Advanced FTNMR Techniques - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 46
About This Presentation
Title:

Advanced FTNMR Techniques

Description:

Use the MS to provide MW and the presence of the most common halogens or odd # of nitrogens ... Ignore alkane, alkene, alkyne and aromatic for now. Sample Problem 1 ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:94
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 47
Provided by: DrMichae
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Advanced FTNMR Techniques


1
Advanced FT-NMR Techniques
  • CHEM 430
  • Fall 2009

2
Example Problem 1
  • Use the MS to provide MW and the presence of the
    most common halogens or odd of nitrogens
  • Couple the M1 data for isotopic 13C with the 13C
    NMR spectrum to deduce the actual number of
    carbon atoms
  • Identify all functional groups by FT-IR
  • Use a brief survey of the 1H NMR to determine
    nature of compound- aliphatic, aromatic or both,
    as well as the depth of the problem

3
Sample Problem 1
M 114, M1 non-existent
4
Sample Problem 1
  • With the availability of 1H NMR dont bother with
    Rule of Thirteen or HDI calculations at this
    point
  • Make the same basic observations you would if the
    MS was your only data
  • This compound must/probably
  • Have less than 9 carbons
  • Not have any Cl or Br atoms
  • Not be aromatic
  • Contain an even of nitrogen atoms

5
Sample Problem 1
  • Inspect the FT-IR for functional groups
  • Concentrate on heteroatom groups that would NOT
    show on 1H NMR! Ignore alkane, alkene, alkyne
    and aromatic for now

6
Sample Problem 1
  • Note the strong CO band in the high 1700s
    remember this is most likely ester, anhydride or
    acid halide but could be a strained ketone
  • We can rule out anhydride (only one CO band) and
    acid halide (no Cl, Br by MS) presence of
    strong band at 1180 could support ester

7
Sample Problem 1
  • Initial Inspection of 1H NMR

8
Sample Problem 1
  • Initial Inspection of 1H NMR
  • Molecule not aromatic or alkene (confirms MS)
  • Primarily aliphatic with 3 families of protons
    close to an EWG
  • 7 families of protons as clean multiplets are
    observed
  • Integration suggests1211113 ratio and a
    total of 10 hydrogens

9
Sample Problem 1
  • Initial survey is complete
  • Molecule is an aliphatic ester with less than 9
    carbon atoms and 10 hydrogens approximate
    formula Clt9H10O2
  • Now the problem is to complete what we previously
    could not with IR, MS and UV data to figure the
    bulk structure of this compound

10
Sample Problem 1
  • Now inspect the 13C NMR in conjunction with the
    DEPT-135 spectrum

11
Sample Problem 1
  • From the 13C spectrum we observe 6 signals
  • We also confirm the CO is an ester
  • To test to see if there are chemically equivalent
    carbons use the MS M data
  • Formula is now C6H10O2 which has a MW of 114
  • HDI is 2 which suggests a ring is present as well
    as the CO

12
Sample Problem 1
  • From the 13C DEPT-135 we observe that 5 signals
    remain (less CO)
  • We observe 3 negative peaks or 3 CH2s the other
    two must be CH3 or CH
  • The downfield carbon is not CH2-, this is the
    carbon next to the sp3 oxygen of the ester
  • Keep in mind the presence of a ring means this
    compound may not end in a CH3
  • HDI is 2 which suggests a ring is present as well
    as the CO

13
Sample Problem 1
  • Remember to never stop playing with the
    mathematical bounds of the molecule
  • If three carbons are CH2- that is six protons
  • We observed a total of ten by 1H NMR and we have
    two remaining C signals - one must be a CH the
    other must be a CH3!
  • Now we know the pieces that must be put together!

14
Sample Problem 1
  • Here is what we have
  • -(CO)-O-
  • -CH3 -CH2- -CH2- -CH2- -CH
  • We also know there is a ring closure

15
Sample Problem 1
  • We now use the first of our advanced 2-D
    techniques
  • 1H-1H COrrelation SpectroscopY or COSY
  • This experiment allows us to see what protons are
    coupled to which other protons

16
2D COrrelation SpectroscopY
  • DESCRIPTION The 2D COSY experiment is the most
    simple and widely used 2D experiment.
  • It is an homonuclear chemical shift correlation
    experiment based on the transfer polarization by
    a mixing pulse between directly J-coupled spins.
  • Thus, homonuclear through-bond interactions can
    be trace out by simple analysis of the 2D map
    providing a more general and more useful
    alternative to classical 1D homodecoupling
    experiments.

