Challenges of Convergence - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 12
About This Presentation
Title:

Challenges of Convergence

Description:

The opinions expressed are my own, and do not necessarily reflect the views of ... ENUM - a Pandora's Box. The Internet versus the PSTN ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:142
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 13
Provided by: SMAR3
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Challenges of Convergence


1
Challenges of Convergence
  • J. Scott Marcus
  • Senior Advisor for Internet Technology
  • Federal Communications Commission (FCC)
  • The opinions expressed are my own, and do not
    necessarily reflect the views of the FCC or the
    U.S. Government.

2
Policy Challenges
  • Convergence as a challenge to the regulator
  • IP Telephony
  • ENUM
  • Broadband - cable versus DSL

3
Convergence as a Challenge to the Regulator
  • Technology changes quickly.
  • Regulation changes slowly.
  • The Telecom Act of 1996 is based on definitional
    categories.
  • Definitions are blurring together.
  • A possible approach Regulate the service, not
    the underlying technology.
  • Where this is not possible, expect
  • opportunities for regulatory arbitrage
  • irrational results

4
IP Telephony
  • An innovative, competitive and important service.
  • Has flourished in a largely unregulated
    environment.
  • Ongoing international pressure to rethink
    regulatory status.

5
U.S. Policy on IP Telephony
  • No recent official statements.
  • Stevens Report (April, 1998)
  • Where both sides are telephones, IP telephony
    bears many characteristics of a
    telecommunications service however, we must
    consider specifics on a case-by-case basis.
  • Where at least one side is a computer, IP
    telephony should not be viewed (at present) as a
    telecommunications service.
  • IP telephony does not directly contribute to the
    Universal Service Fund (USF), but underlying
    components (e.g. private lines) do thus, IP
    telephony does not necessarily generate a net
    reduction in the USF.
  • IP telephony serves the public interest by
    placing significant downward pressure on
    international settlement rates and consumer
    prices.

6
European Commission Policy
  • 1998 notice concluded that Internet voice
    services do not constitute voice telephony
    UNLESS
  • they are offered commercially and separately to
    the public as voice services
  • they are provided to and from PSTN termination
    points and
  • they are offered in real time at the same level
    of speech quality and reliability as is offered
    by the PSTN.
  • January, 2001 communication reaffirmed the 1998
    position observed, however, that the quality of
    IP telephony over a single network has improved.
  • As the EC migrates to a new telecommunications
    regulatory framework, the subject will be
    reevaluated using methods borrowed from
    competition law.

7
IP Telephony and the ITU
  • Significant interest within the International
    Telecommunications Union (ITU) in defining
    Internet telephony and IP telephony.
  • Many members would like to make IP telephony
    subject to international accounting rates.
  • ITU Study Group 2 recently declined to create
    definitions, observing that Internet telephony
    should not be viewed as a service.

8
ENUM - a Pandoras Box
  • The Internet versus the PSTN
  • Global Internet versus national numbering plans
  • ITU versus IETF
  • Free market mechanisms versus government
    regulation
  • Incumbents versus insurgents
  • Centralized versus decentralized control
  • Issues of security, hijacking, privacy, SPAM,
    slamming, and number portability ...

9
U.S. Industry Recommendation
  • ITAC-T Advisory Committee to Department of State
  • Recommends that the U.S. participate in a global
    global ENUM implementation rooted at e164.arpa.
  • Notes the need for open competition, especially
    at ENUM Tier 2, and recognizes that other ENUM
    domains are not precluded.

10
Position of U.S. ITU Delegation
  • Supportive of a global tree under e164.arpa
  • Recognition of sovereign rights of nations to
    choose to opt in or not
  • Allow for competition wherever possible
  • Promote interworking between different approaches
    and systems
  • Cooperation between IETF and ITU
  • Market-based system with minimal regulatory
    intervention
  • Must not be inconsistent with
  • competition in telecommunications
  • encouragement of innovation
  • promotion of advanced data services

11
Broadband
  • Categorization of cable access to IP services is
    uncertain
  • Categorization of telephony over cable is
    uncertain
  • High Speed NOI in process

12
Where to from Here?
  • Technology will continue to change quickly.
  • Regulation will continue to change slowly.
  • For now, there is no panacea, no silver bullet.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com