Electronic Discovery - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 20
About This Presentation
Title:

Electronic Discovery

Description:

Certified Computer Forensics Technician (Advanced) Certified ... Served on Editorial Review Board for The Journal of Computer Crime Investigation and Forensics ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:173
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 21
Provided by: itsecur
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Electronic Discovery


1
Electronic Discovery
  • Frank Krahn, CISSP
  • Mayo Clinic Information Security Office

2
Frank KrahnInformation Security Specialist
  • 26 years experience in Security at Mayo Clinic
  • Mayo Clinic Information Security Office,
    Information Security Specialist
  • Certified Information Systems Security
    Professional (CISSP)
  • Certified Computer Crime Investigator (Advanced)
  • Certified Computer Forensics Technician
    (Advanced)
  • Certified in Electronic Discovery
  • InfraGard-Minnesota Chapter, former Vice
    President and Board of Directors member
  • High Tech Criminal Investigators Association
  • Served on Editorial Review Board for The Journal
    of Computer Crime Investigation and Forensics

3
OVERVIEW
  • Discovery A process whereby a party has the
    opportunity to obtain information an
    documentation that may be relevant from other
    parties
  • Written requests (Interrogatories, RFPs, etc.)
  • Subpoenas
  • Deposition testimony

4
OVERVIEW(cont.)
  • Discoverable information includes
  • All facts known by a party
  • Expert opinions offered by a party
  • Documentation
  • Paper and other hard versions
  • Electronic versions including underlying data

5
Electronic Discovery
  • Definition A party must produce any electronic
    data in its possession that may be relevant to
    the lawsuit.
  • Lawsuits that this a concern
  • Complex litigation (Patent infringement
    commercial litigation)
  • Government investigations
  • Employment litigation

6
New Federal Rules
  • E-discovery amendments to FRCP took effect
    December 1, 2006
  • Sweeping changes Formalized process that was
    previously in the hands of individual judges.
  • Provides direction on the preservation
    subsequent disclosure of ESI

7
Legals Obligations
  • Know the Clients Information Management System
  • Formalize Practices
  • Anticipate litigation/investigations
  • Identify Potentially Relevant Scope of
    Information
  • Identify Key Players

8
Legals Obligations(cont.)
  • Issue Litigation Hold Notice
  • Meet with Key Players
  • Segregate and Preserve Potentially Relevant
    Information
  • Monitor Preservation Practices

9
Legal Needs IT
  • Most of Legals E-Discovery Obligations cannot
    not be met without significant help from IT.
  • IT must be made part of the team from the start.
  • Together Legal and IT develop and implement an
    E-Discovery Plan.
  • Information Technologist Testifies.

10
E-Discovery Plan
  • Identify purpose
  • Outlines the initial meeting with IT
  • Specifies IT roles and responsibilities
    (including testimony)
  • List questions to be asked at key player
    meetings
  • Address backup tapes, archives employee
    terminations

11
IT Responsibilities
  • Gathering, searching, culling and producing large
    volumes of relevant information for legal review
  • Data is accessed but not analyzed
  • Includes active and archival data
  • Generally excludes discarded, hidden or deleted
    data
  • Comes from variety of sources
  • E-mail systems
  • Network shares
  • Desktops
  • Back-ups

12
IT Responsibilities (cont)
  • Make true byte or sector by sector copies of
    local hard drives using write protection
    technology
  • Document by who, how and when server data was
    collected
  • Limit access to data on using the need to know
    principle

13
Metadata
  • Data about data
  • Provides insight into what was really done
  • Bcc
  • Creator
  • Last modified
  • This is one of the most difficult to maintain the
    integrity of the data

14
Backup Tapes
  • What is your official retention policy
  • Document it
  • Publish it

15
We Cant Get it Wrong!
  • Spoliation
  • Determination by court that a party wrongfully
    failed to preserve or destroyed potentially
    relevant evidence.
  • Jury is instructed to infer that the evidence
    would have been harmful to the party that failed
    to preserve it.
  • Burden of proof shifts to the Defendant.

16
Whats at Risk?
  • The Case
  • Exculpatory Evidence
  • Money (Sanctions)
  • Credibility

17
Pit Falls
  • Lack of good documentation of procedures by IT
  • Most of the time you will be working months if
    not years behind where you are at today.
  • Lack of good direction by Legal staff
  • Make yourself known to Legal before the sky falls
  • Failure on your part to ask questions not only of
    Legal but also of IT

18
Some Resources
  • http//www.thesedonaconference.org/
  • http//www.krollontrack.com/legalresources/sample.
    aspx
  • http//www.law.com/jsp/legaltechnology/edd.jsp

19
Questions
20
Contact Information
  • Frank Krahn
  • Mayo Clinic Information Security Office
  • 507-266-0146
  • E-mail krahn.frank_at_mayo.edu
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com