Title: The STAR Detector at RHIC
1The STAR Detector at RHIC
2- The STAR Heavy Flavor Tracker
- An Introduction and Brief Review of the Technical
Design and Physics Goals at Mid-rapidity - Jim Thomas
- Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
- November 1st, 2007
3The Heavy Flavor Tracker
PXL IST SSD
- The PXL is new technology
- 30 mm silicon pixels
- to yield 10 mm space point resolution
- Direct Topological reconstruction of Charm
- Detect charm decays with small ct, including
D0 ? K ? - New physics
- Charm collectivity and flow to test
thermalization at RHIC - C B Energy Loss to test pQCD in a hot and
dense medium at RHIC - The proposed Tracking Upgrades include
- PXL (2 layers)
- IST (1 or 2 layers)
- SSD (existing layer)
The PXL 2 layers of Si at mid rapidity
4Summary of Si Detectors Inside the TPC
- Goal graded resolution to achieve highly
efficient tracking from the outside ? in - TPC SSD IST PXL
- TPC pointing resolution at the SSD is 1 mm
- SSD pointing at the IST is 300 mm
- IST pointing at the HFT is 250 mm
- HFT pointing at the VTX is 50 mm
5The Heart of the Beast
The PXL detector is a thin detector using 50 ?m
thick Si to finesse the limitations imposed by MCS
See the talk by Howard Wieman for the latest
developments (and photos)
6Direct Topological Identification of Open Charm
Goal Put a high precision detector near the IP
to extend the TPC tracks to small radius
The STAR Heavy Flavor Tracker will identify
daughters of the decay and do direct topological
reconstruction of open charm hadrons. No Mixed
events, no random background subtraction.
7Heavy Flavor is the Next Frontier
- The QGP is the universally accepted hypothesis at
RHIC - The next step in confirming this hypothesis is
the proof of thermalization of the light quarks
in RHIC collisions - The key element in proving this assertion is to
observe the flow of charm because charm and
beauty are unique in their mass structure - If heavy quarks flow
- frequent interactions among all quarks
- light quarks (u,d,s) likely to be thermalized
Current quark a bare quark whose mass is due to
electroweak symmetry breaking
Constituent quark a bare quark that has been
dressed by fluctuations in the QCD sea
8Flow Probing Thermalization of the Medium
py
9? -mesons Flow Partonic Flow
- ?-mesons are very special
- they do not re-interact in hadronic environment
- they show strong collective flow
- they are formed via coalescence with thermal
s-quarks -
- STAR Preliminary QM06, S. Blyth
- Hwa and Yang, nucl-th/0602024 Chen et al.,
PRC73 (2006) 044903
10Scaling as a Function of (mT m0)
STAR Preliminary work by Yan Lu
- The light quark sector scales beautifully with
v2/nq .vs. (mT m0)/nq - Note that pT
- The strange quark sector also scales with
and the scaling holds at all centralities - Even the ? meson
- See S. Blythe QM2006
Does it work in the Charm Sector? A strong test
of the theory
Yuting Bai, QM 2006 for the STAR Collaboration
11- pT distributions of electrons from semi-leptonic
decay of heavy flavor mesons (left D-mesons,
right B-mesons) as a function of parent pT. The
inserted plots represent the projections to the
corresponding heavy flavor distributions. The
widths of the electron pT windows are indicated
by dashed boxes.
12Single Electron Spectra are not sufficient
- Hydro and Pythia are extreme models on opposite
ends of the model spectrum - Charm in red, Beauty in Blue Hydro is the solid
line, Pythia is dashed - Single electron spectra make it difficult to
distinguish hard and soft physics below 3 GeV - Also true for RAA measurements
- The decayed spectra are shown in black. The
sensitivity to the original spectra are reduced. - We heard this message many times at QM
S. Batsouli et al., Phys. Lett. B 557 (2003) 26.
H. Liu et al., Phys. Lett. B 639 (2006) 441.
We need direct topological identification of Charm
13Heavy Flavor Energy Loss RAA for Charm
- Heavy Flavor energy loss is an unsolved problem
- Gluon density 1000 expected from
light quark data - Better agreement with the addition of inelastic E
loss - Good agreement only if they ignore Beauty
- Beauty dominates single electron spectra above 5
GeV - We can separate the Charm and Beauty by the
direct topological identification of Charm
Theory from Wicks et al. nucl-th/0512076v2
Where is the contribution from Beauty?
14Baryons vs. mesons
- Coalescence and fragmentation conspire at
intermediate pT to give constituent quark number
scaling and Baryon-Meson differences. - Coalescence and fragmentation of charm quarks is
different than for light quarks so it is a
strong test of the theory
- Coalescence of light quarks implies deconfinement
and thermalization prior to hadronization - How do baryons and mesons behave in the Charm
sector? - The ?c will be a fascinating test and we might
be able to do it with the HFT via ?c / D
15The Properties of the Open Charm Hadrons
16A Rich Physics Program
- There is a rich physics program when all of the
STAR physics detectors are working together - Flow in the Charm sector
- dE/dx in the Charm and Beauty sector
- Recombination and RAA in the Charm and Beauty
sector - Vector Mesons
- Charm Angular Correlations
- now accessible due to STARs large acceptance
- non-photonic electrons
17 18Finding the D0 (whew, it works)
- The open circles show the primary vertex
resolution in central AuAu collisions.
