Title: Anesthesia for Thoracic Surgery:
1Anesthesia for Thoracic Surgery
- A potpourri of interesting topics
- Ottawa Hospital
- Journal Club
- October 16, 2006
2Perioperative Risk Factors for Anastomotic
Leakage After Esophagectomy Influence of
Thoracic Epidural AnalgesiaPierre Michelet MD
Xavier-Benoit DJourno, MD Antoine Roch, MD PhD
Laurent Papazian, MD Jacques Ragni, MD Pascal
Thomas, MD, PhD Jean-Pierre Auffray, MD
- Presented By Dr. Jennifer Ozard
3Preamble
- Carcinoma of the esophagus
- More common in men than women
- Accounts for approx. 1 of all cancers in the
North American population - Mets to liver and lungs primarily
- Risk Factors include age (gt55), alcohol abuse,
chewing tobacco, poor nutrition, exposure to
toxins (solvents), HPV, obesity, smoking, hx of
swallowing lye, mets from larynx/pharynx/tonsils/l
ung/breast/liver/ - kidney/prostate/testicle/bone/skin ca,
achalasia, GERD, Barretts esophagus - Periop mortality rate 3-10
- Most common postop complications include resp
failure and anastomotic leakage
4Preamble-2
- TEA
- Most satisfactory analgesia for esophagectomy
patients - Has been shown to decrease fatal and nonfatal
complications in multiple studies
5The Study
- Purpose
- To evaluate the influence of various
perioperative factors, including the use of TEA,
on the incidence of anastomotic leakage after
esophagectomy - Design
- Retrospective
- Population
- 207 patients undergoing 1-stage esophagectomy
between 1998-2003 in a teaching hospital
6Interventions-Patient Population
- Preop Factors
- Gender
- Age
- Height
- Weight
- BMI
- Smoking hx
- DM
- Tumour histology and stage
- Preop Factors
- Preop rads/chemo
- ASA class
- NYHA class
- PaO2/FVC/FEV1 pred
- FEV1/FVC pred
7Interventions-Periop Factors and Postop
Complications
- Periop Factors
- Duration of surgery (skin incision to closure),
duration of 1-lung vent, duration of mech vent,
periop blood loss, occurrence of hemodynamic
instability (lt80mmHg for 5 min) - Level of anastomosis
- Postop Factors/Complications
- Need for blood transfusion, inotrope use, lowest
value of PaO2/FiO2 within 1st 24 hours postop,
need for re-intubation - Pneumonia, ARDS, sepsis
8Outcome of Interest
- Anastomotic Leakage
- Defined as dehiscence diagnosed during the
postoperative period - For mech ventd patients, a routine upper
endoscopy was performed to confirm or rule out an
anastomotic leakage as possible cause of resp
failure - In patients with short stay in ICU, leakage was
assessed by a water-soluble monomeric, ionic
x-ray contrast medium study on postop days 8-10
and if suspicious, confirmed by endoscopy
9Methods
- Anesthetic Technique
- Induction Midaz, sufenta, muscle relaxant
- Left-sided double lumen tube
- TV 8-10ml/kg in 2-lung vent
- TV 5-6ml/kg in 1-lung vent with PEEP of 5cm H2O
- TEA and goals
- Placed before induction, T6-8, median approach
- Infusion started at end of esogastric anastomosis
(ropi and sufenta) - VASlt3 at rest, nerve block T2-9
- PCA if failure to place, refusal by pt or
accidental removal
10Methods, contd
- Esophagectomy
- en bloc esophagectomy with two-field
lymphadenectomy for malignancy - Right transthoracic approach with an
esophagogastric anastomosis in the upper thorax
for lower third and gastroesophageal tumors (Ivor
Lewis technique) or in the neck for higher lesions
11Statistics
- SPSS 12.0 stats software
- Univariate analysis
- Categorical data ?2 or Fisher Exact test
- Continuous data Wilcoxan or Kruskal Wallis
- Used to compare occurrence of anastomotic leak
against pre/peri/postop variables and development
of postop complications - Multivariate analysis
- Odds ratio calculated based on multiple logistic
regression of variables found to be significant
(or plt0.25) in the univariate analyses (2-sided
tests)
12Results-1
- Anastomotic Leak 11 (23/207)
- 30-day mortality Leak 26
- 30-day mortality - Leak 5.4
- Plt0.002
- OR 8.1 (2.2-30.4, plt0.002)
- Mean length ICU stay Leak 19/-16 d
- Mean length ICU stay -Leak 9/-7 d
- Plt0.008
- Mean length hospital stay Leak 43/-27 d
- Mean length hospital stay -Leak 23/-11 d
- Plt0.001
13Results-2
14Results-3
- Preop characteristics
- Significant difference in freq. of leak with
respect to tumour histology and preop radiation - Periop characteristics
- No significant difference in freq. of leak with
regard to surgical duration, mechanical
ventilation time, OLV duration - Significant difference in freq. of leakage with
- Cervical anastomosis plt0.001
- Hypotensive event plt0.001
- Estimated blood loss plt0.001
- ARDS plt0.001
- Epidural analgesia p0.002
15Results-4
- TEA
- 93/207 patients
- Duration 4.4 /- 0.8 d
- 4 accidental losses
- Significant difference in length of ICU stay when
compared to pts with no TEA - Significant difference in 30-day mortality when
compared to pts with no TEA
16Results-5
- Anastomotic Leakage associated with
- Documentation of surgical difficulties (indicated
by periop blood loss) - ?Rate of hypotensive events
- ?Incidence of ARDS postop (5 pts with
post-leakage ARDS) - ?Incidence of TEA
- Multiple Logistic Regression Analysis
17Conclusions
- Anastomotic leakage is not rare (11)
- Anastomotic leakage is associated with
significantly increased - 30-day mortality
- ICU and hospital length of stays
- TEA may be protective against conduit ischemia
and prevent leak - Support for relationship
- TEA promotes intensive physiotherapy that can
preserve pulm function and prevent hypoxemia - Improvement of the gastric tube microcirculation
- Surgical difficulty, cervical anastomosis and
development of ARDS may increase risk of ischemia
and leak
18Conclusions-2
- Offers more justification for spending the MAFAT
on the thoracic epidural for esophagectomies
19Critical Discussion-1
- Study Design
- Reference Kabon et al who showed that epidural
initiated before skin incision can improve
microcirculation and prevent anastomosis
insufficiency postop--in this study, not
initiated until after esogastric anastomosis
completed - Retrospective study
- Missing data
- Stats
- could have used stronger stats when doing the
multiple regression analysis
20Critical Discussion-2
- Confounders
- Epidural placement only achieved in 93/207
patients! - ARDS as a chicken and the egg argument