Title: Group Think
1Group Think
- A mode of thinking that people engage in when
they are deeply involved in a cohesive in-group, - when the members' strivings for unanimity
override their motivation to realistically
appraise alternative courses of action(Janis
1972 9) - When the desire for unanimity overcomes a groups
ability to make rational assessments on all
available information - Can include an unquestioned belief in your moral
correctness religious (give your life to God)
or political (Nazi Germany) - Reduces team effectiveness because it can remove
the ability/need to question or validate
2Group behaviour
- Group Behaviour -
- Positive and provides for trust, belonging,
reliance, - Resulting in being happy at work - better more
efficient service - Like minded people with similar ideas
expectations - Did not join public service to make a fortune
- Joined to
- serve
- make a difference
- belong
- get self esteem (Maslow 1987)
- Develop identity
- Fitting-in (Baigent 2001)
- Surface acting that develops into deep acting
(Hochschild 1983) - Culture can inclusive
- Realise needs (Maslow 1987)
- Avoid alienation (Marx)
- Resisting deskilling (Braverman 1974)
- Culture can be negative
- Racism (Macpherson 1999)
3Formal Public Service Culture
- Weberian Bureaucracy
- Written rules (orders) for everything
- A clear chain of command
- No room for entrepreneurs
- Rationality rules
- An iron cage (Weber)
4CAMBRIDGESHIRE FIRE AND RESCUE SERVICE - CFRS
STRUCTURE
CHIEF FIRE OFFICER TOM CARROLL
COMMUNITY SAFETY DIRECTORATE Lawrie Booth
MANAGEMENT SERVICES DIRECTORATE Cheryl Rolph
DISTRICT COMMUNITY SAFETY CAMBRIDGE CITY
DISTRICT HUNTINGDON DISTRICT Dave Warren Peter
Sharpe EAST CAMBS DISTRICT PETERBOROUGH
DISTRICT Dave Robertson Paul Malinowski FENLAND
DISTRICT SOUTH CAMBS DISTRICT Paul
Fredericks Pat Kilby
FIRE CONTROL Elaine Wakerley
PERSONAL ORGANISATIONAL DEVELOPMENT GROUP Mauric
e Moore
CORPORATE DEMOCRATIC SERVICES GROUP Fiona Fowler
HUMAN RESOURCES Tracy Bennett-Tighe/ Marissa
Reynolds
TECHNICAL SERVICES DIRECTORATE Peter Warner
RESOURCES DIRECTORATE John Hummersone
FLEET EQUIPMENT SERVICES GROUP Frank Laska
COMMUNITY RISK MANAGEMENT GROUP Gerry Dacey
FINANCE CONTRACT MANGEMENTGROUP Matthew Warren
INFORMATION COMMUNICATIONS TECHNOLOGY
GROUP Martin Scott
NEW DIMENSIONS OFFICER Andy Dunlop
AUDIT OFFICER Mark Bennett-Tighe
PAYROLL TEAM Daphne Baker
PROPERTY ESTATES GROUP Danny Rust
5(No Transcript)
6Forming a society
- Jones (1994) suggests that Durkheim has an
orthodox consensus view of social structures made
up of norms, values and rules. - Durkheim argues we learn about norms, values and
rules through socialisation - Norms values and rules serve the function of
making social life possible - Each generation of people pass on these norms,
values and rules to the next (tradition) - Functionalists believe in a society formed by
social structures - Structures that become real in their consequences
(W I Thomas) - The argument of functionalist is that any social
process exists because they serve a function - For example we have laws because they lay down
the boundaries of what is acceptable in a society - Durkheim uses the term social solidarity to
describe how people achieve social order - Social solidarity was achieved by collective
standards and rules of behaviour that make the
social glue that holds society together - Social solidarity/order flows from consensus -
the existence of shared norms, values and rules - When individuals do not feel they belong in a
society share the same norms and values they
feel alienated a situation that Durkheim saw as
anomie - Mayo, recognise that workers at Hawthorn suffered
from anomie they did not feel as is they
belonged during his experiment he made them
feel important that they belonged and therefore
they were happier and worked harder.
7Durkheim
- A collective way of living/being can be termed a
culture - Cultures can be macro gender, ethnicity, class
- Cultures can be micro family, work, teenagers
- Each generation has the ability to change their
culture - People have a choice if they comply or not
- In Public Services there are two cultures
- Formal
- Informal
8These arguments almost make as if culture has a
life of its own
- As a result, it is often the culture rather than
individuals that is seen as responsible for how
cultural values get put into practice - Formal police culture may appear to have
strength, power and authority, but this is due to
a combination of group ownership, tradition and
history, not because it actually exists. - Police culture is a structure
accepted/constructed by the individuals who
operate within it - Because the culture has to be put into action by
individuals, there is space for those individuals
to act differently
9It is sometimes possible to forget that
- People in the fire and police services have minds
of their own - Frequently group behaviour acts like a snowball
almost forcing people to put their own values on
hold as they to give up some free will to join in
with the group - People in the fire or police services make a
choice when they join in on cultural practices - Sometimes choice is not made under circumstances
that the individual would choose
10There can be a number of views about public
service culture.
