INTRODUCTION TO INCLUSION - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 33
About This Presentation
Title:

INTRODUCTION TO INCLUSION

Description:

... students with disabilities are separated from their classmates who are typically ... grades begin to adopt this attitude when their classmates with ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:196
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 34
Provided by: shri7
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: INTRODUCTION TO INCLUSION


1
INTRODUCTION TO INCLUSION CO-TEACHING
Calhoun City Schools
  • Children that learn together, learn to live
    together.

2
Essential Question
  • What do you want to learn from this workshop?

3
(No Transcript)
4
Relevant Terminology
  • Adaptations
  • Any procedure intended to meet an educational
    situation with respect to individual differences
    in ability or purpose.
  • Individualized Education Program (IEP)
  • A written statement for a child with a disability
    that is developed, reviewed, and revised.
  • Least Restrictive Environment (LRE)
  • To the maximum extent appropriate, children with
    disabilities, including children in public or
    private institutions or other care facilities,
    are educated with children who are not disabled.

5
  • Modifications
  • Changes made to the content and performance
    expectations for students.
  • Accommodations
  • Adaptations provided to students that level the
    playing field with their non-disabled peers.
  • Present Level of Educational Performance
  • An evaluation and a summary statement which
    describes the students current achievement in
    the areas of need.
  • Related Services
  • Developmental, corrective, and other services
    (e.g., occupational and/or physical therapy,
    speech, transportation) required to assist an
    individual with a disability to benefit from
    special education.

6
The Legislation of LRE True or False?
  • Each state must have procedures that assure
    students with disabilities are educated with
    students who are not disabled to the maximum
    extent appropriate.
  • 2. Some types of disabilities are excluded
    from receiving Free and Appropriate Public
    Education (FAPE).
  • 3. The Individuals with Disabilities
    Education Act (IDEA) was once entitled Education
    for All Handicapped Children Act.
  • The Least Restrictive Environment (LRE) is always
    the general education classroom.
  • 5. Related Services includes transportation.
  • At least one general education teacher must be
    represented at all IEP team meetings.

7
Legal Issues
  • IDEA states
  • Each State must establish procedures to assure
    that, to the maximum extent appropriate, children
    with disabilitiesare educated with children who
    are not disabled, and that special education,
    separate schooling, or other removal of children
    with disabilities from the regular educational
    environment occurs only when the nature or
    severity of the disability is such that education
    in regular classes with the use of supplementary
    aids and services cannot be achieved
    satisfactorily. 20 U.S.C. 1412(5)(B).

8
  • Rehabilitation ActSection 504
  • Legal mandate of Least Restrictive Environment
    and the use of supplementary aids and services
    for students with disabilities.
  • Ensures nondiscrimination on the basis of
    disability.

9
GEORGIAS PERFORMANCE GOALS FOR STUDENTS WITH
DISABILITIES
  • Overall Goal Ensure that all students with
    disabilities have available to them a free
    appropriate public education that emphasizes
    special education and related services designed
    to meet their unique needs and prepares them for
    employment and independent living.

10
Georgia Department of EducationPerformance Goals
and Indicators for Students with
Disabilities(Calhoun City Schools will be
concentrating on italicized items for FY 2007)
  • 1. Improve post-school outcomes for students with
    disabilities
  • Decrease the percentage of students with
    disabilities who drop out of
  • school.
  • Increase the percentage of students with
    disabilities who earn a regular high school
    diploma.
  • Increase the percentage of students with
    disabilities who transition to
  • employment or post-secondary
    education.
  • Increase the percentage of transition aged
    students with disabilities who have coordinated
    and measurable IEP goals and transition services
    that will lead to attainment of post-secondary
    goals.

11
Georgia Department of EducationPerformance Goals
and Indicators for Students with
Disabilities(Calhoun City Schools will be
concentrating on italicized items for FY 2007)
  • 2. Improve services for young children (ages 3
    5) with
  • disabilities
  • Increase the percentage of young children
    referred by parents, or other agencies prior to
    age three who are determined eligible and have an
    IEP implemented by the third birthday.
  • Increase the percentage of time young children
    with disabilities spend in natural environments
    with typically developing peers.
  • Increase the percentage of young children with
    disabilities who show
  • improved positive social/emotional
    skills, acquisition and use of knowledge and
    skills, and use of appropriate behaviors.

