Paradigm Shifts: Understanding Ideological Foundations of Inequality - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 37
About This Presentation
Title:

Paradigm Shifts: Understanding Ideological Foundations of Inequality

Description:

Paradigms and Power in the Post Industrial World ... What is a paradigm- A model. ... Polynesians and Melanesians of the Pacific and for the aborigines of Australia. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:131
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 38
Provided by: FayeLin
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Paradigm Shifts: Understanding Ideological Foundations of Inequality


1
Paradigm Shifts Understanding Ideological
Foundations of Inequality
  • Dominant Paradigms in Western Thought
  • The Social Construction of Categories Race,
    Class, Gender, Sexuality
  • Paradigms and Power in the Post Industrial World
  • The Social Construction of Reality and Social
    Change

2
The Social Construction of Inequality
  • The Normal and the Abnormal
  • Common Sense Assumptions
  • Associations

3
Dominant Paradigms and Social Constructions
  • What is a paradigm- A model. The dominant
    paradigm is the ontological underpinnings of
    social thought. It is the framework that
    structures ideologies. These ideologies then in
    turn reinforce the dominant paradigm.

4
Paradigm Shifts Understanding the Ideological
Foundations of Inequality
  • Feudalism/Renaissance
  • Industrial Capitalism/Enlightenment
  • Post-Industrial Capitalism/Empirical Science

5
The History of Social Inequality
  • Race
  • Class
  • Gender
  • Sexuality

6
The Guiding Paradigm Structures Ideologies of
Difference/Inequality
  • Understanding The Social Construction of
    Categories Race, Class, Gender, Sexuality

7
The Social Construction of Categories Race
  • Racial Formation- refers to the process by which
    social, economic, and political forces determine
    the content and importance of racial categories,
    and by which they are in turn shaped by racial
    meanings. Race is a central axis of social
    relations which cannot be subsumed under or
    reduced to some broader category or conception.
    (Omi and Winant p.21)
  • Racial subjection is quintessentially
    ideological. (Omi and Winant p. 22)

8
The Social Construction of Categories Race
  • Racialization- signifies the extension of racial
    meaning to a previously racially unclassified
    relationship, social practice, or group.
  • Racialization is a historically specific
    ideological process.
  • Racial ideology is constructed from pre-existing
    conceptual elements. It emerges from the
    struggles of competing political projects.
  • -By the end of the seventeenth century, Africans
    whose specific identity was Ibo, Yoruba, Fulani,
    etc. were rendered black by an ideology of
    exploitation based on racial logic - the
    establishment and maintenance of a color line.
    (Omi and Winant P.23)

9
The Social Construction of Categories Race
  • The seemingly obvious natural and common
    sense qualities which the existing racial order
    exhibits themselves testify to the effectiveness
    of the racial formation process in constructing
    racial meanings and racial identities. Omi and
    Winant p. 21

10
The History of Racial Formation
  • As Winthrop Jordan has observed From the
    initially common term Christian, at mid-century
    there was a marked shift toward the terms English
    and free. After about 1680, taking the colonies
    as a whole, a new term of self-identification
    appeared- white.

11
Racial Systems of Classification and Shifting
Systems of Power and Privilege
  • Johann Friedrich Blumenbach (1752-1840), the
    German anatomist and naturalist
  • Blumenbach's final taxonomy of 1795 divided all
    humans into five groups, defined both by
    geography and appearance--in his order, the
    Caucasian variety, for the light-skinned people
    of Europe and adjacent parts of Asia and Africa
    the Mongolian variety, for most other inhabitants
    of Asia, including China and Japan the Ethiopian
    variety, for the dark-skinned people of Africa
    the American variety, for most native populations
    of the New World and the Malay variety, for the
    Polynesians and Melanesians of the Pacific and
    for the aborigines of Australia.

12
Caucasian? Isnt that a region between Russia
and Georgia?
  • Caucasian- Blumenbach's definition cites two
    reasons for his choice--the maximal beauty of
    people from this small region, and the
    probability that humans were first created in
    this area.

13
Caucasian?
14
Why Race?
  • Shifting Discourses-
  • Colonialization and the primitive other.
  • Colonial power and racial classification.

15
The Social Construction of Categories Race
  • What types of Expectations/Assumptions are made
    about people of Different Races/Ethnicities (Be
    sure to interrogate Dominant Categories as well
    as subordinate).
  • Abilities
  • Preferences (Likes and Dislikes)
  • Family Life

16
Understanding the Racialization of Terrorism
  • How did terrorism become an Arab/Muslim
    phenomenon?
  • Media representation.
  • After September 11, 2001, images of celebrating
    Palestinians were broadcast with the implication
    being that they were celebrating the attack. In
    reality, the footage was of group celebrating a
    soccer victory.
  • Single image hides the diversity of the
    community.
  • Multi-religious, multi-cultural etc.

17
Discussion
  • What are some of the ways that people of Middle
    Eastern Descent are racialized?
  • How is terrorist and Muslim conflated?

