC

5
History of Technology Innovation Legislation 3
  • 1987
  • Executive Order 12591
  • Facilitating Access to Science and Technology to
    assist universities the private sector by
    transferring technical knowledge.
  • Most important, 4 discuss the procedure for
    dealing transferring information to a FOCI.
  • 1988
  • Omnibus Trade and Competitiveness Act (P.L.
    100-418)
  • Part of a series improving T2. established
    Industrial Extension Services Information
    clearing houses .

6
History of Technology Innovation Legislation 4
  • 1989
  • National Competitiveness Technology Transfer Act
    (P.L. 101-189)
  • Additional modifications of scope of CRADAs
    specific clauses added for protection of Trade
    Secrets as well as creating a Fed. Government
    equivalent of trade secrets (FOIA exception).
  • 1991
  • American Technology Preeminence Act (P.L.
    102-245)
  • IP could be a contribution.
  • Excess equipment could be contributed to higher
    Education.

7
History of Technology Innovation Legislation 5
  • 1992
  • Small Business Research Development Enhancement
    (P.L. 102-564)
  • Extended SBIR program established STTR program.
  • 1994
  • National Department of Defense Authorization Act
    (P.L. 103-160)
  • Broadened definition of a laboratory

8
History of Technology Innovation Legislation 6
  • 1995
  • National Technology Transfer Advancement Act
    (P.L. 104-113)
  • Major revisions to S-W Act making CRADAs more
    attractive to laboratories, scientists and
    private industry assuring them of IP rights in
    joint research.
  • Increased Government inventors share of royalties
    to up to 150,000.

9
History of Technology Innovation Legislation 7
  • 2000
  • Technology Transfer Commercialization Act (P.L.
    106-404)
  • Recognizes success of CRADAs and expanded
    licensing authority.
  • Permitted licensing of background rights in
    Government owned inventions without need to
    advertise.
  • Reduced advertising period for Government
    inventions to 15 days.

10
History of Technology Innovation Legislation 8
  • Each year, changes are often slipped into the
    funding bills of DoD or DoE.
  • A bill is currently wending its way through
    Congress that treats as an invention from one
    party inventions made by collaborative research
    so long as there is a formal agreement in writing
    to do the research (exempt from consideration as
    prior art).

11
Major Provisions of Title 15- Commerce
TradeChapter 63 Technology Innovation
  • 3701 Findings
  • Central to economic etc. of US
  • Improve standard of living
  • Improvements occur at Government and University
    labs need to be transferred to public through
    cooperation and collaboration
  • Small business important to advancing innovation
  • Innovation in US maybe lagging

12
Major Provisions II
  • 3701 Findings cont.
  • Increased innovation in US would reduce trade
    deficit etc.
  • Government antitrust, economic, trade, patent,
    procurement, regulatory, research and development
    and tax policies have significant impacts on
    industrial innovation
  • No comprehensive national policy exists need
    domestic policy to better utilize technology at
    Federal Government Labs
  • National interest to promote adaptation of
    Federal innovation to State and local government
    use.

13
Major Provisions III
  • 3701 Findings cont.
  • The Federal laboratories and other performers of
    federally funded research and development
    frequently provide scientific and technological
    developments of potential use to State and local
    governments and private industry. These
    developments, which include inventions, computer
    software, and training technologies, should be
    made accessible to those government and industry.
    There is a need to provide means of access and
    to give adequate personnel and funding support to
    these means.
  • The Nation should give fuller recognition to
    individuals and companies which have made
    outstanding contributions to the promotion of
    technology improvement of the economic,
    environmental, or social well-being of the United
    States.

14
Major Provisions IV
  • 3702. Purpose
  • It is the purpose of this chapter to improve the
    economic, environmental, and social well-being of
    the United States by
  • (1) establishing organizations in the executive
    branch to study and stimulate technology
  • (2) promoting technology development through the
    establishment of cooperative research centers
  • (3) stimulating improved utilization of federally
    funded technology developmentsby Stateand the
    private sector

15
Major Provisions V
  • 3702. Purpose (cont.)
  • (4) providing encouragement for the development
    of technology through the recognition of
    individuals and companies which have made
    outstanding contributions in technology and
  • (5) encouraging the exchange of scientific and
    technical personnel among academia, industry, and
    Federal laboratories.
  • 3703. Definitions see text

16
Major Provisions VI
  • 3704. Commerce and Technological Innovation
  • Established a technology administration that
    includes Nat. Institute of Standards Nat.
    Technical Information Service a policy analysis
    office known as Office of Technology Policy.
  • Among duties is Japanese technical literature
  • Experimental Program to Stimulate Competitive
    Technology

