Speed dating Classification - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Speed dating Classification

Description:

A rabbi invented speed dating 10 years ago. Here's how it works... Professor Dan Jurafsky (Linguistics Dept.) Professor Dan McFarland (School of Education) ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:281
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 8
Provided by: raje188
Learn more at: https://nlp.stanford.edu
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Speed dating Classification


1
Speed dating ClassificationWhat you should know
about dating
  • Stephen Cohen
  • Rajesh Ranganath
  • Te Thamrongrattanarit

2
Speed dating
  • A rabbi invented speed dating 10 years ago
  • Heres how it works
  • Goal To find the model that predicts men and
    womens decisions

3
Massive feature extraction
  • Easy things
  • Word count
  • Count of certain words
  • Backchannelling
  • Post-conversation word count
  • Question count
  • Non-academic discussion
  • Etc.
  • Difficult things
  • Latent Dirichlet Allocation
  • Latent Semantic Analysis
  • Various vector similarity metrics
  • Speed of conversation
  • Etc.

4
Classifiers and other techniques
  • Lexical Feature Extraction
  • Logistic Regression with linear kernel
  • Support Vector Machines with
  • Linear kernel
  • RBF kernel

5
Evaluation
  • Principle Component Analysis
  • For every feature we add, we capture more
    variance. good sign
  • The Rajesh Metric for evaluating models
  • Logistic Regression and SVM work just as well.
  • Pick the best model based on the Rajesh Metric
  • Analyze regression coefficients of the best model

6
What you should know about dating
  • Men are more likely to say yes if ..
  • More positive words are uttered. lexical
    features
  • Men and women talk about the same topics Latent
    Dirichlet Allocation and Jenson-Shannon
    similarity
  • Menwomen word count ratio is high
  • Women ask more questions! count of question
    marksbut opposite effect on women
  • And more
  • Womens decisions can hardly be predicted by the
    model. (Women are hard to understand)
  • Women are more likely to say yes if they talk
    about the past.
  • Physical appearance? Voice? Speech? Chemistry?

7
Acknowledgement
  • Professor Dan Jurafsky (Linguistics Dept.)
  • Professor Dan McFarland (School of Education)
  • Stephan Stiller (Computer Science)
  • David Hall (Symbolic Systems and CS)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com