18
The Social Construction of Categories Gender
  • Doing Gender- Gender is done (West and Zimmerman,
    1987)
  • Through repeated enactments of gender norms,
    gender is written on the body and into the psyche.

19
The Social Construction of Categories Gender
  • Talking about gender for most people is the
    equivalent of fish talking about water. Gender
    is so much the routine ground of everyday
    activities that questioning its
    taken-for-granted assumptions and presuppositions
    is like thinking about whether the sun will come
    up. (Lorber p.99)

20
The Social Construction of Categories Gender
  • As a social institution, gender is a process of
    creating distinguishable social statuses for the
    assignment of rights and responsibilities.
    Lorber p.101
  • Gender creates the social differences that define
    woman and man.
  • Gender boundaries tell the individual who is like
    him or her, and who is unlike.

21
Dominant Ideologies of Gender
  • What do dominant ideologies tell us that men and
    women in American Culture
  • Look Like
  • Act Like
  • Like/Desire/Enjoy
  • Dislike/Avoid
  • Value
  • Expect

22
The Social Construction of Categories Class
  • Formal Components of Class Income, Wealth,
    Education, Occupation.
  • Informal Appearance, possessions
  • Cultural Capital- Knowledge, abilities, and
    preferences that are socially valued (Bourdieu)

23
The Social Construction of Categories Class
  • Class position is assumed to be Earned-
  • The Horatio Alger Myth
  • Implications and Assumptions-
  • People who get ahead work hard
  • People who fail to get ahead are somehow
    deficient and individually responsible for their
    position.
  • Because our system is meritocratic, success is
    equally available to all.

24
The Social Construction of Categories Class
  • What types of Expectations/Assumptions are made
    about people of Different Class Statuses?
  • Abilities
  • Physical Appearance
  • Preferences (Likes and Dislikes)
  • Family Life

25
The Social Construction of Categories Sexuality
  • Understanding the Continuum
  • How is Sexuality done?
  • Heteronormativity- the normalization of
    heterosexuality.

26
The Social Construction of Categories Sexuality
  • The fact that the homosexual in history is the
    subject of study, but not the heterosexual
    demonstrates the machinations of power.
  • -According to this proposal, women and men make
    their own sexual histories. But they do not
    produce their sex lives just as they please.
    They make their sexualities within a particular
    mode of organization given by the past and
    altered by their changing desire, their present
    power and activity, and their vision of a better
    world. (Katz p.146).

27
The Social Construction of Categories Sexuality
  • -To understand the subtle history of
    heterosexuality we need to look carefully at
    correlations between (1) societys organization
    of eros and pleasure (2) its mode of engendering
    persons as feminine or masculine (its making of
    women and men) (3) its ordering of human
    reproduction and (4) its dominant political
    economy. (Katz p. 147)

28
The Social Construction of Categories Sexuality
  • According to Dominant Ideologies, what do
    heterosexual and homosexual/Queer men and women
    in American Culture
  • Look Like
  • Act Like
  • Like/Desire/Enjoy
  • Dislike/Avoid
  • Value
  • Expect

29
Paradigms and Power in the Post Industrial World
  • How are people advantaged or disadvantaged by
    being in different categories?
  • Race
  • Class
  • Gender
  • Sexuality

30
2000 Median Annual Earnings of Year-Round,
Full-Time Workers
31
Otherness Discussion Activity
  • Form Groups of 4-6 and Discuss the Following
    Questions
  • 1) Discuss a time you realized you were being
    viewed as the other.
  • 2) Discuss a time you saw someone else othered,
    while you remained in the dominant category.
  • How did these experiences make you
  • Feel/think About Yourself
  • Feel/think about other people
  • Feel/think about your status/authority/options
  • Feel/think about others status/authority/Options

32
The Social Construction of Reality and Social
Change
  • Because categories are constructed, they can be
    changed.
  • A continuous process of change occurs as groups
    and ideologies compete and material conditions
    alter.

33
Altering the Paradigm of Difference
  • Recognize Social Constructions
  • The effort must be made to understand race as an
    unstable and decentered complex of social
    meanings constantly being transformed by
    political struggle. (Omi and Winant, p.25)
  • Understanding Social Construction as Process
  • Because gender is a process, there is room not
    only for modification and variation by
    individuals and small groups but also for
    institutionalized change. (Lorber p.102)

34
Otherness as a Catalyst for Change
  • Politically, the process of othering, creates
    the boundaries that define group identity and
    allow for collective action. (Ibish, p.41)

35
From Otherness to Privilege
  • The experience of otherness is part of systems of
    privilege/oppression. It removes the option of
    being in the dominant category.

36
Dorothy Allison and the Mythical They
  • In Your Opinion, what is the Question of Class?
  • In what ways is Allison oppressed?
  • How are her experiences of oppression manifested?

37
Key Concepts
  • Paradigms
  • Otherness
  • The Social Construction of Inequality
  • How Paradigm Shifts have altered concepts of
    race, class, gender and sexuality
  • Racial Formation
  • Racialization
  • Doing Gender
  • Sexuality Continuum
  • Cultural Capital
  • Horatio Alger Myth
  • Heteronormativity
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com