17
2D COrrelation SpectroscopY
  • The basis for this experiment
  • As with any 2-D technique we use a pulse
    sequence
  • By varying the t1 time, we allow the prepared
    protons to transfer their spin to their neighbors
  • By exciting this population with another pulse
    and obtaining the FT we will observe the protons
    that are coupled
  • For each individual t1 we take an 1H NMR, each
    will be transformed in the normal direction
  • Across the array of t1 we can take Fourier
    transforms and obtain the cross relationships

18
2D COrrelation SpectroscopY
  • The basis for this experiment
  • In the upper figure we see the array of data with
    two successive FTs
  • In the lower diagram we see a cartoon of the
    result
  • Diagonal peaks are created as full relaxation by
    the originally excited protons is not complete by
    t1, so they are reobserved following the second
    pulse
  • Off diagonal peaks give the relationship between
    neighboring spin systems.
  • We see that E-C are a coupled spin system which
    is isolated from the A-B-D coupled spin system (A
    is coupled to B and B is coupled to D)
  • This molecule would be A-B-D-(group or quaternary
    carbon)-C-E

19
Sample Problem 1
  • Lets return to our sample 2D-COSY

20
Sample Problem 1
  • Start wherever you like the ends of the
    resonance set is typically a good place to start
    as coupling will only be to one side
  • For this example lets look at the triplet at d
    0.9
  • This is coupled to two of the three sets of
    protons from d 1.5 to 2.0
  • The integration of the triplet is three and each
    multiplet integrates to 1, so we come to the
    first problem the CH3 is bound to a carbon
    that bears two anisotropic protons!
  • We now have the fragment CH3-CHaHb-

21
Sample Problem 1
  • Now follow the trail what is the signal that
    these two multiplets are coupled to?
  • We quickly see they are both coupled to the most
    downfield multiplet on the 1H NMR
  • This multiplet integrates to one, so we now have
    the fragment CH3-CHaHb-CH-EWG
  • Continuing, we see this multiplet is coupled to
    the multiplet at d 2.3 which integrates to one

22
Sample Problem 1
  • This multiplet is coupled to two others, each
    integrating to one hydrogen
  • Keep in mind we may be in a ring system where the
    Jtrans ? Jcis
  • We can finish the trail to the remaining
    signals
  • We are at a point of confusion as we have the
    following fragment deduced CH3-CHaHb-CH(EWG)-CH-
    CH-CH-CH-CH
  • Too many carbons, but we need to know which
    carbon is deficient by one hydrogen to make our
    ring

23
HSQC - Heteronuclear Single-Quantum Correlation
  • DESCRIPTION The 2D HSQC (Heteronuclear
    Single-Quantum Correlation) experiment permits to
    obtain a 2D heteronuclear chemical shift
    correlation map between directly-bonded 1H and
    X-heteronuclei (commonly, 13C and 15N) .
  • It is widely used because it is based on
    proton-detection, offering high sensitivity when
    compared with the conventional carbon-detected 2D
    HETCOR experiment. Similar results are obtained
    using the 2D HMQC experiment.

24
Sample Problem 1
  • The HSQC is easy to interperet assigned all Hs
    for each CThe 1H NMR is on the F1 dimension and
    an actual 13C NMR is used on the F2 for reference
  • In this experiment a 13C acquisition is never
    done!
  • Simply match 1H multiplets with their respective
    carbons
  • Here you can determine if two Hs are connected to
    the same carbon
  • Coupling this with DEPT you can confirm you have
    assigned all protons to a carbon

25
Sample Problem 1
  • A little larger, with the uninteresting region of
    the 13C spectrum deleted

We see that these 3 sets of Hs are bound to the
same carbon
26
Sample Problem 1
  • If we put this together with the COSY data
  • CH3-CHaHb-CH(EWG)-CH-CH-CH-CH- becomes
  • CH3-CH2-CH(EWG ester)-CH2-CH2-(EWG)
  • From a reference text we find that the protons on
    a carbon bound to the oxygen end of the ester
    will show up downfield (d 4.5) of the protons on
    a carbon bound to the carbonyl carbon of the
    ester (d 2.3)
  • We can now construct the compound

27
HMBC Heteronuclear Multiple Bond Correlation
  • DESCRIPTION The 2D HMBC experiment permits to
    obtain a 2D heteronuclear Chemical Shift
    correlation map between long-range coupled 1H and
    heteronuclei (commonly, 13C).
  • It is widely used because it is based on
    proton-detection, offering high sensitivity when
    compared with the carbon-detected.
  • In addition, long-range proton-carbon coupling
    constants can be measured from the resulting
    spectra.   

28
HMBC Heteronuclear Multiple Bond Correlation
  • The power of this technique is it allows us to
    see through a quarternary carbon center!
  • The drawback is that for small molecules with
    tight ring or fused-ring systems (like many of
    the unknowns) everything may be correlated to
    everything else!
  • Knowing the structure of our sample problem,
    lets look at the HMBC   

29
HMBC Heteronuclear Multiple Bond Correlation
From this spectrum, we see the set of resonances
that are connected from the terminal CH3- group
towards the oxygen end of the ester (red) We see
the set of resonances that start from the
carbonyl end of the ester (blue) We see the two
ends that are associated with the ester carbonyl
carbon! (green)
30
Sample Problem 2 - IR
31
Sample Problem 2
M 154.0 23.9 M1 155.0 2.7
32
Sample Problem 2
33
Sample Problem 2
34
Sample Problem 2
35
Sample Problem 2
36
Sample Problem 2
37
Sample Problem 2
38
Sample Problem 2
39
Sample Problem 3
M 156.0 8.4 M1 157.0 0.9
40
Sample Problem 3
41
Sample Problem 3
42
Sample Problem 3
43
Sample Problem 3
44
Sample Problem 3
45
Sample Problem 3
46
Sample Problem 3
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com