Distributional Equity Objective - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 28
About This Presentation
Title:

Distributional Equity Objective

Description:

Rwanda. 87. 22.8. 52. 31.9. Kenya. 51. 23. 44.2. 68.6. Ethiopia. no data. no data. 53. 4.4. Eritrea ... Government Decision Makers. Distribution Policies ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:48
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 29
Provided by: peter921
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Distributional Equity Objective


1
Distributional Equity Objective
  • Internal Review Board
  • World Resources Institute
  • 7 June 2005

2
Source World Bank, 2005
3
(No Transcript)
4
Why Worry About Poverty and Inequity?
  • Constitutions and international agreements
    guarantee right to life/development
  • Inequity retards econ growth and can cause
    poverty equity promotes econ growth
  • Inequity breeds resentment, especially when basic
    needs not met, and can lead to conflict,
    violence, separatist movements

5
Civil Wars Linked to Resource Wealth Africa,
1990-2002
  • STATE YEAR NATURAL RESOURCE
  • Angola 1975-2002 Oil, diamonds
  • Angola (Cabinda) 1975 Oil
  • Congo, Rep. of 1997 Oil
  • Congo, Dem. Rep. of 1996- Copper, gold, cobalt,
    diamonds, coltan
  • Liberia 1989-96 Timber, iron, rubber, gold,
    diamonds, rubber
  • Morocco 1975- Oil, phosphates
  • Sierra Leone 1991-2000 Diamonds
  • Sudan 1983-2005? Oil

6
Why Should Environmentalists Care?
  • Poverty limits investments in sound env mngt
    inequity-based conflicts lead to env sabotage and
    env corruption
  • Poverty reduction is driving development it is
    important to ensure that pro-poor initiatives
    also promote sound env mngt
  • Env goods are increasingly being marketed, it is
    important to ensure that they also create
    incentives for sound env mngt
  • The commercialization of large env endowments
    offers significant opportunities for generating
    incentives for sound env mngt
  • Distribution policy is common instrument used by
    govts, it is important to identify uses that
    contradict env mngt, understand trade-offs, and
    promote win-win solutions

7
What Do We Know About Poverty Reduction,
Inequity, and the Environment?
  • Econ growth is necessary, but insufficient
    condition unregulated market econ can create
    poverty/inequity
  • Poor lack access to env and other assets cannot
    participate in new econ opportunities
  • As env gains value, elites often with critical
    govt support - take control and capture benefits
    pass costs on to the poor

8
Distribution as a Poverty Reduction Instrument
  • Powerful instrument for creating incentives
    commonly used to meet national objectives
  • Can be more effective than econ growth alone
    small distribution changes can have large effects
  • Distribution of assets, coupled with pro-poor
    growth can speed up their participation in new
    econ opportunities
  • Has been used on a limited basis for promoting
    env management huge potential to contribute more

9
Why Focus on Distribution of Env Assets?
  • Env-dependent national and household economies
    rural poor most dependent (lever for reform)
  • The poorer the country, the more significant is
    natural capital in determining overall
    distribution of wealth
  • Large, underutilized endowments will drive econ
    for yrs
  • Not evenly distributed in space not accessible
    to all
  • Easier to distribute than other forms of capital

10
Obstacles
  • Underestimated Value Env distributions rarely
    recognized in poverty plans. Lack of info on
    values, effectiveness, outcomes
  • Vested Interests Beneficiaries close to
    political power losers are marginalized. Lack
    of transparency, accountability, democracy
  • Distribution Contradictions Principles often in
    conflict with one another. Lack of info on
    trade-offs, reconciling competing interests,
    win-win policies

11
Oil Producing States
12
Political Opportunities for Influence
  • International donor community under pressure
  • PEP, Poverty Offices, WDR 2006, MDG review
  • Governments and politicians under pressure
  • Poverty is a campaign issue - 6-7 LAC countries
    have elected left-leaning presidents ( Mexico?)
  • Poverty plans are principal vehicles for policy
    reform and investments