(absolute value of 3D distance) - The solid circles show the D0 secondary
decay-vertex resolution. The mean decay
distance, c? 123 ?m for the D0, is shown to
guide the eye. - Each D0 decay length was scaled by the
appropriate ?? factor to provide a universal peak
for the purposes of the illustration.
19D0 Reconstruction Efficiency
- The yield of reconstructed D0s divided by the
simulated D0 yield - The red squares show the maximum possible
efficiency for reconstructing a D0 based upon the
single track efficiencies for the daughter
particles. - The black circles show the efficiency for
actually finding these D0s after applying the
topological cuts.
20Significance of the D0 measurement
- The expected significance of the D0 measurement
with 100 M central events as a function of pT.
For pT above 5 GeV/c, the upper limit on the
signal significance is shown because we do not
have sufficient statistics to properly estimate
the background. - UPC electrons and pileup of minimum-bias events
during the integration time of the PIXEL
detectors are not included in this simulation
21?c Reconstruction with the HFT
- ?c reconstruction is difficult due to 3 body
final state and the short decay length, however - a ?c spectrum can be measured in 50 M central
Au-Au events - an RAA measurement with 20 error bars can be
made out to 4 GeV with 500 M events
22Charm Meson Flow
- The green line describes the expected magnitude
of the v2 parameter if only the light quarks in
the D0 exhibit flow. - The red line illustrates how the flow parameter
can increase if the charmed quarks also flow. - The blue error bars shown at the top of the
figure show the anticipated errors of measurement
in 100 M AuAu minimum-bias events.
23 Rates Estimation - v2
- dN/dpT distributions for D-mesons.
- Scaled by 290, corresponds to the
minimum bias Au Au collisions at RHIC. - (b) Assumed v2 distributions for D-mesons.
- ---- PLB 595, 202 (2004)
- Error bars shown are from 15 systematic
errors - (c) D0 meson v2 rates from minimum bias Au Au
collisions at 200 GeV. - The small and large error bars are for 15
and 30 systematic errors, respectively. For the
v2 analysis, 12 bins in ? are used.
500 M Events is one RHIC Month with DAQ1000
24Hints of Elliptic Flow with Charm
- D ? e X
- Single electron spectra from PHENIX show hints
of elliptic flow - Is it charm or beauty?
- The HFT will cut out large photonic backgrounds
- g ? ee-
- and reduce other large stat. and systematic
uncertainties - STAR can make this measurement with 100M AuAu
events in the HFT - Smoking gun for thermalization at RHIC!
Better if we can do direct topological
identification of Charm
25PHENIX PRL 98, 172301 (2007)
- RAA of heavy-flavor electrons in 010 central
collisions compared with ?0 data and model
calculations - V2 of heavy-flavor electrons in minimum bias
collisions compared with ?0 data and the same
models. - Conclusion is that heavy flavor flow corresponds
to ?/s at the conjectured QM lower bound
?0
?0
However, Hydro doesnt know about Quark
Coalescence
26Charm Meson Flow coalescence view
- The green line describes the expected magnitude
of the v2 parameter if only the light quarks in
the D0 exhibit flow. - The red line illustrates how the flow parameter
can increase if the charmed quarks also flow.
27Fridays PRL 99, 172301 (2007) new insights
- Romatschke2 perform relativistic viscous
hydrodynamics calculations - Data on the integrated elliptic flow coefficient
v2 are consistent with a ratio of viscosity over
entropy density up to ?/s ?0.16 - But data on minimum bias v2 seem to favor a much
smaller viscosity over entropy ratio, below the
bound from the antide Sitter conformal field
theory conjecture
28A possible interpretation
- Assume the PHENIX data are correct, then they may
have seen charmed meson flow - A couple of assumptions
- The PHENIX data do not show charmed quarks
flowing rather they see the light quarks
flowing ( ½ the full value for the flow of the
light hadrons) - This would be consistent with the ?/s ratio fit
by Teaney et al. - It would also be consistent with the even lower
value of the ?/s ratio found by Romatschke
Romatschke for the light hadrons - Conclusion charmed quarks dont flow and the
conjectured QM lower bound has been violated
Future data sets and further discussion will be
very interesting!
29Direct Topological Identification of Open Charm
- The STAR HFT will identify the daughters in the
decay and do a direct topological reconstruction
of the open charm hadron. - No mixed events, no random background
subtraction.
30Summary
- The STAR HFT will explore the Charm and Beauty
sectors - We will do direct topological reconstruction of
Charm - Our measurements will be unique at RHIC
- The key measurements include
- V2
- Energy Loss
- Charm Spectra, RAA Rcp
- Vector mesons
- Angular Correlations
- The technology is available on an appropriate
schedule