Title: 200809 Proposed Budget
1 2008-09 Proposed Budget
Encinitas Union School District
2Introduction
1
- What a difference a few months makes!
- Politics have definitely moved toward support of
education - Economics have gotten worse and made the Budget
problem more difficult - As expected, the politics are trumping the
economics again - Gone are the cuts that caused the greatest public
outcry - No call for suspension of Proposition 98
- No early release of prisoners
- No closure of state parks
- Most other cuts proposed in January remain
- Revenue projections are improved by assuming
more debt or a sales tax increase and other
lesser methods - The long-term structural deficit remains
3May Revision Features
2
- No suspension of Proposition 98
- Special education gains deferred maintenance
losses - Cost-of-living adjustment (COLA) is up, but so is
the deficit factor - Lottery proposal stretches out resolution of the
Budget problem
4January vs. May Proposals
3
5January Proposals Withdrawn
4
- The January Governors Budget set no priorities
among the many state programs - Instead, almost all areas of the State Budget
were targeted for an across-the-board 10 cut - The May Revision withdraws this approach to
budgeting - The January Proposal to close 48 state parks is
withdrawn the May Revision adds 13.2 million
and raises park fees to keep all parks open - Early release of 22,000 inmates is withdrawn
revised inmate and parolee population projections
yield sufficient savings to avoid the early
release of inmates
6New May Revision Proposals
5
- Health and Human Services programs are targeted
for greater reductions than proposed in January
673 million more - Medi-Cal benefits are reduced for newly qualified
immigrants and outlays for emergency services are
reduced because of monthly eligibility
requirements for undocumented immigrants - Medi-Cal eligibility is made more stringent as
the income threshold is moved closer to the
federal poverty level - SSI/SSP grants for the aged, blind, and disabled
are not increased for the federal COLA in January
2009 - Instead, the state will lower General Fund
support and capture the increase - The SSI/SSP Cash Assistance Program is eliminated
7New May Revision Proposals
6
- California Work Opportunity and Responsibility to
Kids (CalWORKs) grants receive no COLA in
2008-09 and are cut 5 on a year-over-year basis - State contribution to In-Home Support Services
(IHSS) workers is limited to the state minimum
wage - Special Fund balances of various health and
social services programs are transferred or
loaned to the General Fund - The Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation
is slated for 174 million in reductions related
to a new parole supervision program
8State Lottery Proposal
7
- Governor proposes borrowing 15 billion from Wall
Street against future increased profits from
State Lottery - 10 billion of funding would go for a reserve to
use during fiscal crisis - 5.1 billion would be used for the 2008-09 Budget
- 1.2 billion currently for education continues,
but is at risk - Lottery revenue for up to 32 years would go to
investors to repay loan - Requires voter approval-most likely in November
2008
9Stand-By Sales Tax
8
- The Governors May Revision acknowledges the
risks surrounding the Lottery proposal - Voters may reject it
- It may be challenged in court
- Wall Street may not embrace it
- As a back-up plan, the Governor proposes a 1
increase in the sales tax, which would yield
about 6 billion annually - The Department of Finance would determine whether
the sales tax trigger is pulled, based on
balances available in the RSF
10Stand-By Sales Tax
9
- The sales tax would remain in effect until the
RSF has accumulated a fund balance equal to 15
of General Fund tax revenues (about 15 billion) - The tax expires June 30, 2011
- The May Revision indicates that, after the tax
expires, Californians will receive rebates equal
to the amount of sales tax collected - No details are available, but the Director of
Finance suggested direct rebates to taxpayers or
a temporary reduction in the sales tax rate
11Mandate Reimbursements
10
- The January Budget contained conflicting funding
proposals - It provided no funding for reimbursement claims
in 2008-09, but by appropriating 1,000 for each
of 38 education mandates, it required school
districts to continue to provide the services - It provided 150 million for deferred mandate
claims, in accordance with the terms of the 2004
Budget Act - The May Revision makes no change to either
proposal
12Revenue Stabilization Fund
11
- Proceeds from the Lottery borrowing would be
deposited into a newly created Revenue
Stabilization Fund (RSF) - The RSF would receive the proceeds from the bond
sale - Transfers out of the RSF are authorized only
during years in which General Fund revenues under
perform the ten-year average growth rate - This condition will be met in 2008-09
- The RSF also affects Proposition 98, although
written details are not yet available
13Proposition 98 Funding Per Pupil
12
14Revenue Limits COLA and Deficits
