Title: Assessment-Driven Instruction
1Assessment-DrivenInstruction
2(No Transcript)
3(No Transcript)
4(No Transcript)
5(No Transcript)
6(No Transcript)
7(No Transcript)
8Models of Reading Assessment
9Models of Reading Assessment
Deficit Model
10Models of Reading Assessment
Deficit Model Contextual Model
11Models of Reading Assessment
Deficit Model Contextual Model Stage Models
12Models of Reading Assessment
Deficit Model Contextual Model Stage
Models Cognitive Model
13The Cognitive Model of Reading Assessment
14Phonological Awareness
Decoding
Sight Word Knowledge
Fluency Context
Automatic Word Recognition
Vocabulary
Language Comprehension
Reading Comprehension
Background Knowledge
Knowledge of Structure
Strategic Knowledge
General Purposes for Reading
Specific Purposes for Reading
Knowledge of Strategies for Reading
Print Concepts
15Phonological Awareness
Decoding
Sight Word Knowledge
Fluency Context
Automatic Word Recognition
Vocabulary
Language Comprehension
Reading Comprehension
Background Knowledge
Knowledge of Structure
Strategic Knowledge
General Purposes for Reading
Specific Purposes for Reading
Knowledge of Strategies for Reading
Print Concepts
16Phonological Awareness
Decoding
Sight Word Knowledge
Fluency Context
Automatic Word Recognition
Vocabulary
Language Comprehension
Reading Comprehension
Background Knowledge
Knowledge of Structure
Strategic Knowledge
General Purposes for Reading
Specific Purposes for Reading
Knowledge of Strategies for Reading
Print Concepts
17Is the child able to read texts at his or her
grade placement level with automatic word
recognition and adequate expression?
18Phonological Awareness
Decoding
Sight Word Knowledge
Fluency Context
Automatic Word Recognition
Vocabulary
Language Comprehension
Reading Comprehension
Background Knowledge
Knowledge of Structure
Strategic Knowledge
General Purposes for Reading
Specific Purposes for Reading
Knowledge of Strategies for Reading
Print Concepts
19Phonological Awareness
Decoding
Sight Word Knowledge
Fluency Context
Automatic Word Recognition
Vocabulary
Language Comprehension
Reading Comprehension
Background Knowledge
Knowledge of Structure
Strategic Knowledge
General Purposes for Reading
Specific Purposes for Reading
Knowledge of Strategies for Reading
Print Concepts
20Does the child make use of context to monitor his
or her reading?
21Before we go any further, lets do a brief
sidebar on context. The role of context in
reading has long been a controversial topic. Two
competing models of the reading process have
described this role very differently. We will
refer to these models as the Top-Down and
Bottom-Up models. Lets take a quick look at
each.
22Two Models of Reading
23She combed her hair.
24She combed her hair.
25She combed her hair.
26Top-Down Model of Reading
- Brain cannot rapidly process print.
- Reader predicts the next word.
- Reader merely samples the print.
- Reader slows down if prediction is wrong.
27She combed her
28She combed her b
29She combed her bangs.
30She combed her bangs.
31Bottom-Up Model of Reading
- Brain processes almost every letter.
- Most of this processing is automatic.
- Reader does not need to predict words.
- Reader uses context for multiple meanings.
32Conclusion Research has clearly supported the
Bottom-Up Model.
33Is the child fluent?
34Phonological Awareness
Decoding
Sight Word Knowledge
Fluency Context
Automatic Word Recognition
Vocabulary
Language Comprehension
Reading Comprehension
Background Knowledge
Knowledge of Structure
Strategic Knowledge
General Purposes for Reading
Specific Purposes for Reading
Knowledge of Strategies for Reading
Print Concepts
35Phonological Awareness
Decoding
Sight Word Knowledge
Fluency Context
Automatic Word Recognition
Vocabulary
Language Comprehension
Reading Comprehension
Background Knowledge
Knowledge of Structure
Strategic Knowledge
General Purposes for Reading
Specific Purposes for Reading
Knowledge of Strategies for Reading
Print Concepts
36Does the child have adequate sight word knowledge?
