Title: Basics of Scientific Inquiry
1Basics of Scientific Inquiry
2Common sense claims
- Common sense claims are often hunches based on
anecdotal evidence e.g. most people would not
hurt another human being just because an
authority figure told them too. - Milgrams (1966) famous experiment into
conformity. - Approx 70 of those tested gave electric shocks
to what they believed was another test subject,
at a level high enough to kill them. - Before carrying out the research, Milgram had
asked other psychologists whether he should go
ahead with the experiment. He was told that
nearly all participants would withdraw before
causing any pain.
3Three lessons from Milgram
- Skepticism is valuable.
- Careful observation under controlled conditions
is very important. - Observer expectancy results are real and are
research cancer. - Clever Hans wasnt so clever, after all.
4What Is Scientific Inquiry?
- Four goals of scientific inquiry
- Description (what happens)
- Prediction (when it happens)
- Causal control (what causes it to happen)
- Explanation (why it happens)
- How would we apply these goals to the study of
the effects of alcohol intoxication?
5- An open mind and good imagination are not enough.
Research in the psychological sciences requires a
skeptical attitude and objective methodology.
6(No Transcript)
7Falsifiability
- The case of blood-letting
- For a theory to be useful, the predictions drawn
from it must be specific. - Tell us what will happen
- Tell us what will not happen
- How would we test for my ability to mind read?
8The Bottom Line
- Progress occurs in science when a theory does not
predict everything. - Rather, science benefits from specific
predictions about phenomena, made in advance. - Falsifiability is liberating making mistakes
furthers progress
9Falsifiable or Unfalsifiable?
- Pepsi tastes better than Coca Cola
- Psychics can speak to the dead
- Aliens abduct us, do medical experiments on us
and then return us, leaving no evidence
10Pseudoscience
- A theory with the empirical trappings of real
science, including a system of theoretical
concepts and a wealth of corroborating evidence. - But a pseudo-science has built-in defense
mechanisms against possible refutation. - The Freudian theory provides an interpretation
for every conceivable symptom of the patient. - Its predictions therefore can never be refuted.
- http//www.youtube.com/watch?vIWE5N8z2Aa4
11The Nature of Science
- Order there are regular patterns in events
- Determinism events have identifiable causes
- Empiricism theories should be based on publicly
available evidence gathered through objective
observation - Parsimony explanations should explain as much as
possible as simply as possible
12Ockham's Razor
A rule in science and philosophy stating that
entities should not be multiplied needlessly.
This rule is interpreted to mean that the
simplest of two or more competing theories is
preferable and that an explanation for unknown
phenomena should first be attempted in terms of
what is already known. Also called law of
parsimony.
13The Empirical Process
14Building a Psychological Science
- Facts
- objective statement, based on direct observation,
reasonable people agree with - Theories
- Interrelated set of concepts designed to explain
existing facts generate new predictions - Hypotheses Specific Predictions
- Predictions about new facts based on the theory
15The Methods of Psychological Science
16An Experiment Involves Manipulating Conditions
- Manipulating independent variables and measuring
dependent variables helps to establish causal
relationships - Random assignment helps create equivalent groups
17Types of Reasoning
18Deductive Research
- A top down approach
- GENERAL SPECIFIC
- IF All oranges are fruit
- and all fruit grows on trees
- THEN oranges grow on trees
- Deductive process- Reasoning from general to
particular. E.g. Start with a theory look for
instances that confirm this (deduction).
19Inductive Research
- A bottom up approach
- GENERAL SPECIFIC
- Inductive process- Reasoning from particular to
general E.g. Scientists may observe instances of
a natural phenomenon and derive a general law
(inductive)
20Inductive or Deductive?
- Dan is a liar so I predict that the next thing he
says will be a lie - Bubba has seen his puppy gnaw on shoes so he
predicts that puppies always gnaw on shoes - Robins have nested under Rays carport for 3
years. He expects that they will nest there again
this year. - The gene for blue skin in fish also codes for
aggression so Jane will not put her blue fish in
with Elaines red fish.
21The Experiment
22Independent Variables are Manipulated by
Experimenters
- Experimenter control is the central feature of
IVs - IVs are NOT free to vary instead, they are
fixed by design
23Dependent Variables are Measured in Relation to
IVs
- DVs are said to depend on, be effects of, or be
caused by IVs - DV in alcohol intoxication study?
24Identify the IV and DV
- Jack does an experiment to determine whether
alcohol makes fish more aggressive - Jane puts more water in the dough of her bread in
order to make it rise better - Martha gives her crying baby a popsicle because
she thinks she may be teething - Dr. Smith shows people violent movies and
measures how quickly they eat a meal afterward - Wanda puts one orchid in the sun and one in the
shade because she wants to decrease growing time
25An Experiment Involves Manipulating Conditions
- Manipulating independent variables and measuring
dependent variables helps to establish causal
relationships - Random assignment helps create equivalent groups
26List of Core Features of Experimental Methods
- Independent variables (IVs)
- Dependent variables (DVs)
- Random sampling from representative populations
- Random assignment to conditions or treatments
- Efforts to control or minimize
extraneous/irrelevant factors
27Operational Definition
- The quantification of a variable that allows it
to be measured - Concepts in scientific theories must in some way
be grounded in, or linked to, observable events
that can be measured - Preexisting bias problem
28Class Activity
29James Randi
- The Amazing Randi
- Paranormal 1 million dollar challenge
- http//www.youtube.com/watch?vNzwwMmNRIVc