- values that one cohort of public servants pass
down to the next - a common form of behaviour amongst public
servants - a public service ethos to serve and protect
- values that officers, managers, constables,
firefighters, soldiers etc. have in common - something people sign up to because it provides
for your needs, a sense of belonging, identity,
purpose
11Alienation not here
- Public Servants love their jobs
- Teamwork can prevent alienation from the work
process - Informal culture gives individuals some control
over what they do - The process of deskilling
- What do the workers feel
12Tuckman, B. (1965) 'Developmental sequence in
small groups', Psychological Bulletin 63(6)
Forming
- Identifying the task and how to accomplish it.
- Deciding what is acceptable group behaviour and
how to handle group conflict - Deciding what information needs to be gathered to
tackle the task - Abstract conceptual discussions or some members'
impatience with these discussions - No clear focus on task or problem as evidenced by
irrelevant discussions - Complaining about organisational problems and
barriers to accomplishing the task instead of
focusing on the task
13Storming
- Arguing among group members, even if they agree
on the issues - Choosing sides within the group, bids for power,
drawing divisional lines - Tension, jealousy, lack of unity, and a perceived
hierarchy - Establishing unobtainable goals, increased
concerns about too much work to be done.
14Norming
- Conflict avoidance in an attempt to promote
harmony - Friendlier discussions on a more personal level,
more discussions about the dynamics of the group,
begin to confide in one another - More of a sense of group cohesion and esprit,
more commonality of goals - Establishing and maintaining realistic group
parameters for behaviour and performance - Organising how team will sanction transgressors
15Performing
- Constructively changing one's self--actually
changing for the betterment of the group. - Ability to avoid group conflict and, should
conflict arise, being able to work through it. - Much closer identity with the group,
understanding each other's strengths and
weaknesses.
16(No Transcript)
17- Self-appointed peer group leaders
- members who protect the group
- Maintain/police behaviour
- Protect the current culture holding the
accepted norms, values and rules in trust for the
next generation An illusion of invulnerability, - We know best
- Optimistic about your power
- Prepared to challenge managers covertly
- Ignore modernisation
- Collectively
- Rationalise your arguments
- Discount warnings
- Avoid reconsidering your assumptions
- Justify what you think
- Stick with past views (traditions)
- An unquestioned belief that the group is right
- Belief in the group's inherent morality
- Ignoring the real, ethical or moral consequences
of your actions - Stereotyped views of politicians managers
public - Too weak
18Norming and Action theories
- Impression management (Goffman)
- Labelling theory (Becker)
- Deviancy amplification (Cohen)
- What if you are black how might the police
service label you - What do the public services think of
modernisation - How does the label female affect you if you are
applying for a job the fire service
19Macpherson, W. (1999) The Stephen Lawrence
Inquiry, London HMSO.
- 6.44 We heed this warning, but upon all the facts
we assert that the conclusion that racism played
its part in this case is fully justified. Mere
incompetence cannot of itself account for the
whole catalogue of failures, mistakes,
misjudgements, and lack of direction and control
which bedevilled the Stephen - 6.3 In this Inquiry we have not heard evidence of
overt racism or discrimination, unless it can be
said that the use of inappropriate expressions
such as "coloured" or "negro" fall into that
category. The use of such words, which are now
well known to be offensive, displays at least
insensitivity and lack of training. A number of
officers used such terms, and some did not even
during their evidence seem to understand that the
terms were offensive and should not be used. - 11.36 The main conclusion that we reach is that
the inadequacy of the steps taken was as the
result of the failure of direction by supervisory
officers. The standard of command and
co-ordination during the first two hours after
this murder was in the opinion of the Inquiry
abysmal. - The collective failure of an organisation to
provide an appropriate and professional service
to people because of their colour, culture, or
ethnic origin. It can be seen or detected in
processes, attitudes and behaviour which amount
to discrimination through unwitting prejudice,
ignorance, thoughtlessness and racist
stereotyping which disadvantage minority ethnic
people.
20Bain, G. (2002) The Future of the fire service
reducing risk, saving lives, London ODPM
- 10. Personnel policy, procedures and practices in
the Fire Service give cause for concern. Despite
clear policies from management and the FBU in
favour of diversity, in practice only lip-service
is paid to it. Harassment and bullying are still
too prevalent. - The leadership must recognise that urgent action
is required. An improved programme of HR
management must be put in place as a matter of
priority. The work on the introduction of the
new Integrated Personal Development System (IPDS)
gives a framework for this improvement programme.
But the programme itself will not be a substitute
for real effort by management at all levels to
tackle the problems. (Bain 2002 V). - 6.28 We have been told by many including some
politicians that the leadership and general
input from local politicians to fire authorities
is poor. This is disappointing. If only because
of the spotlight that has now been shone on the
Service, it must be clear to all that good
leadership and management have been lacking in
many respects.
21Positive Action another view
- DB So if there's a positive action day for
ethnic minorities only, do you think, is that a
good or a bad thing? - Ff I think thats racist.
- DB You think its racist?
- LF Yes, absolutely. Its out and out
discrimination against the white, well, every
other. It basically says it doesnt matter if
you apply or not, theyre not interested in you
as a person or interested in this group or this
group at this time.
22FireWorksfor equality in the fire service
Barriers of Ethnic Minority Recruitment
- Perceived Barriers
- Cultural sensitivities prohibited some BEM groups
from applying - Religious restrictions prevented other ethnic
groups from applying - Asians saw the firefighting profession as a
low-status career - Problem of recruitment rested with BEM groups
23I think therefore I am