the of go
37Phonological Awareness
Decoding
Sight Word Knowledge
Fluency Context
Automatic Word Recognition
Vocabulary
Language Comprehension
Reading Comprehension
Background Knowledge
Knowledge of Structure
Strategic Knowledge
General Purposes for Reading
Specific Purposes for Reading
Knowledge of Strategies for Reading
Print Concepts
38Phonological Awareness
Decoding
Sight Word Knowledge
Fluency Context
Automatic Word Recognition
Vocabulary
Language Comprehension
Reading Comprehension
Background Knowledge
Knowledge of Structure
Strategic Knowledge
General Purposes for Reading
Specific Purposes for Reading
Knowledge of Strategies for Reading
Print Concepts
39Does the child have adequate knowledge of
decoding strategies?
b l
m ake
t
40Phonological Awareness
Decoding
Sight Word Knowledge
Fluency Context
Automatic Word Recognition
Vocabulary
Language Comprehension
Reading Comprehension
Background Knowledge
Knowledge of Structure
Strategic Knowledge
General Purposes for Reading
Specific Purposes for Reading
Knowledge of Strategies for Reading
Print Concepts
41Phonological Awareness
Decoding
Sight Word Knowledge
Fluency Context
Automatic Word Recognition
Vocabulary
Language Comprehension
Reading Comprehension
Background Knowledge
Knowledge of Structure
Strategic Knowledge
General Purposes for Reading
Specific Purposes for Reading
Knowledge of Strategies for Reading
Print Concepts
42Does the child have adequate phonological
awareness?
43Phonological Awareness
Decoding
Sight Word Knowledge
Fluency Context
Automatic Word Recognition
Vocabulary
Language Comprehension
Reading Comprehension
Background Knowledge
Knowledge of Structure
Strategic Knowledge
General Purposes for Reading
Specific Purposes for Reading
Knowledge of Strategies for Reading
Print Concepts
44Phonological Awareness
Decoding
Sight Word Knowledge
Fluency Context
Automatic Word Recognition
Vocabulary
Language Comprehension
Reading Comprehension
Background Knowledge
Knowledge of Structure
Strategic Knowledge
General Purposes for Reading
Specific Purposes for Reading
Knowledge of Strategies for Reading
Print Concepts
45Is the child able to comprehend the language of
the text?
46Phonological Awareness
Decoding
Sight Word Knowledge
Fluency Context
Automatic Word Recognition
Vocabulary
Language Comprehension
Reading Comprehension
Background Knowledge
Knowledge of Structure
Strategic Knowledge
General Purposes for Reading
Specific Purposes for Reading
Knowledge of Strategies for Reading
Print Concepts
47Phonological Awareness
Decoding
Sight Word Knowledge
Fluency Context
Automatic Word Recognition
Vocabulary
Language Comprehension
Reading Comprehension
Background Knowledge
Knowledge of Structure
Strategic Knowledge
General Purposes for Reading
Specific Purposes for Reading
Knowledge of Strategies for Reading
Print Concepts
48Does the child have an adequate vocabulary for
his or her age and grade?
wise
blue
equator
Pacific
weary
arrive
49Phonological Awareness
Decoding
Sight Word Knowledge
Fluency Context
Automatic Word Recognition
Vocabulary
Language Comprehension
Reading Comprehension
Background Knowledge
Knowledge of Structure
Strategic Knowledge
General Purposes for Reading
Specific Purposes for Reading
Knowledge of Strategies for Reading
Print Concepts
50Phonological Awareness
Decoding
Sight Word Knowledge
Fluency Context
Automatic Word Recognition
Vocabulary
Language Comprehension
Reading Comprehension
Background Knowledge
Knowledge of Structure
Strategic Knowledge
General Purposes for Reading
Specific Purposes for Reading
Knowledge of Strategies for Reading
Print Concepts
51Does the child have the background knowledge
necessary to understand the particular passage
that he or she is reading?
52Phonological Awareness
Decoding
Sight Word Knowledge
Fluency Context
Automatic Word Recognition
Vocabulary
Language Comprehension
Reading Comprehension
Background Knowledge
Knowledge of Structure
Strategic Knowledge
General Purposes for Reading
Specific Purposes for Reading
Knowledge of Strategies for Reading
Print Concepts
53Phonological Awareness
Decoding
Sight Word Knowledge
Fluency Context
Automatic Word Recognition
Vocabulary
Language Comprehension
Reading Comprehension
Background Knowledge
Knowledge of Structure
Strategic Knowledge
General Purposes for Reading
Specific Purposes for Reading
Knowledge of Strategies for Reading
Print Concepts
54Is the child able to use common text structures
to aid in comprehension?
