Title: Fixed-Mobile Convergence
1Fixed-Mobile Convergence
- Regulatory Point of View
- Daniel Rosenne
- Director General, Ministry of Communications,
Israel - rosenned_at_moc.gov.il
2Presentation Agenda
- What is Fixed-Mobile Convergence?
- Market realities Mobile versus Fixed
- The future unified regulation
- Example the case of Israel
- Conclusions.
3What isFixed-Mobile Convergence?
4Fixed-Mobile Convergence Different Meaning from
Different Views
- Consumers
- Seamless Services, regardless of type of
network. - Incumbent Operators
- One stop shopping/one bill - bundling of fixed
and mobile services. - Mobile Operators
- Integrated services - cellular service
positioning as fixed replacement. - Regulators
- Ensuring fair competition - Fixed versus mobile,
Mobile versus value added services.
5Fixed-Mobile ConvergenceIts All About
Competition
- Competition for voice minutes
- Fixed versus Mobile.
- Competition for value added services revenues
- Mobile versus value added service providers.
- Competition for content revenues
- Mobile versus value added service providers
versus content providers.
6MobileVersus Fixed Market Realities
7Fixed-Mobile ConvergenceIts All About
Competition
- Can mobile substitute fixed?
YES!
- When mobile offers
- Similar tariffs Additional competition.
- Similar services Data services.
- Same quality as fixed.
8Mobile Tariffs Paradox
- Simple economics
- Marginal investment per customer
- Fixed US 1000-1500.
- Mobile US 300-500.
- Operating expense similar for both.
- Why are mobile tariffs higher than fixed tariffs?
- Lets face reality tariffs are not pushed down,
neither by market forces, nor by regulatory
action.
9Towards Unified Regulation
10Why Regulation?
- Market controlled by limited number of dominant
operators. - Abuse of market power by discrimination and
unfair practices will eliminate competition. - Regulators goal - foster competition, for the
ultimate benefit of consumers.
11Fixed-Mobile Convergence Regulators Role
- Protect consumers interests.
- Abolish artificial and historical barriers to
competition. - Reduce entry barriers to new entrants, especially
for innovative new players.
12Key Regulatory Action Points (1)
- Cost-based interconnection
- eliminating market distortion resulting from
different methods for mobile and for fixed
interconnection tariff setting. - Symmetrical airtime
- eliminating discriminatory practices resulting
from charging different airtime tariffs from
mobile subscribers and from fixed subscribers.
13Key Regulatory Action Points (2)
- Open network access
- allowing long distance and value added service
providers access to the mobile network, similar
to their fixed network access. - Prevention of discriminatory bundling
- ensuring transparent bundling, in a
non-discriminatory manner.
14The Case of Israel
15Israel's Telecommunications
- 2.8 million main telephone lines
- (47 penetration).
- 2.5 million mobile customers, on three networks,
Pelephone, Cellcom Partner/Orange. - (42 penetration).
- 1.1 million Cable-TV connected households.
- (3 operators, 70 of passed households, 90
household coverage).
16Telecommunications Services Market - 1998
International Long-Distance
Cable TV
Terminal Equipment Business Systems
Internet services
2
2
Cellular Telephony
7
38
11
Fixed Services
40
Total telecom services market 3.7 billion
17Israels Mobile Operators
- Pelephone 800 MHz NAMPS and CDMA. Operations
since 1987. - Bezeq (50), Motorola (50).
- Cellcom 800 MHz TDMA.
- Operations since 1995.
- BellSouth (34), Safra Brothers (34), Discount
Investments (12.5), PEC (12.5), private
investors (7). - Partner/Orange 900 MHz GSM.
- Operations since 7 October 1998.
- Hutchison (46.67), Matab (20.31), Elbit.com
(16.5), Tapuz (16.5)
18The Mobile BoomIsrael Telecommunications
Services Revenues, 1995-1998 (US M)
2,000
Fixed
1,500
Mobile
1,000
International
500
CATV
0
1995
1996
1997
1998
19Israels Mobile Services Growth
- High growth - 2.5 million subscribers, compared
to 125,000 in January 1995. - Key stimulators for the explosive growth
- Low tariffs US 0.11 to 0.23/minute air time,
11 to 29 monthly charge. - (300 min average monthly bill - 56 to 74)
- Calling Party Pays (CPP), in operation since
1994. - High quality, nationwide coverage.
- Fair competition.
20Israels Regulatory Issues Concerning
Fixed-Mobile Convergence
- Achievements
- Structural separation, preventing discriminatory
bundling - Calling party pays
- Cost-based fixed interconnect tariffs
- Open access, to fixed mobile networks
(including pre-selection/dialing parity to
international long distance providers) -
- Open Issues
- Symmetrical air time
- Cost-based mobile interconnect tariffs
- Enhanced competition
- Additional mobile operators
- 3G frequencies allocation.
-
21Conclusions
22Summary - Market Related Points
- Fixed-Mobile convergence has several meanings
- For incumbent Telco one stop shopping.
- For competing Celco fixed substitute.
- For consumers additional competition? better
service? more service offerings? lower prices? - Mobile will not be true substitute to fixed,
unless - Mobile prices will be similar to fixed.
- Mobile service offering will be similar to fixed,
including data services. - Mobile will offer fixed quality.
23Summary - Regulatory Points
- Competition in telecommunications services is
still limited, and should be promoted. - In the context of Fixed-Mobile Convergence,
regulators role is to prevent abuse of market
power by discrimination and unfair practices. - The key issues are
- Cost-based interconnection.
- Symmetrical airtime.
- Open network access.
- Prevention of discriminatory bundling.
24Regulation - Its All About Competition
- The future - from convergence to integration.
- Regulation - uniform rules and principles for
fixed and mobile. - Re-alignment of competitive positions -
- Mobile and fixed
- Incumbent and new operators.
25The Regulatory Equation
FMC Fixed-Mobile Convergence CBI Cost Based
Interconnect ONP Open Network Provision
26For more information about Israels
telecommunicationshttp//www.moc.gov.il
27The End
- Thank you for your attention