Debate In Negotiation

1 / 27
About This Presentation
Title:

Debate In Negotiation

Description:

Slide 1. Debate In Negotiation. The Four Phases of ... It is appropriate to interrupt somebody who is clearly factually incorrect in their statements ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:85
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 28
Provided by: jeffc204

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Debate In Negotiation


1
Debate In Negotiation
  • The Four Phases of negotiation
  • Phase One how to prepare
  • Phase Two how to debate
  • Phase Three how to propose
  • Phase Four how to bargain

2
Debate In Negotiation
  • Debate is the act of two way communication and
    shapes the tone of the negotiation
  • Proposing takes 10 of the time, bargaining less
    than 5 and debate takes up the rest more than
    80
  • Kennedy If we can organise and discipline our
    debate behaviour we have a very good chance of
    quite dramatically improving our negotiation
    effectiveness

3
Rackham and Carlisle
  • R C conducted an interesting study where they
    sought to describe how effective and average
    negotiators behave.
  • What is an effective negotiator?
  • Rated as effective by both sides
  • Track record of significant success
  • Low incidence of implementation failures

4
Rackham and Carlisle
  • Skilled negotiators show marked differences in
    their use of specified behaviour categories
    compared with average negotiators
  • Confirmed what everyone knew statistically
  • In negotiation training people are introduced to
    effective and ineffective categories of
    behaviour, and these are further developed
    through simulation and role-playing

5
Variances in behaviours
6
Variances in behaviours
7
Types of debate
  • The message is that debate can be either
    constructive or destructive
  • Constructive debate moves us towards an
    acceptable solution, destructive debate moves us
    away from desirable outcomes
  • What are the destructive behaviours?

8
Destructive behaviours
9
Interruption
  • It is appropriate to interrupt somebody who is
    clearly factually incorrect in their statements
  • True or false?

10
Other irritators
  • Blocking
  • Blocking denies the opportunity to give more
    information
  • Don't block hear them out
  • Point scoring
  • Attacking/Blaming
  • Threats

11
Constructive behaviours
  • How do we deal with someone who is behaving
    destructively?
  • The alternative to destructive argument is
    constructive debate
  • There is no alternative to a constructive
    approach whatever the behaviour of the other
    negotiator

12
Constructive behaviours
13
Assurances
  • Gentlemen, I am in the solution, not the
    retribution business
  • How to deal with an angry hotel guestBefore
    you say anything, I have three things to say to
    you first, I unreservedly apologise for the
    distress we have caused you second, I am going
    to listen to what you have to say, and third, I
    am going to put right whatever is wrong

14
Moving forward
15
Spot the difference?
16
Signalling?
  • It would be extremely difficult to meet that
    delivery date
  • We do not normally extend our credit facilities
  • It is highly unlikely that my boss will agree to
    a free upgrade
  • Under these circumstances we cannot agree to
    compensation
  • As things stand our prices must remain as listed
  • I can't give you a better discount on your
    current volume

17
Proposing
18
Proposing
19
Proposing
  • Signalling is the bridge from debate to proposal
  • Topic of chapter 9 how to make an effective
    proposal

20
Proposing look at these
  • I wish
  • I hope
  • I would like
  • It would be nice
  • Would this suit you?
  • I need
  • I require
  • We prefer
  • We want
  • It is necessary that

21
Proposing
  • It is the ability to shift from loose informal
    proposal language to tight formal and assertive
    proposal language that improves your performance
  • A proposal is a tentative suggestion
  • We could make it four visits a week
  • We could look at the number of visits

22
Look at this proposal
  • Effective proposals consist of two parts the
    condition and the offer
  • Ineffective proposals only consist of offers
  • The condition may be vague or specific, but the
    offer must always be vague

23
Proposing
  • Kennedy writes The most common mistake
    negotiators make when presenting a proposal is to
    drown it in irrelevant verbiage by confusing the
    proposal and debate phases. In short, they
    propose and explain their proposals at the same
    time

24
Proposing
Make a proposal, then shut up.
25
Effective proposals
  • To make an effective proposal, follow these main
    rules should be practised
  • It should be conditional
  • It should be presented unadorned, without
    explanation
  • On completing the proposal you should go silent
  • It should be presented with condition first, then
    followed by the offer

26
What is wrong here?
27
How to receive a proposal
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)