55Phonological Awareness
Decoding
Sight Word Knowledge
Fluency Context
Automatic Word Recognition
Vocabulary
Language Comprehension
Reading Comprehension
Background Knowledge
Knowledge of Structure
Strategic Knowledge
General Purposes for Reading
Specific Purposes for Reading
Knowledge of Strategies for Reading
Print Concepts
56Phonological Awareness
Decoding
Sight Word Knowledge
Fluency Context
Automatic Word Recognition
Vocabulary
Language Comprehension
Reading Comprehension
Background Knowledge
Knowledge of Structure
Strategic Knowledge
General Purposes for Reading
Specific Purposes for Reading
Knowledge of Strategies for Reading
Print Concepts
57Phonological Awareness
Decoding
Sight Word Knowledge
Fluency Context
Automatic Word Recognition
Vocabulary
Language Comprehension
Reading Comprehension
Background Knowledge
Knowledge of Structure
Strategic Knowledge
General Purposes for Reading
Specific Purposes for Reading
Knowledge of Strategies for Reading
Print Concepts
58Does the child have adequate knowledge of the
purposes for reading and possess strategies
available to achieve those purposes?
59Phonological Awareness
Decoding
Sight Word Knowledge
Fluency Context
Automatic Word Recognition
Vocabulary
Language Comprehension
Reading Comprehension
Background Knowledge
Knowledge of Structure
Strategic Knowledge
General Purposes for Reading
Specific Purposes for Reading
Knowledge of Strategies for Reading
Print Concepts
60Phonological Awareness
Decoding
Sight Word Knowledge
Fluency Context
Automatic Word Recognition
Vocabulary
Language Comprehension
Reading Comprehension
Background Knowledge
Knowledge of Structure
Strategic Knowledge
General Purposes for Reading
Specific Purposes for Reading
Knowledge of Strategies for Reading
Print Concepts
61Does the child have a set of strategies that can
be used to achieve different purposes in reading?
62Phonological Awareness
Decoding
Sight Word Knowledge
Fluency Context
Automatic Word Recognition
Vocabulary
Language Comprehension
Reading Comprehension
Background Knowledge
Knowledge of Structure
Strategic Knowledge
General Purposes for Reading
Specific Purposes for Reading
Knowledge of Strategies for Reading
Print Concepts
63Phonological Awareness
Decoding
Sight Word Knowledge
Fluency Context
Automatic Word Recognition
Vocabulary
Language Comprehension
Reading Comprehension
Background Knowledge
Knowledge of Structure
Strategic Knowledge
General Purposes for Reading
Specific Purposes for Reading
Knowledge of Strategies for Reading
Print Concepts
64What does the child view as the goal of reading
in general?
65Phonological Awareness
Decoding
Sight Word Knowledge
Fluency Context
Automatic Word Recognition
Vocabulary
Language Comprehension
Reading Comprehension
Background Knowledge
Knowledge of Structure
Strategic Knowledge
General Purposes for Reading
Specific Purposes for Reading
Knowledge of Strategies for Reading
Print Concepts
66Phonological Awareness
Decoding
Sight Word Knowledge
Fluency Context
Automatic Word Recognition
Vocabulary
Language Comprehension
Reading Comprehension
Background Knowledge
Knowledge of Structure
Strategic Knowledge
General Purposes for Reading
Specific Purposes for Reading
Knowledge of Strategies for Reading
Print Concepts
67What concepts of print does the child have?
68What is the Literacy Coachs role in reading
assessment?
69An LCs Many Assessment Caps
- Tester
- Interpreter
- Profiler
- Cheerleader
- Booster
70 LC as Tester
- The LC will be part of the Assessment Team.
- The LC may administer diagnostic tests.
71 LC as Interpreter
- The LC may be asked to interpret schoolwide
achievement scores when they arrive. - The LC will need to be able to reach sound
conclusions about trends. - These conclusions will need to communicated with
honesty and tact.
