Does dark matter really exist - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 20
About This Presentation
Title:

Does dark matter really exist

Description:

MOND in the MW. Tully-Fisher relation. HSB & LSB galaxies. Giant elliptical galaxies ... to DM, non-circular motions in (l,v) vanish (even shallow halo smoothes bumps) ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:80
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 21
Provided by: homepa69
Category:
Tags: dark | exist | matter | really | vanish

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Does dark matter really exist


1
Does dark matter really exist?
  • Benoit Famaey
  • Oxford University
  • 11.03.2005, FNRS contact group

2
Outline
  • DM in clusters
  • DM in galaxies
  • ?CDM cosmology
  • Milky Way model
  • MOND
  • MOND in the MW
  • Tully-Fisher relation
  • HSB LSB galaxies
  • Giant elliptical galaxies
  • Baryonic DM in clusters?
  • No-DM cosmology and lensing
  • Theoretical physics
  • Conclusions

3
DM in galaxy clusters
  • 1933 Zwicky, Coma cluster KU/2 0 with
    K 3Mltv2rgt/2 and U -GM2/(2 Mpc)
    ?M/Mvis 20
  • Gravitational lensing i
    4GMcluster/c2 (dcluster-1 - dsource-1)1/2

4
DM in individual galaxies
  • Vc(R) (GM(R)/R)1/2
  • Vc cst ? M(R) ? R ? ?(R) ? R-2
  • ? dark halo
  • NGC 3198

5
DM distribution from ?CDM cosmology
  • Supernovae data ? accelerating Universe
    WMAP ?  concordance  ?CDM model
  • Flat Universe ? 1
  • ?matter 0.3 and ?? 0.7
  • Primordial nucleosynthesis ? ?baryons
    0.04
  • ? DM non-baryonic
  • cold (CDM) i.e. massive particles such as
    neutralino 1 TeV to grow hierarchical structure

6
  • High resolution simulations of clustering CDM
    halos (e.g. Diemand et al. 2004)
  • Central cusp ? ? r-?
  • with ? gt 1
  • Milky Way model (Klypin et al. 2002)

7
Milky Way model from gas dynamics
  • HI 21-cm (l,v) diagrams
  • Circular orbit at radius R
  • Vr Vc(R)/R - Vc(R0)/R0 R0 sin l
  • Enveloppe terminal velocity curve
  • Vr sign(l) Vc(R0sin l) - Vc(R0) sin l

8
  • Bissantz et al. (2003) potential from COBE
    near-IR luminosity density including bar and
    spiral structure in disk with spatially constant
    M/L
  • Fit M/L and ? in potentials of bar and of spiral
    to gas dynamics
  • Provides good fit to microlensing

9
  • No DM Milky Way provides good fits to gas
    dynamics and microlensing within 5 kpc
  • But Vc(R0) 185 km/s instead of 220 km/s
  • ? DM halo
  • ? 1/2 V82 ln(r2 rc2)
  • Negligible contribution inside 5 kpc
  • NOT cuspy
    if mass inside 5 kpc shifted from baryons
    to DM, non-circular motions in (l,v) vanish (even
    shallow halo smoothes bumps)

10
MOND
  • Milgrom (1983)

Works for a0 1.2 X 10-8 cm s-2 cH0/2p
c(?/3)1/2
11
Bekenstein-Milgrom equations
12
MOND in the Milky Way
  • Inside 5 kpc agta0 ? MOND Newton
  • Fhalo Vc2/r (1rc2/r2)-1
  • If FMOND Vc2 /r
    and ?(x) x/(1x)
    Then FMOND - FNewton
    Vc2/r (1Vc2/ra0)-1
  • At R0, Fhalo/(FMOND - Fnewton) 0.95
    (Famaey Binney 2005)

13
Tully-Fisher relation
  • Deep MOND regime when ?(x)x
  • At large r always enter deep MOND

14
HSB LSB galaxies
HSB
LSB
?
?
(Sanders McGaugh 2002)
15
Giant elliptical galaxies
  • Radial velocities of Planetary Nebulae
    (Romanowsky et al. 2003) up to very large radii
    in NGC 821, NGC 3379 and NGC 4494
  • Quasi-Keplerian fall !!
  • Quasi no-DM, but merger of disks !!
  • Very high accelerations, very small discrepancy
    in MOND (Milgrom Sanders 2003)

16
Baryonic DM in clusters of galaxies?
MOND predicts that baryonic matter has to be
found in the cores (ok since ?visiblelt ?baryons)
17
No-DM cosmology and lensing
  • Needs relativistic theory of MOND
  • Early Universe not in MOND regime if a0cst
  • Results for CMB of McGaugh (1999) confirmed by
    WMAP (McGaugh 2004)
  • Gravitational lensing GR implies strong
    correlation between visible and DM distributions
    in lenses
  • ? Kochanek (2002) argued in favour of modified
    gravity

18
Theoretical physics
  • Conformal gravity (Mannheim Kazanas 1989,
    Edery et al. 2003)
  • Ftot F ?0c2/2
  • No dark energy
  • Not exactly MOND
  • Less deflection for null geodesics
  • Nonsymmetric gravity (Moffat 2004)
  • g?? g(??) g??
  • Non-abelian effects of quantum gravity inspired
    from QCD (Deur 2003)
  • Relational gravity (Roscoe 2004)
  • Theory that does not accept empty space-time as
    a solution
  • Effect of the vacuum (Milgrom 1999)
  • in ?-Universe, ? has an effect on inertia at
    accelerations c ?1/2 (a0)
  • TeVeS (Bekenstein 2004)
  • g?? e-2?(g??U?U?) -e2?U?U?

19
Conclusions
  • OR GR is THE correct theory of gravitation
  • THEN dark matter must exist BUT strong coupling
    with visible matter (Tully-Fisher, bumpy
    rotation curves, lack of DM in giant
    ellipticals, lensing)

  • ? detecting a neutralino ? end
    of the mystery !

20
  • OR amazing observational successes of MOND are
    the peak of an iceberg, i.e. the correct
    gravitational theory
  • Must make proper dynamical models of galaxies
    within MOND (simulate spiral structure)
  • CMB, large-scale structure predictions,
    gravitational waves astrophysics with
    relativistic theories such as TeVeS
  • See if we can also eliminate the dark energy
    AND understand
    the link with the rest of physics (quantum
    gravity?)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com