Title: How to Write a Scientific Paper
1How to Write a Scientific Paper
2You should already have started to write your
first/next paper, whether you know it or not!
- Ethics committee applications, job applications,
grant applications, protocol presentations etc
allow you to rehearse in writing - context, background, literature review
- emergent hypotheses
- a sense of motivation for the study
- major study design elements
3Introduction (1) Context, background,
literature review
- Make a short, simple opening statement of the
context in a few, accessible sentences - avoiding
over-ambitious vagueness or immediately
impenetrable jargon - Hitherto, the nature of consciousness has proved
elusive. - AR models of residual autocorrelation will fail
for 1/f noise - Background, literature review
- remember this is not a review - so be selective,
play favourites - remember your paper will be peer-reviewed, by
prior autors in the field, so dont be too
selective... - acknowledge history!
4Introduction (2)
- Hypotheses
- inevitable, refutable, empirically specific,
statistically testable - written down a priori
- Motivation
- why should you bother writing this paper and why
should I bother reading it?
5MethodsMajor study design elements
- Sample
- size, with respect to power
- composition, with respect to population and
stratification - Measurements
- observational
- experimental
- Statistical models and testing
- factorial structure
- test statistics or outcome measures
- distributions including priors
- hypothesis testing, type 1 and type 2 error
control
6Results
- Use figures and tables with self-contained
legends to convey your most important results at
a glance - Let your readers see as much as possible of the
data for themselves, without losing narrative
coherence - use descriptive statistics/graphics as well as
hypothesis tests - oragnise presentation so that logically or
substantively related results are juxtaposed
7Discussion
- It is OK to use a less constrained, more
conversational style - Start positive, headlining key results in context
- return to hypotheses
- be thoughtful about any differences between your
work and the existing literature - Do not simply rehearse results
- interpretation, synthesis, predictive speculation
- avoid blob-by-blob decompositions of complex
function in fMRI papers - pay attention to unexpected/discrepant results
- Explicitly consider the limitations of your work
8Title, authors, abstractThe really important
stuff
9Title, authors, abstractthe really important
stuff
- The title is the only part of your paper most
people will read - make it clear, self-contained,
descriptive - The abstract is vitally important - without doubt
the most important 200 words in the paper - tailor it to target journal
- report results
- use key words for literature searching
- Authors - first, second, last and corresponding
- seek guidance from your supervisor
10How to publish a scientific paper (1)
- Think about target journals early on
- high impact equals tight word count
- impact is not always a six letter word
- if you aim low you cant subsequently move up the
food chain - if you aim high you may have to allow for
turnaround time (rejection) or second album
syndrome (success) - Obey instructions to authors
- use a bibliography manager
- acknowledge grant support, conflict of interest
11How to publish a scientific paper (2)
- Dealing with reviews
- anticipate revision it is almost inevitable and
generally beneficial - organise the final version of the paper and all
ancillary data carefully before submission - try not to take criticism personallyor as a
reflection of incompetence on the part of
reviewers - their failure to understand is your lack of
clarity - be respectful, exact and direct in responding to
the editor - if the reviews are too negative to justify
acceptance, incorporate any helpful comments and
resubmit - whatever you do - do it sooner rather than later!
- Dealing with proofs
- Dealing with fame!