72ITBS Percentile Ranks for Grade 3 School Last
Year This Year Difference ________________________
_______________________________ Morristown
45 41 -4 Harmony
57 62 5 District
49 51 2 State 48
50 2
73Three Common Problems of Interpreting Group
Achievement Test Scores
- Misinterpreting of percentiles
- Assuming that different groups of children are
equivalent - Confusing achievement with norms
74ITBS Percentile Ranks for Grade 3 School Last
Year This Year Difference ________________________
_______________________________ Morristown
45 41 -4 Harmony
57 62 5 District
49 51 2 State 48
50 2
75Percentiles and Football
G 50 G
Avoid differences in percentile ranks. Use NCEs
or stanines instead.
76How NCEs are made
NCEs flatten the normal curve so that
differences are statistically equivalent.
77Interpreting Stanines
9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
Above Average Stanines 7-9 Borderline Stanine
6 Average Stanine 5 Borderline Stanine 4 Below
Average Stanines 1-3
78Three Common Problems of Interpreting Group
Achievement Test Scores
- Misinterpreting of percentiles
- Assuming that different groups of children are
equivalent - Confusing achievement with norms
79Test Scores and Auto Racing
80 LC as Profiler
- The LC should present teachers with classroom
profiles of test results. - Such profiles might use a spreadsheet format.
- The point is to influence instruction!
- This means
- Discussing options.
- Monitoring outcomes.
81- Sample Excel File
- A B C D E
F G H - 1 Student Teacher Grade Terra Nova Sep
DIBELS Sep DIBELS - Comp NS ORF Level WC/Minute
- Doe, Jane Ellis 3 4 Low 52
- Hall, Monte Ellis 3 5
Low 60 - Perez, Juan Ellis 3 1 High
8 - Rogers, Fred Ellis 3 5
Low 61 - Ruth, Babe Ellis 3 7
Low 135 - Yopp, Hallie Ellis 3 3 Some
39
82 LC as Cheerleader
- Look for the silver lining.
- Interpret test results intelligently.
- Focus on what your teachers are doing right!
- Offer constructive suggestions.
- Dont avoid unpleasant truths.
83LC as Booster
- Understand AYP requirements.
- Do your best to make sure classroom
instruction is data-driven. This is the very
best way to improve scores.
- Cautiously consider additional steps in light of
- Ethical issues
- Likelihood of effectiveness
- Possible threat to professional climate.
84How Can DIBELS Drive Instruction?
85(No Transcript)
86?
87How do we use DIBELS to drive instruction at a
grade level?
88Sample Beginning-of-Year DIBELS Distribution
Test K 1 2 3
A S L A S L A S L
A S L
ISF 7 23 70
LNF 3 10 87 5 15 80
PSF 20 26 54
NWF 18 20 62
ORF 18 20 62 22 22 56
89Sample Beginning-of-Year DIBELS Distribution
Test K 1 2 3
A S L A S L A S L
A S L
ISF 7 23 70
LNF 3 10 87 5 15 80
PSF 20 26 54
NWF 18 20 62
ORF 18 20 62 22 22 56
90Sample Beginning-of-Year DIBELS Distribution
Test K 1 2 3
A S L A S L A S L
A S L
ISF 7 23 70
LNF 3 10 87 5 15 80
PSF 20 26 54
NWF 18 20 62
ORF 18 20 62 22 22 56
91Sample Beginning-of-Year DIBELS Distribution
Test K 1 2 3
A S L A S L A S L
A S L
ISF 7 23 70
LNF 3 10 87 5 15 80
PSF 20 26 54
NWF 18 20 62
ORF 18 20 62 22 22 56
92Sample Beginning-of-Year DIBELS Distribution
Test K 1 2 3
A S L A S L A S L
A S L
ISF 7 23 70
LNF 3 10 87 5 15 80
PSF 20 26 54
NWF 18 20 62
ORF 18 20 62 22 22 56
93Sample Beginning-of-Year DIBELS Distribution
Test K 1 2 3
A S L A S L A S L
A S L
ISF 7 23 70
LNF 3 10 87 5 15 80
PSF 20 26 54
NWF 18 20 62
ORF 18 20 62 22 22 56
94Sample Beginning-of-Year DIBELS Distribution
Test K 1 2 3
A S L A S L A S L
A S L
ISF 7 23 70
LNF 3 10 87 5 15 80
PSF 20 26 54
NWF 18 20 62
ORF 18 20 62 22 22 56
