Title: Science as a Way of knowing
1Science as a Way of knowing Developing and
Testing Hypotheses
ISB 202, Section 005
2What is Science?
Scientific method(s) other
ways of knowing
3So, how do we come to know stuff, anyway ?
4Four basic ways that we may come to decide that
something is true.
5Four basic ways that we may come to decide that
something is true
-
- 1) We have relevant personal experience on the
topic
6Four basic ways that we may come to decide that
something is true
- 2) We trust the source of the information
7Four basic ways that we may come to decide that
something is true
- 3) We have a sense of intuition or inspiration
about it
8Four basic ways that we may come to decide that
something is true
4) We reach a tentative conclusion of an
explanation, and seek ways to make skeptical
tests of that hypothesis
9Four Basic Ways of Knowing
-
- We have relevant personal experience on the
topic - We trust the source of the information
- 3) We have a sense of intuition or
inspiration about it - 4) We undertake skeptical investigation of
hypotheses
Method of EXPERIENCE AUTHORITY INTUITION
SCIENCE
10Each of these ways of knowing is potentially
flawed.
"Smart people can come up with very good
explanations for mistaken points of view."
People have argued issues of all kinds for
centuries, but arguments cannot determine whether
a statement is correct.
11Each of these ways of knowing is potentially
flawed.
Method of EXPERIENCE
Optical illusions!
12Each of these ways of knowing is potentially
flawed.
The Moon Illusion
Method of EXPERIENCE
13Each of these ways of knowing is potentially
flawed.
Method of EXPERIENCE AUTHORITY
Aristotle Sun rotates around the earth
14Each of these ways of knowing is potentially
flawed.
Galileo and Heliocentrism, 1633
Salem Witch Trials, 1692
Method of EXPERIENCE AUTHORITY INTUITION
15Each of these ways of knowing is potentially
flawed.
Scientific findings are refuted, or refined,
continuously. This is how science progresses.
Method of EXPERIENCE AUTHORITY INTUITION
SCIENCE
Newtonian Physics vs. Relativity
16Each of these ways of knowing is potentially
flawed.
17- Be skeptical, devise tests of hypotheses
continually seek out exceptions to rules, and
so on .
18Advantages to the Scientific Method
- A major attempt to be
- Unprejudiced (unbiased - but this is not always
the case b/c scientists are people) - Repeatable
- Falsifiable
19Developing Testing Hypotheses
Science is a way of knowing that tries to get
closer and closer to the truth by chipping away
at whats false.
20Developing and Testing Hypotheses
Types of Questions
- Proximate
- how, where, when, who, what questions
- largely answerable
- Ultimate
- why questions
- largely unanswerable
? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?
21Developing and Testing Hypotheses
Types of Questions
- Proximate
- How do mountains form?
- What causes lung cancer?
- How do clouds form?
- Where does rainwater end up?
Ultimate Why are we here? Is Michigans UP
beautiful? What is considered cruel? Was the
course of evolution directed by a supernatural
being?
22Developing and Testing Hypotheses
Types of Questions
- Proximate
- often can be tested by the scientific method
- Ultimate
- usually not able to be tested by the scientific
method
? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?
23Two Views of How Science is Done
- General public
- Collecting facts
- Unbiased, dispassionate
24What is a hypothesis?
- idea or proposition that can be tested by
observations or experiments about the natural
world - hypotheses are subject to scientific evaluation
and must be falsifiable. - A hypothesis can never be proven. It can be
CONFIRMED (supported) or it can be FALSIFIED
(rejected).
25Ho wing length does not differ among dragonfly
populations
26HA wing length in dragonfly population A is
greater than that of populations B and C
27(No Transcript)
28Scientific Theories and Laws
- Scientific data
- Natural laws
- Experiments
- Scientific hypotheses
- Scientific models
- Scientific theories
Fig. 2-2
29What is a scientific theory?
- A scientific theory is a coherent explanation for
a large number of facts and observations about
the natural world. - ? Internally consistent and compatible with the
evidence (patterns in data!) - ? Firmly grounded in and based upon evidence
- Tested against a wide range of phenomena
- Demonstrably effective in problem-solving
30What is a scientific or natural law?
A Scientific or Natural Law is a description of a
natural phenomenon or principle that invariably
holds true under specific conditions and will
occur under certain circumstances.