17
Major Provisions VII
  • 3704a. Clearinghouse for StateInitiatives on
  • 3704b. National Technical Information Service
  • 3704b-1. (NTIS) Recovery of Operating Costs
    Through Fee Collections
  • 3704b-2. Transfer of federal Scientific and
    Technical Information (through NTIS)
  • 3705. Cooperative Research Centers
  • 3706. Grants Cooperative Agreements (in
    support of this section)

18
Major Provisions VIII
  • 3707. National Science Foundation Cooperative
    Research Centers
  • 3708. Administrative Arrangements
  • Sense of Congress that departments and
    agenciesshouldsupport and participate in
    activities or projects authorized by this
    chapter.
  • 3709. Repealed

19
Major Provisions IX
  • 3710. Utilization of Federal Technology
  • (a) Policy
  • (1) It is the continuing responsibility of the
    Federal Government to ensure the full use of the
    results of the results of the Nations Federal
    investment in research and development. To this
    end the Federal Government shall strive where
    appropriate to transfer federally owned or
    originated technology to Stateand to the private
    sector.
  • (2) Technology transfer, consistent with mission
    responsibilities, is a responsibility of each
    laboratory science and engineering professional.

20
Major Provisions X
  • 3710. cont.
  • (3) Each laboratory director shall ensure that
    efforts to transfer technology are considered
    positively in laboratory job descriptions,
    employee promotion policies, and evaluation of
    the job performance of scientist and engineers in
    the laboratory.
  • (b) Establishment of Research and Technology
    Applications Offices (ORTA)
  • Each lab with 200 should have full-time
    equivalent
  • Sufficient funding
  • Training

21
Major Provisions XI
  • 3710. cont.
  • (c) Functions of Research and Technology
    Applications Offices
  • (d) Dissemination of technical information (by
    NTIS)
  • (e) Establishment of Federal Laboratory
    Consortium for Technology Transfer (supported by
    tax on RD )
  • (f) Agency reports on utilization (with budget
    submission)
  • (g) Functions of Secretary (DoC)

22
Major Provisions XII
  • 3710. cont.
  • (h) Duplication of reporting
  • (i) Research equipment
  • The Director of a laboratorymay loan, lease, or
    give research equipment that is excess to the
    needs of the laboratory, agency, or department to
    an educational institution or nonprofit
    organization for the conduct of technical and
    scientific education and research activities.
    Title of ownership shall transfer with a gift
    under this section.

23
Summary to This Point
  • 1. Congress thinks that research done at Federal
    Labs is of value.
  • 2. Congress thinks that transferring the Federal
    funded research product to the private sector for
    manufacture use in US will help US economy.
  • 3. Yes! This is a wrap-yourself in the Flag type
    of law.
  • 4. Periodically, Congress wants a report on
    CRADAs submitted to it with agency Budget request.

24
Major Provisions XIII
  • 3710a. Cooperative Research Development
    Agreements
  • (a) General Authority
  • Each Federal agency may permit the director
    ofFederal laboratories
  • (1) to enter into cooperative research and
    development agreements with just about anyone
    except another foreign government and
  • (2) to negotiate licensing agreements under 207
    of title 35 for inventions made or other
    intellectual property developed at the laboratory

25
Major Provisions XIV
  • 3710a. Cont.
  • (b) Enumerated authority
  • (1) laboratory may grant, or, in advance , to a
    collaborating party patent licenses or
    assignments, or options in any invention made
    in whole or in part by a laboratory employee
    under the agreement Navy policy prefers only
    granting an option
  • Subject to 35 U.S.C. 209, can option or
    license pre-existing Fed owned invention related
    to Subject of CRADA
  • Pre-negotiated field of use.
  • If more than one party, collective license.
  • Government license.

