GIVING CONSTRUCTIVE FEEDBACK - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 12
About This Presentation
Title:

GIVING CONSTRUCTIVE FEEDBACK

Description:

Criticizes the work NOT the person. Avoids mixed messages ... Turf wars' Internal. Reviewer/reviewer. Reviewers/editors. Reviewers/editors/referees ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:2670
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 13
Provided by: michelle208
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: GIVING CONSTRUCTIVE FEEDBACK


1
GIVING CONSTRUCTIVE FEEDBACK
  • Keeping the authors on board
  • Michelle Proctor

2
Constructive Feedback
  • Tips on feedback
  • Tools for commenting/giving feedback
  • Checklists

3
Before giving feedback ask
  • What stage is the work at? (1st draft,
    pre-submission)
  • What am I expected to review? (grammar / style /
    content / methods)
  • Who else is reviewing / has reviewed it?

4
Constructive feedback
  • Is specific
  • Criticizes the work NOT the person
  • Avoids mixed messages
  • Is expressed in the positive (where possible)
  • Suggests actions / remedies

5
Is specific
  • Too wordy
  • Hard to read
  • Confusing!
  • Use shorter sentences
  • Use less technical language
  • Use shorter words
  • Avoid wordy phrases (eg prior to, with respect to)

6

Criticises the work not the person
  • Your ordering is illogical.
  • Your English is terrible!
  • The Cochrane Handbook suggests that you put the
    methods section before the results.
  • The language could benefit from checking by a
    native English speaker, the editorial base may be
    able to help with this.

7
Avoids mixed messages
  • Avoid yes, but messages.
  • Includes however and although
  • You have worked hard on this review, but. . . .

8

Expressed in the positive
  • Your sentences are far too long.
  • Your thinking is muddled.
  • Shorter sentences may make it easier to read.
  • The paragraphs in this section are very detailed
    and informative. They may be easier for readers
    to understand if you separated them into the
    benefits and problems with the treatment.

9
Suggest actions
  • I would have liked to have read about.in your
    discussion.notThe discussion missed important
    details
  • "I don't understand the organization of this
    section. Are you trying to do . here? If so it
    may be useful to ."not "This section is really
    poorly organized."

10
Dealing with disagreements
  • Turf wars
  • Internal
  • Reviewer/reviewer
  • Reviewers/editors
  • Reviewers/editors/referees
  • Role of publications ombudsperson

11
Tools of editing
  • Red pen, fax and post?
  • Electronic methods free form, checklists, track
    changes in Word edit
  • Latter can be useful if multiple edits are
    required
  • Example Renal Group simple checklist for
    referees, technical editor fills out checklist
    plus provides a Word version of the review with
    Track changes

12
Checklists
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com