95Sample Beginning-of-Year DIBELS Distribution
Test K 1 2 3
A S L A S L A S L
A S L
ISF 7 23 70
LNF 3 10 87 5 15 80
PSF 20 26 54
NWF 18 20 62
ORF 18 20 62 22 22 56
96Sample Beginning-of-Year DIBELS Distribution
Test K 1 2 3
A S L A S L A S L
A S L
ISF 7 23 70
LNF 3 10 87 5 15 80
PSF 20 26 54
NWF 18 20 62
ORF 18 20 62 22 22 56
97Sample Beginning-of-Year DIBELS Distribution
Test K 1 2 3
A S L A S L A S L
A S L
ISF 7 23 70
LNF 3 10 87 5 15 80
PSF 20 26 54
NWF 18 20 62
ORF 18 20 62 22 22 56
98An Action Plan for DIBELS
- 1. Make a table for fall, including results at
the three levels of risk, for each grade and
test. - 2. Identify points where large numbers of
children are at high and moderate risk. - 3. Discuss the big picture with teachers in
grade groups. - 4. Make clear to everyone that a central goal is
to move all children into the low risk category. - 5. Meet with individual teachers to plan for
intervention and progress monitoring.
99Beware of comparing groups from two different
years!
100Hamilton Elementary
- PreK-5, 622 students
- 96.9 African American
- 89.2 Free or Reduced-Price Lunch
- 27th Percentile Rank in Reading, Grade 3
- 30th Percentile Rank in Reading, Grade 4
- 24th Percentile Rank in Reading, Grade 5
- 16 Annual Teacher Turnover
- Serves 3 Housing Projects
- Serves 2 Homeless Shelters
101Table 1. End-of-Year Kindergarten DIBELS Results
over Two Years ___________________________________
____________________ Subtest Year 1 Year
2 ___________________ __________________ At S
ome Low At Some Low _________________
______________________________________ LNF 6
11 83 6 17 77 PSF
11 45 45 8 48 44 NWF
7 12 82 5
12 84 _________________________________
______________________
102 Table 2. End-of-Year Grade 1 DIBELS Results
over Two Years ___________________________________
____________________ Subtest Year 1 Year
2 ___________________ __________________ At S
ome Low At Some Low _________________
______________________________________ PSF 1
12 87 0 15 85 NWF
1 35 63 0 29 71 ORF
9 30 61 4
28 68 _________________________________
______________________
103 Table 3. End-of-Year Grade 2 DIBELS Results
over Two Years ___________________________________
____________________ Subtest Year 1 Year
2 ___________________ __________________ At S
ome Low At Some Low _________________
______________________________________ ORF 19
24 57 24 34
41 _______________________________________
________________
104 Table 4. End-of-Year Grade 3 DIBELS Results
over Two Years ___________________________________
____________________ Subtest Year 1 Year
2 ___________________ __________________ At S
ome Low At Some Low _________________
______________________________________ ORF 11
31 58 34 42
24 _______________________________________
________________
105Table 5. Changes in Percentage of Children at
High or Moderate Risk ____________________________
____________________________ Grade Subtest
Year 1 Year 2 ___________
__________ B E B E _________________________
______________________________ K LNF
7 17 27 23 PSF 71 56 64 56
NWF 10 19 20 17 1 PSF 54 13 61 15
NWF 18 36 15 29 ORF 21 39 18 32 2
ORF 33 43 62 58 3 ORF 21 42 67 76 _____
__________________________________________________
106Its better to track cohorts.
107Its better to track cohorts.
3 2 1 K
B M E B M E
Year 1 Year 2
108Its better to track cohorts.
3 2 1 K
B M E B M E
Year 1 Year 2
109Its better to track cohorts.
3 2 1 K
B M E B M E
Year 1 Year 2
110Its better to track cohorts.
3 2 1 K
B M E B M E
Year 1 Year 2
111Its better to track cohorts.
