Waste Reduction, Recycling and Climate Change - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Waste Reduction, Recycling and Climate Change

Description:

Waste Reduction, Recycling and Climate Change. The use of the Life Cycle Analysis ... Dr Peter Olsen. Scottish Environment Protection Agency ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:141
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 32
Provided by: peter507
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Waste Reduction, Recycling and Climate Change


1
Waste Reduction, Recycling and Climate Change
  • The use of the Life Cycle Analysis tool WRATE
  • Dr Peter Olsen
  • Scottish Environment Protection Agency
  • UCCCfS Climate Change Action Plans Planning
    Implementation
  • Dundee College
  • Dundee 11th May 2009

2
Life Cycle Assessment
  • Life cycle assessment (LCA) is a methodology for
    assessing the potential environmental impacts of
    a product or service across its entire life
    cycle, or cradle to grave

Its
3
Life Cycle Assessment
4
LCA
  • Using LCA has many advantages
  • Often its an eye opener, providing an insight
    into systems and their alternatives
  • It can confirm expected environmental impacts and
    reveal completely unexpected impact

5
LCA
  • However, the results of LCA should not be used in
    isolation to decide on one option over another
  • LCA is one of many decision-support tools.

6
LCA
  • It is also necessary to consider economic and
    social factors, as well as those environmental
    factors that cannot be quantified using LCA

7
WRATE
  • The software SEPA use to undertake the LCA of
    waste management options is called WRATE (Waste
    and Resource Assessment Tool for the
    Environment). WRATE was developed for the
    Environment Agency to replace the tool used to
    assess the Area Waste Plans when they were first
    developed, WISARD

8
WRATE
  • LCA of waste management systems is different from
    a product LCA, in that the cradle-to-grave
    approach is applied only to the waste management
    infrastructure.

9
WRATE
10
WRATE
  • Wrate does not include the life cycle of the
    products that are now being treated as waste,
    they are only included in the system once they
    become waste

11
WRATE
  • Designed to model household waste but can be
    adapted for single waste streams.

12
WRATE
  • WRATE models
  • Non renewable resource Depletion
  • Freshwater Ecotoxicity
  • Acidification
  • Eutrophication
  • Global warming
  • Human toxicity
  • Land use

13
WRATE
  • When a waste management process generates a
    useable output, such as recycling or energy from
    waste, there are environmental impacts from the
    treatment of those materials, emissions etc.
  • There is also avoided impacts, i.e. where the
    requirement for the production of energy from
    more conventional sources is avoided.
  • This is accounted for by subtracting impacts of
    e.g. generating energy from waste from the impact
    of generating energy from coal or gas

14
WRATE
  • A key aspect of interpreting the results from
    WRATE is to understand the concept of avoided
    impacts
  • negative numbers mean that the burden of waste
    management system is effectively avoided

15
Typical WRATE analysis of different waste
management options
16
Scenario comparisons
  • A College collects the following
  • 100 tonnes of paper
  • 1000 tonnes of food waste
  • 100 tonnes of drink cans
  • 500 tonnes of glass
  • 100 tonnes of plastic

17
Which treatment will have the biggest impact in
terms of global warming
  • Landfill it all ?
  • Burn it all in an energy from waste plant?
  • Recycle it all?

18
All to landfill
19
All to Energy from Waste
20
Full recycling
21
Equivalencies
  • WRAT can report impacts in two ways
  • CO2 equivalents
  • This takes into account the Global Warming impact
    of different elements and display them as kgs of
    Carbon Dioxide
  • EUr person equivalents
  • converts the impact to the amount of CO2 an
    average European person would emit

22
Global Warming Potential
23
Where are the burdens?
24
Where are the burdens?
  • Landfill, collection, treatment and
    transportation have direct impacts whereas
    recycling sees the biggest avoided impact

25
Where are the burdens in the landfill?
26
Landfill burdens
  • around 250 tonnes CO2 eq, is associated with
    construction and operation of the landfill

27
Where are the burdens in the landfill collection?
  • 202 tonnes from the production of large skips

28
Where are the avoided burdens in Recycling?
29
Aluminium
30
Aluminium
  • Almost 800 tonnes of fossil CO2 (or 62 Eur.
    Persons) is avoided by recycling 75 tonnes of
    aluminium

31
Waste Reduction, Recycling and Climate Change
  • The use of the Life Cycle Analysis tool WRATE
  • Dr Peter Olsen
  • Scottish Environment Protection Agency
  • UCCCfS Climate Change Action Plans Planning
    Implementation
  • Dundee College
  • Dundee 11th May 2009
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com