12
Georgia Department of EducationPerformance Goals
and Indicators for Students with
Disabilities(Calhoun City Schools will be
concentrating on italicized items for FY 2007)
  • 3. Improve the provision of a free and
    appropriate public education to
  • students with disabilities
  • Increase the percentage of students who are
    evaluated and determined
  • eligible for special education
    within 60 days.
  • Increase the percentage of students with
    disabilities who receive their
  • instruction in the general
    education setting with appropriate supports and
  • accommodations.
  • Increase the performance of students with
    disabilities on statewide assessments when
    given appropriate accommodations.
  • Decrease the percentage of students with
    disabilities who are removed from
  • their school or placements for
    disciplinary reasons.
  • Decrease the disproportionate representation of
    students with disabilities
  • due to inappropriate policies,
    procedures, and practices.
  • Increase the percentage of parents of children
    receiving special education

13
Georgia Department of EducationPerformance Goals
and Indicators for Students with
Disabilities(Calhoun City Schools will be
concentrating on italicized items for FY 2007)
  • 4. Improve compliance with state and federal laws
  • and regulations.
  • All identified noncompliance will be corrected as
    soon as possible, but no later than one year from
    identification.
  • Dispute resolution procedures and requirements
    are followed within any applicable timelines.
    Includes formal complaints, mediation, due
    process hearings, and resolution sessions.
  • Reports are submitted in a timely manner.

14
In response to NCLB, the State of Georgia has
instituted the 90-80 Rule that is, 90 of our
students with disabilities will receive
instruction in the general education setting for
at least 80 of the school day.
15
Rationale
  • The development of children who are typically
    developing does not decelerate when a diverse
    array of children are in the classroom (Odom,
    Deklyen, Jenkins, 1984).
  • Academic achievement of elementary age students
    is not compromised by the presence of students
    with disabilities in the classroom (Sharpe, York,
    Knight, 1994).
  • Students without disabilities do not model or
    copy inappropriate behavior from students with
    disabilities (Staub, Schwartz, Gallucci, Peck,
    1994).

16
Rationale
  • When students with disabilities are separated
    from their classmates who are typically
    developing, all students come to understand that
    people who are different do not belong. Students
    in the early elementary grades begin to adopt
    this attitude when their classmates with
    disabilities come and go throughout the day to
    receive services outside the general classroom.
    (Schnorr, 1990).

17
Rationale
  • Negative consequences of educating students with
    disabilities in separate classes, including
  • Poorer quality IEPs (Hunt Farron-Davis, 1992)
  • Lack of generalization of learning to
    environments outside of the separate classroom
    (Stokes Baer, 1977)
  • Disrupted opportunities for sustained
    interactions and social relationships with
    students without disabilities (Strully Strully,
    1992)
  • A decrease in the confidence that general class
    teachers have for teaching diverse learners
    (Giangreco et al., 1993)
  • Absence of appropriate behavior and role models.

18
Rationale
  • Students who are well supported in general
    education classrooms also learn the hidden
    curriculum, consisting of expectations,
    routines, behaviors, relationships, and culture,
    which is significantly different from that of the
    special education classroom (Apple, 1979).
  • There is no difference in the amount of attention
    teachers give to students without disabilities in
    inclusive classrooms (Hollowood, Salisbury,
    Rainforth, Palombaro, 1994/1995).

19
Rationale
  • Students who are typically developing report an
    increase in their own self-concept, growth in
    social cognition, and reduced fear of human
    differences (Peck, Donaldson, Pezzoli, 1990).
  • Students who are typically developing viewed
    their classmates with disabilities as being just
    one of the guys and just like us (Jorgensen,
    Mroczka, Williams, 1998).
  • Students with disabilities learn more social
    skills, develop closer relationships with peers
    who are typical developing, acquire a greater
    repertoire of functional skills, and develop
    better communication skills in inclusive
    environments than in segregated settings
    (McGregor Vogelsbert, 1999).

20
Percentage of Students Removed from General
Education for
21
Estimated Number and Percentage of Students
Removed from General Education for Schoolfor FY 2007
  • CPS
  • Number 38/63
  • Percentage 60.32
  • CES
  • Number 60/80
  • Percentage 75
  • CMS
  • Number 54/103
  • Percentage 52.43
  • CHS
  • Number 66/88
  • Percentage 75
  • Total
  • Number 218/334
  • Percentage 65.27

22
Inclusion Models
  • Supportive Instruction
  • Student with disability receives service from
    personnel other than a certified teacher (i.e.
    paraprofessional, interpreter, job coach, etc.)
    in the general education classroom.
  • Co-Teaching
  • The special education teacher provides service
    in the general education classroom by sharing
    teaching responsibility with the general
    education teacher for a FULL segment everyday.

23
6 Models of Co-Teaching
  • One teach/One observe
  • A traditional approach that depends on good
    planning and preparation. One teacher may
    demonstrate an effective lesson and the other
    observes, analyzes, and prepares for a later
    discussion.
  • One teach/One drift
  • Building on the traditional model, the teacher
    who is not presenting the lesson may assist a
    student in need, monitor group or center
    activities, and check work. The drifter drifts
    to all students, not just students with
    disabilities.
  • Parallel teaching
  • The class can be split into two groups with both
    of the teachers teaching the same content or
    skills.

