An overview of assessing pupils progress - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 25
About This Presentation
Title:

An overview of assessing pupils progress

Description:

APP is a structured approach to periodically assessing mathematics and reading ... judgements for each of the following National Curriculum attainment targets (ATs) ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:57
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 26
Provided by: hom563
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: An overview of assessing pupils progress


1
An overview of assessing pupils progress
  • Nothing new?

2
  • APP is a structured approach to periodically
    assessing mathematics and reading and writing so
    teachers can
  • track pupils' progress through Key Stage 2
  • use diagnostic information about pupils'
    strengths and weaknesses.

3
  • Using APP materials teachers can make level
    judgements for each of the following National
    Curriculum attainment targets (ATs)
  • reading
  • writing
  • using and applying mathematics
  • number
  • shape, space and measures
  • handling data.

4
  • Based on the assessment focuses (AFs) that
    underpin National Curriculum assessment, the APP
    approach improves the quality and reliability of
    teacher assessment. It has proved to be robust,
    manageable and effective in practice.

5
  • The materials are made up of two elements
  • assessment guidelines - sheets for assessing
    pupils' work in relation to National Curriculum
    levels
  • standards files - exemplars of pupils'
    performance at National Curriculum levels of
    attainment.

6
(No Transcript)
7
  • APP involves 'stepping back' periodically to
    review pupils' ongoing work and relate their
    progress to National Curriculum levels.

8
  • As well as these APP materials, the
    Qualifications and Curriculum Authority (QCA) and
    the Primary National Strategy (PNS) are currently
    developing a range of further materials to
    support teacher assessment throughout Key Stage 1
    and for speaking and listening.

9
Making judgements the process
10
Use these steps to formalise your assessments of
pupils' mathematics into level judgements.
  • You will need
  • evidence of the pupil's mathematics that shows
    most independence, for example from work in other
    subjects as well as in mathematics lessons
  • other evidence about the pupil as a
    mathematician, e.g. notes on plans, the pupil's
    own thoughts, your own recollections of classroom
    interactions, oral answers given during mental
    starters
  • a copy of the assessment guidelines for the level
    borderline that is your starting point.

11
Standards files
  • Purpose
  • exemplify standards by giving guidance accurate
    assessments
  • acting as a resource and reference point for
    teachers
  • on assessing pupils' work
  • on diagnosing pupils' strengths and weaknesses
  • for training and professional development
    purposes.

12
Each standards file includes
  • examples of pupils' ongoing classroom work which
    have been assessed
  • commentary on the evidence at assessment focus
    (AF) level
  • the assessment guidelines sheet that records both
    a profile of attainment across the AFs and a
    National Curriculum level for the attainment
    target (AT).

13
Teacher's notes establishes a starting point
uses diagrams, as modelled in question finds
four of six possible solutions and repeats one
solution.
Next steps develop a more systematic approach and
organised way of recording compare results,
discuss which are the same or different and find
all possibilities.
14
What the teacher knows about Paulo's attainment
in Ma1
  • Paulo suggests suitable ways of starting a
    problem and sometimes selects and uses
    appropriate apparatus to support his work. In
    problems when he is finding 'How many ways...?'
    he needs to be more systematic in his approach.
  • He discusses his methods and strategies, using
    mathematical vocabulary. He sometimes uses
    pictures, diagrams and symbols to explain, and
    this helps him to visualise a solution. He
    increasingly chooses to make recordings and
    jottings when working independently.
  • Paulo explains his thinking for example, he
    identifies and explains the first steps needed to
    solve the 'Sail away' 1 problem.

15
  • In this logic problem, he soon loses sight of the
    mathematics and offers other practical solutions
    such as 'One man could swim back to the island.'
  • His explanations are becoming more detailed,
    though he sometimes needs prompting to be more
    specific. Paulo looks for patterns in numbers.
    For example, when working with addition
    sequences, he identifies how much is added each
    time and uses the rule to find missing numbers
    and to extend the sequence

16
Summarising Paulo's attainment in Ma1
  • Paulo's attainment in Ma1 is best described as
    working at secure level 2. He sometimes needs
    support to break into a problem but he then
    selects the mathematics to solve it. He discusses
    his work using some mathematical language and he
    sometimes represents solutions using simple
    diagrams. He explains why an answer is correct
    with increasing independence however, he needs
    to try different approaches and organise his work
    more systematically.

17
Using the standards files
  • There are different ways of using the standards
    files
  • to ensure that teachers' judgements are in line
    with national standards before making assessments
  • as a reference when assessing your own pupils
  • to support moderation activity
  • to clarify what it means to make progress
  • to exemplify the APP approach.

18
standardisation training in school could use the
materials in the following ways.
  • Each teacher assesses one pupil, and agrees the
    level judgement with a colleague by comparing and
    contrasting the pupil's work with that of a
    standards file pupil at that level.

19
  • Teachers assess the work of one standards file
    pupil, using a training version of the standards
    files with the references to level judgements
    removed, and then compare their judgements with
    those in the full standards file.

20
  • Teachers copy one or two collections of work from
    their own pupils, without any annotation or
    commentary, and ask colleagues to identify pupils
    in the standards files to which each is closest
    in performance.

21
  • Using two standards files at the same level (e.g.
    low 3 and secure 3) with all the annotations but
    without the assessment summaries or assessment
    guidelines sheets, groups discuss and agree which
    is low and which is secure.

22
  • To clarify progress, look through all standards
    files that cover one identified AT to track the
    evidence for a particular AF or group of AFs.

23
When assessing your own pupils you should use
the standards files for reference
  • as a benchmark when making periodic assessments
  • to compare the performance of your pupils at a
    particular level with exemplars that have been
    assessed against national standards
  • to check what constitutes sufficient evidence of
    attainment in an AF at a specific level
  • comparing two collections of work in the same AT,
    one on either side of a level borderline
  • to check what progression in a particular AF
    looks like.

24
Supporting in-school moderation
  • Moderation activity generally involves a group of
    teachers reviewing a sample of class teachers'
    initial assessments, reconciling any
    disagreements and agreeing a final judgement.
  • Disagreement can be resolved by recourse to the
    question How does the pupil under discussion
    compare with pupil X or Y from the standards
    files?

25
Discussion could be focused on
  • attainment at a particular level in different
    year groups, or in a particular AF at different
    levels
  • the range of potential evidence in using and
    applying mathematics or reading, for example how
    much evidence of attainment for a particular AF
    is required to support a judgement
  • differences between evidence gathered from oral
    work and from writing
  • whether it is harder to find evidence for some
    AFs than others
  • identifying the next steps in teaching and
    learning for a particular pupil or groups of
    pupils.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com