Research Career Mentoring in Communication Sciences - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 26
About This Presentation
Title:

Research Career Mentoring in Communication Sciences

Description:

Using an Endangered Species Model. Western Lowland Gorilla. Horned Puffin ... Species as Endangered. Numbers alone will not perpetuate the discipline. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:36
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 27
Provided by: christophe46
Learn more at: http://www.asahp.org
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Research Career Mentoring in Communication Sciences


1
Research Career Mentoring in Communication
Sciences DisordersDuring a Period of Species
Endangerment
  • Christopher A. Moore, Ph.D.Professor and Chair
  • University of Washington

2
Consideration of CSD Mentoring Training Using
an Endangered Species Model
3
Threats Can Present Opportunities
  • There are administrative opportunities to create
    a research-centric program - including doctoral
    research training
  • There are comparatively few programs providing
    sustainable academic research training in CSD.
  • The opportunities for new or rising CSD programs
    are relatively rich compared to more densely
    populated disciplines (e.g., chemistry).
  • An investment of 14 faculty positions can anchor
    a new program.
  • Students, demand for graduates, and career paths
    are all in place.
  • NIDCD support is unparalleled.

4
Identification of a Species as Endangered
  • For most species, the problems and solutions are
    complex interactions of multiple factors.
  • Recruitment
  • Retention
  • Training
  • Propagation
  • Nurturing
  • Survival

5
Identification of a Species as Endangered
  • Propagation rate is exceeded by mortality
  • Annual shortfall of new PhDs in CSD is about 100
    with respect to faculty openings. Even
    assuming that all new PhDs go into academic
    research, the shortfall is dire.

6
Identification of a Species as Endangered
  • Numbers alone will not perpetuate the discipline.
    The propagation of CSD as a discipline depends
    on a healthy population of academic researchers.
  • Distinct from master clinicians or accomplished
    teachers, these researchers provide the
    foundation for new knowledge in treatment and
    advanced instruction.
  • Whos tending the pipeline?

7
Identification of a Species as Endangered
  • The less-quantifiable, far more insidious threat
    degradation of research training
  • Responding to increasing need, faculty are
    increasingly hired with lower levels of research
    training experience (post-docs are rare in CDS)
  • Teaching loads rise with shortages, reducing time
    allocated to research training
  • Its not too late for junior faculty.
  • Formalized continued mentorship (local or
    external)
  • Formalized expectations, including continued
    training, as needed

8
Optimizing Habitat
  • How can academic research programs improve the
    recruitment, retention, and training of our
    successors?
  • Make pigs sing annoy pigs
  • We know of many other strategies that arent
    working, and some that help individuals, but not
    the discipline or dept.
  • Can youShould youWhy would you want toprovide
    administrative guidane, viion, and mucle to
    make strategic (i.e., lab group) hires to create
    effective research habitat.

9
Incubation by Acculturation
  • Inevitably raises self-expectations establishes
    a model of performance and protocol
  • Reduces organizational demand on individuals
  • Provides redundancy in identifying areas of
    training importance, thereby reducing gaps
  • Establishes a long-term community

10
IncubatingFuture Research Faculty
  • Explicit attention to research training as the
    primary objective for those seeking the research
    doctorate
  • Exploiting all available resources to enhance
    research training
  • Removing threats, barriers, and distracters from
    research training.

11
Training Elements
  • Culture
  • Mentoring
  • Curriculum
  • Funding

12
Specific Training ElementsCulture
  • Creating a more general culture of expectation
  • Joining with established research groups
  • Promoting participation in the larger culture
    (e.g., presentations at scientific meetings
    specific to the students research area

13
Specific Training ElementsMentoring
  • Use a Strong Mentoring Model
  • Include students in mentors work
  • e.g., manuscript review, human subjects
    approvals, purchasing, analysis)
  • Build toward solid, early independence (its
    unlikely theres a post-doc in his/her future).
  • Create expectations that build toward career
    goals at a high level (e.g., scientific
    presentations, journal publications,
    grantwriting, technical skills)
  • Within each research group, stay product-focused

14
Specific Training ElementsCurriculum
  • Departmental core-discipline curriculum
  • e.g., speech acoustics, speech physiology,
    bioacoustics, psychoacoustics, spoken language
    production, speech perception, speech, language,
    and hearing development
  • Research forum as an incubator
  • Grant writing (e.g., require an F31 app)
  • Lab rotations have advantages and disadvantages

15
Specific Training ElementsGrants
  • Training Grants (T32 or F31) andResearch Grants
    (e.g., R01, R15, R21)
  • Enforce a common research focus within a
    research group

16
Specific Training ElementsGrants
NIH 20-year survey of research training
Institutional trainingIndividual training
awardsResearch assistantships
17
Specific Training ElementsGrants
  • Matching educational goals with research support
  • e.g., using doctoral students as clinic
    supervisors only when their research area or
    career focus includes supervision.

18
Threats
19
Specific Threats
  • High teaching and supervisory expectations
  • Reduced research exposure
  • Part-time enrollment denies the student the
    opportunities afforded by a cohort.
  • Overprotection

20
Specific ThreatsCultural Insufficiency
  • Science in a vacuum
  • A viable cohort is essential
  • Abandoning the basic sciences
  • Ever-increasing M.S. certification requirements
  • Clinical doctorate (AuD, SLPD)
  • Diverting basic research support and students
    into advanced clinical training

21
Possible Actions When a Cohort is Too Small to
Thrive
  • Merging with healthy populations
  • Cross-breeding to take advantage of established
    disciplines strong traditions, habitats, and
    cultures of research rigor
  • With other departments
  • Across universities
  • Capitalizing on the strengths of other species
    (e.g., psychology, physiology, neuroscience)

22
How small is too small?
  • Too small to provide a sense of community
  • Too small to justify the resources (attention,
    teaching load, space) necessary to provide the
    community
  • Doctoral students are too rare to yield a regular
    pattern
  • Too small to offer doctoral-level coursework
    overly reliant on independent study.

23
Training PitfallsProgrammatic
  • Still-growing programs
  • No generation is expendable
  • Building research programs that rely too heavily
    on hired (i.e., non-student) researchers.
  • Future mentors without adequate research training

24
Strategies
  • Getting by
  • Ramping up
  • Building a Whole Department

25
Alternatives
Raphus cucullatus ( - 1681)
26
camoore_at_u.washington.edu
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com