Title: Critical Illness Design
1Critical IllnessDesign Pricing
Caribbean Actuarial Association- 2004 -
Accepting New Realities
Presentation by Sylvain Goulet, FCIA, FSA, MAAA
2Critical Illness- Design Pricing -
- Product Design Issues
- Product Pricing Issues
- Profitability and Risk Considerations
- Reinsurance Issues
- Incidence Rates Development of Rates
- Conclusions
3Critical Illness - Design Pricing -
- Product Design Issues
- Product Pricing Issues
- Profitability and Risk Considerations
- Reinsurance Issues
- Incidence Rates Development of Rates
- Conclusions
4Product Design Issues- The Simplest Form -
- Lump Sum Payment
- Lump sum payment at the onset of a covered
illness or condition - Not disability income
- No proof of need required, just proof of the
condition - Type
- Stand-alone basis
- Rider, attached to a base life insurance policy
5Product Design Issues- The Simplest Form -
- Major Conditions The Big 4
- Cancer numerous alternatives
- Heart Attack
- Stroke
- Coronary Artery
- Bypass Surgery
With or without a 30-day survival period
6Product Design Issues- The Simplest Form -
- Other Adult Conditions
- Alzheimer
- Kidney failure
- Major organ transplant
- Paralysis, etc.
- Children Conditions
- Cerebral palsy
- Cystic fibrosis
- Downs syndrome
7Critical Illness - Design Pricing -
- Product Design Issues
- Product Pricing Issues
- Profitability and Risk Considerations
- Reinsurance Issues
- Incidence Rates Development of Rates
- Conclusions
8Product Pricing Issues- Costs Consideration -
- Differences by Sex
- Male incidence rates almost always higher than
female incidence rates - Differences by Smoking Status
- A big increase around ages 60-75
- Slowdown (non-smoker) and plateau or decrease
(smoker) around ages 80-90 - Then rates increase very fast at older ages
9Product Pricing Issues- Costs Consideration -
Male vs Female Non-Smoker
Prostate Cancer, Heart Attack Stroke
Breast Cancer, Heart Attack Stroke
10Product Pricing Issues- Costs Consideration -
Male vs Female Smoker
Lung Cancer, More Severe Heart Attack Stroke
11Product Pricing Issues- Costs Consideration -
Non-Smoker vs Smoker (Male)
Lung Cancer, More Severe Heart Attack Stroke
12Product Pricing Issues- CI Compared to Mortality
-
- Male Non-Smoker issue age 20, ultimate
- Morbidity almost always higher than mortality,
but not so at the much older ages - 20-29 -12
- 30-39 33
- 40-49 94
- 50-59 87
- 60-69 63
- 70-79 14
- 80-89 -42
- 90-99 -64
13Product Pricing Issues- Costs Consideration -
CI Incidence vs Mortality (Male NS)
14Product Pricing Issues- Characteristics -
- Much Like Life Product
- Low incidence rates at younger ages, increasing
rapidly at older ages - Smokers higher than non-smokers (lung cancer,
heart diseases, etc.) - Male rates higher than female rates
- Lapse-Supported
- Behaves like a Term to 100
- Must assume low lapse rates at higher durations
and higher attained ages
15Critical Illness - Design Pricing -
- Product Design Issues
- Product Pricing Issues
- Profitability and Risk Considerations
- Reinsurance Issues
- Incidence Rates Development of Rates
- Conclusions
16Profitability and Risk Considerations- How to
Mitigate Costs -
- Conditions Covered
- Include the big 4 as a base plan (75-85 of
the cost) - Offer other conditions as riders
- Offer packages to avoid anti-selection
- Differences by Smoking Status
- Most conditions create higher rates for smoker
than for non-smoker - A big increase for smokers around ages 60-75
17Profitability and Risk Considerations - How to
Mitigate Costs -
- Offer Other Benefits to Even Out the Costs
- Price with Cash Surrender Values (CSV)
- Offer Return of Premiums (ROP)
- Protect the Downfalls
- Offer non-guaranteed rates plus a rider for
guaranteed rates - e.g. 8.00/1000 2.50/1000 for guaranteed rates
- price the base appropriately and the rider
conservatively
18Profitability and Risk Considerations - How to
Mitigate Costs -
- Change the Benefits Structure
- Change the of benefits paid, for example
- 20-65 100
- grading to 70 at 75
- grading to 60 at 80
- grading to 45 at 90
- grading to 25 at 100
- Lower ultimate costs at older ages
- Consistent with reduced financial needs (children
gone, house paid, etc.)
