Title: An overview of assessing pupils progress
1An overview of assessing pupils progress
2- APP is a structured approach to periodically
assessing mathematics and reading and writing so
teachers can - track pupils' progress through Key Stage 2
- use diagnostic information about pupils'
strengths and weaknesses.
3- Using APP materials teachers can make level
judgements for each of the following National
Curriculum attainment targets (ATs) - reading
- writing
- using and applying mathematics
- number
- shape, space and measures
- handling data.
4- Based on the assessment focuses (AFs) that
underpin National Curriculum assessment, the APP
approach improves the quality and reliability of
teacher assessment. It has proved to be robust,
manageable and effective in practice.
5- The materials are made up of two elements
- assessment guidelines - sheets for assessing
pupils' work in relation to National Curriculum
levels - standards files - exemplars of pupils'
performance at National Curriculum levels of
attainment.
6(No Transcript)
7- APP involves 'stepping back' periodically to
review pupils' ongoing work and relate their
progress to National Curriculum levels.
8- As well as these APP materials, the
Qualifications and Curriculum Authority (QCA) and
the Primary National Strategy (PNS) are currently
developing a range of further materials to
support teacher assessment throughout Key Stage 1
and for speaking and listening.
9Making judgements the process
10Use these steps to formalise your assessments of
pupils' mathematics into level judgements.
- You will need
- evidence of the pupil's mathematics that shows
most independence, for example from work in other
subjects as well as in mathematics lessons - other evidence about the pupil as a
mathematician, e.g. notes on plans, the pupil's
own thoughts, your own recollections of classroom
interactions, oral answers given during mental
starters - a copy of the assessment guidelines for the level
borderline that is your starting point.
11Standards files
- Purpose
- exemplify standards by giving guidance accurate
assessments - acting as a resource and reference point for
teachers - on assessing pupils' work
- on diagnosing pupils' strengths and weaknesses
- for training and professional development
purposes.
12Each standards file includes
- examples of pupils' ongoing classroom work which
have been assessed - commentary on the evidence at assessment focus
(AF) level - the assessment guidelines sheet that records both
a profile of attainment across the AFs and a
National Curriculum level for the attainment
target (AT).
13Teacher's notes establishes a starting point
uses diagrams, as modelled in question finds
four of six possible solutions and repeats one
solution.
Next steps develop a more systematic approach and
organised way of recording compare results,
discuss which are the same or different and find
all possibilities.
14What the teacher knows about Paulo's attainment
in Ma1
- Paulo suggests suitable ways of starting a
problem and sometimes selects and uses
appropriate apparatus to support his work. In
problems when he is finding 'How many ways...?'
he needs to be more systematic in his approach. - He discusses his methods and strategies, using
mathematical vocabulary. He sometimes uses
pictures, diagrams and symbols to explain, and
this helps him to visualise a solution. He
increasingly chooses to make recordings and
jottings when working independently. - Paulo explains his thinking for example, he
identifies and explains the first steps needed to
solve the 'Sail away' 1 problem.
15- In this logic problem, he soon loses sight of the
mathematics and offers other practical solutions
such as 'One man could swim back to the island.' - His explanations are becoming more detailed,
though he sometimes needs prompting to be more
specific. Paulo looks for patterns in numbers.
For example, when working with addition
sequences, he identifies how much is added each
time and uses the rule to find missing numbers
and to extend the sequence
16Summarising Paulo's attainment in Ma1
- Paulo's attainment in Ma1 is best described as
working at secure level 2. He sometimes needs
support to break into a problem but he then
selects the mathematics to solve it. He discusses
his work using some mathematical language and he
sometimes represents solutions using simple
diagrams. He explains why an answer is correct
with increasing independence however, he needs
to try different approaches and organise his work
more systematically.
17Using the standards files
- There are different ways of using the standards
files - to ensure that teachers' judgements are in line
with national standards before making assessments
- as a reference when assessing your own pupils
- to support moderation activity
- to clarify what it means to make progress
- to exemplify the APP approach.
18standardisation training in school could use the
materials in the following ways.
- Each teacher assesses one pupil, and agrees the
level judgement with a colleague by comparing and
contrasting the pupil's work with that of a
standards file pupil at that level.
19- Teachers assess the work of one standards file
pupil, using a training version of the standards
files with the references to level judgements
removed, and then compare their judgements with
those in the full standards file.
20- Teachers copy one or two collections of work from
their own pupils, without any annotation or
commentary, and ask colleagues to identify pupils
in the standards files to which each is closest
in performance.
21- Using two standards files at the same level (e.g.
low 3 and secure 3) with all the annotations but
without the assessment summaries or assessment
guidelines sheets, groups discuss and agree which
is low and which is secure.
22- To clarify progress, look through all standards
files that cover one identified AT to track the
evidence for a particular AF or group of AFs.
23When assessing your own pupils you should use
the standards files for reference
- as a benchmark when making periodic assessments
- to compare the performance of your pupils at a
particular level with exemplars that have been
assessed against national standards - to check what constitutes sufficient evidence of
attainment in an AF at a specific level - comparing two collections of work in the same AT,
one on either side of a level borderline - to check what progression in a particular AF
looks like.
24Supporting in-school moderation
- Moderation activity generally involves a group of
teachers reviewing a sample of class teachers'
initial assessments, reconciling any
disagreements and agreeing a final judgement. - Disagreement can be resolved by recourse to the
question How does the pupil under discussion
compare with pupil X or Y from the standards
files?
25Discussion could be focused on
- attainment at a particular level in different
year groups, or in a particular AF at different
levels - the range of potential evidence in using and
applying mathematics or reading, for example how
much evidence of attainment for a particular AF
is required to support a judgement - differences between evidence gathered from oral
work and from writing - whether it is harder to find evidence for some
AFs than others - identifying the next steps in teaching and
learning for a particular pupil or groups of
pupils.