24
  • Alternative teaching
  • One teacher can work with an identified small
    group of students (NEVER more than 6) for
    remedial, enrichment, or other targeted, but
    alternative, instruction. The teacher works with
    a mix of studentsnot just students with
    disabilities.
  • Team teaching
  • When the two teachers have complimentary styles,
    they may together teach a class combing each
    teachers strengths and knowledge. Usually the
    general education teacher provides content and
    the special education teacher provides
    strategies.
  • Station teaching
  • Two teachers can allow for additional stations
    (centers) to be developed, monitored or managed.
    Students rotating from one center to another
    would have additional instruction and assistance
    available.

25
Co-TeachingCollaborative ConsultationCollabor
ative Teaching
  • Two teachers two specialties one class one
    goal.

26
10 Rules for Co-Teaching
  • Limits
  • Multi-service delivery models
  • Planning time (Float)
  • Program evaluation
  • Feedback on successes
  • Program continuation
  • Defined collaboration
  • Parent information
  • Strategic scheduling
  • Voluntary participation

27
General and special education teachers need the
following competencies
  • Ability to solve problem
  • Ability to take advantage of childrens
    individual interests
  • Ability to set high, but alternative expectations
  • Ability to make appropriate accommodations
  • Ability to determine how to modify assignments
  • Ability to learn how to value all kids of skills
    that students bring
  • Ability to provide daily successes
  • Realization that every child in the class is
    their responsibility
  • Knowing a variety of instructional strategies
  • Ability to work as a team with parents and
    teachers
  • Ability to be flexible with a high tolerance level

28
General Education Teachers Responsibilities
  • Model positive attitude
  • Plan as a team
  • Teach as a team
  • Provide detailed lesson plans for modification by
    the special education teacher
  • Facilitate inclusion and acceptance of the
    special education student
  • Share details of classroom procedures
  • Make special education teacher feel welcome in
    the classroom
  • Avoid paraprofessional trap
  • Participate in the IEP process
  • Be flexible
  • Share responsibility for assessing students
    mastery level.
  • Discuss your differences with the special
    education teacher.

29
Special Education Teachers Responsibilities
  • Model positive attitude
  • Plan as a team with the regular classroom teacher
  • Teach as a team with the regular classroom
    teacher
  • Adapt lesson plans, methods, and materials
  • Facilitate inclusion and acceptance of students
    with disabilities by their non-disabled peers
  • Be willing to assume role of support
  • Be flexible and unobtrusive
  • Assume responsibility for IEP and due process of
    students with disabilities
  • Share responsibility for assessing students
    level of mastery
  • Discuss your differences with the regular
    classroom teacher

30
Checklist for Effective Collaborative Practices
  • A positive collaborative atmosphere exists in the
    classroom.
  • Each teacher demonstrates a positive attitude of
    mutual respect and support toward collaborative
    partner.
  • Special education teacher is made to feel welcome
    in the classroom and is treated as an equal
    professional partner.
  • Both teachers are thought of as equals by
    students.
  • A system of conflict resolution is in place to
    resolve professional differences, or no
    differences are evident.
  • A problem solving system is in place to resolve
    difficulties with students.
  • Both teachers are willing to assume secondary
    roles of support.

31
  • Both teachers share routine classroom
    responsibilities.
  • Both teachers are familiar with every student in
    the classroom.
  • Goals are cooperatively established and prepared
    by both general and special education teachers.
  • Discipline is consistent no matter who is
    teaching.
  • Expectations are expressed and consistent on the
    part of both teachers.
  • Structure and consistent routines are evident in
    the classroom.
  • Teachers plan for and instruct classes jointly,
    utilizing each persons skills, competencies, and
    interests.

32
  • Both teachers participate in parent conferences,
    IEP development, etc., for students with
    disabilities.
  • Detailed lesson plans are provided to the special
    education teacher with sufficient time allowed
    for modifications.
  • Special education teacher has easy access to all
    curriculum materials, including teachers
    editions of textbooks.
  • Special education teacher adapts lesson plans,
    methods, and materials.

33
  • Both teachers are open and willing to learn and
    implement new strategies for effective teaching
    for all students.
  • Both teachers seek and participate in staff
    development related to collaborative practices.
  • Teachers plan together.
  • Both teachers are involved in assessment, program
    development, and grading for students with
    disabilities.
  • Both teachers teach and are accountable for all
    students.
  • A variety of instructional strategies and
    teaching styles are used.
  • A variety of co-teaching models are used in the
    classroom.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com