Tuning Bacterial Behaviour - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 25
About This Presentation
Title:

Tuning Bacterial Behaviour

Description:

E.coli has one constitutive chemosensory pathway. ... Interaction between cognate HPK-RR depend on very few amino acids (motifs may ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:106
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 26
Provided by: Jud56
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Tuning Bacterial Behaviour


1
(No Transcript)
2
Tuning Bacterial Behaviour
Judy Armitage University of Oxford Department of
Biochemistry and Oxford Centre for Integrative
Systems Biology StoMP 2009
3
E.coli chemotaxis-the best understood system in
Biology
  • E.coli has one constitutive chemosensory pathway.
  • Biases swimming direction by regulating motor
    switching
  • Not essential and phenotype obvious
  • All components known, kinetics of all reactions,
    copy number of all proteins, structures of most
  • Cells respond to 2 molecules over 6 orders of
    magnitude
  • Paradigm for 2 component pathways

4
E.coli chemotaxis
  • 4 dedicated constitutive membrane spanning
    receptors (MCPs) plus Aer
  • One sensory pathway via CheW (linker), CheA
    (histidine protein kinase), CheY (response
    regulator)
  • Chemotaxis is via biasing a normally random
    swimming pattern
  • Adaptation of MCPs via single CheB/R methylation
    system
  • Mutations give either smooth swimming or tumbling
    phenotypes
  • Unusual HPK pathway
  • Termination of CheY-P through CheZ-not HPK
    phosphatase

Histidine protein kinase signalling
MCP ?? CheA ?? CheY/B
5
Rhodobacter sphaeroides
  • Member of a-subgroup proteobacteria
  • Heterotrophic, photoheterotrophic, anaerobic
    respiration, CO2- N2- fixation, hydrogenase,
    fermentation
  • Quorum sensing, biofilm forming
  • Membrane differentiation-aerobic vs
    photoheterotrophic
  • Targeting-flagellum, cell division proteins,
    chemotaxis proteins


6
Chemotaxis in R.sphaeroides
  • Single unidirectional flagellum (under lab
    conditions)
  • Stopping involves a molecular brake
  • 3 chemosensory operons
  • Need transport and possibly partial metabolism
    for chemotactic response
  • Why have 3 chemosensory pathways to control on
    flagellar motor?
  • 4 CheAs
  • 8 membrane spanning MCPs
  • 4 cytoplasmic Tlps
  • 6 CheYs
  • 2 CheBs
  • NO CheZ

7
R.sphaeroides uses a brake to stop
8
Activity of the chemotaxis proteins in vitroIs
there cross talk between apparently homologous
proteins encoded by the different operons? In
vitro phosphotransfer measured between 4 CheA
HPKs and the 6 CheY and 2 CheB RRs
CheA has H on Hpt domain
9
Pattern of in vitro phosphotransfer
10
Kinase and Response Regulators
  • CheA2 will phosphotransfer to all Che Response
    Regulators-wherever encoded (CheOp1, CheOp2 or
    CheOp3)
  • CheA1 will only phosphotransfer to proteins
    encoded in own operon (CheOp1)
  • CheA3/4 will only phosphotransfer to proteins
    encoded in its operon (CheOp3)
  • How is discrimination achieved?

11
Chemotaxis in vitro phosphotransfer
Horribly complex!
12
Where are the gene products?
  • Do the genes encode proteins that make separate
    or cross-talking pathways in vivo ?
  • G(C,Y)FP (N and C terminal) fusions to all che
    genes replaced in genome behind native promoters
    and tested for normal behaviour
  • Confirmed by immuno-elecronmicroscopy

13
Pathways targeted to different part of cell
Cytoplasmic general CheB1, CheB2, CheY3, CheY4,
CheY6
Red CheOp2 Blue CheOp3
.
14
Localisation
  • Chemosensory proteins are physically separate in
    the cell
  • CheOp2 encoded proteins with MCPs at poles and
    CheOp3 with Tlps in cell centre
  • CheAs physically separate and therefore do not
    cross phosphotransfer in vivo ?
  • What controls localisation?
  • Why have 2 physically separate chemosensing
    pathways?
  • Is this common? Does it only apply to taxis
    pathways?
  • Would not have been identified without in vivo
    investigations

15
Localisation requires two CheOp3 proteins
  • PpfA (Slp)
  • Homology to ParA family type 1 DNA partitioning
    proteins, contains Walker type ATPase domain
  • Deletion results in reduced taxis to a range of
    organic acids, but normal growth
  • TlpT
  • Putative cytoplasmic chemoreceptor
  • Essential to chemotaxis to a range of organic
    acids
  • Co-localises in the cytoplasm with CheA3, A4 and
    CheW4, TlpC, TlpS

16
PpfA regulates the number and position of
cytoplasmic clusters
Cephalexin treated WS8N DppfA
17
PpfA a protein partitioning factor
  • PpfA (Protein)
  • signal for new cluster formation, and anchoring
    midcell, ¼ and ¾ positioning.
  • ATP dependent (Walker box mutantsnull)
  • Partner/interactions?
  • ParA (DNA)
  • characteristic midcell, ¼ and ¾ positioning of
    plasmids
  • Polymerisation? Oscillation?
  • ATP/ADP ParA switch
  • ParB and parC(S) partners

18
Cytoplasmic chemoreceptor TlpT
TlpT nucleating protein for cytoplasmic cluster?
19
How common is this protein segregating system?
  • 53 of complete genomes in databases have more
    than one putative chemotaxis pathway (max 8)
  • 60 of these have putative ppfA in one Che operon
  • Of these 83 also have putative cytoplasmic
    chemoreceptor gene adjacent and all have
    disordered N-terminal domain

20
R.sphaeroides chemosensory pathway the happiness
centre?
Metabolic state Kinase vs phosphatase
CheB2-P
External world
A3A4
A2
CheY6-P
CheY3/4-P
  • CheA3 is a kinase and specific phosphatase for
    CheY6
  • Model prediction phosphoryl groups originating
    from CheA3A4 can end up on CheY3 and CheY4 using
    CheB2 and CheA2 as a phosphoconduit.
  • His-asp-his-asp phosphorelay between clusters is
    route to integrating and balancing the signals
    from metabolism and the external environment.
  • Dominant CheY6-P level regulated by CheA3
    kinasephosphatase activity

21
How do these pathways control the single motor?
How is discrimination achieved?
22
What determines localisation
  • Is it operon position on chromosome?
  • Are there specific interaction domains?

23
Rhodobacter sphaeroides CheA Proteins
Swapped P1 domains and looked at
phosphotransfer Swapped P5 domains and looked at
localisation Created chimeras with same P1
domains in CheAs at both cell locations
24
Conclusions
  • There is internal organisation in bacteria with
    apparent homologues targeted to specific sites in
    the cell (high throughput in vitro analysis may
    give misleading interaction patterns)
  • Interaction between cognate HPK-RR depend on very
    few amino acids (motifs may allow engineering of
    novel interactions)

25
The people who did the work
George Wadhams Steven Porter Mark Roberts Sonja
Pawelczyk Mila Kojadinovic Kathryn Scott Nicolas
Delalez Mostyn Brown David Wilkinson Christian
Bell Yo-Cheng Chang Murray Tipping Gareth
Davies Elaine Byles
COLLABORATORS Dave Stuart Philip Maini Marcus
Tindall Charlotte Deane Rebecca Hamer
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com