Psychology as a science - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 23
About This Presentation
Title:

Psychology as a science

Description:

For this week's lab you need to download, print out, read, and bring to lab an article. The article is: ... Applied research Theory sometimes takes a backseat. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:40
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 24
Provided by: jcoo1
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Psychology as a science


1
Psychology as a science
  • Psych 231 Research Methods in Psychology

2
Announcements
  • For this weeks lab you need to download, print
    out, read, and bring to lab an article.
  • The article is Strayer Johnston (2001)
  • It can be downloaded from the Milner library
    pagehttp//www.mlb.ilstu.edu/

3
The anatomy of a research article
  • Method - tells the reader exactly what was done
  • Enough detail that the reader could actually
    replicate the study.
  • Subsections
  • Participants - who were the data collected from
  • Apparatus/ Materials - what was used to conduct
    the study
  • Procedure - how the study was conducted, what the
    participants did

4
The anatomy of a research article
  • Reading checklist for Methods
  • 1 a) Is your method better than theirs?
  • b) Does the authors method actually test the
    hypotheses?
  • c) What are the independent, dependent, and
    control variables?
  • 2) Based on what the authors did, what results do
    YOU expect?

5
The anatomy of a research article
  • Results - gives a summary of the results and the
    statistical tests
  • Reading checklist
  • 1) Did the author get unexpected results?
  • 2 a) How does the author interpret the results?
  • b) How would YOU interpret the results?
  • c) What implications would YOU draw from these
    results?

6
The anatomy of a research article
  • Discussion - the interpretation and implications
    of the results
  • Reading checklist
  • 1 a) Does YOUR interpretation or the authors'
    interpretation best represent the data?
  • b) Do you or the author draw the most sensible
    implications and conclusions?
  • References - full citations of all work cited
  • Appendices - additional supplementary supporting
    material

7
Psychology as a science
  • Psychologys goals are similar to the goals of
    the physical sciences (e.g., physics and
    chemistry)
  • Psychologists are concerned with the behavior of
    people (and animals) rather than the physical
    world.

8
Psychology as a science
  • How is psychology different from the physical
    sciences?
  • One big difference is that human behavior (and
    animals) is typically much more variable than
    most physical systems.
  • To address this in part, we use a lot of
    statistical procedures.
  • We also do as much as we can to reduce
    variability by using various methods of control.

9
Goals of psychology
  • Description of behavior
  • describe events, what changes what might affect
    change, what might be related to what, etc.
  • Prediction of behavior
  • given X what will likely happen
  • Control of behavior
  • for the purpose of interventions (e.g., how do we
    prevent violence in schools)

10
Goals of psychology
  • Causes of behavior
  • sometimes predictions arent enough, want to know
    how the X and the outcome are related
  • Explanation of behavior
  • a complete theory of the hows and whys

11
Properties of a good theory
  • Organizes, Explains, Accounts for the data
  • If there are data relevant to your theory, that
    your theory cant account for, then your theory
    is wrong
  • either adapt the theory to account for the new
    data
  • develop a new theory that incorporates the new
    data

12
Properties of a good theory
  • Organizes, Explains, Accounts for the data
  • Testable/Falsifiable cant prove a theory, can
    only reject it
  • our research goal is not to prove theories, but
    rather to
  • disconfirm them. Results may support
    theories,
  • but not prove them.

13
Support, not proof
  • Einstein No amount of experimentation can ever
    prove me right a single experiment can prove me
    wrong.
  • All dogs have four legs
  • hard to prove, need to examine all the dogs that
    exist (and have existed).
  • To disconfirm all we need to do is find one dog
    which doesnt have four legs

14
Omnipotent Theory
  • Beware theories that are so powerful/ general/
    flexible that they can account for everything.
    These are not testable
  • Karl Popper claimed that Freudian theory isnt
    falsifiable
  • If display behavior that clearly has sexual or
    aggressive motivation, then it is taken as proof
    of the presence of the Id
  • If such behavior isnt displayed, then you have a
    reaction formation against it. So the Id is
    there, you just cant see evidence of it.
  • So, as stated, the theory is too powerful and
    cant be tested and so it isnt useful

15
Properties of a good theory
  • Organizes, Explains, Accounts for the data
  • Testable/Falsifiable
  • Generalizable not too restrictive
  • the theory should be broad enough to be of use,
    the more data that it can account for the better
  • the line between generalizability and
    falsifiability is a fuzzy one.

16
Properties of a good theory
  • Organizes, Explains, Accounts for the data
  • Testable/Falsifiable
  • Generalizable
  • Parsimony (Occams razor)
  • for two or more theories that can account for the
    same data, the simplest theory is the favored one

17
Properties of a good theory
  • Organizes, Explains, Accounts for the data
  • Testable/Falsifiable
  • Generalizable
  • Parsimony
  • Makes predictions, generates new knowledge
  • a good theory will account for the data, but also
    make predictions about things that the theory
    wasnt explicitly designed to account for

18
Properties of a good theory
  • Organizes, Explains, Accounts for the data
  • Testable/Falsifiable
  • Generalizable
  • Parsimony
  • Makes predictions, generates new knowledge
  • Precision
  • makes quantifiable predictions

19
Using theories in research
  • Induction reasoning from the data to the
    general theory
  • So in complete practice this approach probably
    needs a new theory (or an adapted one) for every
    new data set
  • Deduction reasoning from a general theory to
    the data
  • Here the theory (if it is a good one) is
    sometimes viewed as more critical than the data.
    It also will guide the choice of what experiments
    get done

20
The chicken or the egg?
Theory
induction
deduction
Data
  • Typically good research programs use both

21
Research Approaches
  • Basic (pure) research - tries to answer
    fundamental questions about the nature of
    behavior
  • e.g., McBride Dosher (1999). Forgetting rates
    are comparable in conscious and automatic memory
    A process-dissociation study.
  • Applied research Theory sometimes takes a
    backseat. This is research designed to solve a
    particular problem
  • e.g., Jin (2001). Advertising and the news Does
    advertising campaign information in news stories
    improve the memory of subsequent advertisements?

22
Research Approaches
  • Probably the best way to think of this is as a
    continuum rather as two separate categories.
  • Often applied work may bring up some
    interesting basic theoretical questions, and
    basic theory often informs applied work.

23
Next time
  • Basic Methodologies
  • Read Chapters 6 and 7
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com