3 2 1 K
B M E B M E
Year 1 Year 2
112Its better to track cohorts.
3 2 1 K
B M E B M E
Year 1 Year 2
113Its better to track cohorts.
3 2 1 K
B M E B M E
Year 1 Year 2
114K 1 2 3
115 B M E B M E B M
E B M E
K 1 2 3
116 Table 6. Long-Term NWF DIBELS Cohort Results
for Grades K-1 ___________________________________
_____________________ Middle of End
of Year 1 Year 2
__________________________________________________
______ Mean Number of Letter Sounds
29.1 66.8 Goal 13
50 Percentage at High or Moderate Risk
10 29 _______________________________________
_________________
117 B M E B M E B M
E B M E
K 1 2 3
118 Table 7. Long-Term ORF DIBELS Cohort Results
for Grades 2-3 ___________________________________
_____________________ Middle of End
of Year 1 Year 2
__________________________________________________
______ Mean WPM Correctly Read 61.7
90.0 Goal 44
110 Percentage at High or Moderate Risk
33 76 ____________________________________
____________________
119How do we use DIBELS to drive instruction in a
classroom?
120Start with the Class Profile!
121Class Summary
1st Grade Beginning Benchmark
Name
LNF
PSF
NWF
SCORE STATUS PCTILE
SCORE STATUS PCTILE
SCORE STATUS PCTILE
INTENSIVE Poe, Edgar Allan 19 HIGH
5 40 ESTAB 65 8
HIGH 13 STRATEGIC Blass, Bill
31 SOME 27 44 ESTAB
83 22 SOME 40 Borden, Liz
32 SOME 28 42 ESTAB
72 22 SOME 40 Tell, Wm.
40 LOW 48 27
EMERG 28 6 HIGH 9 Trump,
Don 31 SOME 27
28 ESTAB 29 12 SOME
20 BENCHMARK Doe, Jane 37
LOW 39 29 EMERG 30
36 LOW 72
122DIBELS Box-and-Whisker Plot
95th Percentile Rank 80th Percentile Rank 50th
Percentile Rank 20th Percentile Rank (May
need support) 5th Percentile Rank (May need
intensive support)
12370 60 50 40 30 20 10
Mon 1 Mon 2 Mon 3 Mon 4 Mon 5 Mon 6 Mon 7 Mon 8
Mon 9 Mon 10
Sample Plot for Phoneme Segmentation Fluency
124 Benchmark range for end of K Benchmark range
for middle of K
70 60 50 40 30 20 10
Mon 1 Mon 2 Mon 3 Mon 4 Mon 5 Mon 6 Mon 7 Mon 8
Mon 9 Mon 10
Sample Plot for Phoneme Segmentation Fluency
125 Benchmark range for end of K Benchmark range
for middle of K
70 60 50 40 30 20 10
Mon 1 Mon 2 Mon 3 Mon 4 Mon 5 Mon 6 Mon 7 Mon 8
Mon 9 Mon 10
Sample Plot for Phoneme Segmentation Fluency
126A Data-Driven Model
- Key Assumptions
- An SBRR core is in place.
- The core offers additional materials for children
who are slightly behind. - SBRR Intensive Intervention Programs (outside the
core) are available for each of the 5 component
areas.
127DIBELS Benchmark Test
Low Risk Some Risk At Risk
Core Core Core
Small-Group Intensive Core
Intervention Intervention
Core Intervention Intervention
Assessments Assessments
Core Assessments
DIBELS Progress Monitoring
Continue Intervention
Discontinue Intervention
No
Yes
Low Risk?
128DIBELS Benchmark Test
Low Risk Some Risk At Risk
Core Core Core
Small-Group Intensive Core
Intervention Intervention
Core Intervention Intervention
Assessments Assessments
Core Assessments
DIBELS Progress Monitoring
Continue Intervention
Discontinue Intervention
No
Yes
Low Risk?
129DIBELS Benchmark Test
Low Risk Some Risk At Risk
Core Core Core
Small-Group Intensive Core
Intervention Intervention
Core Intervention Intervention
Assessments Assessments
Core Assessments
DIBELS Progress Monitoring
Continue Intervention
Discontinue Intervention
No
Yes
Low Risk?