26
Major Provisions XV
  • 3710a(b)(1) cont.
  • (A) A nonexclusive, nontransferable, irrevocable,
    paid-up license (Government license) from the
    collaborating party to the laboratory to practice
    the invention or have the invention practiced
    throughout the world
  • Government shall not publicly disclose trade
    secrets etc. or Government equivalent.
  • (B) If a laboratory assigns title
    March-in-rights
  • (C) Government may exercise its right under
    subparagraph (B) only in exceptional
    circumstances with determination relating to
    health and safety in view of non-performance

27
Major Provisions XVI
  • 3710a(b)(2) cont.
  • (2) Under agreements pursuant to subsection
    (a)(1) laboratory shall ensure that a
    collaborating party may retain title subject
    to Government license
  • Original existing statute language
  • 3710a(b)(3)
  • (3) Under an agreement entered into pursuant to
    subsection (a)(1) of this section, a laboratory
    may-

28
Major Provisions XVII
  • 3710a(b)(3) laboratory may - cont.
  • (A) accept, retain, and use funds, personnel,
    services, and property from a collaborating party
    and provide personnel, services, and property to
    a collaborating party
  • (B) use funds received from a collaborating party
    in accordance with subparagraph (A) to hire
    personnel to carry out the agreement who will not
    be subject to full-time-equivalent restrictions
  • (C) to the extent consistent with any applicable
    agency requirements or standards of conduct
    permit inventor to commercialize invention

29
Major Provisions XVIII
  • 3710a(b)(3) cont.
  • (D) waive subject to Government license in
    advance, in whole or in part, any right of
    ownership Feds may have to any subject
    invention made under the agreement by
    collaborator
  • 3710a(b)(4)
  • (4) A collaborating party in an exclusive license
    in any invention made under an agreement entered
    into pursuant to subsection (a)(1) of this
    section shall have the right of enforcement under
    chapter 29 of title 35.

30
Major Provisions XIX
  • 3710a(b)(5)
  • (5) A GOCO provisions relating to GOCOs
  • 3710a(c) Contract considerations
  • (1) A Federal agency may issue regulations
    Navy has!
  • (2) The agency in permitting a Federal laboratory
    to enter into agreements under this section shall
    be guided by the purposes of this chapter. Hey,
    go back and read 3702 again!!!!!

31
Major Provisions XX
  • 3710a(c)(3)
  • (A) Any agency using the authority given under
    subsection (a) of this section shall review
    standards of conduct for its employees problem
    areas in approving CRADAs and licenses and
    receiving royalties are mentioned
  • (B) If, in implementing subparagraph (A), an
    agency is unable to resolve potential conflicts
    of interest propose necessary statutory changes
    to be forwarded to its authorizing committees in
    Congress.

32
Major Provisions XXI
  • (c) Contract considerations cont.
  • (4) The laboratory director in deciding what
    cooperative research and development agreements
    to enter into shall
  • (A) give special consideration to small business
    firms, and consortia involving small business
    firms and
  • (B) give preference to business units located in
    the United States which agree that products
    embodying inventions made under the (CRADA) or
    produced through the use of such invention will
    be manufactured substantially in the (US) FOCI

33
Major Provisions XXII
  • (c) Contract considerations cont.
  • (5)(A) If the head of the agency or his designee
    desires an opportunity to disapprove or require
    the modification of any such agreement presented
    by the director of a Government-operated
    laboratory, the agreement shall provide a 30-day
    period
  • (B) In any case which the head of an agency
    disapproves head shall transmit a written
    explanation to the head of the laboratory
    concerned.
  • (C) (D) both subparagraphs pertain to GOCOs

34
Major Provisions XXIII
  • (c) Contract considerations cont.
  • (6) Each agency shall maintain a record of all
    agreements entered into under this section.
  • (7)
  • (A) No trade secrets or commercial or financial
    information that is privileged or confidential
    which is obtained in the conduct of research or
    as a result of activities from a non-Federal
    party participating in a CRADA shall be
    disclosed. Note no time limit
  • (B) The director for a period of up to 5 years
    after development of information that results
    from CRADA that would have been trade secret
    if from a non-Federal parties it can be
    protected

35
Major Provisions XXIV
  • (d) Definitions cont.
  • As used in this section
  • (1) the term cooperative research and
    development agreement means any agreement
    between one or more Federal laboratories and one
    or more non-Federal parties under which the
    Government, through its laboratories, provides
    personnel, services, facilities, equipment,
    intellectual property, or other resources with or
    without reimbursement (but not funds to
    non-Federal parties) and the non-Federal parties
    provide funds, personnel, services, facilities,
    equipment, intellectual property, or other
    resources toward conduct of specified research
    consistent with the missions of the laboratory
    except not a contract or cooperative agreement
    under 31 U.S.C. 6303, 6304 6305

36
Major Provisions XXV
  • (d) Definitions cont.
  • (2) the term laboratory means
  • (A) a facility or group of facilities owned,
    leased, or otherwise used by a Federal agency, a
    substantial purpose of which is the performance
    of research, development, or engineering by
    employees of the Federal Government
  • (B) specific to GOCO
  • (C) specific to GOCO
  • (3) specific to GOCO
  • (4) specific to DoE

