What is the point of this session - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 44
About This Presentation
Title:

What is the point of this session

Description:

Tim Mitchell. Geoff Jenkins. Richard Jones. Jason Lowe. James Murphy. David Hassell. Penny Boorman ... Informed by the Third IPCC Climate Change Assessment Report ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:94
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 45
Provided by: clima77
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: What is the point of this session


1
What is the point of this session?
  • To use the UKs experience to give ideas about
    creating and using climate change scenarios in
    other countries and situations
  • Not a talk on climate modelling!
  • An overview of who, how, what and why
  • Discussion of how these experiences apply to your
    own needs

2
The next hour and a half..
  • What are climate change scenarios and how have
    they featured in the UK?
  • How have the UKCIP02 scenarios been created?
  • Who are the major players?
  • How have we dealt with uncertainties?
  • Potential applications of the UKCIP02 scenarios
  • How can the scenarios be improved?
  • Lessons for the future
  • Discussion

3
What are scenarios?
  • A scenario is
  • a coherent, internally consistent and plausible
    description of a possible future state of the
    world (Parry and Carter, 1998)
  • Not a forecast or a prediction
  • A series of pictures of what the world could look
    like in the future

4
Climate change scenarios
  • Socio-economic futures (eg. population, economy,
    carbon intensity) - affects how GHG may change
  • Climate modelling
  • Result integrated scenarios - more sophisticated
    than pure climate modelling

5
A history of UK Climate Change scenarios
  • Climate Change Impacts Review Group of the DoE
    (CCIRG)
  • 1991, 1996
  • Presented a range of highly artificial
    global-scale scenarios (CO2 doubling)
  • Tended to present a best guess based on 1980s
    Met Office UKTR model and HadCM1

6
The 1998 UKCIP scenarios
  • 1997 UK Climate Impacts Programme (UKCIP)
  • 1998 Climatic Research Unit, Hadley Centre
    created UKCIP98 scenarios
  • Wider range of variables and time-scales than
    CCIRG
  • Range of four scenarios based on IS92a/IS92d
  • HadCM2 model

7
How have the UKCIP02 scenarios been created?
8
UKCIP02 Climate Change Scenarios
  • Geoff Jenkins
  • Richard Jones
  • Jason Lowe
  • James Murphy
  • David Hassell
  • Penny Boorman
  • Ruth McDonald
  • Steven Hill
  • Mike Hulme
  • Xianfu Lu
  • John Turnpenny
  • Tim Mitchell

9
UKCIP02 Climate Change Scenarios
  • Funded by
  • For

10
The UKCIP02 Scenarios
  • To be launched April 2002
  • Revised scenarios using developments over past
    three years
  • Explicitly linked to four socio-economic
    scenarios produced by IPCC
  • Informed by the Third IPCC Climate Change
    Assessment Report

11
  • Uses more sophisticated HadCM3 and regional
    HadRM3 models (more greenhouse gas species,
    improved ocean and vegetation models)
  • Much more detailed regional information (104 vs.
    4 grid boxes)
  • 5 km observed data set
  • Responses to users much more on extremes rapid
    climate change Gulf Stream uncertainty

12
The SRES Scenarios
13
Global carbon emissions - four IPCC scenarios
(2000 - 2100)
14
Carbon dioxide concentrations IPCC scenarios
15
The four UKCIP02 scenarios
  • High Emissions A1FI
  • Medium-High Emissions A2
  • Medium-Low Emissions B2
  • Low Emissions B1
  • as inputs to Hadley Centres HadCM3 model
    (effective sensitivity 3.0 deg C)

16
Global temperature (2000 - 2100)
17
The Hadley Centre Global Climate Model (HadCM3)
18
Hadley Centre Regional Climate Model (HadRM3)50
km grid
19
What are UKCIP02s defining characteristics?
  • It was GENERIC rather than for a SPECIFIC impacts
    project
  • The centre of a policy network of groups with
    different aims
  • Scenario range examined emissions uncertainty
    rather than uncertainty in the model

20
What do the key players represent?
  • DEFRA - funder government policy international
    obligations public perception
  • UKCIP - scenario users (scientists, policymakers,
    impact assessments)
  • Hadley - rigorous science basis of climate
    modelling
  • Tyndall - leading the analysis and writing
    coordinating report production

21
The results
  • UKCIP02 had to balance needs of all the
    organisations
  • Ease of communication vs. rigorous science vs.
    usefulness to impacts community
  • Example - pattern-scaling

22
Pattern-scaling
  • Only A2 emissions, 2071-2100 means were modelled
  • Other time periods and emissions scenarios were
    produced by scaling the model output patterns
  • Scientifically less than rigorous
  • But needed by the users (eg 2020s, 2050s)

23
Interaction with other groups
  • Hadley Centre modellers - storm surges/ocean
    modelling
  • Land movement (Durham)
  • Sea level (POL)

24
What will happen to sea level?
25
Sea level change Four IPCC scenarios
26
Components of sea-level rise in 21st century
27
Commitment to sea-level rise 600 years
28
UK land movement (mm/yr) Source Ian Shennan
29
How have we dealt with uncertainties?
30
What uncertainties are there?
  • Emissions - how will society change? We chose to
    explicitly include these in the range of
    scenarios
  • Scientific - how do different models represent
    the environment? We have assessed the main
    scientific uncertainties and provided guidance on
    how to incorporate these

31
UK temperature and precipitation (2080s)
comparison of models
32
Winter temperature change with C-cycle (2080s,
Medium-High Emissions)
33
Summer temperature change with C-cycle (2080s,
Medium-High Emissions)
34
Methane concentrations - with and without climate
change feedbacks (A2 Emissions)
35
Ozone concentrations - with and without climate
change feedbacks (A2 Emissions)
36
Pattern-scaling
  • Scientifically acceptable to scale HadRM3
    patterns with other models global temperatures?
    We decided not.
  • Acceptable comparison between model and
    pattern-scaled results? Yes.

37
HadRM2 vs. HadRM3Mean temperature change
38
HadRM2 vs. HadRM3Precipitation change
39
Daily maximum temperature HadRM3 (dotted) vs.
observations (solid)
40
Potential applications of the UKCIP02 scenarios
41
  • Impacts, Adaptation, Vulnerability
  • Informing Mitigation Policy
  • Education and communication

42
(No Transcript)
43
Lessons for the future
44
Questions for discussion
  • Who are your scenarios for?
  • Who is funding them?
  • How will they link climate and social science?
  • Who is the most important player?
  • How might the different powers interact?
  • How will you communicate them to relevant groups
    and to the public?
  • Are they user-friendly?
  • Which government department is responsible, if
    any?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com