13
Charcoal Profits, Senegal
1994 2002/3
12 22 - - 53 10 3
? ? - - ?
14
Mechanisms of Benefit Concentration
  • Management plans
  • RC right to say no
  • RC labor allocation
  • Access to RC
  • Villagers ? Forest access control
  • Threats of violence
  • Village access (wells housing)
  • Woodcutters ? Access to merchants
  • Social ties ? Social identity
  • Technical skills
  • Merchants ? Control of labor opportunities
  • Permits
  • Credit
  • Control of market access
  • ? Control of access to markets
  • Quotas, licenses
  • Cooperative membership
  • Social ties with government
  • ? Leverage over prices
  • Collusive price fixing
  • Inter-locking credit-labor arrangements
  • Misinformation
  • Wholesalers ? Control of distribution

15
Central Government Public Servicesand the Poor
Madagascar
district poverty incidence
p.c. health to districts
p.c. edu to districts
Source E Galasso, The World Bank, 2002
16
(No Transcript)
17
(No Transcript)
18
Sources World Bank, 2005World Resources
Institute, 2002-2004
19
Objective Statement
  • Within the next five years, the international
    discourse on development will recognize
    environmental distribution as a poverty reduction
    instrument AND governments in three countries
    will adopt and implement distribution policies
    that reduce poverty by promoting more equitable
    access to environmental benefits while providing
    incentives for sound resource management.

20
International Objectives
  • Env distribution recognized in international
    discourse on poverty reduction
  • Env distribution incorporated into preparation
    and implementation guidelines for major poverty
    reduction instruments (PRSPs, MDGs)
  • Target Audience WB/IMF (PRSP), UN (MDGs),
    bilaterals (PEP)

21
National Objectives Govt Policies
  • Repeal distribution policies that contradict
    poverty reduction and env management
  • Adopt distribution policies that provide equity
    of opportunities/access and incentives for sound
    env management
  • When possible, develop env distribution policies
    that target the poor

22
National Objectives - Continued
  • Target Audience
  • Env distribution policy decision makers and
    decision-making processes
  • Distributional equity champions NGOs,
    legislators, elected local leaders, corporate
    executives

23
DEO Influence Strategy
WRI
International Institutions
NGOs
Champions
24
Strategy 4 Pronged Approach
  • Policy Research. Value costs/benefits, identify
    winners/losers, outcomes, effectiveness
  • Outreach. Inform distribution policymakers,
    decision-making processes, champions
  • Tools. Develop interactive tools to assess
    policy options and monitor implementation/outcomes
  • Mobilization. Strengthen champions (organization
    development, outreach/advocacy, enabling env)

25
Countries and Natural Resources - Criteria
  • Poverty rate - WRI Board interest
  • Level of inequity - Opportunities for reform
  • Potential for scaling up - Availability of data
  • Env dependency - Separate accounting system
  • WRI partners - Funding opportunities
  • WRI experience

26
WRI Projects and Staff
  • Projects. Distributional Equity project,
    Environmental Accountability in Africa, Global
    Forest Watch, World Resources Report, Poverty
    Mapping, Lauretta/Suzies valuation work
  • Objectives. Access Objective, Forestry
    Objective, and possibly Ag and Trade Objective
  • New Hires. Economist, LAC expert, PRSP expert

27
Indicators of Success
  • Discourse on poverty reduction recognizes env
    distribution
  • WB/IMF PRSP guidelines and national PRSPs reflect
    the importance of env distribution
  • Govts adopt distribution policies that provide
    equity of access and opportunities
  • Govts use WRI-developed tool to inform
    decision-making
  • NGOs use WRI-developed tool to monitor govt
    decisions
  • Communities capture a fair share of env
    costs/benefits, reducing poverty and promoting
    sound env mngt

28
NAME THAT AUTHOR
  • The test of our progress is not whether we add
    more to the abundance of those who have much it
    is whether we provide enough for those who have
    too little.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com