130DIBELS Benchmark Test
Low Risk Some Risk At Risk
Core Core Core
Small-Group Intensive Core
Intervention Intervention
Core Intervention Intervention
Assessments Assessments
Core Assessments
DIBELS Progress Monitoring
Continue Intervention
Discontinue Intervention
No
Yes
Low Risk?
131DIBELS Benchmark Test
Low Risk Some Risk At Risk
Core Core Core
Small-Group Intensive Core
Intervention Intervention
Core Intervention Intervention
Assessments Assessments
Core Assessments
DIBELS Progress Monitoring
Continue Intervention
Discontinue Intervention
No
Yes
Low Risk?
132DIBELS Benchmark Test
Low Risk Some Risk At Risk
Core Core Core
Small-Group Intensive Core
Intervention Intervention
Core Intervention Intervention
Assessments Assessments
Core Assessments
DIBELS Progress Monitoring
Continue Intervention
Discontinue Intervention
No
Yes
Low Risk?
133DIBELS Benchmark Test
Low Risk Some Risk At Risk
Core Core Core
Small-Group Intensive Core
Intervention Intervention
Core Intervention Intervention
Assessments Assessments
Core Assessments
DIBELS Progress Monitoring
Continue Intervention
Discontinue Intervention
No
Yes
Low Risk?
134DIBELS Benchmark Test
Low Risk Some Risk At Risk
Core Core Core
Small-Group Intensive Core
Intervention Intervention
Core Intervention Intervention
Assessments Assessments
Core Assessments
DIBELS Progress Monitoring
Continue Intervention
Discontinue Intervention
No
Yes
Low Risk?
135DIBELS Benchmark Test
Low Risk Some Risk At Risk
Core Core Core
Small-Group Intensive Core
Intervention Intervention
Core Intervention Intervention
Assessments Assessments
Core Assessments
DIBELS Progress Monitoring
Continue Intervention
Discontinue Intervention
No
Yes
Low Risk?
136DIBELS Benchmark Test
Low Risk Some Risk At Risk
Core Core Core
Small-Group Intensive Core
Intervention Intervention
Core Intervention Intervention
Assessments Assessments
Core Assessments
DIBELS Progress Monitoring
Continue Intervention
Discontinue Intervention
No
Yes
Low Risk?
137DIBELS Benchmark Test
Low Risk Some Risk At Risk
Core Core Core
Small-Group Intensive Core
Intervention Intervention
Core Intervention Intervention
Assessments Assessments
Core Assessments
DIBELS Progress Monitoring
Continue Intervention
Discontinue Intervention
No
Yes
Low Risk?
138DIBELS Benchmark Test
Low Risk Some Risk At Risk
Core Core Core
Small-Group Intensive Core
Intervention Intervention
Core Intervention Intervention
Assessments Assessments
Core Assessments
DIBELS Progress Monitoring
Continue Intervention
Discontinue Intervention
No
Yes
Low Risk?
139DIBELS Benchmark Test
Low Risk Some Risk At Risk
Core Core Core
Small-Group Intensive Core
Intervention Intervention
Core Intervention Intervention
Assessments Assessments
Core Assessments
DIBELS Progress Monitoring
Continue Intervention
Discontinue Intervention
No
Yes
Low Risk?
140DIBELS Benchmark Test
Low Risk Some Risk At Risk
Core Core Core
Small-Group Intensive Core
Intervention Intervention
Core Intervention Intervention
Assessments Assessments
Core Assessments
DIBELS Progress Monitoring
Continue Intervention
Discontinue Intervention
No
Yes
Low Risk?
141DIBELS Benchmark Test
Low Risk Some Risk At Risk
Core Core Core
Small-Group Intensive Core
Intervention Intervention
Core Intervention Intervention
Assessments Assessments
Core Assessments
DIBELS Progress Monitoring
Continue Intervention
Discontinue Intervention
No
Yes
Low Risk?
142DIBELS Benchmark Test
Low Risk Some Risk At Risk
Core Core Core
Small-Group Intensive Core
Intervention Intervention
Core Intervention Intervention
Assessments Assessments
Core Assessments
DIBELS Progress Monitoring
Continue Intervention
Discontinue Intervention
No
Yes
Low Risk?
143(No Transcript)