Storm Water Management Overview - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 22
About This Presentation
Title:

Storm Water Management Overview

Description:

Drainage Map. Development. DEQ submittal numbers: Q=CiA. Runoff = 0.36 in/hr x 14.69 acres x 1 ... Convince DOT that flood irrigation numbers are reasonable. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:75
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 23
Provided by: carrie51
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Storm Water Management Overview


1
Storm Water Management Overview
  • Carrie Larson

2
Overview
  • History of project
  • Location
  • Development
  • Engineering
  • Solution

3
History
  • Minor Subdivision 1980s
  • Minor Subdivision 1998
  • Major Commercial Subdivision 2006
  • Survey
  • Preliminary Design
  • Preliminary Approval
  • Final submittal (DEQ MDT)
  • November 2006

4
Location
5
Major Subdivision
6
Development of Project
  • Road Design
  • Utilities
  • Storm Water Management
  • Lot Layout

7
DEQ Permit
  • DEQ Circular 8
  • Pre-development Post-development runoff
  • 2 year, 1 hour storm
  • Flood Irrigated farmland pre-development
  • Evapotranspiration rate?
  • Runoff from irrigation gtgt DEQ Storm

8
Highway Permits
  • Very strict with runoff
  • Prove irrigation runoff gtgt storm event
  • Find management for storm event to minimize
    highway collection
  • Deny pre-existing irrigation ditch
  • Not on legal survey

9
Drainage Map
10
Development
  • DEQ submittal numbers
  • QCiA
  • Runoff 0.36 in/hr x 14.69 acres x 1
  • Q 5.28 ac-in/hr
  • V1hr 0.44 ac-ft 19,200 ft3

11
Development
  • MDT Submittal Numbers
  • Convince DOT that flood irrigation numbers are
    reasonable.
  • Use AGRIMET archives and FIRI for data

12
Data Development
13
Problem Development
  • The FIRI computer program was developed by the
    USDA Natural Resource Conservation Service
    (NRCS) to analyze irrigation information.
  • Using the FIRI computer program, a seasonal
    efficiency for flood irrigation for the project
    site was determined to be approximately 21 which
    fits within the range of efficiency values (18
    to 30) provided by the local NRCS Office. A 21
    efficiency, therefore, gives an average yearly
    runoff for the site of approximately 23 inches.

14
Analysis Comparison
  • 28.1 ac-ft gtgt 0.44 ac-ft

15
Engineering Solution
  • Even with supporting data, DEQ/DOT will not let
    us get away with no storm water management on
    site
  • Use first minor subdivision boundary and drain
    into existing outlet
  • Crowned Roads
  • Pipe Network
  • Sediment/Detention Basin

16
Drainage (Roads Minor Subdivision Boundary)
17
Pipe Network Plan
18
Pipe Network Profile
19
Major Sediment Basin
20
Minor Sediment Basins
  • Try to eliminate these with irrigation argument

21
Submittal
  • Sent to MDT
  • Want a traffic study before giving approach
    permits
  • Success with irrigation argument!
  • DEQ Engineering Report never submitted
  • Available upon request
  • Never know their response

22
Questions?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com