13
- The statutory COLA is 5.66 with a deficit of
5.357, eliminating the proposed 2.4 reduction
proposed in January - The following includes the increases to the base
revenue limit that are funded at zero
15Revenue Limit Deficit Factor
14
16Supplemental Hourly Programs 2008-09
15
- May Revision includes 6.5 reduction to overall
funding for supplemental hourly programs, but not
all programs are equally affected - Mandated programs Grade 7-12 CAHSEE and Grade
2-9 Retention slight increase - Non mandated programs K-12 Core and Grade 2-6
At Risk take reduction for all four programs - In addition, the May Revision attempts to spread
the distribution of the deficit across
17Special Education
16
- Good News Proposed January Cut Restored
- May Revision provides 234 million above the
January Proposed Budget - Reverses 6.5 cut and makes adjustment for local
property taxes and growth - The increased state funding also meets the
federal maintenance-of-effort requirement for
special education program
- Bad News No COLA
- Not funding the 5.66 COLA on the state/local
share of funding means a loss of 26.34 per ADA
18Special Education Supplement to Base
17
- Federal funding for special education is expected
to increase by almost 13 million in 2008-09 - The Supplement to Base is estimated to be 2.15
per ADA provided to SELPAs - As of 2007-08, the Supplement to Base is no
longer rolled into the statewide target rate for
the Special Disabilities Adjustment (SDA) - 2008-09 Budget proposes to continue this trend
19Charter Schools
18
- General Purpose rates are based on statewide
average revenue limits - CDE will recalculate the General Purpose rates at
each apportionment - Final amounts could vary by 20 per ADA (or
more) - Categorical block grant rate reflects 6.5 cut
- Estimated 2008-09 funding rates for charter
schools, after cuts, are
20Categorical Programs
19
- January proposed cuts are restored for revenue
limits and special education, but other
categorical programs are not so fortunate - May Revision continues to include, on average,
6.5 reduction to most state categorical programs
with no COLA - A few exceptions
- High Priority Schools Grant Program 400 per
student at eligible schools - After School Education and Safety Grants same
rate and maximums as approved in grant award
letter - Quality Education Investment Act rates
according to settlement agreement
21Categorical Programs
20
- It is important to note that, included among the
programs to be cut, there are many that may
primarily support staff - Economic Impact Aid
- Physical Education Teacher Incentive Grants
- K-3 Class-Size Reduction
- Home-to-School Transportation
- AB 825 Block Grants
- The May Revision includes a number of proposals
to mitigate the impact of budget reductions on
school agency operations and, importantly, the
ability to meet fiscal solvency requirements
22Federal Funding Update
21
232008-09 Budget Assumptions
22
242008-09 Budget Assumptions
23
252008-09 Budget Assumptions
24
- Annual Property Liability Premium of 220,430
- Total Regular Ed. FTE budgeted is 239 (based on
5,273 students) - Step and Column is budgeted for Certificated and
Classified employees - No salary increases included for any bargaining
units - Staffing _at_ 201 for K-3 and 311 for 4-6
- Maintain retiree benefits as they now exist
- Employer Labor Related Costs
- STRS 8.25
- PERS 9.428
- Social Security 6.20
- Medicare 1.45
- SUI 0.3
- Workers Comp. 2.068
- Health Welfare 10,236
262008-09 Budget Assumptions
25
- Utilities Increase of 15
- Funding of 32,000 for safety monitor positions
- Transfer of 267,500 toward state match for the
Deferred Maintenance Program - Site allocation of 32.50 per prior year CBEDS
enrollment (will be adjusted at 2008-09 CBEDS) - Site allocation of 5.00 per prior year CBEDS
enrollment for Media books and supplies - 10 days of teacher sick leave per FTE
- Custodial supplies of 280 per classroom
- Routine Restricted Maintenance to be funded at 3
of total General Fund expenditures - Transportation expense of 498,102
27 Average Daily
Attendance
26
28Unrestricted General FundRevenues, Expenditures,
and Changes in Fund BalanceJune 30, 2008
27
29Unrestricted General Fund Revenues
28
30Unrestricted General Fund Expenditures
29
31Unrestricted General Fund Analysis of Ending
Fund BalanceJune 30, 2008
30
32Restricted General FundRevenues, Expenditures,
and Changes in Fund BalanceJune 30, 2008
31
33Restricted General Fund Revenues
32
34Restricted General Fund Expenditures
33
35General Fund Expenditures(Unrestricted
Restricted)
34
36District Expenditures by Function
35
37Child Nutrition FundJune 30, 2008
36
38Deferred Maintenance FundJune 30, 2008
37
39Special Reserve-Non Capital FundJune 30, 2008
38
40Special Reserve Fund For Post Employment
BenefitsJune 30, 2008
39
41Building FundJune 30, 2008
40
42Capital Facilities Fund 25-18June 30, 2008
41
43Capital Facilities Fund 25-19June 30, 2008
42
44Special Reserve-Capital Outlay FundJune 30, 2008
43
45Paul Ecke Central Trust FundJune 30, 2008
44
46Self Insurance FundJune 30, 2008
45