37
Major Provisions XXVI
  • (e) Determination of laboratory missions
  • For the purposes of this section, an agency shall
    make separate determinations of the mission or
    missions of each of its laboratories.
  • (f) Relationship to other laws
  • Nothing in this section is intended to limit or
    diminish existing authorities of any agency.
  • (g) Principles this is specific GOCO

38
Review to this Point 2
  • A CRADA can be signed by the laboratory CO or
    designee in chain of command (Navy Policy).
  • A lab can accept money under a CRADA.
  • A lab can not fund the CRADA partner.
  • Conflicts of Interest should be avoided.
  • All DoN facilities (Navy USMC) that do test,
    evaluation, research engineering are designated
    as a laboratory for 15 U.S.C. 3710a. (Navy
    Policy Determination)

39
A Comparison of Trade Secret Treatment
40
Executive Order 12591(a)
  • Section 1. Transfer of Federally Funded
    Technology encourages T2
  • Section 2. Establishment of the Technology Share
    Program
  • Section 3. Technology Exchange Scientists and
    Engineers
  • Section 4. International Science and Technology
  • Requires review of T2 with FOCI

41
Executive Order 12591(b)
  • Section 5. Technology Transfer from the DoD
  • the Secretary of Defense shall identify a list
    of funded technologies that would be potentially
    useful to US industries and universities. The
    Secretary shall then accelerate efforts to make
    these technologies more readily available to US
    industries and universities.
  • Section 6. Basic Science and Technology Centers
  • Section 7. Reporting Requirements
  • Section 8. Relation to Existing Law
  • RONALD REAGAN
  • The White House
  • April 10, 1987

42
Major Provisions XXVII
  • 15 U.S.C. 3710b. Rewards for Scientific,
    Engineering, and Technical Personnel of Federal
    Agencies
  • Inventions, innovations, computer software, etc.
  • Exemplary activities that promote the domestic
    transfer
  • 15 U.S.C. 3710c.
  • long complicated system of sharing royalties
    received by the Government for patented invention
    with inventor(s).

43
Major Provisions XXVIII
  • 15 U.S.C. 3710d. Employee Activities
  • (a) Where US can take title and declines, it can
    be left with inventors subject to certain
    conditions
  • (b) Special Government employees defined
  • (c) Relationship to other laws
  • 15 U.S.C. 3711. National Technology Medal
  • 15 U.S.C. 3711a. Malcolm Baldrige National
    Quality Award
  • 15 U.S.C. 3711b. Conference on Advanced
    Automotive Tech.
  • 15 U.S.C. 3711c. Advanced Motor Vehicle Rsch.
    Award

44
Major Provisions XXIX
  • 15 U.S.C. 3712. Personnel Exchanges
  • Sec. DoC and NSF establish program to exchange
    science personnel
  • 15 U.S.C. 3713. Authorization of Appropriations
  • 15 U.S.C. 3714. Spending Authority
  • 15 U.S.C. 3715. Use of Partnership
    Intermediaries separate Instruction
  • 15 U.S.C. 3716. Critical Industries

45
Supporting Cast at Navy DoD.
  • Thomas E. McDonnell, Patent Counsel of the Navy
  • ? 703-696-4000, ? 703-696-6909
  • A. David Spevack, Supervisory. Assoc. Cnsl (IP)
    ONR,
  • ? 703-696-4007, ?703-696-6909
  • Charles H. Harris, Assoc. Counsel (IP) ONR
  • ?703-696-4017, ?703-696-6909
  • Nancy Groves, Program Mgr. T2 ONR,
  • ? 703-696-5991, ? 703-696-4884
  • Dorothy Vincent, Tech Transfer Specialist, ONR,
  • ? 703-696-4792, ? 703-696-4884
  • http//www.onr.navy.mil/sci_tech/industrial/tt.htm
  • Cynthia Gonsalves, Program Mgr.T2, DoD,
  • ?703- 607-5315, ? 703-607-5328

46
Reference Web Resources
  • ONR Technology Transfer Office
  • - http//www.onr.navy.mil/sci_tech/industrial/362
    /
  • Navy CRADA Reference Tool
  • - http//www.onr.navy.mil/sci_tech/industrial/362
    /tech_tran/res_docs.asp
  • NARDIC
  • - www.onr.navy.mil KEYWORD NARDIC
  • - POC is Karen Armentani (215) 697-9531

47
CRADAs Under 15 U.S.C. 3715a
Bye
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com