19Product Pricing Issues- Costs Consideration -
100 CI Incidence Full Benefits
20Product Pricing Issues- Costs Consideration -
100 CI Incidence Partial Benefits
21Profitability and Risk Considerations - How to
Mitigate Costs -
- Change the Benefits Structure
- Change the of benefits paid, for example
- 20-65 100
- grading to 70 at 75
- grading to 60 at 80
- grading to 45 at 90
- grading to 25 at 100
- Lower total premium rates for all issue ages,
especially older ones - Greatly reduces the lapse-supported nature of
these products
22Profitability and Risk Considerations - How to
Mitigate Costs -
- Offer RC Term Premiums
- For example, T10 RC
- Lower going-in premiums, increasing rapidly at
renewal - Guaranteed premiums for the first 10 or 20 years,
then non-guaranteed - Could increase say to age 70, then convertible to
whole life rates - In Canada
- 40 RC, 39 Level, 18 Permanent, 3 Others
(source Munich Re Survey)
23Profitability and Risk Considerations - How to
Mitigate Costs -
- Differences by Country
- Extending some countries experience to other
countries must be done carefully - Focus on common characteristics
- The Big 4 account for 75-80 (may not always be
the case in all countries) - Cancers, Heart Attacks, Strokes usually well
documented - Similar pattern by sex and age
- Allow for more margins, or non-guaranteed rates
24Critical Illness - Design Pricing -
- Product Design Issues
- Product Pricing Issues
- Profitability and Risk Considerations
- Reinsurance Issues
- Incidence Rates Development of Rates
- Conclusions
25Reinsurance Issues- Typical Reinsurance
Constraints -
- Non-Guaranteed Rates
- Offer non-guaranteed products backed by the
reinsurer and a Guarantee rider at a
conservative cost (25 to 30) - Until the reinsurer increases the rate, you keep
the rider premium - Try to negotiate maximum reinsurance rates first
(cost of the rider)
26Reinsurance Issues- Typical Reinsurance
Constraints -
- Attained Age Limit (Coverage) of 65-75
- Offer a to age 65/75 product with an
Extension rider for life, with decreasing
benefits after 65/75 - Offer CSV benefits or ROP to mitigate the cost
(not reinsured) - Negotiate steps down ceding percentages up front,
maybe linked with declining benefits - e.g. 60 reinsured up to 75, declining to 30
afterwards
27Reinsurance Issues- Typical Reinsurance
Constraints -
- Lower Face Amounts
- Typically lower face amounts
- Not as much need for reinsurance, depending on
individual retention limits - Cost per 1000 usually more expensive
28Critical Illness - Design Pricing -
- Product Design Issues
- Product Pricing Issues
- Profitability and Risk Considerations
- Reinsurance Issues
- Incidence Rates Development of Rates
- Conclusions
29Incidence Rates- Development of Rates -
- Empirical data
- Difficult to obtain because limited access and
experience (direct writers and reinsurers) - Research Development
- Available in Canada, USA, UK, Australia
- Canada much ahead of the USA, which is new at
offering CI - May Need adjustment for the Caribbean, Latin
America and other territories
30Incidence Rates - Development of Rates -
- See Sample Pricing Tables
31Incidence Rates - Development of Rates -
32Critical Illness - Design Pricing -
- Product Design Issues
- Product Pricing Issues
- Profitability and Risk Considerations
- Reinsurance Issues
- Incidence Rates Development of Rates
- Conclusions
33Conclusions
- Simple Approach
- Big 4 causes 75-80 of total incidence
- Incidence rates available from reinsurers (with
exclusivity confidentiality) or consultants, no
CSV, discount rates, etc. - Easy to design and price it seems so!
34Conclusions
- Pitfalls
- Differences across countries lack of reliable
or available data in many Caribbean countries - Differences across countries CI rates
differences not the same as mortality rates
differences - Higher profitability targets to recognize more
uncertainty in future experience - Lapse-supported nature lapse rates assumption
is crucial - Reinsurance restrictions work around them by
offering special riders
35Conclusions
- Complex / Flexible Approach
- Sometime large differences by sex, age, smoking
status - Reflect different benefits (non-level)
- Reflect guarantees and/or non-guarantees
- Reflect different structure permanent, limited
ages, RC - Creativity in designing a product that works for
the markets
36Thank you very much ...
- If you wish a copy of this presentation, please
send an email to syg_at_eckler.ca / website
www.eckler.ca