Title: WREZ Project Workplan and Schedule
1WREZ Project Workplan and Schedule
2Value Added By Project
- LSEs, transmission providers, generation
developers, state regulators can make more
informed decisions about - Costs of renewable power
- Optimum transmission needed to move renewable
power to consumers - Potential partners in developing transmission to
access renewable areas and - Where renewable energy developers can site their
facilities to ensure access to the transmission
system and minimize environmental impacts.
3Information is essential to develop transmission
because
- Outside of the CA ISO and AB, there is no
mechanism in the Western Interconnection to force
unwilling parties to pay for new transmission. - LSE fuel choices will ultimately determine what
transmission gets built. - LSE resource planners (and regulators) often
operate in stovepipes and may miss opportunities
for inter-company collaboration. - Inter-company collaboration is important because
transmission is a lumpy investment with large
economies of scale. One LSE may not need all the
capacity created by transmission to a REZ.
4A WREZ effort also
- Promotes a regional view of renewables
development blunting potential balkanization of
the renewables markets. This is particular
important for development of renewables that are
distant from load centers. - Paves way for interstate collaboration on
- Permitting of multi-state transmission
- Allocating and recovering cost of new
transmission. - Could provide an informational foundation for new
approaches to interconnection and transmission
service queuing problems.
5Western Interconnection Context
- Highly integrated grid
- Excellent and diverse renewable resources
- State-by-state REZ initiatives
- Other Western Interconnection actions important
to the WREZ work
6Context Western Interconnection
7Overview of WREZ Phases
- Identification of WREZs
- Technical analysis
- Stakeholder ground truthing
- Conceptual transmission from WREZs
- Coordinated procurement for renewables (beyond
current budget period) - Institutional options to facilitate interstate
transmission for renewables (beyond current
budget period)
8Organization of REZ Project
Steering Committee (Governors, PUC Commissioners,
Premiers, Federal ex-officio members)
Technical Committee (states, provinces, work
group chairs)
NREL technical support
LBNL Technical Support
Zone Identification/Technical Analysis
Generation/ Transmission Modeling
Environment, Land Use and Permitting
Ad Hoc Work Group?
9Interaction among work groups
Technical Committee
Resource zone identification work group
Environment, land use permitting work group
Generation/ transmission modeling work group
Economic assumptions in supply curves
Areas to be excluded and minimum elements an area
must have to be considered
Areas of concern
Mitigation measures and cost
Conceptual transmission plans
Model for LSE evaluation of interest in REZs
Area requiring close collaboration
10Estimated Phase I Timeline
- May 28-29 kick-off meeting Salt Lake City
- June 23 Technical Committee finalizes work plan
and schedule - July 11 publish REZ identification criteria
- July 30 identify developable renewable energy
zones - Sep 5 supply curves and mitigation strategies
developed - Sep 19 Draft report sent to Technical Committee
- Sep 24-25 Technical Committee meeting to consider
draft report - October 1-24 public comment and outreach
- November 21 revised draft report
- December 4 Technical Committee meets to finalize
report - December 16 final report to Steering Committee
- January 8, 2009 Steering Committee meets to
approve report - January 8, Launch of Phase 2 (transmission from
zones)